Weiner apologizes to Breitbart , admits guilt in naughty tweets.
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Saturday, July 22, 2023 01:11
VIEWED: 5255
PAGE 6 of 9
Still too much a coward to answer a direct question, I see.
You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:
Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.
I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.
So far, for a day now, you've proven me 100% correct. You ARE too big a coward to admit your failures.
"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I want you to lead...me...take me somewhere...weiner had an apology for breitbart why because weiner allowed the media to personally attack bb while he lied...dispicable...little cock...that weiner....kinda respect that pussy of a man..i love pussies with tight lips....actually, i think the whole story....after looking at it....is nothing
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sending those pictures was stupid, but lying about it was assanine. He definitely made some mistakes here, and I think it should be up to his constituants whether he should be asked to leave since he isn't resigning. Is it the worst thing he could have done? Probably not, but its still bad and the lying made it wayyyyyyy worse from an integrity standpoint, that's what would push his constituants towards telling him he's done.
"I'm big, your little. I'm smart you're dumb. I'm right you're wrong." Points to who can name the film.
"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Weiner's arrogance and selfishness are what I see as the most glaring issues. That he staunchly denied this stuff for 10 days, and admonished reporters who were trying to cover the story, even going so far as to call one of them a jackass.
That's not going to win you many friends on the Hill.
With out Googling, I'm gonna guess that quote is from Matilda.
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
slow news week in the US?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Apparently, Magons. 
The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.
...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Still too much a coward to answer a direct question, I see.
You keep dodging this, so I'll keep reposting it:
Do you still claim that Weiner himself claimed that Andrew Breitbart hacked his account? Yes or no. Stand by your earlier lie and show everyone here once and for all that you're a lying sack of shit, or man the hell up, admit you were lying, and apologize.
I'm willing to bet that you're not man enough to do the latter.
So far, for more than a day now, you've proven me 100% correct. You ARE too big a coward to admit your failures.
"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Madame Geezer's take on a guy named Weiner sending pictures of his, well, weiner package was, "You couldn't write this. No one would buy it". She also wonders how so many people in positions of authority can be so stupid about emailing lewd pictures, hitting on staff, etc. I agree.
"Keep the Shiny side up"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Pelosi calls for ethics probe for Weiner
Yep. Can't make this stuff up.
Even Harry Reid tells Weiner not to call him for support.
Harry's not a Weiner supporter either.
" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
I’m not going to TOUCH that one, it’s so far beyond the pale, only say that numerous investigations have proven otherwise. I’ll let others:
Breitbart, much the the scorn of the Left, has an impeccable record of reporting the facts.Quote:
’Nuff said.
Breitbart repeatedly claimed that the videos depicted "illegal activity," with O'Keefe and Giles likewise accusing ACORN of aiding in "criminal" actions. But investigations by California's attorney general, Brooklyn's district attorney, and an independent investigator hired by ACORN all determined that the videos showed no such illegal activity.
After Brooklyn prosecutors cleared ACORN, Breitbart embarrassingly backtracked on his previous accusation of ACORN criminality, tweeting that the "ACORN tapes were less about 'criminality' than facility with which employees all knew how to work system for any lowlife wanting govmnt $."
The California and Brooklyn investigations also shined a spotlight on how Giles and O'Keefe had deceptively edited the tapes to "meet their agenda." California Attorney General Jerry Brown said the videos created a "highly selective editing of reality."
Meanwhile, a central pillar of the ACORN attacks -- that O'Keefe "dressed as a pimp" during his meeting with ACORN officials -- was unraveling. Breitbart eventually acknowledged that he himself had been unaware that O'Keefe had entered the offices dressed in slacks and a dress shirt, not the outlandish pimp costume O'Keefe wore in the tapes' opening sequences.
Numerous right-wing media figures backed away from O'Keefe following his arrest, while Breitbart -- who had previously acknowledged that he paid O'Keefe "a fair salary" -- denied any knowledge of his activities, then accused the U.S. attorney of having "frame[d]" O'Keefe "in media." O'Keefe later pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for his role in the incident.
In July, the NAACP released a resolution calling on Tea Party activists to repudiate the movement's racist elements. In retaliation, Breitbart posted a 2 minute and 36 second clip that he claimed showed Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod telling a "racist tale" to an NAACP audience about her supposed past discrimination against a white farmer.
But when Sherrod and the farmer she had supposedly discriminated against came forward to tell their stories and the NAACP released the full video of Sherrod's comments, it became clear that the clip Breitbart posted had been ripped from context, and the smear completely dissolved.
With his concocted smear on the rocks, Breitbart began hurling a variety of bizarre (and false) accusations in hopes of preserving his credibility -- all while alternating between declaring himself "sympathetic" to Sherrod's "plight" after the media supposedly "made it about her," and continuing to suggest that Sherrod is a racist.
The scandal took on a new light after Dr. Kevin Pezzi was invited by Breitbart to repost two pieces accusing Sherrod of racism on BigGovernment.com. After we exposed Pezzi as a racist who claims to be responsible for "over 850 inventions" and schemes such as a "magic bullet" for cancer, a "robotic chef," and sexual inventions like "penile enlargement techniques" and "ways to tighten the vagina," Breitbart pulled Pezzi's posts from his site and apologized.
Unimpressed with his wild claims, media of all stripes condemned Breitbart as untrustworthy and his actions as "a classic example of what is wrong with our national discourse."
From top of the world to too toxic for network television -- Breitbart has come a long way in a year. But while he's lost credibility with virtually everyone else, he's still a welcome member of the conservative media elite.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME