Weiner apologizes to Breitbart , admits guilt in naughty tweets.

POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Saturday, July 22, 2023 01:11
VIEWED: 5255
PAGE 3 of 9

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:11 AM

http://www.breitbart.tv/breitbart-on-weinergate-organized-left-sought-
to-destroy-messenger-give-credit-to-dana-bash-at-cnn-for-pursuing-story/

Anthony Weiner accused Andrew Breitbart of hacking his account, and then apologize for making that false accusation.

You know it, I know it, the world knows it.

I win, you lose.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:11 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

None of them do.

You have no honor, no honesty, and no integrity.

You lied about this, and you know you lied, and I've called you on it repeatedly now.

You still won't say "AuRaptor lied, Kwicko was right."

You're without honor. This shows the "character" inherent in the GOP. Every single one of them.

If you ever said "Support the Troops!", you are a socialist. You've taken money from me, by force and at gunpoint, and you've given it to people who are on a mission I don't support, and are murdering others in my name, and I am given no choice in the matter.

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Anthony Weiner accused Andrew Breitbart of hacking his account, and then apologize for making that false accusation.

You know it, I know it, the world knows it.

I win, you lose.

He never said it. SHOW US THE EVIDENCE! You won't, because you can't. You refuse, because you're a coward.

SHOW US WHERE HE ACCUSED BREITBART OF HACKING HIS ACCOUNT.

BYTEMITE

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:20 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
I think she did, AURaptor.

In any case, I'm beyond caring about or being surprised by this stuff. I didn't care when it was Larry Craig, I don't care now. Really it's all par for the course.

No, she didn't. She said he was a Weiner, that she was upset at believing him, but didn't say "AURaptor was right, I was wrong."

And once again, this goes to show the character of Dems and Republicans. The GOP dirt bags, they hight tail it and resign. Democrats ? Have no such honor.

None of them do.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

Sure, but doesn't that imply that she agrees with you? I guess I don't see the reason to make it personal and rub faces in anything. But, whatever, it's an internet discussion board. Do as you all like.

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:21 AM

Aaaaannnnnd

Crickets from Rappy.

Not a shred of evidence to prop up his baseless claims, as usual.

Known to all the world as a liar and a coward. That's our Rappy.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:29 AM

Weiner apologized.

game, set, match.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:44 AM

The strategy was to attack Breitbart, attack the messenger, and call into question the credibility and legitimacy of the story.

Breitbart was 100% truthful and is 100 % vindicated, as am I on this matter.

Kwickie, you've got something on your face. Ya might want to see to that.

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NIKI2

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 1:57 AM

I went back to the other thread about this story just to be sure I remembered it right, because I know what I believe and I know what I wrote. There were more rsponses than last time I was there, and some of this shit really pisses me off.

I never backed Weiner; I dissed those who were quick to judge him and said I thought it was a stupid non-story because I don’t CARE whether he did or not. I was willing to wait and see if anything came of it, but thought it was really stupid to make such a big deal of it. Ditto Lee. You can’t claim I “defended” Weiner, because I never did. So stop addressing that shit to me, or prove yourself. Go check the thread I put up expressing my disgust at how big a deal this all was. NOWHERE did I defend Weiner, nor would I have until there was something concrete either way. I couldn't even have gone back and changed anything, because I can't edit my posts lately. I have to contact Haken about that, but currently, I'm stuck with what I write.

Crap like this in the other thread and here makes me sick to my stomach, mostly because it so clearly illustrates that you don't READ WHAT IS WRITTEN, and then jump ahead to condemn the person you hate because of what you THOUGHT you read. Your attack on me for having “defended” Weiner is energetically , because I NEVER DID.

Onward: So if anyone’s “owned” and got shafted, what about you guys and Lee? It’s a stupid tit for tat; both sides got took and got a black eye. Deal with it.

Quote:
There'd be 100 + replies by now, had some GOP member of Congress, after having so vehemently denied any wrong doing, after having accused MediaMatters or TheDailyKos of hacking his private account, and going through all the twists and theatrics, claiming innocence, a conspiracy, blah blah blah....

