Countdown To Criminal Charges Against DEEP STATE Traitors
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, January 18, 2024 23:56
VIEWED: 6320
PAGE 1 of 5
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.
Ad also, did I forget anybody special?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Your traitor has already been caught and his name is Aldrich Ames. He worked for the Russians.
It is not treason to say that Trump is a lying sack of fat.
www.cia.gov/news-information/blog/2019/to-catch-a-spy-25th-anniversary
-of-the-aldrich-ames-arrest.html
www.britannica.com/biography/Aldrich-Ames
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.
Ad also, did I forget anybody special?
I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:They've had three years with this. Nothing's gonna happen. Justice Dept. ONLY goes after Republicans.
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?
Quote:Anybody turn State's Evidence during all the Obama scandal hearings? No, Dems always close ranks and say nothing.
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?
Quote:Sure they will ….. not!
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Supposedly the former head ofthe No Such Agency, Adm Michael Rogers, is cooperating with Durham.
Quote:The reason why the NSA only had "moderate confidence" in the report (which according to whistleblower analysis means "no confidence at all" in spook-speak) was because they [the NSA] had intercepted NO packets of DNC files heading across the internet to Julian Assange. I have made this point many times, and this point has been made many times by former high-level employees and whistleblowers, but not on the M$M. If you people would bother to listen to something other than Rachel Madcow bloviating about the latest propaganda, you might have known this too.
Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout
December 20, 2019 6:32 PM
Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)
Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.
Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.
The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,” as Brennan testified in May 2017.
Quote:... under Obama ...
Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.
According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.
Quote:And they can do this because they have a big giant database of illegally-obtained communication.
The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.
Quote:According to Adm Rogers, he cut off CIA and FBI access to this database, which was fostering more surveillance and prosecution abuses.
After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,
Quote:Under Obama
the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.
Quote:
After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Now, what does this all mean?
I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.
In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So Barr himself isn't going to go full bore against the entire Washington swamp. I mean, if he pursued Debbie Washerwoman Shit and her "IT guy" who had access to many congressional emails (and who has since fled back to Pakistan), and Epstein and everyone associated with him, and pursued everyone who laundered money from Ukraine and elsewhere, and everyone who represented a foreign government (including Israel) without declaring it, and everyone who had a "foundation" to launder foreign donations, and everyone who disposed of evidence (looking at YOU, Hillary), and everyone who used illegally-obtained evidence or lied to the FISA court or who lied to Congress (looking at YOU, Mr. Brennan!) or ordered murders or embezzled or leaked classified information or subverted the democratic process ... why, there wouldn't be anyone left but maybe a dozen people! The FIB, CYA, NoSuchAgency, Stat Dept, DuD, would be depopulated of its top three tiers, at least! Entire "think tanks" would be gone. Congress would be an series of empty halls and empty offices, except maybe a half-dozen people (and I'm being generous).
Wow, what a picture!
So, yeah ... Barr is going to be selective about who he prosecutes. The question is, is he going to go after top names like Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Obama? Or is is going to pick easier targets?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Troll #1 has posted that he has no clue.
Originally posted by second:
Your traitor has already been caught and blah blah blah
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Troll #2 has posted that he still has no clue.
Originally posted by captaincrunch:Quote:I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.
Ad also, did I forget anybody special?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:This prediction might be that since Durham was not involved in Epstein, then that means Durham will not charge anybody in his Investigation. Or maybe I got that wrong.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?
I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.
In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME