How Can I Prove I am Not a Racist?
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 05:20
VIEWED: 17920
PAGE 15 of 20
Quote:
Originally posted by antimason:
you people on the left really need to get a backbone and try to stick up for your ideological views based on there merits for once, rather then resorting to impuning the character of your opponants.
What have you just done with your post, other than try to impugn the character of your opponents? Sounds like you need a backbone! Maybe you haven't evolved enough to become a vertebrate yet, eh? ;)
AURaptor's Greatest Hits:
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by mal4prez:Quote:
Originally posted by antimason:
you people on the left really need to get a backbone and try to stick up for your ideological views based on there merits for once, rather then resorting to impuning the character of your opponants.
Hey, speaking of needing to get a backbone, why don't you answer my question? I've been waiting three years now...
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=29741Quote:
Originally posted by mal4prez:Quote:Are you skeptical of your own beliefs, or only of those that disagree with yours?
Originally posted by antimason:
i will likely always be skeptical and left with the same questions, because no one will ever know what happened 'in the beginning'
Anyway, by bringing up the "beginning" you're running away from my point (remember that I said evolution does describe the origin, only the process since then) My point - you repeatedly claim that there are no transitional fossils, that there's no proof that one species ever shifted to another. There is proof, my dear. You refuse to look at it, but it's there. A cartoon example:
The fossils of this transition from toed feet to hooves have been found, in our very earth. I'm sure there are museums where you can go see these fossilized bones set out before you. How do you explain them away? Do you think scientists have faked them? Or do you just try really hard not to look?
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
Y'know, M4P, we've been very, VERRRRYYYY patient, waiting all this time for Ant to evolve and grow a backbone and face this question. I guess he's still hundreds of millions of years away from the truth, though...
AURaptor's Greatest Hits:
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.
Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Mal4prez-
Hey, speaking of needing to get a backbone, why don't you answer my question? I've been waiting three years now...
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=29741
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by mal4prez:
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by antimason:
i will likely always be skeptical and left with the same questions, because no one will ever know what happened 'in the beginning'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you skeptical of your own beliefs, or only of those that disagree with yours?
Anyway, by bringing up the "beginning" you're running away from my point (remember that I said evolution does describe the origin, only the process since then) My point - you repeatedly claim that there are no transitional fossils, that there's no proof that one species ever shifted to another. There is proof, my dear. You refuse to look at it, but it's there.
hahahahaahahaha! are you kidding me? just how long have you been sitting on this? tell me this whole time now you haven't been dwelling on that conversation? how long have you been sitting on this, just waiting to throw it out when its most irrelevant? i had to laugh- thats like taking a full 30 seconds to respond with a comeback from an off the cuff jab. in all honesty, i never even saw that response of yours. if it's eating at you, start a new thread, but can we try to stick to the subject at hand- we're talking about politics, not debating creation/evolution. if you do i'm sure i'll be there giving my opinions, same as you all. but forgive me if some peoples responses get lost in the shuffle, especially when you represent a minority view. its like being on stage, and trying to debate a crowd of people just shouting at you and over eachother. but i get under the skin of some people aroud here, so i must be doing something right
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Either you don't believe Mark Williams and the Tea Party Express are (or WERE) part of the "Tea Partiers", or you don't believe that anything he said or posted is in any way racist or bigoted. Either way, you're wrong.
No, you're wrong.
There's nothing remotely " racist " about lower taxes, smaller gov't, securing the border and balancing the budget.
I don't care what you say, what the NAACP says, what Obama says, there's nothing in the least bit 'racist' about the Tea Party movement.
This entire nonsense is nothing but a diversion by the Left to attack the right....
" deflect.. change the subject... call them racists!"
That's the sum of it all , in its entirety.
The Left simply can not win a debate on the merits of the facts alone, and must - MUST resort to cheap demagoguery and sensational tactics.
And you're no different.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Malachite:
.But it doesn't measure a person's future potential or their chances for future success.
QFT.
