Countdown To Criminal Charges Against DEEP STATE Traitors
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, January 18, 2024 23:56
VIEWED: 6320
PAGE 4 of 5
Honestly, I was hoping Durham would wrap up with something substantial before the election, because afterward - if Biden wins - he might get shut down.
I want it ALL to be brought to light. Both sides, any person involved, all the facts.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Too bad they didn't shut down the RUSSIA!RUSSIA! disinfo campaign, the "quid pro quo" disinfo campaign, and the other disinfo campaigns.
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Facebook and Twitter are choking the spread of a controversial New York Post story about Hunter Biden after questions arise about its veracity and a possible disinformation campaign
https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hunter-biden-new-york-post-st
ory-fact-checkers-2020-10
Whenever a fake story comes out, you can always count on the Russian troll to spew their bullshit, then get their ass handed to them by me, with facts and logic.
I have done so, yet again.
You always have, and always will lose to me.
Russian troll destroyed.
Not that they're biased, or anything.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
#WEARAMASK
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Honestly, I was hoping Durham would wrap up with something substantial before the election, because afterward - if Biden wins - he might get shut down.
I want it ALL to be brought to light. Both sides, any person involved, all the facts.
Even in the alternate timeline where Trump doesn't get reelected, he put in 3 supreme court justices, and Roberts being the liberal wolf in sheep clothing isn't going to matter anymore.
2nd Amendment rights fully protected across the board now, and Facebook and Twitter are going to get what's coming to them.
Dorsey should probably just keep hiding out in whatever 3rd world shithole that he's slacking in right now and Zuckerborg ought to go to his cryosleep pod and chill for 50 or so years before they get enough Anti-Constitutionalist Leftists in SCOTUS again for him to continue with his plans.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Wow, hiding behind fake Russian interference in order to interfere with the election.
Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.
The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:
Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.
pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020
Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.
Quote:Oh, puhleez! Can't they come up with a better excuse than that?
Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.
Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:
Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020
Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.
The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.
The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.
Quote:
News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.
"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."
The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I understand that many Libtards do not care about the Biden Crime Family, and their structure to give half of their corrupt and treasonous income back to Joe, thus laundering his income for him. Plus, auctioning off his bribes and Government access is not a problem in Libtard books.
https://realnse.com/2020/10/15/giuliani-reveals-new-email-showing-hunt
er-biden-giving-half-of-foreign-salary-to-joe-biden/
His sale of Government access is near to rival The Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:We don't care about conspiracy theories and fake news.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I understand that many Libtards do not care about the Biden Crime Family, and their structure to give half of their corrupt and treasonous income back to Joe, thus laundering his income for him. Plus, auctioning off his bribes and access is not a problem in Libtard books.
https://realnse.com/2020/10/15/giuliani-reveals-new-email-showing-hunt
er-biden-giving-half-of-foreign-salary-to-joe-biden/
His sale of access is near to rival The Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Wow, hiding behind fake Russian interference in order to interfere with the election.
Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.
The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:
Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.
pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020
Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.Quote:Oh, puhleez! Can't they come up with a better excuse than that?
Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.
Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:
Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020
Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.
The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.
The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.Quote:
News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.
"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."
The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020
We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter SaNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I don't know where from, but it sounds like everybody now knows that Sloppy Joe has admtted to being the central architect of all of the Biden corruption, Biden bribery, Biden money siphoning that he has been denying lately.
How timely.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME