TRUMP - Just because.....................Naw, I just can't say it!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Monday, March 9, 2026 20:06
VIEWED: 244478
PAGE 136 of 170
Awwwwwwwww, lost your broomstick dear? Call 1 (800) WHOTHEFUCKGIVESASHIT
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Nope, not mad.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Can we move this to a (new) shorter thread?
Something that applies to Trump as President-elect, and not Trump the candidate? Because I guarantee you NOBODY is going to look at the previous 26 pages ... or even the previous five posts (especially yours, SECOND) no matter HOW blistering you think they are! - SIGNY
Awww, she's mad.- GSTRINGQuote:Glad you think so!
And funny wrong as usual.-GSTRINGQuote:I have read SECONDRATE'S/ SECONHAND'S posts, which are usually links to someone else's posts. and what I find is that they usually consist of shocked- and inaccurate - whining. It's difficult to have a conversation about some specific thing if everyone is posting about everything: hard to locate relevant comments.
I read every one of second's posts. I look forward to every one of second's posts. You would learn a lot if you did the same.- GSTTRINGQuote:Because the topic isn't specific enough. I have some very specific things to say about Trump and Obama. But that's OK, I'll just start other threads about those more focused thoughts and leave this one for whatever.
Why move a thread? Click the thread title, go to the last page - easy even for you.= GSTRING
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ya know, it's funny but nearly 3 million popular votes later and the CIA report of widespread Russian hacking, and we still don't have a TRUE leader,
as "president-elect" Donald Hump goes about betraying the people who voted for him, by picking billionaire cabinet members to help ruin this country.
Last legs!? Fuck, Trump is out there prepping with KY Jelly and practicing grabbing his ankles before in-auguration day. January 20th sworn in, by Jan. 21 singing a Russian lullabye to the tune of tie a yellow ribbon round my old white ass. Before Putin rips him a new one, maybe he should buy him dinner and a box of chocolates.
SGG
quote]A game show host is about to be sworn in as president of the United States and 1kiki and Signym are convinced that the Democratic Party is practically on its last legs.
That is not what the data says.

The data says she won 3 populous states with large urban areas: New York, California and Illinois. And she won a dozen or so small states. Overall, she won 17 of 50 states. To put it another way, she lost 33 of 50 states. That's pathetic. And it doesn't indicate broad popular support.
Also, as Signy pointed out, and which I've pointed out multiple times in the past - democrats have lost both houses of Congress, retain only 18 of 50 governorships, have only 15 of 49 state senates and 16 of 49 state houses. https://www.multistate.com/state-resources/governors-legislatures
AND in addition, democrats have lost significant voter share to 'independents', which, as Signy pointed out, tend to break republican.
And now democrats lost the ONE thing they had left to lose: the presidency.
I'd say things are not looking good for democrats.
How did your beloved 'democratic' party fuck up so badly?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fuck the people who voted for Trump. They'll get their when he runs the country into the ground. They will be ordering consumer goods from a Russian outlet mall in Weehauken NJ.
Cites!? - proven track record. Trump has run many of his businesses into the ground and laughed all the way to the bank. He'll do America the hard way.
By the way, we've already slipped into the 7th Ring of Hell, and soon after we will be that 3rd World country you've heard about.
People of Earth, Be Afraid!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So, you're going to be mad at roughly half of the United States because they didn't vote for your Annointed One?
Yanno, SECOND, after Bush stole the election for the second time, I was pretty pissed off. But not at people here who voted for Bush, and not even at the GOP for cheating, but at the Democratic Party, for not taking action when it was clear that Karl Rove stole the election the FIRST time (FL 2000).
Why did the DNC SPECIFICALLY rig the primary against Sanders? To me, that was a serious strategic blunder: If the voting results were telling the DNC that one candidate could win the primary and the polling results were telling them that same candidate had a much better chance of winning against Trump in a head-to-head, why did the DNC insist on foisting off a much less popular candidate, by hook or by crook, on its own constituency???
That kind or arrogance and entitlement is pretty breathtaking, but I can think of a few interlinked reasons why:
1) Most of Sanders donations came in small amounts, from individuals.
2) Hillary would be able to fill her "war chest" with multi-million dollar, big-ticket donations,
3) Those big donors wanted a return on their investment, which WASN'T Bernie.
4) The DNC believed they would need a lot of money to run a campaign, especially for a candidate who had a huge unfavorable rating.
What this speaks of, in the DNC, is a lack of faith in the popular vote for its own brand. The DNC deliberately turned its back on its own voters choice. The decision having been made, Debbie and Donna and John and the rest of the party apparatchiks then conspired how they were going to jam Hillary down everyone's throats.
I still have a hard time wrapping my head around that decision. Either Bernie's probable policies ... on "free trade", on Israel, on Saudi Arabia and our proxy terrorists, on the dollar, on globalism .... were going to be so different than Hillary's (her policies being known to those who get to see her "private face") that Bernie was completely and totally unacceptable to the DNC's underwriters .... or people in the DNC were getting serious kickbacks from their big-money donors. In any case, it boggles the mind.
That was the DNC's internal flaw. Externally, the DNC simply stopped representing "Americans". It made a point of slicing and dicing America into gay-Americans, female-Americans, Hispanic/Chicano-Americans, African-Americans, transgender-Americans, illegal aliens, legal immigrants etc and appealing to each slice as if they were victims (We are, but not in the way the DNC wants us to believe). But in the end, the DNC (Obama) followed policies that simply did not benefit the vast majority of Americans, where ALL of our interests overlap.
It's not just Trump, SECOND. I don't know if you noticed, but the DNC has lost a lot of Congressional seats, state Legislators, governors, and even county supervisors/commissioners, and mayors.
They're doing something seriously wrong. It's time for you to stop being mad, you need to wake up and smell the coffee. And if you are as rich as you say you are, and you have any donor-influence on the DNC, or at least Texas Democrats, then use that influence to slap them into reality.
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
"If I could write inflammatory commentary to scorcNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Signym, see if you understand this Constitutional dilemma. Trump claims he has already started working on it, but he can't have his cake and eat it, too. What Trump tweeted is NOT a solution, no matter what he claims. To solve Trump's dilemma will take either a Supreme Court case, with all the Democrats voting against all the Republicans, or passing a major piece of legislation, with the Senate Democrats filibustering against. Or Trump could liquidate his properties, which he'd rather not.:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I can't imagine why your panties are in such a twist. This is a GOOD thing.
Trump is a walking, talking violation of the Constitution. He violates the emoluments clause, which basically says no officer of the United States can be on the receiving end of any kind of economic benefit, payment, gift, profit, whatever, from a foreign government or its corporations or agents. That includes Donald Jr. or Ivanka or Eric. Foreigners stuffing money into any of Trump’s family bank accounts, not just Donald’s, violates the emoluments clause.
Since yesterday Trump has already begun arguing that is not so: “Even though I am not mandated by law to do so, I will be leaving my businesses before January 20th so that I can focus full time on the Presidency. Two of my children, Don and Eric, plus executives, will manage them. No new deals will be done during my term(s) in office.” That’s Donald saying he will fire his daughter from the family business, but even if he fires his sons, too, and it still won’t be enough to satisfy the Constitutional requirement.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/808528428123254785
Read the Emoluments Clause:
www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/68/emoluments-claus
e
There is an explanation of why the clause exists. It involves King Louis XVI and Ben Franklin, the ambassador to France.
Trump is a constant emolument magnet. He thinks of himself as a babe magnet, but he’s an emoluments magnet. And all around the world everybody wants to go to his hotels and not the competitors, and wants to give him a variance or a special land use permit and there’s simply no way short of absolutely liquidating all of his assets and placing the proceeds into a blind trust and not handed over to his kids or wife. No way short of that prevents him from being a walking, talking violation of the Constitution from the moment he takes the oath.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:No. I'm extremely frugal. If I need something and it seems pricey, I'll try to figure something else out to use instead, or go without. If I REALLY need it and it seems pricey I'll shop online. What I won't do is go from store to store to store to save $.10 on an item. Plus, I know in general which stores have the best overall prices. For groceries they're Trader Joe's and Vitamin City. For certain household goods it's Vitamin City and Target. For others it's Target and Walgreens. For first aid and sundry it's Target and Walgreens. And I go to Ace Hardware for things I can't get anywhere else. Ace is pretty expensive, but I support them as a business, because they REALLY are 'the helpful place'.
it looks like from your comment above "I just buy what they have" that you are not a cost conscience consumer. Is that true?
How did your beloved 'democratic' party fuck up so badly?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The Constitutional dilemma of tweeting about Lockheed Martin's F-35?
I can't imagine why your panties are in such a twist. This is a GOOD thing.- SIGNY
Signym, see if you understand this Constitutional dilemma.- SECOND
What in god's name does this have to do with ... anything? You've got a permanent knot in your undies. I mean, I know you despise Trump but your posts are just unhinged bitching. How about focusing on something real?
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
"If I could write inflammatory commentary to scorch the eye brows and lashes off Trump, Signym or 1kiki, I would.- SECOND"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You best look at the ACE Hardware labels for Chinese goods.
Originally posted by 1kiki:Quote:No. I'm extremely frugal. If I need something and it seems pricey, I'll try to figure something else out to use instead, or go without. If I REALLY need it and it seems pricey I'll shop online. What I won't do is go from store to store to store to save $.10 on an item. Plus, I know in general which stores have the best overall prices. For groceries they're Trader Joe's and Vitamin City. For certain household goods it's Vitamin City and Target. For others it's Target and Walgreens. For first aid and sundry it's Target and Walgreens. And I go to Ace Hardware for things I can't get anywhere else. Ace is pretty expensive, but I support them as a business, because they REALLY are 'the helpful place'.
it looks like from your comment above "I just buy what they have" that you are not a cost conscience consumer. Is that true?
1kiki, I thought you and Trump were deeply concerned about factory jobs? This shows no passion whatsoever for American factory workers losing their incomes. It would be like complaining about millions of gas station attendants losing jobs to self-service gas stations than being unaware that you are buying gas at a self-service filling station solely because it is more convenient and cheaper for you.
Please, 1kiki, pay higher prices and inconvenience yourself for patriotic love of displaced American factory workers from faraway states. Factory workers east of the Mississippi will thank you . . . not. They’re not appreciative. They think you, in snooty California, owe them a living in hardworking Pennsylvania. If the production of popular items like iPhones and sneakers were done domestically rather than abroad, their prices would increase considerably.
www.businessinsider.com/how-much-products-would-cost-if-made-in-us-201
6-11/#iphones-1
www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/mothergooseandgrimm/s-1902507

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:BECAUSE WAGES TO AMERICAN WORKERS ARE HIGHER.
If the production of popular items like iPhones and sneakers were done domestically rather than abroad, their prices would increase considerably. - SECOND
I guess you have a problem with that?
-----------
"Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor"- William Blake
"If I could write inflammatory commentary to scorch the eye brows and lashes off Trump, Signym or 1kiki, I would.- SECOND"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:If you aren't aware, Texans don't have much concern for the well-being of Yankees or Californians, even Yankee factory workers in Indiana, especially if Texans have to pay higher prices to create factory jobs in California or the Midwest. It is all about doing what is right for your own state, not some state that is four or five state borders away. That is why the USA didn't end up being called the One State of America, with a single BIG star on the flag.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:BECAUSE WAGES TO AMERICAN WORKERS ARE HIGHER.
If the production of popular items like iPhones and sneakers were done domestically rather than abroad, their prices would increase considerably. - SECOND
I guess you have a problem with that?



NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
How Putin got his pet game show host elected president
by Kevin Drum, Dec. 13, 2016 6:24 PM
Over lunch I read today's big New York Times story about the Russian cyberattacks aimed at disrupting the US election. It was mesmerizing even though I already knew a lot of it, and it was also depressing as hell.
www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us/politics/russia-hack-election-dnc.html
By the time I finished, I was pretty close to thinking that the right response would be a couple dozen cruise missiles aimed straight at Putin's lone remaining aircraft carrier. I guess we're all lucky I'm not the president.
There are a dozen depressing things I could highlight, but somehow I found this the most depressing of all:
"By last summer, Democrats watched in helpless fury as their private emails and confidential documents appeared online day after day — procured by Russian intelligence agents, posted on WikiLeaks and other websites, then eagerly reported on by the American media, including The Times....Every major publication, including The Times, published multiple stories citing the D.N.C. and Podesta emails posted by WikiLeaks, becoming a de facto instrument of Russian intelligence."
I know: news is news. Somehow, though, that doesn't seem sufficient. I'm still not entirely sure what the right response is to leaks like this, but simply publishing everything no matter where it came from or what its motivation no longer seems tenable. There has to be something more to editorial judgment than that.
Anyway, Putin won this round. He didn't do it all by himself —— he had plenty of help from the FBI and the media —— but in the end, he got his pet game show host elected president of the United States. I hope we all live through it.
www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/12/how-putin-got-his-pet-game-show
-host-elected-president
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME