Countdown To Criminal Charges Against DEEP STATE Traitors

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Thursday, January 18, 2024 23:56
VIEWED: 6320
PAGE 1 of 1

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, December 27, 2019 3:45 AM

Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

SECOND

Friday, December 27, 2019 6:23 PM

Your traitor has already been caught and his name is Aldrich Ames. He worked for the Russians.
It is not treason to say that Trump is a lying sack of fat.
www.cia.gov/news-information/blog/2019/to-catch-a-spy-25th-anniversary
-of-the-aldrich-ames-arrest.html
www.britannica.com/biography/Aldrich-Ames

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Friday, December 27, 2019 7:40 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!

JONGSSTRAW

Friday, December 27, 2019 8:40 PM

Quote:
When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

They've had three years with this. Nothing's gonna happen. Justice Dept. ONLY goes after Republicans.

Quote:
Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

Anybody turn State's Evidence during all the Obama scandal hearings? No, Dems always close ranks and say nothing.

Quote:
It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

Sure they will ….. not!

SIGNYM

Friday, December 27, 2019 10:33 PM

Supposedly the former head ofthe No Such Agency, Adm Michael Rogers, is cooperating with Durham.

Quote:
Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout

December 20, 2019 6:32 PM

Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)

Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.

Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.

The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,” as Brennan testified in May 2017.

The reason why the NSA only had "moderate confidence" in the report (which according to whistleblower analysis means "no confidence at all" in spook-speak) was because they [the NSA] had intercepted NO packets of DNC files heading across the internet to Julian Assange. I have made this point many times, and this point has been made many times by former high-level employees and whistleblowers, but not on the M$M. If you people would bother to listen to something other than Rachel Madcow bloviating about the latest propaganda, you might have known this too.

Quote:
Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.

According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.

... under Obama ...

Quote:
The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.

And they can do this because they have a big giant database of illegally-obtained communication.

Quote:
After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,

According to Adm Rogers, he cut off CIA and FBI access to this database, which was fostering more surveillance and prosecution abuses.

Quote:
the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.

Under Obama

Quote:
After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY

SIGNYM

Friday, December 27, 2019 10:50 PM

Now, what does this all mean?

I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.

In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY

SIGNYM

Friday, December 27, 2019 11:03 PM

So Barr himself isn't going to go full bore against the entire Washington swamp. I mean, if he pursued Debbie Washerwoman Shit and her "IT guy" who had access to many congressional emails (and who has since fled back to Pakistan), and Epstein and everyone associated with him, and pursued everyone who laundered money from Ukraine and elsewhere, and everyone who represented a foreign government (including Israel) without declaring it, and everyone who had a "foundation" to launder foreign donations, and everyone who disposed of evidence (looking at YOU, Hillary), and everyone who used illegally-obtained evidence or lied to the FISA court or who lied to Congress (looking at YOU, Mr. Brennan!) or ordered murders or embezzled or leaked classified information or subverted the democratic process ... why, there wouldn't be anyone left but maybe a dozen people! The FIB, CYA, NoSuchAgency, Stat Dept, DuD, would be depopulated of its top three tiers, at least! Entire "think tanks" would be gone. Congress would be an series of empty halls and empty offices, except maybe a half-dozen people (and I'm being generous).

Wow, what a picture!

So, yeah ... Barr is going to be selective about who he prosecutes. The question is, is he going to go after top names like Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Obama? Or is is going to pick easier targets?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, December 28, 2019 3:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Your traitor has already been caught and blah blah blah

Troll #1 has posted that he has no clue.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, December 28, 2019 3:29 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

Ad also, did I forget anybody special?
I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!

Troll #2 has posted that he still has no clue.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, December 28, 2019 3:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?

I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.

In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.

This prediction might be that since Durham was not involved in Epstein, then that means Durham will not charge anybody in his Investigation. Or maybe I got that wrong.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, December 28, 2019 3:32 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Supposedly the former head ofthe No Such Agency, Adm Michael Rogers, is cooperating with Durham.

Quote:
Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout

December 20, 2019 6:32 PM

Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)

Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.

Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.

The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,” as Brennan testified in May 2017.
The reason why the NSA only had "moderate confidence" in the report (which according to whistleblower analysis means "no confidence at all" in spook-speak) was because they [the NSA] had intercepted NO packets of DNC files heading across the internet to Julian Assange. I have made this point many times, and this point has been made many times by former high-level employees and whistleblowers, but not on the M$M. If you people would bother to listen to something other than Rachel Madcow bloviating about the latest propaganda, you might have known this too.

Quote:
Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.

According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.
... under Obama ...
Quote:
The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.
And they can do this because they have a big giant database of illegally-obtained communication.
Quote:
After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,
According to Adm Rogers, he cut off CIA and FBI access to this database, which was fostering more surveillance and prosecution abuses.

Quote:
the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.
Under Obama

Quote:
After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

Yes, I heard this some time ago.

SIGNYM

Saturday, December 28, 2019 4:10 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?

I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.

In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.

JSF: This prediction might be that since Durham was not involved in Epstein, then that means Durham will not charge anybody in his Investigation. Or maybe I got that wrong.

Durham isn't investigating Epstein, but (I don't know if you recall) Trump made a strong connection between the deep state and pedophilia, and many of his supporters said that he was going to wrap up "the swamp" on pedophilia charges.

I personally think that Epstein WAS some sort of asset, and his pedo-blackmail oppression was very useful for some of the deeper parts of the deep state.

As head of DOJ, Barr has the authority to order the FBI to pursue Epstein's activities and death further. So far it looks like it's somewhere between "back burner" and "coverup"

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

I'd nuke a BILLION PEOPLE if it would save the other 7 billion from living under Putin. Hell, I might go all the way to the last 100 people on Earth to keep this planet from being under fascist rule.- WISHIMAY

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, January 6, 2020 2:32 AM

On the similar topic of DEEP STATE, it sounds like The REINS Act could rein in much of the Deep State Rules and Regulations.

https://ballotpedia.org/REINS_Act

For those interested in solutions to the problem. At least, this part of the problem.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, January 16, 2020 3:52 AM

Rumor is the Senate will hold an Impeachment Trial, and call witnesses. Since the Fake Impeachments reference the Ukraine Quid Pro Quo Deal with Hunter and Joe Biden, they could be called and could get the first invitations to prison.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:03 AM

Man. I don't believe anything I hear about anything anymore.

We'll see what happens.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:49 AM

Trump said he has the most transparent presidency ever. I think it's true. And now people are getting to see how sausage is made.

Except for the most pathological TDSers, what I *HOPE* is that people are getting a good, unvarnished look at how government runs. And that they're realizing how everyone is at the trough snorking up goodies and pursuing piggy agendas, and nobody is actually representing them, reason, equity, basic honesty ...

I *HOPE* that even if there's not a moment of sudden realization, there comes a slow erosion of faith in the government when it says 'trust us'.

THG

Thursday, January 16, 2020 4:51 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

CAPTAINCRUNCH

Thursday, January 16, 2020 8:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Trump said he has the most transparent presidency ever. I think it's true.

*snort* You owe me a keyboard, Kookie!

You mean like his lies are so transparent?

You mean not complying with Congressional Oversight's request for documents is being transparent?

You mean when they silence witness testimony through intimidation and by blocking them from appearing to testify is being transparent?

Or do you suggest that the increase in FOIA requests under Trump is a sign of openness?
http://foiaproject.org/2018/01/16/lawsuits-trump-first-year/

Perhaps, for you Trump's obscuring the truth with obvious lies and see through cover-ups is what you mean by transparency? If so, then you are also being equally transparent.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, January 29, 2020 6:21 AM

It's been 33 days since this thread was finally started.

Seems like things are still in the works.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, February 6, 2020 6:14 AM

Now that the Fake Impeachment is over with, this countdown can get cookin'.

It's been 41 days since this thread was started.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, February 6, 2020 9:47 AM

I wouldn't hold your breath buddy.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, March 5, 2020 5:48 AM

https://www.judicialwatch.org/in-the-news/judge-orders-hillary-clinton
-deposition-in-judicial-watch-lawsuit/

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Wednesday, July 1, 2020 1:15 AM

Seems things are still in the works on this front.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, October 3, 2020 1:00 AM

Top Level Obamination FBI Lawyer pleads Guilty.

https://infoglitz.com/durham-investigation-former-fbi-lawyer-pleads-gu
ilty-to-first-criminal-case-arising-from-review/

This is the thread I was looking for when that came out.

REAVERFAN

Saturday, October 3, 2020 1:02 AM

So, more nothing.

REAVERFAN

Saturday, October 10, 2020 12:35 AM

Barr Tried to Prove a Deep State Plot Against Trump. He Failed.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/10/william-barr-trump-russia-durh
am-investigation-deep-state-mueller-fbi.html

Axios confirms that Barr has been breaking the news to top Republicans that Durham won’t have anything before the election. “Barr is communicating that Durham is taking his investigation extremely seriously and is focused on winning prosecutions,” the story notes.

This is certainly one explanation. Another, more plausible explanation is that Durham has not been able to find any crimes because they don’t exist.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, October 15, 2020 1:31 AM

TRUMP’S “UNMASKING” PROBE OF OBAMA AND BIDEN FOUND A WHOLE LOT OF NOTHING
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/trump-unmasking-probe-obama-bi
den-found-nothing

In May, as the right made angry noises about what they said was the improper “unmasking” of Trumpworld figures by Barack Obama and his administration, William Barr authorized United States Attorney John Bash to probe the matter. “The Attorney General determined that certain aspects of unmasking needed to be reviewed,” Justice Department spokesperson Kerri Kupec told Fox News’s Sean Hannity at the time. “We know that unmasking inherently isn’t wrong, but...can be problematic.” The inquiry, a spinoff of John Durham’s review of the origins of the Russia investigation, appeared to be yet another effort by Barr to legitimize Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories—and to target Joe Biden and the Democrats in the run-up to the 2020 election.

But when Bash, the now-former U.S. Attorney from West Texas, concluded his investigation recently, he came up so empty-handed Barr didn’t even announce it had ended. Indeed, Bash found no wrongdoing on the part of Obama, Biden, or others in their administration and finished his inquiry without pressing any charges, the Washington Post reported Tuesday. He left the DOJ last week, but neither he nor Barr discussed the results of his probe.

That’s not necessarily unusual—as the Post points out, the DOJ doesn’t typically make announcements about probes that don’t result in charges. But this probe wasn’t exactly typical: The election year inquiry sprung from a Trump conspiracy that the Obama administration had spied on his campaign, and has helped form the basis of political attacks on Biden from the president and his allies. Trump said last week that Obama and Biden should be arrested for their supposed attempts to subvert him, and his cronies have used the ginned-up scandal in jabs at the Democrat as recently as this month. “If you’re more worried about [Trump] unmasking on a balcony with no one close to him than you were by the Obama/Biden administration unmasking (aka illegally spying on) their political opponents, my diagnosis is you have [Trump Derangement Syndrome],” Rand Paul tweeted October 6, referring to the president’s bizarre appearance on the White House balcony upon returning to the White House after his COVID hospitalization. “My prescription is to put down your phone.”

That Barr has not released the results of the Bash probe that would torpedo such attacks shows that he continues to serve the president’s interests, even if his fishing expedition didn’t turn up any wrongdoing. Still, that’s unlikely to satisfy Trump, who has been frustrated with the Attorney General since he warned that Durham’s probe into the origins of the Russia investigation would not be completed by Election Day—because what good would the inquiry be if it didn’t turn up an October surprise? “Bill Barr is going to go down as either the greatest Attorney General in the history of the country,” Trump told Fox Business last week, “or he’s going to go down as, you know, a very sad situation.” The fact that Barr can’t seem to come up with actual dirt isn’t stopping Trump from flinging wild, desperate allegations that “THE BIGGEST OF ALL POLITICAL SCANDALS” in history had been committed against him. “BIDEN SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO RUN,” Trump tweeted last week. “GOT CAUGHT!!!”
---

You can't find anything more stupid than trumptard stupid.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:46 AM

HEY! They were not supposed to find that Sex Tape Video I left on my laptop I dropped off!

https://www.inquisitr.com/6332043/hunter-biden-sex-tape-allegations-bl
asted/

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/senate-panel-investigating-hunter-
biden-emails-showing-introduction-between-joe-biden-burisma-adviser/

REAVERFAN

Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:51 AM

Facebook and Twitter are choking the spread of a controversial New York Post story about Hunter Biden after questions arise about its veracity and a possible disinformation campaign
https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hunter-biden-new-york-post-st
ory-fact-checkers-2020-10

Whenever a fake story comes out, you can always count on the Russian troll to spew their bullshit, then get their ass handed to them by me, with facts and logic.

I have done so, yet again.

You always have, and always will lose to me.

Russian troll destroyed.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, October 15, 2020 5:31 AM

Yeah. We know that Facebook and Twitter hate America and have taken on the role of publisher and censor patriots.

Trump will remove their shield in his 2nd term and they'll either be shut down from all the lawsuits or they're going to have to stop censoring any material that isn't straight up snuff and/or child porn.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

1KIKI

Thursday, October 15, 2020 8:48 AM

Honestly, I was hoping Durham would wrap up with something substantial before the election, because afterward - if Biden wins - he might get shut down.

I want it ALL to be brought to light. Both sides, any person involved, all the facts.

SIGNYM

Thursday, October 15, 2020 8:54 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by reaverfan:

Facebook and Twitter are choking the spread of a controversial New York Post story about Hunter Biden after questions arise about its veracity and a possible disinformation campaign
https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hunter-biden-new-york-post-st
ory-fact-checkers-2020-10

Whenever a fake story comes out, you can always count on the Russian troll to spew their bullshit, then get their ass handed to them by me, with facts and logic.

I have done so, yet again.

You always have, and always will lose to me.

Russian troll destroyed.

Too bad they didn't shut down the RUSSIA!RUSSIA! disinfo campaign, the "quid pro quo" disinfo campaign, and the other disinfo campaigns.

Not that they're biased, or anything.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

#WEARAMASK

6IXSTRINGJACK

Thursday, October 15, 2020 10:51 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Honestly, I was hoping Durham would wrap up with something substantial before the election, because afterward - if Biden wins - he might get shut down.

I want it ALL to be brought to light. Both sides, any person involved, all the facts.

Even in the alternate timeline where Trump doesn't get reelected, he put in 3 supreme court justices, and Roberts being the liberal wolf in sheep clothing isn't going to matter anymore.

2nd Amendment rights fully protected across the board now, and Facebook and Twitter are going to get what's coming to them.

Dorsey should probably just keep hiding out in whatever 3rd world shithole that he's slacking in right now and Zuckerborg ought to go to his cryosleep pod and chill for 50 or so years before they get enough Anti-Constitutionalist Leftists in SCOTUS again for him to continue with his plans.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

SIGNYM

Thursday, October 15, 2020 1:27 PM

Quote:
Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.

The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:

Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.

pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020

Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.

Wow, hiding behind fake Russian interference in order to interfere with the election.

Quote:
Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.

Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:

Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020

Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.

The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.

The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.

Oh, puhleez! Can't they come up with a better excuse than that?

Quote:
News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.

"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."

The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

1KIKI

Thursday, October 15, 2020 1:47 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, October 16, 2020 12:34 AM

I understand that many Libtards do not care about the Biden Crime Family, and their structure to give half of their corrupt and treasonous income back to Joe, thus laundering his income for him. Plus, auctioning off his bribes and Government access is not a problem in Libtard books.

https://realnse.com/2020/10/15/giuliani-reveals-new-email-showing-hunt
er-biden-giving-half-of-foreign-salary-to-joe-biden/

His sale of Government access is near to rival The Clinton Crime Family Foundation.

REAVERFAN

Friday, October 16, 2020 12:37 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I understand that many Libtards do not care about the Biden Crime Family, and their structure to give half of their corrupt and treasonous income back to Joe, thus laundering his income for him. Plus, auctioning off his bribes and access is not a problem in Libtard books.

https://realnse.com/2020/10/15/giuliani-reveals-new-email-showing-hunt
er-biden-giving-half-of-foreign-salary-to-joe-biden/

His sale of access is near to rival The Clinton Crime Family Foundation.

We don't care about conspiracy theories and fake news.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, October 16, 2020 3:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.

The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:

Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.

pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020

Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.
Wow, hiding behind fake Russian interference in order to interfere with the election.

Quote:
Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.

Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:

Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020

Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.

The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.

The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.
Oh, puhleez! Can't they come up with a better excuse than that?

Quote:
News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.

"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."

The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter Sa

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

REAVERFAN

Friday, October 16, 2020 9:15 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, October 22, 2020 11:08 PM

I don't know where from, but it sounds like everybody now knows that Sloppy Joe has admtted to being the central architect of all of the Biden corruption, Biden bribery, Biden money siphoning that he has been denying lately.

How timely.

REAVERFAN

Thursday, October 22, 2020 11:23 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I don't know where from, but it sounds like everybody now knows that Sloppy Joe has admtted to being the central architect of all of the Biden corruption, Biden bribery, Biden money siphoning that he has been denying lately.

How timely.

I'll tell you where from. You pulled that straight out of your Russian troll ass.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, October 23, 2020 12:16 AM

This is kinda funny.

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/10/22/npr-managing-edito
r-wed-report-hunters-e-mails-dont-want-bother-something/

JAYNEZTOWN

Wednesday, October 19, 2022 9:38 PM

John Brennan: I Want DOJ To Pursue Criminal Investigation Into Trump For An "Accountability Standpoint"

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2022/10/07/john_brennan_i_want
_doj_to_pursue_criminal_investigation_into_trump_for_an_accountability_standpoint.html

JAYNEZTOWN

Thursday, January 4, 2024 6:09 PM

Conspiracy talk about a 'Cabal' the New World Order, "parallel state", the Great Reset, illiberal democracy, a secret gathering of guys dressed in pagan robes in a Smoke-filled room, Propaganda Due was a Masonic lodge, even in Monarchy a Power behind the throne

Republicans slam DOJ for dropping campaign finance charges against major Democratic donor Sam Bankman-Fried

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12913961/SBF-campaign-finance
-donations-coverup.html

Trump alleged a clandestine network of members of the federal government (especially within the FBI and CIA), working in conjunction with high-level financial and industrial entities and leaders, to exercise power alongside or within the elected United States government

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/05/21/trump-vs-the-deep-state

JAYNEZTOWN

Thursday, January 18, 2024 11:56 PM

Cheryl Hines says she’d embrace being RFK Jr’s first lady: ‘Let’s do it’

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/4416071-cheryl-hines-rfk-jr-firs
t-lady-2024/