Ahhh, you caught yourself there. Leaving off the “accused” bullshit (because HE did not), where are the “100 +” posts crowing over Lee like you’re doing over Weiner?? I don’t see any... Face it, little boy, neither side is better than the other when it comes to this, and you only think it’s a big deal and that people are suffering because that’s how you think, not because it has anything to do with reality. I could care less; it’s only important to YOU.

Quote:
He tried to implicate others who were simply reporting the story, claiming THEY had hacked his twitter account.

Wrong. He never said WHO might have hacked into his account, he only said his account MIGHT have been hacked and they were trying to find out who. He was pushed into apologizing to Breitbart for not having stood up and told the truth. You have to show proof that he accused Breitbart specifically for hacking, and he didn’t.

Quote:
“I want to hear the truth from Congressman Weiner and quite frankly I would like an apology for him being complicit in a blame-the-messenger strategy," Breitbart said.

"I'm being accused of being the hacker against a congressman. He said nothing. He allowed for that to go. His minions perpetuated that false, malicious meme and then he went on CNN to attack me."

In other words, the MEDIA speculated about Breitbart and Weiner allowed it to go on; you have to show proof that Weiner HIMSELF accused Breitbart, and I can’t find anything by Googling “Weiner accuses Breitbart”. So show us your proof or stop persisting in that lie. Even that URL you put up is headlined “Organized Left Sought to Destroy Messenger” – NOWHERE does it say Weiner himself accused Breitbart.

If anything Weiner did is “Standard Dem M.O.”, then what is Ensign’s whole scandal, or the “Appalachian trail” guy, or any of the others? Get a grip: It’s “standard politician M.O.”, on ALL sides, not just R or D.

Breitbart made an ass of HIMSELF, getting up there and preening in the spotlight to make it all about himself, a la The Donald. He said reporters ASKED him to, but that’s n

KWICKO

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:

Weiner apologized.

game, set, match.

The strategy was to attack Breitbart, attack the messenger, and call into question the credibility and legitimacy of the story.

Breitbart was 100% truthful and is 100 % vindicated, as am I on this matter.

Kwickie, you've got something on your face. Ya might want to see to that.

Bush apologized.

Game, set, match.

He not only ordered the torture at Abu Ghraib, he lied about it to cover it up. You've just admitted as much.

As Signy says "Goose sauce = gander sauce".

And I'll note yet again that you steadfastly REFUSE to produce ANY evidence that Weiner accused Breitbart of hacking his accounts. You're lying, you've been called on it, and you've been challenged to prove your case. Yet you persist in producing ZERO evidence, screaming "I'm right! I'M RIGHT!", and running away from the issue.

You won't provide evidence, because you have none at all.

Prove me wrong. Go ahead. We'll all wait.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, June 7, 2011 2:24 AM

Bush ordered no torture at Abu Ghraib. As commander in chief, he's sorry that abuses took place, and those responsible were identified and punished.

Weiner's actions were his and his alone.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

Weiner was complicit in the disinformation coming from the Left wing bloggers. He knew the real story , all along, and did nothing to dissuade or correct the lies coming from KOS and other sites.

I'm sorry, Kwickie, that you're too stupid or too much of an useful idiot to comprehend the finer points, but truth is, they're actually pretty coarse, and not that fine at all.

Niki - nice try. You tried to wash your hands of Weiner by saying " it's a stupid story", when in fact, it was a legit story, and there's no way around that. Doesn't matter that YOU'D like to down play it, because he's a Dem, and one you were eager to praise. ( Which , even before this mess, is absolutely hysterical )

He not only lied, he brazenly did so, while taking part in the willful slandering of a reporter who was 100% on the right side of this story.

And you look towards this Weiner guy as some sort of LEADER ? Someone to be praised and held up?

Figures. John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Patrick Kennedy, Gary Hart.... man, the list is never ending!

Looks like you've been by a Weiner

" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

FIRST PAGE PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NEXT PAGE LAST PAGE