Of all the incorrect statements in your post, you did nail it right here. Numerous High-IQ societies have made this obvious, and consider it a running joke among the groups.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'll see your hahaha and raise you a BWAH-HAHAHAHA! You did it again, huh? How predictable.
Originally posted by antimason:
hahahahaahahaha! are you kidding me? just how long have you been sitting on this?
We all see who's got no backbone. Again Antimason avoids. This time he doesn't disappear, but begs: "No - please don't bring up that topic again! Please don't make me look at that! I can't even include the picture in my quote, I've got to close my eyes. I've tried so hard to see only what the creationist sites show me. I avoid the discovery channel, museums, and anyone who's actually capable of *thinking* about reality! Please don't knock on my denial walls! I need them to keep me safe and warm!"
Anti, I'm going to keep bringing this up as long as you keep running away from it with your little vestigial tail between your legs. It's been several times now. Go on - avoid dealing with the question one more time. Here's your chance:
How do you explain the very real transitional fossils dug out of the ground, like this, which came from a peer-reviewed paper:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/v16470436056263j/
(Denial/Avoidance in 5, 4, 3 ...)
-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are no transitional fossils. Macro evolution has never been witnessed and never will, not because it takes so long but because it never happened. Sure there are many similar forms and one can conclude that these must be transitional forms. There are only so many forms because all species are created from the same set of materials. Think of it as a set of legos you can only make a given number of things from the set given it's pieces , and a lot will look a like. Just a guess. I don't really know...Only god knows for sure
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by jewelstaitefan:Quote:
Originally posted by Malachite:
.But it doesn't measure a person's future potential or their chances for future success.
QFT.
Of all the incorrect statements in your post, you did nail it right here.
Would you mind elaborating on what statements of mine you thought were incorrect? Perhaps with a link to an authoritive resource? Thanks.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
70% of black births are illegitimate, no father taking responsibility. Black leaders rarely dare acknowledge or condemn that race's national disgrace. Typical scenario is single working or welfare mamas with 5 kids from 4 different "sperm daddies". Only way these doomed-to-fail kids know who their daddy is if their mama tells them. And none of them were ever slaves. White Liberals do their little dance of guilt and make excuse after after excuse for Blacks. Our entire society has been dragged down because of pc correctness white-washing despicable behavior.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Riverlove:
70% of black births are illegitimate, no father taking responsibility. Black leaders rarely dare acknowledge or condemn that race's national disgrace. Typical scenario is single working or welfare mamas with 5 kids from 4 different "sperm daddies". Only way these doomed-to-fail kids know who their daddy is if their mama tells them. And none of them were ever slaves. White Liberals do their little dance of guilt and make excuse after after excuse for Blacks. Our entire society has been dragged down because of pc correctness white-washing despicable behavior.
Even if your statements were true, which I doubt (70% seems a bit high, and your "typical scenario" may not be so typical if by typical you mean "a majority"), you are still pointing to significant environmental deprivation (lack of stable family, lack of parental supervision, lack of proper nutrition, a single parent with low education having limited education themselves and limited financial resources to help their children succeed academically, an emphasis on survival in dangerous neighborhoods as a priority rather than academic success, idealization of the gang lifestyle, stigmatization of blacks who actually do have academic success in these scenarios by their own peers, lack of quality educational institutions in impoverished neighborhoods, etc) that could explain lower academic achievement and lower IQ scores rather than some innate genetic deficiency that dictates that blacks have less innate intelligence than whites. I would argue that whites experiencing similar environmental pressures would also perform worse than average as well.
To sum: you have pointed out environmental deficiencies that continue to contribute to poor academic success. We can choose to let this pattern continue, or we can figure out how to change the environment. Ideally, this comes from within the black community itself (as you mentioned, black leaders calling attention to the problems and then, hopefully proposing solutions), but chances are, it is going to need outside funding and outside resources as well. I say it needs to be spearheaded by blacks because some may have mistrust of some major overhaul spearheaded by whites.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME