Why Nazis Are Just Copies of Democrats
POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Saturday, August 12, 2023 19:00
VIEWED: 14609
PAGE 5 of 12
Quote:Speak for yourself, Nazi boy. I know plenty.
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
You and me... at the end of the day we don't know shit about shit.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:Speak for yourself, Nazi boy. I know plenty.
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
You and me... at the end of the day we don't know shit about shit.
You're just a whiny little cunt and a troll.
The fact that you keep calling me a Nazi shows how little you know about the world and how insulting your very existence is to people who have suffered real oppression at the hands of true evil.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Supporting Nazis speaks volumes about the mentality of people on the far right.
SGG
Hey SGG.
I consider you one of the rational people on this board.
I would like you to REALLY read these two threads that are being heavily posted on and think for yourself here, rather than jumping on board the Wishy/Reaverfan hate train.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Yeah, do that. Watch them consistently defend Nazi terrorists.
Originally posted by 6stringJoker:
Hey SGG.
I consider you one of the rational people on this board.
I would like you to REALLY read these two threads that are being heavily posted on and think for yourself here, rather than jumping on board the Wishy/Reaverfan hate train.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.
Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it. - WISHY
Ok, so can we generalize that to: It's bad if ANYONE drives a car into a group pf people, whether they are Nazis, radical jihadists, militant Hindus, or anyone else? If fact, can we make that an even MORE general statement, that killing or injuring anyone for a political cause is bad???
Yup, I think we can.
-----------
By the way, GSTRING, I predicted your response PERFECTLY
* ... and then you'll say I'm "too wordy". And then you will - as always- refuse to address the pertinent points, and respond with even more lies and even more bullshit personal attacks.*
And voila! Here it is http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=61835&mid=1
035581#1035581
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:All 5 points are proof they are Liberals.
Originally posted by reaverfan:Quote:Why are Nazis always so poorly educated, and get everything wrong? Illiterate AND terrorists. Wow.
Originally posted by second:Quote:Your facts are wrong, Signym. Your conclusion is wrong.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Hey, all you liberals, I think you're missing the point.
Why did we destroy Afghanistan? Partly it was because they refused to turn over their guest (ObL) to the USA - although they WOULD have turned him over to the ICC, that wasn't good enough for us. Plus, the Taliban was in charge, and they treated females worse than donkeys. We needed to do something about that. When we were done, Afgahnistan was in far worse shape than when we started, and not only was the Taliban still in control of much of the countryside, ISIS reared its ugly head.
Afghanistan could not turn over Osama bin Laden because he was in Pakistan and Bush could not leave Afghanistan until he found bin Laden is the place he was not. Everything wrong with that war follows from Bush being wrong about why he continued to fight it. Bush was doomed to fail because his ambitions, once he could not find bid Laden, grew too big and too vague. Bush didn't send enough troops to turn all the Afghan men into either well behaved gentlemen or corpses.Quote:Rumsfeld estimated the war would be cheap. Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki was fired when he testified that was flat wrong.
Why did we destroy Iraq? Well, "Saddam had WMD" and posed a major security risk to ... the USA, I guess ... Plus yanno he was a terrible dictator. So it was worth killing somewhere between 200,000- 1,000,000 civilians and leaving the nation partially occupied by ISIS and riven with ethnic hatred just to depose a dictator and get rid of phantom WMD.
www.cnn.com/2013/03/20/opinion/mills-truth-teller-iraq/index.html
V.P. Cheney estimated that Halliburton could steal Iraq oil.
Bush estimated that he would be hailed as the Great Liberator of Iraq.
Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush are delusional Republicans. It was no surprise that their war was poorly planned, executed at enormous cost, and failed to live up to their delusions.
www.usnews.com/news/blogs/press-past/2013/03/20/the-underestimated-cos
ts-and-price-tag-of-the-iraq-warQuote:Having ruled for merely 42 years, Muammar Gaddafi botched the transfer of power to his son. After decades of compromises with Gaddafi, the many tribal factions that he had kept under control had lost patience with Gaddafi's endless promises. The tribes wanted all control for themselves, sharing nothing with any other tribe. They could not agree on how to share Libya, but they could agree on one thing: to kill Gaddafi.
Why did we destroy Libya? Well, Qaddafi was a terrible dictator, and despite the fact that the standard of living in Libya was VASTLY superior to any other nation in Africa, Qaddafi had to "massacre his own people" in order to stay in power, which somehow required not only a NATO no-fly zone but eventual bombing of the entire civilian space and arming radicalized jihadists to topple the leader. But we managed to take down Qaddafi and the price was only about 10,000 dead, a nation crawling with jihadist terrorists, and a catastrophic drop in living standards.
Signym, you didn't get enough facts right about these three countries. No surprise that your three explanations are wrong. But I have to complement your style. You show high confidence in yourself and you are very articulate.
Nazis - check.
poorly educated - check.
get everything wrong - check.
Illiterate - check.
terrorists - check.
Maybe you accidentally swerved into truth and fact, but you still managed it this time.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Then why is there not more universal outrage?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:Quote:Ok, so can we generalize that to: It's bad if ANYONE drives a car into a group pf people, whether they are Nazis, radical jihadists, militant Hindus, or anyone else? If fact, can we make that an even MORE general statement, that killing or injuring anyone for a political cause is bad???
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.
Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it. - WISHY
Yup, I think we can.
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:I am not sure I have seen your outrage over the doctors prescribing these psychotropic drugs to this guy or others. When these doctors are held responsible and thrown in prison for these deaths then we'll have started to make progress.
Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.
Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.
https://breggin.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I am sorry that I had that linky address incorrect. Fixed it now.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:I am not sure I have seen your outrage over the doctors prescribing these psychotropic drugs to this guy or others. When these doctors are held responsible and thrown in prison for these deaths then we'll have started to make progress.
Originally posted by Wishimay:
This whole thread is just one big *facepalm.
Morons fighting over who wants to kill who, which party does or said what 150 years ago. Or thirty years ago. Like it fucking matters right here and now. Like ANYTHING would justify ANYONE driving a car into a group of ANY people.
Nazi's are bad, M'kay. If you don't get THAT at least, the hell with you.
As usual, this planet would be a whole lot better without most humans on it.
https://breggin.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I also neglected to mention the Anti-Semitic actions of Democraps such as FDR when he sent back to Europe Jewish refugees from Nazis, aboard SS St Louis.
At least 250 of them died as a result.
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005267
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27373131
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-government-turned-away-thousa
nds-jewish-refugees-fearing-they-were-nazi-spies-180957324/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I also neglected to mention the Anti-Semitic actions of Democraps such as FDR when he sent back to Europe Jewish refugees from Nazis, aboard SS St Louis.
At least 250 of them died as a result.
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005267
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27373131
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/us-government-turned-away-thousa
nds-jewish-refugees-fearing-they-were-nazi-spies-180957324/
The St. Louis is a tragic story, but in 1939 FDR's administration could not have possibly foreseen or even imagined the scope of the mass exterminations that would take place years later. Eisenhower himself was on hand in 1945 when American troops stumbled upon Ohrdruf and Birkenau death camps and he couldn't believe or comprehend what he saw there.
I remember FDR and his Democrats as the Party that supported Churchill during England's darkest days when they alone stood against Hitler. The Republicans were isolationists. They argued against Lend/Lease and wanted no part of the fight against Germany.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME