Weiner apologizes to Breitbart , admits guilt in naughty tweets.

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Saturday, July 22, 2023 01:11
VIEWED: 5255
PAGE 1 of 1

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 8:53 PM

Give the guy credit, he stood up to the podium and took the questions...

But lied.

Blatantly

To his wife, his constituents and the US public.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 9:04 PM

First, sour grapes from KOS...

Quote:
At a press conerence just now, Anthony Weiner has accepted responsibility for sending the infamous tweet that has dominated news for the past week. He's also apologized for having misled his supporters and the media by claiming his account had been hacked. Weiner says he's had online relationships with a half-dozen or so women over the years, but that he hasn't met them in person. Weiner says he won't resign over his personal mistakes, embarrassing though they may be.

You can watch the press conference live here.

Update: The fucking media wants Weiner to apologize to Andrew Breitbart, which Weiner delivers. And the fucking media wants to know where his wife is. What assholes.

They're only assholes because they (said media) asked for the truth, which obviously the dick heads at TDK went to great lengths to obscure and hide from the public.

FAIL!!!!

" Just me and my pussys " - Congressman Weiner

NEW YORK | Mon Jun 6, 2011 4:49pm EDT
(Reuters) - Representative Anthony Weiner admitted on Monday to sending a lewd photo of himself to a 21-year-old female college student over his Twitter account after previously denying he had done so.

Weiner, a New York Democrat and a leading liberal voice in the House of Representatives who was expected to run for mayor of New York City in 2013, also admitted to inappropriate Internet and telephone conversations with about six women but said none of them developed into a physical relationship.

"I'm deeply regretting what I have done and I'm not resigning," Weiner told a news conference.

"The picture was of me and I sent it," he said.

(Reporting by Richard Chang; editing by Daniel Trotta and Will Dunham)

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

1KIKI

Monday, June 6, 2011 9:51 PM

I invite everyone (except Rap) to compare lies and see which is worse:

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction
Salon exclusive: Two former CIA officers say the president squelched top-secret intelligence, and a briefing by George Tenet, months before invading Iraq.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/blumenthal/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/index
.html

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 9:55 PM

ROFLMBO!!!

Bush didn't lie vs Weiner knowingly lied.

TWO COMPLETELY SEPARATE ISSUES!

You can't run away from this issue by trying to dredge up dated, tired old talking points on what EVERYONE IN THE WORLD knew to be the case, that Saddam hand and used WMD.

Now, for the matter at hand...

Weiner lied. He tried to implicate others who were simply reporting the story, claiming THEY had hacked his twitter account.

So, he lied, lied about the lie, and then try to blame others for HIS OWN ACTIONS !

Standard Dem M.O.

DEAL WITH IT !

There is no happy ending for you here. Those of you who supported Weiner, and swallowed his lies. Sorry folks, you took the shaft... ALL OF IT !

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 10:02 PM

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

FIVVER

Monday, June 6, 2011 10:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I invite everyone (except Rap) to compare lies and see which is worse:

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction
Salon exclusive: Two former CIA officers say the president squelched top-secret intelligence, and a briefing by George Tenet, months before invading Iraq.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/blumenthal/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/index
.html

1kiki you're sinking fast. You're only hope is NAZIS! Start shrieking NAZIS!

BYTEMITE

Monday, June 6, 2011 10:47 PM

...There's an uproar about someone taking a picture of themselves with cats and making a joke about "pussy"?

Well, damn. Throw me in jail.

(OMG KITTIES) - sorry, irrepressible internal "cat-proximity" reaction. (THEY ARE SLEEPIES AND SOFT) - this is going to take a while, folks.

KWICKO

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

...that Saddam hand and used WMD.

He hand them?

Quote:

Now, for the matter at hand...

Weiner lied. He tried to implicate others who were simply reporting the story, claiming THEY had hacked his twitter account.

You're lying.

Weiner never claimed that THEY hacked his account. He claimed that his account had been hacked. Others showed how easily this can be done. Given Breitbart's track record of shady dealings and shenanigans involving those he buys fake stories from, it was an easy connection to make, but Weiner himself never said what you're claiming he did. And you know that. So, by your own rules, you're lying.

Now apologize.

Hey, it's what you demand of others...

Quote:

So, he lied, lied about the lie, and then try to blame others for HIS OWN ACTIONS !

Standard Dem M.O.

DEAL WITH IT !

I had no idea John Ensign and Tom Coburn were Democrats now.

Quote:

There is no happy ending for you here. Those of you who supported Weiner, and swallowed his lies. Sorry folks, you took the shaft... ALL OF IT !

Meh... Nobody died over it. Not exactly a claim you can make about Bushie's lies, eh?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

KWICKO

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:11 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by fivver:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
I invite everyone (except Rap) to compare lies and see which is worse:

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction
Salon exclusive: Two former CIA officers say the president squelched top-secret intelligence, and a briefing by George Tenet, months before invading Iraq.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/blumenthal/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/index
.html

1kiki you're sinking fast. You're only hope is NAZIS! Start shrieking NAZIS!

Nah, we'll leave that to you tea-baggers. You're so very good at it! Nice work on using "you're" correctly 50% of the time, though.

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

You're lying.

Weiner never claimed that THEY hacked his account. He claimed that his account had been hacked. Others showed how easily this can be done. Given Breitbart's track record of shady dealings and shenanigans involving those he buys fake stories from, it was an easy connection to make, but Weiner himself never said what you're claiming he did. And you know that. So, by your own rules, you're lying.

Now apologize.

You're delusional. Weiner lied, said his account was hacked. It wasn't, he knew it wasn't. He apologized to Breitbart.

You've just been thoroughly and completely owned.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:31 PM

C'mon folks, own it.

You backed this guy, and he was lying, all along.

This guy makes Casey Anthony look like a credible witness.

Please...y'all are embarrassing yourselves w/ your antics and logical contortions.

Congressman Weiner was exposed, and in being so, has exposed ALL of you who sided with him and his version of the story.

Face the mirror, folks. The liar is YOU!

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:38 PM

You care.

Or you WOULD care, if it were a Republican.

There'd be 100 + replies by now, had some GOP member of Congress, after having so vehemently denied any wrong doing, after having accused MediaMatters or TheDailyKos of hacking his private account, and going through all the twists and theatrics, claiming innocence, a conspiracy, blah blah blah....

Hypocrisy ? This board is SOAKING in it!

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Monday, June 6, 2011 11:50 PM

You keep claiming that Weiner claimed that Breitbart hacked his account. You know this to be untrue. Produce your proof, or admit that you're lying.

YOU'RE LYING.

You're now exactly no different from Weiner. He lied. You lied.

Except he came clean and apologized.

Still waiting for you to do the same.

You won't, of course. Guess we know who's the bigger man between you two, eh?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:53 AM

Weiner apologized to Breitbart.

Man, you're really going to circle the drain on this one, no matter what, huh?

Crassic.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:53 AM

Sigh...so Weiner is a weiner after all. I was sad--and angry--to hear it. Pisses me off no end, but doesn't change my opinion one whit that this is not a news story, the media is being ridiculous about it, and anyone who pays attention is a weiner too. If someone is a good legislator, I don't give a flying fuck what they do in their own lives, as long as it doesn't break the law.

And you don't get to say I'm hiding behind anything because Weiner is a Dem. I feel precisely the same about Scott, and think it is just as stupid a story, and I'm amazed, and disgusted, that he quit over it. Many have survived FAR worse; to let a pecadillo like pictures sent over the internet cause one to RESIGN is assinine, in my opinion.

I'm especially pissed at Weiner, tho', because he was doing a good job of being someone who would stand up and call the Republicans out. So now he's gone and done something so stupid that he's made himself look like an ass. I resent that.

What IS it with these guys??? I asked that before and we had a discussion about guys and sex, etc. But this is a different animal, this stupidity of sending photos on Twitter accounts or over e-mail to women by married men in the public eye. Is social media such a new thing they haven't figured it out yet or something? Anything put on the net is never gone; how much brains does it take to realize there are tons of people out there just drooling over the idea of finding something on them? Idiots.

This has just become a non-story, as far as I'm concerned; politicians are assholes. Many male politicians are STUPID assholes who have used their penises to think with. Nothing new there.

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:58 AM

Niki.

I was right, you were wrong.

Say it.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

BYTEMITE

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:03 AM

I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now.

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Weiner apologized to Breitbart.

So I ask again - I challenge you, because you're lying and you know it - show your proof. WHEN AND WHERE did Weiner claim that Breitbart hacked his account? That's YOUR allegation. Prove it. Show evidence. Back it up.

Last chance - back it up, or admit to everyone here that you're a liar. (We already know, but just go ahead and make it official)

I'm right. You're wrong.

Say it.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:08 AM

By the way, you know Bush apologized for the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, right?

So in your world, that means he ordered the abuse.

Agreed?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:09 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

None of them do.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:11 AM

http://www.breitbart.tv/breitbart-on-weinergate-organized-left-sought-
to-destroy-messenger-give-credit-to-dana-bash-at-cnn-for-pursuing-story/

Anthony Weiner accused Andrew Breitbart of hacking his account, and then apologize for making that false accusation.

You know it, I know it, the world knows it.

I win, you lose.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

None of them do.

You have no honor, no honesty, and no integrity.

You lied about this, and you know you lied, and I've called you on it repeatedly now.

You still won't say "AuRaptor lied, Kwicko was right."

You're without honor. This shows the "character" inherent in the GOP. Every single one of them.

If you ever said "Support the Troops!", you are a socialist. You've taken money from me, by force and at gunpoint, and you've given it to people who are on a mission I don't support, and are murdering others in my name, and I am given no choice in the matter.

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Anthony Weiner accused Andrew Breitbart of hacking his account, and then apologize for making that false accusation.

You know it, I know it, the world knows it.

I win, you lose.

He never said it. SHOW US THE EVIDENCE! You won't, because you can't. You refuse, because you're a coward.

SHOW US WHERE HE ACCUSED BREITBART OF HACKING HIS ACCOUNT.

BYTEMITE

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:20 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

None of them do.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

Sure, but doesn't that imply that she agrees with you? I guess I don't see the reason to make it personal and rub faces in anything. But, whatever, it's an internet discussion board. Do as you all like.

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:21 AM

Aaaaannnnnd

Crickets from Rappy.

Not a shred of evidence to prop up his baseless claims, as usual.

Known to all the world as a liar and a coward. That's our Rappy.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:29 AM

Weiner apologized.

game, set, match.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:44 AM

The strategy was to attack Breitbart, attack the messenger, and call into question the credibility and legitimacy of the story.

Breitbart was 100% truthful and is 100 % vindicated, as am I on this matter.

Kwickie, you've got something on your face. Ya might want to see to that.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:57 AM

I went back to the other thread about this story just to be sure I remembered it right, because I know what I believe and I know what I wrote. There were more rsponses than last time I was there, and some of this shit really pisses me off.

I never backed Weiner; I dissed those who were quick to judge him and said I thought it was a stupid non-story because I don’t CARE whether he did or not. I was willing to wait and see if anything came of it, but thought it was really stupid to make such a big deal of it. Ditto Lee. You can’t claim I “defended” Weiner, because I never did. So stop addressing that shit to me, or prove yourself. Go check the thread I put up expressing my disgust at how big a deal this all was. NOWHERE did I defend Weiner, nor would I have until there was something concrete either way. I couldn't even have gone back and changed anything, because I can't edit my posts lately. I have to contact Haken about that, but currently, I'm stuck with what I write.

Crap like this in the other thread and here makes me sick to my stomach, mostly because it so clearly illustrates that you don't READ WHAT IS WRITTEN, and then jump ahead to condemn the person you hate because of what you THOUGHT you read. Your attack on me for having “defended” Weiner is energetically , because I NEVER DID.

Onward: So if anyone’s “owned” and got shafted, what about you guys and Lee? It’s a stupid tit for tat; both sides got took and got a black eye. Deal with it.

Quote:
There'd be 100 + replies by now, had some GOP member of Congress, after having so vehemently denied any wrong doing, after having accused MediaMatters or TheDailyKos of hacking his private account, and going through all the twists and theatrics, claiming innocence, a conspiracy, blah blah blah....

Ahhh, you caught yourself there. Leaving off the “accused” bullshit (because HE did not), where are the “100 +” posts crowing over Lee like you’re doing over Weiner?? I don’t see any... Face it, little boy, neither side is better than the other when it comes to this, and you only think it’s a big deal and that people are suffering because that’s how you think, not because it has anything to do with reality. I could care less; it’s only important to YOU.

Quote:
He tried to implicate others who were simply reporting the story, claiming THEY had hacked his twitter account.

Wrong. He never said WHO might have hacked into his account, he only said his account MIGHT have been hacked and they were trying to find out who. He was pushed into apologizing to Breitbart for not having stood up and told the truth. You have to show proof that he accused Breitbart specifically for hacking, and he didn’t.

Quote:
“I want to hear the truth from Congressman Weiner and quite frankly I would like an apology for him being complicit in a blame-the-messenger strategy," Breitbart said.

"I'm being accused of being the hacker against a congressman. He said nothing. He allowed for that to go. His minions perpetuated that false, malicious meme and then he went on CNN to attack me."

In other words, the MEDIA speculated about Breitbart and Weiner allowed it to go on; you have to show proof that Weiner HIMSELF accused Breitbart, and I can’t find anything by Googling “Weiner accuses Breitbart”. So show us your proof or stop persisting in that lie. Even that URL you put up is headlined “Organized Left Sought to Destroy Messenger” – NOWHERE does it say Weiner himself accused Breitbart.

If anything Weiner did is “Standard Dem M.O.”, then what is Ensign’s whole scandal, or the “Appalachian trail” guy, or any of the others? Get a grip: It’s “standard politician M.O.”, on ALL sides, not just R or D.

Breitbart made an ass of HIMSELF, getting up there and preening in the spotlight to make it all about himself, a la The Donald. He said reporters ASKED him to, but that’s n

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Weiner apologized.

game, set, match.

The strategy was to attack Breitbart, attack the messenger, and call into question the credibility and legitimacy of the story.

Breitbart was 100% truthful and is 100 % vindicated, as am I on this matter.

Kwickie, you've got something on your face. Ya might want to see to that.

Bush apologized.

Game, set, match.

He not only ordered the torture at Abu Ghraib, he lied about it to cover it up. You've just admitted as much.

As Signy says "Goose sauce = gander sauce".

And I'll note yet again that you steadfastly REFUSE to produce ANY evidence that Weiner accused Breitbart of hacking his accounts. You're lying, you've been called on it, and you've been challenged to prove your case. Yet you persist in producing ZERO evidence, screaming "I'm right! I'M RIGHT!", and running away from the issue.

You won't provide evidence, because you have none at all.

Prove me wrong. Go ahead. We'll all wait.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:24 AM

Bush ordered no torture at Abu Ghraib. As commander in chief, he's sorry that abuses took place, and those responsible were identified and punished.

Weiner's actions were his and his alone.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

Weiner was complicit in the disinformation coming from the Left wing bloggers. He knew the real story , all along, and did nothing to dissuade or correct the lies coming from KOS and other sites.

I'm sorry, Kwickie, that you're too stupid or too much of an useful idiot to comprehend the finer points, but truth is, they're actually pretty coarse, and not that fine at all.

Niki - nice try. You tried to wash your hands of Weiner by saying " it's a stupid story", when in fact, it was a legit story, and there's no way around that. Doesn't matter that YOU'D like to down play it, because he's a Dem, and one you were eager to praise. ( Which , even before this mess, is absolutely hysterical )

He not only lied, he brazenly did so, while taking part in the willful slandering of a reporter who was 100% on the right side of this story.

And you look towards this Weiner guy as some sort of LEADER ? Someone to be praised and held up?

Figures. John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Patrick Kennedy, Gary Hart.... man, the list is never ending!

Looks like you've been by a Weiner

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:35 AM

Quote:

Weiner was complicit in the disinformation coming from the Left wing bloggers. He knew the real story , all along, and did nothing to dissuade or correct the lies coming from KOS and other sites.

So which was it? Was he "complicit", or did he actually ACCUSE Breitbart of hacking his account?

You're changing your story now, backing off your earlier claim.

Seems you owe somebody an apology. You lied, and you got caught. And you've admitted as much.

Apologize, now.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:56 AM

Kwickie

Hard to believe that even you're so stupid to think I'm going to fall for your idiocy here.

I'm right, you're wrong.

I backed a winner, you backed a Weiner.

Now suck on it.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:05 AM

Quote:
Weiner was complicit in the disinformation coming from the Left wing bloggers.

Prove it. Prove he didn’t lie to those who know him as well and, ideologues that they are, they suspected and condemned Breitbart...kinda like Palin’s followers have been changing Wikipedia about Paul Revere, y’know? It could just as easily be said that SHE put THEM up to it as to assume that Weiner conspired with lefties to blame Breitbart. Fact is simply that Weiner himself NEVER accused Breitbart, unless you can prove otherwise. Now it’s you who are twisting and spinning things.

Quote:
Niki - nice try. You tried to wash your hands of Weiner by saying " it's a stupid story", when in fact, it was a legit story, and there's no way around that. Doesn't matter that YOU'D like to down play it, because he's a Dem, and one you were eager to praise. ( Which , even before this mess, is absolutely hysterical )

Jezus, Raptor, you’re pitiful. No take-back that I never said I defended Weiner as you accused me of; of course, nobody expected otherwise. I didn’t try to wash my hands of Weiner any more than I defended him; I still believe this AND THE CHRISTOPHER LEE story are mountains made out of molehills by ideologues and the media. Lee’s a Republican, remember? Why would I want to downplay that, if you think I’m “downplaying” Weiner--which I’m not?

I think they’re both stupid, media-driven drivel which has nothing to do with the important things in our country we should be focusing on. When did I ever praise Weiner? He did one thing I know of: He stood up in Congress and faced the Republicans down. I know nothing about him besides that, but I admired that he did so on that particular issue, when nobody else would. I still do:

Quote:
Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner was raging Thursday night on the House floor after it became clear that Republicans had enough votes to defeat a bill that provided health care to 9/11 first responders.

In a dramatic one-and-a-half minute speech, the New York congressman excoriated Republicans for mounting their opposition to the bill's passage on their inability to offer amendments to it.

"It's Republicans wrapping their arms around Republicans rather than doing the right thing on behalf of the heroes," Weiner said. "It is a shame. A shame! If you believe this is a bad idea to provide health care–then vote no! But don't give me the cowardly view that 'Oh if it was a different procedure'…"

I still agree with his stance on that issue, and it is the sum total of what know about Anthony Weiner, prior to this scandal.

Quote:
And you look towards this Weiner guy as some sort of LEADER ? Someone to be praised and held up?

When did I ever say I looked towards Weiner as a leader? Please show where I did, or stop lying about me. I accept that you don’t read what I actually write, but I won’t let your lies stand and it sickens me that you keep doing this. You’ve got me pissed, which you and yours haven’t done in a while; I need to work on that, too. You’re not worth it. But I won’t have you lying to or about me.

The last thing I’d ever look for from you is an apology, tho’ you definitely owe me more than one. It’s amusing, however, that you totally ignored my whole response and are avoiding the fact that there are as many peccadilloes on the right as the left, that it’s just politicians of every stripe who pull shit like this. You just can’t take it, can you? You can’t even defend yourself or your side, you just spit venom. Like I said: pitiful.

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

BYTEMITE

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:13 AM

Wow. I guess people do care.

My mistake. :?

KANEMAN

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

They shouuld fall on thier swords.....repubs do

None of them do.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:27 AM

Niki-

Prove Weiner DIDN'T lie ? Of course he lied. What are you on? That's THE REASON HE APOLOGIZED TO BREITBART, lady ! JEEZE! Specifically because he allowed the story that Breitbart was some how fabricating this story to carry on when he knew the truth, all along!

" When did I ever say I looked towards Weiner as a leader? Please show where I did, or stop lying about me. "

Quote:
I'm especially pissed at Weiner, tho', because he was doing a good job of being someone who would stand up and call the Republicans out.

There will be no apology, Niki. You start a thread on him, and then claim there's no story , no reason for anyone to be talking about this story.

There is.

You praise him for standing up to the GOP, then claim you never saw him as any sort of a leader. Even though he's a bald faced liar, you still think highly of him. With the Left, it's not so much the character of the individual, but what issue they're willing to demagogue. huh?

Oh, and Chris Lee ? He resigned. Where's the story there ? He, like Weiner, got caught for dabbling in areas they didn't want others to know about. Only the GOP ( per usual ) decided to bow out, while the Dem shamelessly carries on, knowing that he'll get re-elected, and before too long, he'll be right back at it. He'll just figure out how the hell to send those naughty pics this time.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:29 AM

No, you're right, Byte. This is a stupid waste of time; I got drawn in because of the lies to and about me, but that's stupid too, as neither he nor his ilk will ever, EVER admit being wrong or apologize for anything.

Quote:
I guess I don't see the reason to make it personal and rub faces in anything.

But you know that's what they do, don't you. Kane, Raptor, Wulf; I sometimes wonder if it's all the same person, since all three of them predictably say and do pretty much the same things. Hate.

But thanx for bringing me up short; I've got far better things to do than keep wasting time responding to these jackasses. I need to remember that. The less I come here, the less I want to come here; the ugliness is sometimes overwhelming.

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

KANEMAN

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:30 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Kwickie

Hard to believe that even you're so stupid to think I'm going to fall for your idiocy here.

I'm right, you're wrong.

I backed a winner, you backed a Weiner.

Now suck on it.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love
only that which they defend. "

Roflmao....well said...i,ve been busy and missed this story....but man...that is one hell of a post

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 3:50 AM

...except one last time I will respond.

Quote:
Prove Weiner DIDN'T lie ?

Cute. Deliberately misunderstanding me, that the new tactic? Dunno whether you're responding to the fact that I said prove Weiner accused Breitbart or prove that you didn't lie in saying I defended Weiner, but either way, nowhere did I say "prove Weiner didn't lie". You're doing it again, and I'm SURE at this point you're doing it to get a rise, which is why I'm going to go do something much more useful and pleasant than reading your crap. Which is just about anything...

Quote:
he allowed the story that Breitbart was some how fabricating this story to carry on when he knew the truth

In other words, as Mike said, you are now backtracking to say that Weiner ALLOWED the story to go on, not that Weiner himself blamed Breitbart. Good, at least we have that one behind us, despite the fact you won't SAY you were wrong in the first place. Gawd forbid and we never expected it.

Quote:
You start a thread on him, and then claim there's no story

Lying again. I started a thread to express my disgust that what I feel is a non-story was being made a big deal of by the media. I started a thread ABOUT a story, not about Weiner and his scandal. Anyone can go back and read the post that started the thread, rather than believe your lies.

Quote:
You praise him for standing up to the GOP, then claim you never saw him as any sort of a leader

How do the two combine??? I recently praised a politician for saying climate change was real; you think I look to HIM as a leader, too? You're playing games. NOWHERE did I say I thought highly of him; I said he did something I approved of and that I don't know SHIT about him otherwise.

Quote:
Even though he's a bald faced liar, you still think highly of him. With the Left, it's not so much the character of the individual, but what issue they're willing do demagogue. huh?

Okay, now I KNOW you're goading me. Obviously, after all I've written about scandals being on both sides, apparently "With the Right, it's not so much the character of the individual, but what issue they're willing do demagogue. huh?" I don't believe that, but hey, if it works for you...

Speaking of which, given how many Republicans (shall we list them?) have been caught with their pants down and not resigning, I guess

Quote:
while the Repub shamelessly carries on, knowing that he'll get re-elected, and before too long, he'll be right back at it.

Oh, let's play that game, shall we?

John Ensign , caught up in a scandal. He didn't resign.
David Vitter, caught up with a prostitute. He didn't resign.
The Larry Craig scanal; he made it at least through the end of his term.

I get it, I really do. You're here to push buttons. Have fun, mine are through being pushed for today; hopefully when I come back I'll be able to remember not to bother with you and your fellow lying, name-calling ilk.

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 4:12 AM

Quote:
In other words, as Mike said, you are now backtracking to say that Weiner ALLOWED the story to go on, not that Weiner himself blamed Breitbart. Good, at least we have that one behind us, despite the fact you won't SAY you were wrong in the first place. Gawd forbid and we never expected it.

It's functionally the exact same thing. Let the underlings do your bidding for you, so you keep YOUR hands clean.

For the final time, WHY DID WEINER APOLOGIZE TO BREITBART ?

You KNOW why... stop acting stupid.

Quote:
Lying again. I started a thread to express my disgust that what I feel is a non-story was being made a big deal of by the media. I started a thread ABOUT a story, not about Weiner and his scandal. Anyone can go back and read the post that started the thread, rather than believe your lies.

Who started the thread? You did. Not a lie.

And lo and behold, turns out it was a pretty legit story, after all. Least, the world thinks so.

It's on par with stepping up on a soap box in the middle of a square and screaming to anyone who'll listen that you don't think that what you're yelling about should be paid attention to, by anyone, so everyone should just go about their business and not pay any mind to what ever the the hell it is you're screaming about...

How do you square flipping the story, when there's case after case of the Republican stepping down and resigning, even at the mere HINT of impropriety ? I know you think in your mind you're making some quid pro quo case here, but you're really not. Not even close.

I'm almost a bit embarrassed for you at this point.

Chris ( not Christopher ) Lee - resigned

Mark Foley - resigned. Never having had any affair, or even texting any lewd images / material.

SC Gov Mark Sanford steps down

And as for the Dems?

Barney Frank - A gay brothel being run out of his condo... no biggie.

Charles Rangel ? He's still around, isn't he ?

What of D.C. Mayor, Marion Barry ? He got re-elected, if I recall.

Gerry Studd? Sexual relationship w/ an underage male page. Voters sent him back for 6 more terms.

And the biggie, of course. Cigar Boy and the intern.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 4:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
In other words, as Mike said, you are now backtracking to say that Weiner ALLOWED the story to go on, not that Weiner himself blamed Breitbart. Good, at least we have that one behind us, despite the fact you won't SAY you were wrong in the first place. Gawd forbid and we never expected it.

It's functionally the exact same thing. Let the underlings do your bidding for you, so you keep YOUR hands clean.

THANK YOU for FINALLY admitting that you were lying. "Functionally the same thing"? Really? That's what you're reduced to now?

Wow.

So if someone here - ANYONE here - EVER comes to my defense on any matter, that "functionally" proves that I told them to do it?

Is that how stupid you really are, Rappy? Honestly?

Weiner lied about his activities. He never accused Breitbart.

You lied in accusing him of that. You're 100% as guilty as he is.

As I keep pointing out, he's man enough to stand up and admit it, and apologize. You obviously are no man at all. You've been caught lying, caught red-handed, and you've admitted you lied - hell, you're even proud of it, in your own fucked-up way - and you still think you're some kind of good guy.

That's a level of delusion I've never seen before. Seek help, and soon!

DREAMTROVE

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 9:58 AM

the part that gets me is that this schmuck put his friends up to sticking up for him, and now they also look like dicks; and a lot of people swallowed it, now that the idiot has come clean, he can't seem to stop spewing this stuff, and they all look like they have egg in their faces.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 10:41 AM

kwickie - maybe your pea sized brain can answer this question then.

Why did Weiner apologize to Breitbart ?

Hmmm ?

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 10:41 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
the part that gets me is that this schmuck put his friends up to sticking up for him, and now they also look like dicks; and a lot of people swallowed it, now that the idiot has come clean, he can't seem to stop spewing this stuff, and they all look like they have egg in their faces.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

DT - I see what you did there.

Clever.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 11:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Why did Weiner apologize to Breitbart ?

I've never claimed that Weiner DIDN'T apologize to Breitbart. Your mistake was in WHY you think he apologized, WHAT he apologized FOR.

If I know somebody who gets mugged and robbed, and I say in a moment of commiseration, "I'm sorry this happened to you," that isn't me apologizing to them and saying that *I* mugged them, is it?

Weiner apologized for the fact that Breitbart was blamed and attacked by others; given Breitbart's record of "reporting" on things in such a shady and fictional manner, it's an easy assumption for most to make. YOU accused Weiner of blaming Breitbart directly, something which never happened, and which I've pointed out to you repeatedly as something which never happened, and you continue in your persistent lie about it and still claim that that's what happened.

So see if your tiny little lizard brain can answer this question:

Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.

I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:01 PM

" given Breitbart's record... "

Nice try . Breitbart, much the the scorn of the Left, has an impeccable record of reporting the facts. When he asked the the room of reporters there to give ONE example of something he's erroneously reported, not one of them cited anything. Because there IS nothing.

If Breitbart were half the hack that you claim, then there'd be no reason to even acknowledge him, at all. Yet Weiner singled him out, by name, for the apology.

The Left wants to paint Breitbart in a negative light, so as to discredit him. Weiner tried that route w/ this story, and it failed. ALL those who stood up for Weiner got the shaft, and it infuriates you that those who stand on the side of truth and the facts won this one.

The good guys won, and it burns you up.

Get use to it.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 12:04 PM

You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:

Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.

I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 6:42 PM

Weiner apologized directly to Breitbart.

You lose, I win.

Play this game as long as you'd like, the outcome won't change.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 10:40 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Weiner apologized directly to Breitbart.

You lose, I win.

Play this game as long as you'd like, the outcome won't change.

Still too much a coward to answer a direct question, I see.

You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:

Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.

I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 10:58 PM

I know you're hurt and embarrassed over all this, but let it go. Show an ounce of dignity. If that's all you have, just let it go.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 11:32 PM

Still too much a coward to answer a direct question, I see.

You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:

Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.

I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.

So far, for a day now, you've proven me 100% correct. You ARE too big a coward to admit your failures.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

KANEMAN

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 3:42 AM

I want you to lead...me...take me somewhere...weiner had an apology for breitbart why because weiner allowed the media to personally attack bb while he lied...dispicable...little cock...that weiner....kinda respect that pussy of a man..i love pussies with tight lips....actually, i think the whole story....after looking at it....is nothing

RIONAEIRE

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 6:28 AM

Sending those pictures was stupid, but lying about it was assanine. He definitely made some mistakes here, and I think it should be up to his constituants whether he should be asked to leave since he isn't resigning. Is it the worst thing he could have done? Probably not, but its still bad and the lying made it wayyyyyyy worse from an integrity standpoint, that's what would push his constituants towards telling him he's done.

"I'm big, your little. I'm smart you're dumb. I'm right you're wrong." Points to who can name the film.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 9:26 AM

Weiner's arrogance and selfishness are what I see as the most glaring issues. That he staunchly denied this stuff for 10 days, and admonished reporters who were trying to cover the story, even going so far as to call one of them a jackass.

That's not going to win you many friends on the Hill.

With out Googling, I'm gonna guess that quote is from Matilda.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

MAGONSDAUGHTER

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:02 AM

slow news week in the US?

HARDWARE

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:48 AM

Apparently, Magons.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:50 AM

Still too much a coward to answer a direct question, I see.

You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:

Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.

I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.

So far, for more than a day now, you've proven me 100% correct. You ARE too big a coward to admit your failures.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

GEEZER

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 12:02 PM

Madame Geezer's take on a guy named Weiner sending pictures of his, well, weiner package was, "You couldn't write this. No one would buy it". She also wonders how so many people in positions of authority can be so stupid about emailing lewd pictures, hitting on staff, etc. I agree.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 12:21 PM

Pelosi calls for ethics probe for Weiner

Yep. Can't make this stuff up.

Even Harry Reid tells Weiner not to call him for support.
Harry's not a Weiner supporter either.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 4:30 PM

Quote:
Breitbart, much the the scorn of the Left, has an impeccable record of reporting the facts.

I’m not going to TOUCH that one, it’s so far beyond the pale, only say that numerous investigations have proven otherwise. I’ll let others:

Quote:
Breitbart repeatedly claimed that the videos depicted "illegal activity," with O'Keefe and Giles likewise accusing ACORN of aiding in "criminal" actions. But investigations by California's attorney general, Brooklyn's district attorney, and an independent investigator hired by ACORN all determined that the videos showed no such illegal activity.

After Brooklyn prosecutors cleared ACORN, Breitbart embarrassingly backtracked on his previous accusation of ACORN criminality, tweeting that the "ACORN tapes were less about 'criminality' than facility with which employees all knew how to work system for any lowlife wanting govmnt $."

The California and Brooklyn investigations also shined a spotlight on how Giles and O'Keefe had deceptively edited the tapes to "meet their agenda." California Attorney General Jerry Brown said the videos created a "highly selective editing of reality."

Meanwhile, a central pillar of the ACORN attacks -- that O'Keefe "dressed as a pimp" during his meeting with ACORN officials -- was unraveling. Breitbart eventually acknowledged that he himself had been unaware that O'Keefe had entered the offices dressed in slacks and a dress shirt, not the outlandish pimp costume O'Keefe wore in the tapes' opening sequences.

Numerous right-wing media figures backed away from O'Keefe following his arrest, while Breitbart -- who had previously acknowledged that he paid O'Keefe "a fair salary" -- denied any knowledge of his activities, then accused the U.S. attorney of having "frame[d]" O'Keefe "in media." O'Keefe later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for his role in the incident.

In July, the NAACP released a resolution calling on Tea Party activists to repudiate the movement's racist elements. In retaliation, Breitbart posted a 2 minute and 36 second clip that he claimed showed Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod telling a "racist tale" to an NAACP audience about her supposed past discrimination against a white farmer.

But when Sherrod and the farmer she had supposedly discriminated against came forward to tell their stories and the NAACP released the full video of Sherrod's comments, it became clear that the clip Breitbart posted had been ripped from context, and the smear completely dissolved.

With his concocted smear on the rocks, Breitbart began hurling a variety of bizarre (and false) accusations in hopes of preserving his credibility -- all while alternating between declaring himself "sympathetic" to Sherrod's "plight" after the media supposedly "made it about her," and continuing to suggest that Sherrod is a racist.

The scandal took on a new light after Dr. Kevin Pezzi was invited by Breitbart to repost two pieces accusing Sherrod of racism on BigGovernment.com. After we exposed Pezzi as a racist who claims to be responsible for "over 850 inventions" and schemes such as a "magic bullet" for cancer, a "robotic chef," and sexual inventions like "penile enlargement techniques" and "ways to tighten the vagina," Breitbart pulled Pezzi's posts from his site and apologized.

Unimpressed with his wild claims, media of all stripes condemned Breitbart as untrustworthy and his actions as "a classic example of what is wrong with our national discourse."

From top of the world to too toxic for network television -- Breitbart has come a long way in a year. But while he's lost credibility with virtually everyone else, he's still a welcome member of the conservative media elite.

’Nuff said.

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 5:31 PM

Yes, even slightly. In fact, it's darn near exactly that. You want to write a 'column' , or blog your views ? Go post them on your own Firefly log. Or even better, keep your views to yourself, and then we'd not have to hear about the story that's not a story, but you felt it worthy enough to point out that it wasn't a story, making it a story anyways...

Should Weiner resign? I dunno. Barney Frank had a gay brothel running out of his D.C. condo, and still kept his seat.

D.C. Mayor Marion Barry was caught on video, in a hotel room, w/ a prostitute, smoking crack. He gets re-elected.

So, unless more comes out and Weiner is tossed out by some growing ethics investigation, and he doesn't resign, sure... it'll be up to those who put him there in the 1st place, the voters.

And if they're fine w/ having an arrogant, 2 timing dirt bag who doesn't have an ounce of credibility , even with his own party leadership...go for it.

Just be sure you know who it is your support.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 6:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Pelosi calls for ethics probe for Weiner

Yep. Can't make this stuff up.

Even Harry Reid tells Weiner not to call him for support.
Harry's not a Weiner supporter either.

Y'know, for all your continual posting of the latest "updates" on this non-story, you'd think you could at least find SOME evidence to back your ridiculous lie that Weiner himself accused Breitbart of hacking his accounts.

I'm still curious as to why you insist that you're right on that one, and yet you refuse to post up even a scintilla of backing evidence. And now you keep dodging the issue completely, and refusing to answer the question:

Will you stand by your lie, or will you admit you were lying and apologize?

Anyone with any shred of decency or honor would do the latter; why can't you? Hell, Weiner did, so he's obviously the bigger man.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 6:46 PM

I'm guessing that if you were going to clue in and figure out that I'm playing you, and using your psychotic quest to some how gain a tiny victory out of a colossal defeat of Weiner having lied, and then apologizing to Breitbart... you'd have done so by now.

But thanks for helping keep this issue front and centre, and up at the top of the forum list.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 10:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
I'm guessing that if you were going to clue in and figure out that I'm playing you, and using your psychotic quest to some how gain a tiny victory out of a colossal defeat of Weiner having lied, and then apologizing to Breitbart... you'd have done so by now.

But thanks for helping keep this issue front and centre, and up at the top of the forum list.

Oh, the pleasure is all mine. I haven't had this much fun showing people what a worthless ass you are since your whole cry-baby little Jack Murtha rant, when you posted up your own rant, reminiscent of the "Leave Britney ALONE!" video. Prior to that, it was your little "I'm quitting this place!" rant that was the funniest of your itty-bitty temper tantrums.

By all means, PLEASE keep this post at the top of the forum list, because it just keeps reminding everyone that when called on one of your countless lies, you steadfastly refuse to acknowledge the truth, you refuse to offer any apology or mea culpa, and you double-down on your stupidity.

So yes, please keep it up. Heck, I'll post it in my every response on every part of this forum if it will make you happy, and I'll keep right on asking until you address the question and post up your proof or apologize for lying to all of us.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:15 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Yes, even slightly. In fact, it's darn near exactly that. You want to right a 'column' , or blog your views ? Go post them on your own Firefly log. Or even better, keep your views to yourself, and then we'd not have to hear about the story that's not a story, but you felt it worthy enough to point out that it wasn't a story, making it a story anyways...

"... right a column..."? Really? Did it capsize?

Quote:

Should Weiner resign? I dunno. Barney Frank had a gay brothel running out of his D.C. condo, and still kept his seat.

Was Larry Craig a client? Or Mark Foley?

Quote:

So, unless more comes out and Weiner is tossed out by some growing ethics investigation, and he doesn't resign, sure... it'll be up to those who put him there in the 1st place, the voters.

And if they're fine w/ having an arrogant, 2 timing dirt bag who doesn't have an ounce of credibility , even with his own party leadership...go for it.

Just be sure you know who it is your support.

It doesn't seem to have slowed down David Vitter or Newt Gingrich (who you have called "a great American" and "a patriot" for his two-timing and lying about it).

Did Mark Sandford resign when his lying and affairs were revealed? Did he resign when it came to light that he used government funds to conduct his affairs?

How about John Ensign? Did he resign as soon as his lying, bribery, indiscretions, and ethics violations were revealed?

More to the point, did YOU call for any and all of them to resign?

Why do you support two-timing, lying, cheating scumbags?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

RIONAEIRE

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:16 PM

Well apparently Raptor is indeed worth something to me because he got my Matilda quote right, he says without googling and I'm choosing to believe him, nicely done Raptor. That is one of my favorite movies from my girlhood. I've noticed I quote movies a lot. Sometimes I don't get the quotes perfect, but I think the gist comes across and this one was fitting since Raptor was all "I'm right you're wrong".

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:44 PM

Was Matilda also a known liar? Because that's what Rappy is most known for around here.

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:50 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Was Matilda also a known liar? Because that's what Rappy is most known for around here.

Matilda was a little girl.

Feel good about yourself, picking on a little girl ?

And kicking the living hell out of your is what I'm known for around here. Making you nuts and pretty much owning you, is my routine. I'm use to it, actually.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Was Matilda also a known liar? Because that's what Rappy is most known for around here.

Matilda was a little girl.

Feel good about yourself, picking on a little girl ?

Are you a little girl, too?

'Cause I'm not picking on a fictional character in a movie. I'm picking on YOU, by comparing you to a little girl. You really do have trouble discerning fiction from reality, don't you? That's three times this week - at least - that you've gotten them mixed up!

Quote:

And kicking the living hell out of your is what I'm known for around here. Making you nuts and pretty much owning you, is my routine. I'm use to it, actually.

"... out of your"? "I'm use to it"?

Classic.

So tell me something, super-genius:

Why do you continue to steadfastly REFUSE to produce ANY evidence that Weiner accused Breitbart of hacking his accounts. You're lying, you've been called on it, and you've been challenged to prove your case. Yet you persist in producing ZERO evidence, screaming "I'm right! I'M RIGHT!", and running away from the issue.

You won't provide evidence, because you have none at all.

Prove me wrong. Go ahead. We'll all wait. Here's your big chance to prove yourself. What have you got? Why won't you answer the question?

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 9, 2011 2:12 AM

So, you admit to picking on little girls, huh? Even fictional ones ?

Figures.

You probably do so in real life, as well.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Thursday, June 9, 2011 2:34 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
So, you admit to picking on little girls, huh? Even fictional ones ?

Figures.

You really don't read so well, do you?

I pointed out that I was picking on YOU by COMPARING you to a little girl. The only way I "picked on" any little girl at all is if you're saying you're a little girl. I know you act like one, but you've indicated in the past that you aren't.

'Course, a little girl would be more likely to answer my earlier question, apologize, and move on. So you aren't even man enough to be a little girl!

Quote:

You probably do so in real life, as well.

Whereas you prefer to try to PICK UP ON little girls, eh? Fourteen to seventeen was your preference, if I remember correctly. ;)

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 9, 2011 10:37 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Whereas you prefer to try to PICK UP ON little girls, eh? Fourteen to seventeen was your preference, if I remember correctly. ;)

They were, when I was about 15-16 years old. Dunno where you're getting your memory from, but not from anything I said.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Thursday, June 9, 2011 10:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Whereas you prefer to try to PICK UP ON little girls, eh? Fourteen to seventeen was your preference, if I remember correctly. ;)

They were, when I was about 15-16 years old. Dunno where you're getting your memory from, but not from anything I said.

I got it from what you posted on this very site:

Here ya go:

August 7, 2008:

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=34471

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
The panicked girls managed to wiggle a few cell phones free

Oh, what I'd give to have been one of those cell phones.

And, further down in the same thread:

Quote:
Posted by AURaptor:

You know, once my ex g/f called me a pedophile. So I asked her, where does an 11 yr old learn such words ?

So much for your record with little girls, you creepy pedophile pervert.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:08 PM

Stalk much ? Seriously? You went back almost 3 years to get some obscure , off the cuff comment about what ever the hell the subject was at the time?

Never heard of Steven Wright, the stand up comedian, have ya ?

Naww... guess not. It was a joke. You know the difference between humor and being serious ?

Oh,never mind. Of course you don't. You're a stalker, and bat shit crazy.

* Oh, and of course, as per your perpetual habit of takings out of completely out of context, you omitted this key part...

" and sorry, all I saw was University of Texas and Cheerleaders".

Which would make my comments LEGAL, assuming I was a phone... which is of course, silly.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:15 PM

So you admit you did indeed post that, right?

So that whole line about "not from anything *I* ever said" was yet another in a long series of lies from you, yes?

It's just so easy to show how much of a liar you are; all I need to do is let you speak, and you'll prove me right every time!

As for "going back 3 years", not really. Going to Google and doing a keyword search was all it took. Less than a minute.

Hey - maybe you could use that to prove your case about Weiner directly accusing Breitbart of hacking his accounts!

Unless you're willing to finally admit that you were lying all along when you made that idiotic claim.

(It's okay, we already know you're a liar; this won't come as a news flash to anyone here.)

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

KWICKO

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:18 PM

In an article about 14-to-17 year-old girls, "all you saw" was "cheerleaders", huh?

How convenient.

Most pedophiles think that way; it's no surprise you do, too. ;)

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:22 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

Most pedophiles think that way;

You must be a pedophile then. I stated from the start that I thought it said Texas Cheerleaders.

And how would you even know/ remember what to google ? Seriously dude, you're obsessed. Seek professional help.

And to be clear, I never said I *dated* 14-17 yr old girls, even in the original thread. I clarified that, so , as usual, I never lied.

You're just a psycho nut case. And that's a fact.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:55 PM

Funny that you have all this phony outrage about some fictional little girl, but you're perfectly fine joking about being a pedophile.

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 9, 2011 11:58 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Funny that you have all this phony outrage about some fictional little girl, but you're perfectly fine joking about being a pedophile.

I'd ask " huh? " , but then that might lead you to the mistaken idea that I even care what you're thinking.

Or why.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Friday, June 10, 2011 12:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Funny that you have all this phony outrage about some fictional little girl, but you're perfectly fine joking about being a pedophile.

I'd ask " huh? " , but then that might lead you to the mistaken idea that I even care what you're thinking.

Or why.

And yet you can't stop responding to me. You don't care, but you can't stop. A conundrum, isn't it?

You were so worked up into a rage of faux indignation when you thought I was "picking on" a fictional little girl in a movie, but you're perfectly happy to make sexual innuendos about underage girls at every opportunity. Sure, you were "joking", and sure, you "didn't know" they were underage. Did you just happen to bring some Mike's Hard Lemonade for your "date", too? What clued you in that they were underage? Was it when Chris Hansen walked in?

SIGNYM

Friday, June 10, 2011 1:38 PM

And Rappy, as usual, has bailed. From his very own thread, even.

How convenient.

NIKI2

Friday, June 10, 2011 2:57 PM

Quote:
You want to write a 'column' , or blog your views ? Go post them on your own Firefly log. Or even better, keep your views to yourself, and then we'd not have to hear about the story that's not a story, but you felt it worthy enough to point out that it wasn't a story, making it a story anyways...

TRULY hysterical. You don’t need reminding that anyone can put post anything they want here, whether you approve of it or not. You already know that. I’ve understand; you’ve found a subject you can keep goading us on and Mike at least will keep replying, thereby giving you the attention you need. You really must have a pitiable life.

I hope Sig is right and Raptor's found somewhere else to play, I didn’t even bother to read the rest of this, as it’s all you and Raptor playing “neener neener” like six year olds.

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

AURAPTOR

Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:35 PM

Weiner pulls out.

Amazingly, many in NY think he should have stayed. Did nothing wrong... All the better that he's gone.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

BYTEMITE

Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:43 PM

Quote:
Weiner pulls out.

That's- *Is shot*

JAYNEZTOWN

Saturday, May 6, 2023 4:39 PM

Friends urging disgraced Anthony Weiner to run for office
https://nypost.com/2023/04/29/friends-urging-anthony-weiner-to-run-for
-office/

Anthony Weiner spotted dining with estranged wife Huma Abedin
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/anthony-weiner-spotted-dining-estrang
ed-wife-huma-abedin

JAYNEZTOWN

Saturday, July 22, 2023 1:11 AM

pedo Weiner is back on tv?

https://gab.com/vaccineregrets/posts/110752483661798549

Anthony Weiner Loses It As Podcast Host Drags Him Over ‘Underage Girls’ While Flogging Clinton Murders Conspiracy

https://www.mediaite.com/online/anthony-weiner-loses-it-as-podcast-hos
t-drags-him-over-underage-girls-while-flogging-clinton-murders-conspiracy-theory/