Real World Event Discussions

Let's Try to Offend Kwicko!

POSTED BY: Kwicko
UPDATED: Sunday, June 24, 2012 22:49
VIEWED: 12157
PAGE 9 of 12

ANTHONYT

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:55 AM

Quote:
I spend some of my time correcting Rappy's many, many, many errors of fact, misstatements, disinformation, and outright lies, so that others won't accept what he says as fact without at least thinking it through.

Hello,

This is more substantive than mere amusement.

--Anthony

Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

ANTHONYT

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:58 AM

Quote:
Ah, but you've posted before that you yourself will attack me for no other reason than that I rub you the wrong way.

Are you saying it's okay when you do it, but not when others do it?

Hello,

One could argue (and I shall) that 'offense' and being 'rubbed the wrong way' are two points on the same continuum.

--Anthony

Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

KWICKO

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:24 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ANTHONYT:
Quote:
Ah, but you've posted before that you yourself will attack me for no other reason than that I rub you the wrong way.

Are you saying it's okay when you do it, but not when others do it?

Hello,

One could argue (and I shall) that 'offense' and being 'rubbed the wrong way' are two points on the same continuum.

--Anthony

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

As one could argue that being intrigued and being amazed are points on the same line as well.

Can a thing annoy me without rising to the level of offending me or appalling me? Can I find a thing unpleasant without finding it torturous?

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I've not watched the video either, or am incapable of intellectually dealing with the substance of this thread, so I'll instead act like a juvenile and claim victory..." - Rappy

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:46 AM

You all do realize, of course, that by giving Kwick over 80 posts in the RWED, much more posts than the Average RWED lifespan is, especially on a meaningless thread, that everyone here, male and female, has basically licked his balls either literally or metaphorically speaking.... (And that he's no doubt masturbated countless times from the attention he doesn't ever get otherwise in real life)

Right?

BTW.....

Your balls are too fucking salty Kwick...

You need to watch your Sodium intake....

I feel like I'm Sea-Biscuit and you're begging to lick my balls without kicking you in the face....

Nobody likes a salty pair of balls dude.....

And seriously man... Shave that shit... It's like living through Harry and the Hendersons in 3D!

I already flossed this morning, I don't need your Slim Jim approved pubes flossing my teeth.

If I'm jonsing for salt, I'll eat that bag of flaming hot Cheetos that's been tempting me for the last 2 hours.

No need to post homophobic posts against this Kwick. Nobody here even questions your sexuality brother

And if you think for a second I would worry about people offending my sexuality after this post.......

Just know that I'm happy wearing my Pink cardigan with 21" muscles on my biceps that are 3" bigger than the waist measurements of my most "dainty" gf back in HS...

Do your best Kwick...

Don't be mad when spend 2 hours with him and I make your Dad worship what's in my pants and I have him eating cock on the subway though

He'll be singing Elton John's "Don't let the sun go down on me" at the local glory hole in no time...

1KIKI

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

Yup. This one's an eye-opener:

http://www.amazon.com/Full-Body-Burden-Growing-Nuclear/dp/030795563X

Listened to an interview with the author yesterday, and it was pretty freaking chilling.

And yet, it wasn't the military that gave us Three Mile Island, or Chernobyl, or Fukushima. And Fukushima isn't even done yet. It's still humming away, reactor no 2 is spiking hydrogen. And we are one collapsed spent fuel pool away from having an uncontrolled open-air multi-ton reactor in spent fuel pool 4.

Here in California the San Onofre nuclear power plant, shut down after a nearly 2/3 billion overhaul resulted in tube wear that would normally take decades to occur, didn't happen b/c of some evil military operation. It happened b/c somebody wanted to make more money, changed essential designs, and passed them off as 'essentially identical' replacements.

This wasn't the military, it was business.

"Greg Werner, who headed the federal team, says a Mitsubishi computer analysis vastly misjudged how water and steam would flow in the reactors. Also, changes intended to improve manufacturing were never thoroughly reviewed in the context of the generator design ... The disclosure will rivet new attention on a series of alterations to the equipment design, including the decision to add 400 tubes to each generator and installing V-shaped supports that were intended to minimize tube wear and vibration. According to company documents, each of the replacement generators weighed nearly 24 tons more than the original generators.

The generators were designed to meet a federal test to qualify as "in-kind," or essentially identical, replacements for the original generators, which would allow them to be installed without prior approval from federal regulators. Inside the guts of the machinery, the original steam generators and the replacements "look substantially different," Collins says."

Has the military spilled as much oil in its entire existence as the single Macando blow-out?

Does the military pollute the ocean as severely as plastics, or worse, micro-plastics?

Did the military dump 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the Hudson River, or anywhere for that matter, the way GE did in its manufacture of capacitors? And that btw is a mere 1/1,000 of the total PCB production in the US, estimated at 1.4 billion pounds, roughly 1/4 of it dumped in waterways and dumps from Waukegan Harbor, Illinois to Stringfellow acid pit in California.

Do either of you have ANY data to back up your claims about the military?

BIGDAMNNOBODY

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ANTHONYT:
One could argue (and I shall) that 'offense' and being 'rubbed the wrong way' are two points on the same continuum.

Oh well, I gave it my best shot. That Kwicko is a slippery one though.;)

ANTHONYT

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:19 AM

Quote:
Can I find a thing unpleasant without finding it torturous?

Hello,

Mr. Raptor may not be the best basis for making such a determination.

--Anthony

Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

ANTHONYT

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

Yup. This one's an eye-opener:

http://www.amazon.com/Full-Body-Burden-Growing-Nuclear/dp/030795563X

Listened to an interview with the author yesterday, and it was pretty freaking chilling.

And yet, it wasn't the military that gave us Three Mile Island, or Chernobyl, or Fukushima. And Fukushima isn't even done yet. It's still humming away, reactor no 2 is spiking hydrogen. And we are one collapsed spent fuel pool away from having an uncontrolled open-air multi-ton reactor in spent fuel pool 4.

Here in California the San Onofre nuclear power plant, shut down after a nearly 2/3 billion overhaul resulted in tube wear that would normally take decades to occur, didn't happen b/c of some evil military operation. It happened b/c somebody wanted to make more money, changed essential designs, and passed them off as 'essentially identical' replacements.

This wasn't the military, it was business.

"Greg Werner, who headed the federal team, says a Mitsubishi computer analysis vastly misjudged how water and steam would flow in the reactors. Also, changes intended to improve manufacturing were never thoroughly reviewed in the context of the generator design ... The disclosure will rivet new attention on a series of alterations to the equipment design, including the decision to add 400 tubes to each generator and installing V-shaped supports that were intended to minimize tube wear and vibration. According to company documents, each of the replacement generators weighed nearly 24 tons more than the original generators.

The generators were designed to meet a federal test to qualify as "in-kind," or essentially identical, replacements for the original generators, which would allow them to be installed without prior approval from federal regulators. Inside the guts of the machinery, the original steam generators and the replacements "look substantially different," Collins says."

Has the military spilled as much oil in its entire existence as the single Macando blow-out?

Does the military pollute the ocean as severely as plastics, or worse, micro-plastics?

Did the military dump 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the Hudson River, or anywhere for that matter, the way GE did in its manufacture of capacitors?

Do either of you have ANY data to back up your claims about the military?

Hello,

On the topic of nuclear power plants, there is a very good argument that they exist at least in part to serve military needs. It has been suggested that they would not be particularly profitable without government support, and that the government supported them because of their military applications in refining the fuel for atomic warheads.

--Anthony

Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

1KIKI

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:47 AM

You'd have to talk with Eisenhower about that. Whether it was a naïve hope that nuclear fuel was the key to an era of abundance and prosperity, a cynical ploy to spread nuclear capability around the globe to keep Russia in check, or what, exactly isn't at all clear. Whatever his motivation, and whatever the motivation of the adopting countries, his 'Atoms for Peace' program had a lot to do with spreading nuclear technology around the globe.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:50 AM

Hehe....

Everyone so poinintley evaded my topic....

Good for you RWED, for not making any waves...

Don't mind me....

I'm just going to the local glory hole now because Kwick ruined me for any girls in the future.

You tiger, you......

Seriously.... can't figure out why the Girls didn't claim them for themselves.....