Real World Event Discussions

The Talk.

POSTED BY: Wulfenstar
UPDATED: Friday, April 13, 2012 00:04
VIEWED: 8856
PAGE 4 of 12

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:
"I did, too. Obviously from what he wrote, these are Wulf's beliefs as well as DErbyshire's. Thank gawd he and Derbyshire reflect a dying breed. But that they should die quickly, and not procreate so that they pass on their sick views to the next generation (which obviously it's too late to keep Wulf from doing. I take heart that his children rejected Derbyshire's sick racism; I fear for Wulf's child."

Actually, Niki. You, and yours, are a dying breed. Feel that? Its age creeping up on you. Hurts a little more getting up in the morning, doesn't it? Thank GOD, you and your kind are finally starting to die off. Its just a matter of time. "Getting old, but still a hippie at heart..."

And considering that you and your kind are so spoiled and selfish that you couldn't even conceive of having children (THANK GOD), your philosophy is finally fucking dying.

Its up to those of us who suffered through your generations assclownery to rule the world. And many of us, have figured out that your life-style, belief-system, idiocy were false.

You die, your sick beliefs die with you. And the world is better for it.

Hurry up already.

AND, part of throwing off the nonsense your kind has foisted on us, is the ridiculous idea that we have to continue to suffer from "white-guilt". Hispanics, Asians, Whites are tired of it.

Like you cast off the idea of being "born-with-sin", we cast off the same.

You rise and fall on your own. I don't owe anyone anything.

As for my daughter. Watch your mouth you stupid fucking bitch.






Hello,

Quoted for Reference.

--Anthony



_______________________________________________
Note to self: Mr. Raptor believes that women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Reference thread: http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=51196
Never forget what this man is. If you respond to this man again, you are being foolish.

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.”
--Thomas S. Szasz

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:31 PM

Hello,

Testing Update.

--Anthony



Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:32 PM

I kind of have to agree that Wulf's kid should be left out of all these discussions. It's in bad taste to keep bringing her up.

That said, I find it in equally bad taste to equate not having children with being selfish. WHO has kids to fulfill some kind of social obligation? No one. People have kids because they want to (or that should be the only reason) and that's no more or less selfish than choosing not to have them.


Also: That article was one of the more disturbing things I have ever read. This guy is talking about human beings as if they were feral dogs or objects. Towards the end he directly compares them to objects. His use of "the pleasures of friendship" is an absolutely sickening rape of the very concept of friendship.

Also like his "scientific" play with statistics. "In his experience" yxz percent of black people are violently racist towards white people and "half" are happy to passively support such violence. The entire basis for his "avoid all black people" safety talk is basically pulled out of his ass. But hey, so many links to random articles about individual cases! So meaningful!


I, too, am heartened that his children didn't buy his hate-filled advice and this makes me feel pretty confident that not-hating is NOT dying out.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:39 PM

Quote:

I kind of have to agree that Wulf's kid should be left out of all these discussions.


Hello,

I agree. I wish Wulf would stop bringing her up or linking to 'talks' he thinks she needs to hear in order to round out her education and understanding of the world.

But recent statements have suggested to me that it is time to give up on Wulf.

--Anthony



Note to Self:
Raptor - women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.
Never forget what these men are.
“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:03 PM

Problem Agent,

is that more and more of people are living with the fallout of decades of this nonsense.

America, as I understand its intent, is that we are all equal. You rise, you fall, and hopefully the government stays out of your way.

But, this is not how its been.

For too long we've been fed a red-slime of political-correctness.

While ignoring what this actually creates.

MLK said "... but by the content of their character."

How does that fit with "hate-crimes", "affirmative-action"?

If, just if, we were all held to the standard of being on our own... this wouldn't even be a problem. If things were fair, if things were right, you would rise or fall on your own. No government hand-outs, no welfare, no corporate meandering. You stood, and did the best you could. The end.

But look where we are now. Look how far we've fallen from the ideal of the individual.

We have all sorts of groups here. One (or many) expects special treatment for their religiosity, one for their sexual-orientation, one for their illegal status, one for their... well the list is endless.

As to this article... its not that he is wrong, its that he is RIGHT which upsets people.

That says more about the subject than the writer.

Would that article have worked if it was written about Asians?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:

MLK said "... but by the content of their character."



Nothing in this article attempts to judge people by the content of their character, you realize that, right? It's a work of bogus statistics and "averages" that broadly sweeps all black people into the realm of "threat to personal safety" and recommends all but the most limited contact. Where it doesn't stamp them violently hostile and "less competent", it freely likens them to objects that can be assets to white people.

Nothing about this respects the individual.



Quote:


As to this article... its not that he is wrong, its that he is RIGHT which upsets people.

That says more about the subject than the writer.

Would that article have worked if it was written about Asians?




I don't think it worked as it is. At all. It might if he was writing about vampires. Or vicious dogs. I don't know.

I'm sure some IWSV (intelligent and well-socialized vampires) might be an asset to befriend, a rare commodity that both employers and other non-vampires would covet. It might be wise to avoid all-vampire neighborhoods. Or leave any gathering where vampire numbers suddenly swell. Or not stop to help out a stranded vampire.

They actually live off our blood, so the blanket threat makes sense in that case. You know? But human beings?

This is not a good article to use when illustrating your anti-anti-discrimination legislation views. Because it's not really about that. It's really about regarding dark-skinned people as sub-human.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:

MLK said "... but by the content of their character."



Nothing in this article attempts to judge people by the content of their character, you realize that, right? It's a work of bogus statistics and "averages" that broadly sweeps all black people into the realm of "threat to personal safety" and recommends all but the most limited contact. Where it doesn't stamp them violently hostile and "less competent", it freely likens them to objects that can be assets to white people.

Nothing about this respects the individual.



Quote:


As to this article... its not that he is wrong, its that he is RIGHT which upsets people.

That says more about the subject than the writer.

Would that article have worked if it was written about Asians?




I don't think it worked as it is. At all. It might if he was writing about vampires. Or vicious dogs. I don't know.

I'm sure some IWSV (intelligent and well-socialized vampires) might be an asset to befriend, a rare commodity that both employers and other non-vampires would covet. It might be wise to avoid all-vampire neighborhoods. Or leave any gathering where vampire numbers suddenly swell. Or not stop to help out a stranded vampire.

They actually live off our blood, so the blanket threat makes sense in that case. You know? But human beings?

This is not a good article to use when illustrating your anti-anti-discrimination legislation views. Because it's not really about that. It's really about regarding dark-skinned people as sub-human.




Boom. That's it, right there. Wulfie of course agrees with the "science" of this article, because it so closely hews to his preconceived notions and beliefs. He never even thought to question whether or not it was a valid article based on valid numbers and facts. And it's not.

Heck, I can make as strong a case for teaching children to avoid bankers, investors, and stock traders, just going on what we all "know" about them: They're shady, they engage in regular illegal activity, they stick together in a gang and are out to stalk and rob others at any cost, they frequent brothels and strip joints, they have a tendency to be unfaithful, etc.

So when you see a group of investment bankers, do you reach for your shotgun, Wulfie? Will you teach your daughter to see the Wall Street crowd (overwhelmingly white, by the way) as "the enemy"?

Nice to see that you're worried about how your daughter is and will be treated, though. Even more precious is that you feel the need to insult someone else's femininity in trying to watch out for her, by calling Niki (and I quote) a "barren succubus" and a "stupid fucking bitch".

Your daughter has the deck stacked against her as long as you are in her life.




"I have no real clue of what you're speaking." - AuRaptor.

"Yes. I was wrong. I am sorry." - AuRaptor.

Note to self: Mr. Raptor believes that women who want to control their reproductive processes are sluts.

Reference thread: http://beta.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=51196

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:44 PM

Im sure it will be very tough growing up in the 21st century when raised by a cave man.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:45 PM

Agent,

"It's really about regarding dark-skinned people as sub-human."

Some Asians are dark-skinned. Indians as well (dots, not feathers). Hispanics too.

No. This addresses a specific subset culture, native to American (and even, British) society.

ACTUAL African-Americans, those who are in the process of becoming Americans, are disdained by this specific subset culture.

The author is right. It sucks, but he is. This article could not play for any other group, or subset (without being tweeked for said specific grouping).

You could write one for Mexicans, for Hispanics, for Asians, for Whites. You would have to change things, but it would still work.

So, why the argument? Why the horrible, gut-churning, reaction?

Is it because it groups all one subset, and bashes them? Ok. If that is so wrong then why do so many do it? Why is one ok, and the other is not?

Before you say different... google "white male". "Christian", "liberal", "conservative", "democrat", "Mexican", "illegal", or a hundred other types.

The truth of the matter is, this author nailed it on this specific sub-group.

But to acknowledge that, is to be labeled racist. Google racist. Then google reverse-racism.

He has it right.

You want a REAL starting point in talking "race-relations" in this country? Start here, start with this article. Acknowledge the truth of it, and move forward from there. Otherwise...just keep on, keeping on. Same old, same old. Breed anger, bitterness, hatred.

Blacks may have some grievances(whites especially). But the rest of the world has grievances against blacks.

Lay them out. Lets start there.



NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:07 PM

Still waiting for you to prove your claim, using the scientific method (your own standard). Or are you a coward?

Come on, you're so sure of your position,l that this moron you stand by is so RIGHT - well, prove it, ya pussy.

Im willing to bet you won't.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME