I suspect vaccinations because...
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Saturday, January 13, 2024 18:35
VIEWED: 11985
PAGE 8 of 17
Hello,
I wonder what the benefit is of using a mercury compound in these injections? It seems odd that such a thing should be desirable, even if it proved to be non-harmful. Does this substance solve some essential problem to the vaccination process?
--Anthony
_______________________________________________
"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's still toxic, especially in regards to the nervous system (though dose is a factor in regards to vaccines), and it still releases mercury in solution (such as the human body). I believe CTS was quite in fact correct. Thimerosal has mercury in it, it can degrade to mercury in vivo, therefore it is a source of mercury.
From your own link:
Quote:
The researchers found higher levels of inorganic mercury in the brains and kidneys of the thimerosal treated animals than in the methylmercury-fed animals.
*shrug*
Anthony - it's meant as a preservative that might kill anything else that gets into the vaccine, and it weakens live virus. As always, the question is whether those benefits exceed the risks.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
Goodness, do we still use live virus vaccines? That seems like a terrible idea.
It also occurs to me that if it will kill anything that gets into the vaccine, it can't be particularly healthy.
I know almost nothing of medicine, but wouldn't it be better to use dead virus in a non-toxic solution, and just be extra careful not to contaminate the vaccine?
--Anthony
_______________________________________________
"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The point of a vaccine is to prep a strong immune response in the event of the real thing. The protein coat of a (dead) virus is often enough, but sometimes they want the reaction to be more pronounced. With all the risks that might entail.
Sometimes we also use multi-virus vaccines, which is also probably an achievement in short sightedness.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
I wonder what screening process they use for recipients of these more hazardous vaccines. I have seen footage of poor, malnourished people in third-world countries receiving vaccines in a seeming assembly-line process. Were they vetted, I wonder?
If the subject needs to be strong and healthy before a vaccine is administered, I hope they make sure those criteria are met.
Sorry if these comments are ignorant. I really know nothing about the process.
--Anthony
_______________________________________________
"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yeah Wish that is scary.
Anthony, I think the questions you're asking are good ones that the industry should be asking itself on a regular basis so as to make things as safe and affective as possible. I wish people could be that objective about their own field.
"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well Anthony, that can of worms goes all the way back to Salk and batches of vaccine contaminated with SV40 which were still used even despite evidence some people knew this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40#Polio_vaccine_contamination
I'm sure those responsible (along with Asbestos companies) were laughing up their sleeve later when that nutter Surgeon General Koop (who it has now been prettymuch acknowledged, was clinically INSANE while in service as SG, mind you) was so hell bent on blaming EVERY case of Mesothelioma on cigarette smoking, no matter how they had to "massage" the studies to do it - not that there's no link, just that his fanaticism left a lotta people swinging and focused blame unfairly on a single source.
Then comes the 1976 Swine Flu panic, and a "vaccine" which killed more people than the flu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_swine_flu_outbreak
And guess who was up to the neck in it, and make out quite a bit financially ?
Donald Rumsfeld - who was ALSO involved in the approval of Aspartame as "safe" despite it's obvious toxicity even then.
Fast forward to Tamiflu and the "bird flu" panic, running by the same goddamn playbook as 1976, with Rumsfeld once again heavily involved and profiting, and once again the "cure" turned out to be worse than the disease - it's been banned in a couple countries and side effects or no, has also been found to be almost wholly ineffective besides.
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/04/19/Report-Tamiflu-may-increase
-abnormal-acts/UPI-37321240170426/
That was enough to draw my attention to the matter in the first place, and then the revelations started coming bang bang bang, from experimentation and accusations of deliberate sterilization via vaccination in Africa - of which there's no conclusive evidence in either direction, but given further events I do not believe the Pharma companies deserve benefit of the doubt, for medicine must always be ethically above reproach or it is no such thing.
Then there are the known problems with the MMR and it's own link to GBS, a link you'll see between many vaccines - problem is that no one seems to know yet the exact method of what will cause a patient to react so to the MMR or why/how - instead it's been chosen to simply write them off as acceptable collateral damage for a vaccine I feel is of rather dubious value.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillain%E2%80%93Barr%C3%A9_syndrome
The words "acceptable losses" are meaningless when one of them is a member of YOUR family.
Thimerosal is suspect, of course, but so too are many adjuvants, which seem to be more harmful than the preservative itself and in combination with such may well be a known cause of neurocomplications that no one wants to admit.
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/adjuvants.html
For them shovelling the mercury-is-safe notion whatever, please note that it's no longer used in dental fillings BECAUSE it is dangerous, you can't have that both ways, either it's toxic or it ain't.
And why it's used, Anthony is simple - money, it's cheaper to use preserved multi-dose than single shot without such preservatives, which mind you ARE available although few will tell you and aquiring them isn't exactly easy - having recently assisted a friends pregnant wife in doing so despite my concerns, as the potentially safest option.
Then comes the "live" vaccines - which I noted before the CDC removed and purged the figures, the physical outbreak map of most flu outbreaks seemed to cluster around places giving flu shots, particularly those serving the elderly, whos immune system may not be in proper shape to wreck a live vaccine and thus they become carriers spreading the infection instead of helped - something no doubt tremendously profitable, and a downright chilling notion if that was as intentional as I've lately begun to suspect it was.
Worse is crap like flumist, which is essentially blasting live flu virus into the sinuses, and you consider say a walmart flu clinic serving children, who WILL sneeze in response, and contaminate the whole goddamn st
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I have thought for many years now that the key to a successful vaccination program is to start any series with highly antigenic bits and pieces only, working your way up to live attenuated virus.
No vaccine is without risk. But like anything in life, you have to assess the upside and the downside both. The downside of not vaccinating can be far worse for far more people.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
What ails these people?
--Anthony
_______________________________________________
"In every war, the state enacts a tax of freedom upon the citizenry. The unspoken promise is that the tax shall be revoked at war's end. Endless war holds no such promise. Hence, Eternal War is Eternal Slavery." --Admiral Robert J. Henner
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://www.youngausskeptics.com/2009/05/vaccines-mercury-and-you/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME