Real World Event Discussions

Redacted Mueller report

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Thursday, July 3, 2025 23:09
VIEWED: 14174
PAGE 7 of 14

Sunday, April 21, 2019 7:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND:
I've got no answer for why NOBODY was indicted for obstruction, so I'm just going to blather about irrelevant pointless shit. fify

Pretty much sums it up?

Per your usual, you changed my quote, rue/1kiki. Pretty typical of a Russian troll who knows nothing, but I know something:

‘The report did not exonerate the president’

I found the most surprising part of the report to be twofold: One, that special counsel Mueller went out of his way multiple times to dispel the notion that there is any concept called “collusion,” and that what he investigated was instead coordination and conspiracy; and two, that the report did not exonerate the president even with respect to conspiracy and coordination.

Although the report stated that there was “no evidence” of conspiracy or coordination, it left open the possibility that there may be evidence out there that the president’s associates suppressed. Some individuals invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Some information was screened even from the special counsel and his team. Several people affiliated with the Trump campaign (including Michael Flynn, George Papadopoulos, Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort) lied or provided incomplete information to the special counsel about their interactions with Russian-affiliated individuals. Still others deleted communications or used encryption that did not provide for the long-term retention of data. And with respect to redactions within the report, the ones concerning the Trump campaign’s interest in WikiLeaks’ releases of hacked material are particularly concerning.

The special counsel declined to make a recommendation on obstruction mostly because the Office of Legal Counsel has concluded, most recently in 2000, that a sitting president is immune from indictment. The report made clear that it is up to Congress to decide whether to use impeachment as a remedy. So what will matter most for the remainder of the Trump presidency is whether the House of Representatives will file articles of impeachment based on the substantial allegations that the president may have obstructed justice.

Marisa Maleck is a senior associate with King & Spalding, and a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/19/mueller-report-analysis-leg
al-experts-226662


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Sunday, April 21, 2019 7:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND:
I've got no answer for why NOBODY was indicted for obstruction, so I'm just going to blather about irrelevant pointless shit. fify

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Pretty much sums it up?

Quote:

Originally posted by GEEBERS:
Aren't you the one that always bitches and moans about how it's a forum crime to change someone's quotes?
^Pretty much sums you up.

NOPE NOT ME. So doesn't sum ME up.

Now I gotta ask - lying AGAIN, GEEBERS?

And you WILL note the fify at the end - which makes it clear I'm not trying to attribute those words to SECOND. Unlike - say - you - who routinely changes other people's posts without notification. So that makes you a hypocrite as well as a liar. Same old GEEBERS. You never get a conscience or even minor emb-bare-ass-ment about being outed as a shitstain - AGAIN.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Sunday, April 21, 2019 7:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND:
I've got no answer for why NOBODY was indicted for obstruction, so I'm just going to blather about irrelevant pointless shit. fify

Pretty much sums it up?

Per your usual, you changed my quote, rue/1kiki. Pretty typical of a Russian troll who knows nothing, but I know something:

‘The report did not exonerate the president’

I found the most surprising part of the report to be twofold: One, that special counsel Mueller went out of his way multiple times to dispel the notion that there is any concept called “collusion,” and that what he investigated was instead coordination and conspiracy; and two, that the report did not exonerate the president even with respect to conspiracy and coordination.

Although the report stated that there was “no evidence” of conspiracy or coordination, it left open the possibility that there may be evidence out there that the president’s associates suppressed. Some individuals invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Some information was screened even from the special counsel and his team. Several people affiliated with the Trump campaign (including Michael Flynn, George Papadopoulos, Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort) lied or provided incomplete information to the special counsel about their interactions with Russian-affiliated individuals. Still others deleted communications or used encryption that did not provide for the long-term retention of data. And with respect to redactions within the report, the ones concerning the Trump campaign’s interest in WikiLeaks’ releases of hacked material are particularly concerning.

The special counsel declined to make a recommendation on obstruction mostly because the Office of Legal Counsel has concluded, most recently in 2000, that a sitting president is immune from indictment. The report made clear that it is up to Congress to decide whether to use impeachment as a remedy. So what will matter most for the remainder of the Trump presidency is whether the House of Representatives will file articles of impeachment based on the substantial allegations that the president may have obstructed justice.

Marisa Maleck is a senior associate with King & Spalding, and a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/19/mueller-report-analysis-leg
al-experts-226662


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Sunday, April 21, 2019 7:36 AM

I like the 'Russian troll' meme SECOND. KEEP 'EM COMING!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, April 21, 2019 4:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND:
I've got no answer for why NOBODY was indicted for obstruction, so I'm just going to blather about irrelevant pointless shit. fify

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Pretty much sums it up?

Quote:

Originally posted by GEEBERS:
Aren't you the one that always bitches and moans about how it's a forum crime to change someone's quotes?
^Pretty much sums you up.

NOPE NOT ME. So doesn't sum ME up.

Now I gotta ask - lying AGAIN, GEEBERS?

And you WILL note the fify at the end - which makes it clear I'm not trying to attribute those words to SECOND. Unlike - say - you - who routinely changes other people's posts without notification. So that makes you a hypocrite as well as a liar. Same old GEEBERS. You never get a conscience or even minor emb-bare-ass-ment about being outed as a shitstain - AGAIN.



Another thing that happens when you change the content of people's posts and then pretend you are quoting them, is you prove that none of your goofy "preservation" attempts can be trusted. You've shown you can, and will, just change the content of what you have "quoted" to whatever you want. I hope you weren't planning to use those in court...?

Another question:
Why do we have so many whack-jobs posting here?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, April 21, 2019 5:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Another question:
Why do we have so many whack-jobs posting here?

Because we are the bitter-enders for a show orphaned or abandoned or placed for adoption by its creator Joss that's not coming back. Remember Can't Stop the Signal? Sorry about that, but somebody at Dark Horse Comics pulled the plug on the signal transmitter and sold it for spare parts to Boom Studios: https://getcomics.info/?s=firefly

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

That’s not the wailing of some left-wing rag. It’s the headline of the country’s leading conservative journal.

www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-mueller-report-should-shock-our-cons
cience
/

I’ve finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel’s Office. We’ve become accustomed to Trump making up his own facts on matters great and small, but to see the extent to which his virus infected his entire political operation is sobering. And the idea that anyone is treating this report as “win” for Trump, given the sheer extent of deceptions exposed (among other things), demonstrates that the bar for his conduct has sunk so low that anything other than outright criminality is too often brushed aside as relatively meaningless. . . .

These lies have multiple consequences. First and most obviously, they demonstrate that the president’s word simply can’t be trusted. Yes, I know that there are readers who will immediately respond that “we already knew that” or that his dishonesty is already “priced in.” But don’t forget — as recently as last year, 76 percent of Republicans still believed that Trump told the truth “all or most of the time.” I personally know many people who believe that Trump’s ability to “tell it like it is” is one of his chief appeals.

Second, the extent of the lying across the Trump team shows that Trump’s lies can’t be contained to Trump. Even honest people who believe and repeat Trump’s words or the words of key members of his team can find themselves deceiving the public. Those who resist Trump’s efforts to deceive can find themselves overruled and publicly shamed. It was to Donald Jr.’s credit that his instinct — after news of the Trump Tower meeting started to leak — was to be transparent. It is Trump’s shame that he forced his own son to put out a misleading statement instead.

Third, the lies help demonstrate why the underlying investigation was so very necessary. When our intelligence agencies are aware of Russian efforts to interfere in the election and tilt it toward Trump, they know Trump officials are in contact with Russians, and they know that Trump officials are lying about those contacts, then it makes cries of “witch hunt” sound hollow indeed . . .

I’m old enough to remember the closing days of the 1996 campaign, when the Clinton administration was already beset by an avalanche of scandals. Bob Dole looked into the cameras and asked a pointed question — “Where is the outrage?” The same question applies today, but to a different audience. The lies are simply too much to bear. No Republican should tolerate such dishonesty.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, April 21, 2019 6:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WISHIMAY:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:



Cough... Cough... 33,000 emails... Cough...



Cough... Smash your cellphones with a hammer... Cough... Cough...




I know a shitstained brain like yours cannot grasp simple facts, or read and retain ANYTHING, but you should try just this once.


I AM NOT, NOR HAVE I EVER BEEN, A HILLARY SUPPORTER.

Your argument means NOTHING to me. She is NOT PRESIDENT. Neither ONE OF THEM SHOULD BE.

The amount of stupid around here....



You're probably right that neither one of them should be.

Unfortunately for you, the alternative isn't something that sits well with you. I'm alright with it... for now, considering what the alternative was.

What are you going to do about it? It seems as though we had no choices.

And Trump is going to be re-elected unless the Democrats can find a resounding message and somebody worth voting for.

Screaming for Trump's head the next 6 years isn't going to work. And it's not going to do your lovely disposition any favors either.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, April 21, 2019 7:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

You're probably right that neither one of them should be.

Unfortunately for you, the alternative isn't something that sits well with you. I'm alright with it... for now, considering what the alternative was.

What are you going to do about it? It seems as though we had no choices.

And Trump is going to be re-elected unless the Democrats can find a resounding message and somebody worth voting for.

Screaming for Trump's head the next 6 years isn't going to work. And it's not going to do your lovely disposition any favors either.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

Once the choice was between Lincoln and Douglas. Do you remember how that ended? Being reasonable with people will not get the country back together again, as Lincoln, with all his skills at persuasion, sorrowfully learned. First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/lincoln1.asp

6ix, you might want to take note that Lincoln's political opponents saw him as the most immoral, treacherous liar that ever held the office. They couldn't prove it, but they didn't care. They said it anyway. In the case of Trump, he proved it. See the redacted Mueller report.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

RUE
Sunday, April 21, 2019 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Quote:

Originally posted by SECOND:
I've got no answer for why NOBODY was indicted for obstruction, so I'm just going to blather about irrelevant pointless shit. fify

Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
Pretty much sums it up?

Quote:

Originally posted by GEEBERS:
Aren't you the one that always bitches and moans about how it's a forum crime to change someone's quotes?
^Pretty much sums you up.

NOPE NOT ME. So doesn't sum ME up.

Now I gotta ask - lying AGAIN, GEEBERS?

And you WILL note the fify at the end - which makes it clear I'm not trying to attribute those words to SECOND. Unlike - say - you - who routinely changes other people's posts without notification. So that makes you a hypocrite as well as a liar. Same old GEEBERS. You never get a conscience or even minor emb-bare-ass-ment about being outed as a shitstain - AGAIN.



Another thing that happens when you change the content of people's posts and then pretend you are quoting them, is you prove that none of your goofy "preservation" attempts can be trusted. You've shown you can, and will, just change the content of what you have "quoted" to whatever you want. I hope you weren't planning to use those in court...?

Another question:
Why do we have so many whack-jobs posting here?

But I didn't 'pretend' I was quoting them - DOOD - I specifically notified I had changed the content. In fact, the whole system depends on people's honor, not something YOU'D know anything about. It depends on people not going back and post-editing. It depends on people not changing quotes WITHOUT NOTIFICATION. There's zero tracking of edits anywhere. So what? As Jack noted, there's an independent scan of this site from 2018, well recent enough to be within the allowable time frame. All I'm doing is showing it's ongoing.

So, we've gotten another lie - that I 'pretend' to quote people - from GEEBERS, the human-form shitstain.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, April 22, 2019 12:14 AM

GSTRING is stupider than THUGR. This was explained to THUGR and he seemed to get it; GSTRING not so much.

GSTRING, there is a tradition here called "fixed it for you" where you quote someone's post but make a few changes in it to demonstrate the logical contradiction/ hypocrisy in someone's post. It started with MIKE (I don't recall his screen name, do you RUE? He lived in Texas and his dad- an ex-military man - used to beat him on the soles of his feet where the bruises wouldn't show) who started that. He would follow it with "Fixed it for you". My god, what a smart man.

ETA (for those of you who don't know that means "edited to add") Oh yes, his screen name was KWICKO.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

"The messy American environment, where most people don't agree, is perfect for people like me. I CAN DO AS I PLEASE." - SECOND

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876 .

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME