Countdown To Criminal Charges Against DEEP STATE Traitors
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, January 18, 2024 23:56
VIEWED: 6320
PAGE 2 of 5
Quote:The reason why the NSA only had "moderate confidence" in the report (which according to whistleblower analysis means "no confidence at all" in spook-speak) was because they [the NSA] had intercepted NO packets of DNC files heading across the internet to Julian Assange. I have made this point many times, and this point has been made many times by former high-level employees and whistleblowers, but not on the M$M. If you people would bother to listen to something other than Rachel Madcow bloviating about the latest propaganda, you might have known this too.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Supposedly the former head ofthe No Such Agency, Adm Michael Rogers, is cooperating with Durham.Quote:as Brennan testified in May 2017.
Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout
December 20, 2019 6:32 PM
Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)
Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.
Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.
The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,”
Quote:... under Obama ...
Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.
According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.
Quote:And they can do this because they have a big giant database of illegally-obtained communication.
The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.
Quote:According to Adm Rogers, he cut off CIA and FBI access to this database, which was fostering more surveillance and prosecution abuses.
After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,
Quote:Under Obama
the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.
Quote:
After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.
Yes, I heard this some time ago.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Durham isn't investigating Epstein, but (I don't know if you recall) Trump made a strong connection between the deep state and pedophilia, and many of his supporters said that he was going to wrap up "the swamp" on pedophilia charges.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?
I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.
In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.
JSF: This prediction might be that since Durham was not involved in Epstein, then that means Durham will not charge anybody in his Investigation. Or maybe I got that wrong.
I personally think that Epstein WAS some sort of asset, and his pedo-blackmail oppression was very useful for some of the deeper parts of the deep state.
As head of DOJ, Barr has the authority to order the FBI to pursue Epstein's activities and death further. So far it looks like it's somewhere between "back burner" and "coverup"
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
On the similar topic of DEEP STATE, it sounds like The REINS Act could rein in much of the Deep State Rules and Regulations.
https://ballotpedia.org/REINS_Act
For those interested in solutions to the problem. At least, this part of the problem.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Rumor is the Senate will hold an Impeachment Trial, and call witnesses. Since the Fake Impeachments reference the Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Deal with Hunter and Joe Biden, they could be called and could get the first invitations to prison.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Man. I don't believe anything I hear about anything anymore.
We'll see what happens.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump said he has the most transparent presidency ever. I think it's true. And now people are getting to see how sausage is made.
Except for the most pathological TDSers, what I *HOPE* is that people are getting a good, unvarnished look at how government runs. And that they're realizing how everyone is at the trough snorking up goodies and pursuing piggy agendas, and nobody is actually representing them, reason, equity, basic honesty ...
I *HOPE* that even if there's not a moment of sudden realization, there comes a slow erosion of faith in the government when it says 'trust us'.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.
Ad also, did I forget anybody special?
I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!
T
Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Trump said he has the most transparent presidency ever. I think it's true.
*snort* You owe me a keyboard, Kookie!
You mean like his lies are so transparent?
You mean not complying with Congressional Oversight's request for documents is being transparent?
You mean when they silence witness testimony through intimidation and by blocking them from appearing to testify is being transparent?
Or do you suggest that the increase in FOIA requests under Trump is a sign of openness?
http://foiaproject.org/2018/01/16/lawsuits-trump-first-year/
Perhaps, for you Trump's obscuring the truth with obvious lies and see through cover-ups is what you mean by transparency? If so, then you are also being equally transparent.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's been 33 days since this thread was finally started.
Seems like things are still in the works.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Now that the Fake Impeachment is over with, this countdown can get cookin'.
It's been 41 days since this thread was started.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME