Redacted Mueller report
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Thursday, July 3, 2025 23:09
VIEWED: 14174
PAGE 11 of 14
Quote:Signym, we all have seen you run this same play many times. You are a Russian troll. (If you are not, I am sorry . . . that you are crazy.) Everybody knows you are lying. Please sue me so that your true identity is revealed. You promised to sue me.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anybody who claims that Assange was the conduit for material hacked by "Russians" without ever having either (1)examined the server from which they were copied or (2) interviewing Assange and Craig Murry has NO credible evidence on which to base that allegation.
As a reminder to those who might believe Signym, there was an indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officials in connection with the 2016 election hacks and the resulting distribution of purloined emails. This was because of the investigation over which the president of the United States fired James Comey as FBI director. This is the investigation Comey confirmed on March 20, 2017, when he told Congress, “I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.”
This was also the investigation that multiple Republican controlled congressional committees have spent more than a year seeking to discredit—most recently Thursday, when two House panels hauled the former deputy assistant director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Department, Peter Strzok, a career FBI agent who worked on the Russia probe, up to Capitol Hill for 10 hours of public, televised, abusive conspiracy theorizing. When the president of the United States derides the Mueller investigation as a “witch hunt,” and when congressional Republicans scream at FBI agents, this is the investigation they are trying to harass out of existence.
It is, therefore, fitting that this indictment of 12 Russian military intelligence officials comes less than one day after the astonishing display House Republicans put on in the Strzok hearing. If Mueller had been trying to remind the public of what the investigation is really about and what the stakes are in it, if he had been trying to make a public statement in response to the Strzok hearing, he could not have timed this action better.
You can read the indictment here:
www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-in
dictment
The actual indictment contradicts all the Fake Experts that Signym wants to sell to you as authentic experts. The Signym's Fake Experts just made up a story for computer dummies & internet ignoramuses to believe is true.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Were Julian Assange and Craig Murray, both with first hand knowledge of who provided the files, ever interviewed by USA investigators from any office?
Yes or no?
Were the DNC's computers ever examined by the FBI, or ever in the BFI's possession?
Yes or no?
There was an indictment, but the evidence was provided by "Crowdstrike". And who is "Crowdstrike"? "Crowdstrike" was a private computer security firm. And who was Crowstrike contracted by?
The DNC.
No conflict of interest there, no siree!!!
*****
I'm sure there is nobody in the administration who will look into this particular miscarriage of justice because nobody is interested in defending Julian Assnge, and for sure the Rssians aren't going to present themselves in American court (altho one of the Russian firms HAS showed up to defend itself).
Therefore, this "indictment" will never be tested in court, and is extremely safe to mamake in order to gain political points. So as they say, you can indict a ham sandwich, which is pretty much what happened here.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-in
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Anybody who claims that Assange was the conduit for material hacked by "Russians" without ever having either (1)examined the server from which they were copied or (2) interviewing Assange and Craig Murry has NO credible evidence on which to base that allegation.
Furthermore, the metadata attached to those files (transfer rates, "last modified" timestamps which are always even which is FAT format) both show that the files were transferred to a USB stick and not "hacked" over the internet or emailed https://jamesfetzer.org/2019/03/bill-binney-and-larry-johnson-how-we-k
now-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians/)
I find it preposterous that anyone would buy into this crock of shit without ever going into the actual evidence, but instead rely on the word of people whose job it is to lie.
dictment
The 12 Russian names from Mueller’s indictment
1) Viktor Borisovich Netyksho,
2) Boris Alekseyevich Antonov,
3) Dmitriy Sergeyevich Badin,
4) Ivan Sergeyevich Yermakov,
5) Aleksey Viktorovich Lukashev,
6) Sergey Aleksandrovich Morgachev,
7) Nikolay Yuryevich Kozachek,
8) Pavel Vyacheslavovich Yershov,
9) Artem Andreyevich Malyshev,
10) Aleksandr Vladimirovich Osadchuk,
11) Aleksey Aleksandrovich Potemkin, and
12) Anatoliy Sergeyevich Kovalev
2. Defendants were GRU officers who knowingly and intentionally conspired with each other, and with persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury (collectively the “Conspirators”), to gain unauthorized access (to “hack”) into the computers of U.S. persons and entities involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, steal documents from these computers, and stage releases of the stolen documents to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
3. Starting in at least March 2016, the Conspirators used a variety of means to hack the email accounts of Volunteers and employees of the U.S. presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton (the “Clinton Campaign”), including the email account of the Clinton Campaign’s chairman.
4. By in or around April 2016, the Conspirators also hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee. The Conspirators covertly monitored the computers of dozens of and DNC employees, implanted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code (“malware”), and stole emails and other documents from the DCCC and DNC.
More at www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-in
dictment
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:The answer to each of your questions is Fuck You, Signym. Keep that in mind as you ask an endless series of questions anonymously from inside Russia. Or you could sue me as promised and then we'd know where you are from and more about your true motives for stalling, delaying, misdirecting, lying. Who knows? You could actually be a Crazy American like Alex Jones of Infowars. He had your "Experts" on hacking appearing on his show.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Were Julian Assange and Craig Murray, both with first hand knowledge of who provided the files, ever interviewed by USA investigators from any office?
Yes or no?
Were the DNC's computers ever examined by the FBI, or ever in the BFI's possession?
Yes or no?
There was an indictment, but the evidence was provided by "Crowdstrike". And who is "Crowdstrike"? "Crowdstrike" was a private computer security firm. And who was Crowstrike contracted by?
The DNC.
No conflict of interest there, no siree!!!
*****
I'm sure there is nobody in the administration who will look into this particular miscarriage of justice because nobody is interested in defending Julian Assnge, and for sure the Rssians aren't going to present themselves in American court (altho one of the Russian firms HAS showed up to defend itself).
Therefore, this "indictment" will never be tested in court, and is extremely safe to mamake in order to gain political points. So as they say, you can indict a ham sandwich, which is pretty much what happened here.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I think YOUR answer tells me that you don't like the obvious/ factual/ truthful answers to the questions that I asked.
The answer to each of your questions is Fuck You, Signym- SLOPPYSECONDS
You think these people are guilty because the deep state tells you so? The same deep state that brags about lying, cheating, and stealing? The same deep state that told you that Trump was a Russian puppet? The same deep state that showed fake photos of sick children and dead ducks to Trump and blamed the Russians for poisoning them?
There's something missing from the indictment, and that's EVIDENCE. Apparently, you don't know what constitutes EVIDENCE, which is why you'll be fooled over and over and over again.
It's too bad that you seem incapable of applying your business acument to parsing the political world. If you invested like you behave politically, you'd be desititute. If you thought about politics like you invest, you'd be smart man.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:There is no Deep State. But there certainly are many conspiracy theorists making claims about the Deep State without backing those up with anything more than their mouths and their keyboards. You'd think that at least one of the conspiracy theorists would buy a gun and shoot somebody in the Deep State, since it is "evil" then bring the corpse forward as evidence. Never happens. All we ever get is ever more words piled upon words.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You think these people are gulty because the deep state tells you so? The same deep state that told you that Trump was a Russian puppet? The same deep state that showed fake photos of sick children and dead ducks and blamed the Russians for poisoning them?
There's something missing from the indictment, and that's EVIENCE. Apparently, you don't know what constitutes EVIDENCE, which is why you'll be fooled over and over and over again.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state_in_the_United_States
Trump and Steve Bannon, his former chief strategist, have both made allegations about a deep state which they believe is interfering with the president's agenda. In 2018, describing the deep state as an "entrenched bureaucracy", Trump accused the United States Department of Justice "of being part of the 'deep state'" in a statement advocating the prosecution of Huma Abedin. Some Trump allies and right-wing media outlets have alleged that former president Barack Obama is coordinating a deep state resistance to Trump. While the belief in a deep state is popular among Trump supporters, critics maintain that it has no basis in reality, arguing that the sources of the leaks frustrating the Trump administration lack the organizational depth of deep states in other countries, and that use of the term in the U.S. could undermine confidence in vital institutions and be used to justify suppressing dissent.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And I think your attempt to drag the discussion off into whether the deep state exists or not is yet another attempt to avoid acknowledging the questions, let alone anwering them
Were Julian Assnge and Craig Muray, both of whom claim first-hand knowldege of who supplied the files, ever interviewed by any investigator from any office of the USA?
Yes or no?
Were the DNC computers ever examined by the FBI, or ever even in the FBI's possession?
Yes or no?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
www.wired.com/story/mueller-report-donald-trump-useful-idiot/
“We’ve reached a point in the Mueller probe where there are only two scenarios left,” I wrote at the time. “Either the president is compromised by the Russian government and has been working covertly to cooperate with Vladimir Putin after Russia helped win him the 2016 election — or Trump will go down in history as the world’s most famous ‘useful idiot,’ as communists used to call those who could be co-opted to the cause without realizing it. At least the former scenario — that the president of the United States is actively working to advance the interests of our country’s foremost, long-standing, traditional foreign adversary — would make him seem smarter and wilier. The latter scenario is simply a tragic farce for everyone involved.”
Last Thursday’s report made clear which answer we face: tragic farce.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What do I care what some idiot blathers, SLOPPY?
I see you're still avoiding the questions. You must really hate the answers.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND
America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Were Julian Assnge and Craig Muray, both of whem claim first-hand knowldege of who supplied the files, ever interviewed by any investigator from any office of the USA?
I have questions too:
How would the FBI interview Julian Assnge [sic]?
Who the f*ck would trust what he says?
Who the heck is Craig Muray? nm
How would you know if the DNC computers ever examined by the FBI, or ever even in the FBI's possession?
From SIGGY'S It Reallly Makes No Sense Department:
Why would the IMF give Ecuador that much money for Assange? They could have bought him much cheaper. It's Ecuador!
More to the point, just as second says, we all recognize your deflection BS. Right after I post from Mueller's report about just how extensive the Russian Hacking was, you pop in and lay down a misdirection nothing Assange burger. More important than who stole the emails was that only 2 hours after the Access Hollywood "Pussy" tape came out, someone released the stolen emails. Why would the Evil Deep State do that and take the heat off Trump? Your logic is, as usual, Deeply Stupid.
Aren't you amazed at how extensive the Russian Hacking was? At just how many Russians were involved and at so many levels of the Russian Government? I dunno, if I went to that much trouble for someone and was that effective, I sure would want something in return, don't you think?
Cue insults in 3... 2... 1...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME