' The truth - We will go extinct, very soon.'
POSTED BY: reaverfan
UPDATED: Sunday, May 18, 2025 05:23
VIEWED: 65274
PAGE 25 of 68
I honestly don't care what people mouth. The fact is that so-called environmentalists don't walk their talk. NO ONE is going to address global petroleum /petrochemicals /plastics /agrochemicals /fishing /mining /lumbering /steel /agriculture ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
I honestly don't care what people mouth. The fact is that so-called environmentalists don't walk their talk.
Quote:Show me Obama's greenhouse gas reductions. Or Norway's. Find me Germany's.
Originally posted by reaverfan:
Oh, really?
Better yet, show me the overwhelming effect of western liberal influence in this list of greenhouse gas reduction superstars:
Rank Country Greenhouse Gas Emission Changes Since 1990
1 Ivory Coast -78%
2 Suriname -75%
3 Iceland -75%
4 Moldova -70%
5 Guyana -63%
6 Papua New Guinea -62%
7 Georgia -62%
8 Latvia -59%
9 Kyrgyzstan -59%
10 Estonia -58%
https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-the-greatest-decrea
ses-in-greenhouse-emissions-over-the-last-26-years.html
Quote:
btw, of the two coalition ruling parties in Italy, Five Star is on a rapid decline while The League is rising quickly.
Quote:You mean I can't REPORT the results of ITALIAN POLLS without being considered a supporter? Did being corrected on a fact tweak you so much you had to get personal?
Your fascist heroes are going strong.
You have not a shred of honesty, do you?
I'm far more honest than you'll ever be, troll.
Now, how come we didn't get anywhere under Obama? Hmm?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Since you failed to refute my post or even address it, it still stands:
I honestly don't care what people mouth. The fact is that so-called environmentalists don't walk their talk. NO ONE is going to address global petroleum /petrochemicals /plastics /agrochemicals /fishing /mining /lumbering /steel /agriculture ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You just spewed reichwing pablum, troll.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I hope that in the future, billions of years from now, another sentient species will arise, figure out how we destroyed ourselves, and not make the same mistakes.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Since you failed to refute my post or even address it, it still stands:
I honestly don't care what people mouth. The fact is that so-called environmentalists don't walk their talk. NO ONE is going to address global petroleum /petrochemicals /plastics /agrochemicals /fishing /mining /lumbering /steel /agriculture ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Show me Obama's greenhouse gas reductions.
You did already - that chart you posted was conclusive, thanks.
Now show us Trump's.
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Better yet, show me the overwhelming effect of western liberal influence in this list of greenhouse gas reduction superstars..."
Did you read about these at all, or just grab some quick stats? Did you notice how many had been influenced (helped) by the United Nations, or "western liberal influences?"
"Africa has been able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by an astounding 78% by working with the United Nations Environment Program." I would bet if you looked further you might find that is pretty common for these small nations. I would bet as well, that since these are such small nations with small industrial footprint, that it doesn't take much to reduce their GH output. Yet another example where citing percentages can be misleading.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"You did already - that chart you posted was conclusive, thanks."
Yes, that chart conclusively showed that dubya, by crashing the US economy, achieved significant greenhouse gas reductions starting in 2007.
Unless you're telling me that Obama, before he was even sworn in, somehow magically reduced greenhouse gas emissions ... that cause doesn't happen before effect. Is that what you're saying?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
"You did already - that chart you posted was conclusive, thanks."
Yes, that chart conclusively showed that dubya, by crashing the US economy, achieved significant greenhouse gas reductions starting in 2007.
Unless you're telling me that Obama, before he was even sworn in, somehow magically reduced greenhouse gas emissions ... that cause doesn't happen before effect. Is that what you're saying?
One of your charts (the other is the same):
From 2009 through 2016, CO below 7,000 MMT, which was the trailing decade, '98 - '08. Not only reducing GHE but reversing the prevailing, worsening direction left to his admin.
Unless you're telling me that Dubya was president from 2009 - 2016?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Now show me the chart for China.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME