It’s over: MPs say the special relationship with US is dead
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Friday, August 29, 2025 15:36
VIEWED: 12277
PAGE 13 of 17
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
That is a past still remembered.
Hey what can I say ... in the US political memory only lasts about 2 years. Time enough to do your damage and then buy yourself a new image for the next election. Unless you are from the south, in which case your memory might go back to the mid 1800's.
The people of Northern Ireland have more right to call themselves Irish and live there, than you do to call yourself American, or live where you do. The people who live there, don't want to leave the UK. Calling it part of the British Empire is a gross mischaracterisation, regardless of how it came to be hundreds of years ago.
--------------------------------------------------
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by citizen:Quote:
Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni:
There was alot of violence involved in the dissolution of the British empire
I said relatively, and considering contenders are places like France, it's fairly accurate. Certainly more accurate than your statement :)Quote:
Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni:
1. That the people who were fighting Britain, had the means of attacking Britain itself... they would have
2. That these attacks would have accelerated that decline
Indeed, if only the IRA had had the means, say, to attack Britain itself. Of course they could never quite manage it because of lack of funding, probably because nations that are staunchly anti-terrorist, like say the US, would never send them bomb money.
--------------------------------------------------
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows.
I wasn't referring to Ireland... different situation I think. Almost more of a internal matter than a foreign war that.
more Sudan, the Mahdi revolt, the Boer war, the Zulu wars, the Marahatta confederation in India
examples like that, maintaining forces that far away from home ( even though East Indian Company forces were largely Indian ) was insanely expensive
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"The people of Northern Ireland have more right to call themselves Irish and live there, than you do to call yourself American, or live where you do."
You're right. I'm a first-generation American, not responsible in any way for the things that were done here in the past or for being born here, and unable to 'go back where I came from' (which would be Poland BTW).
Such is life.
I am not wrong though to point out that the British settled in Northern Ireland by force.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SignyM
I had that epiphany watching a news report of a African mother comforting her starving and dying child. She did what I have done with those on death's door - I recognized the soft comforting strokes, the quiet and helpless watchfulness in her eyes. All the differences - time, location, language, skin color, cause - erased.
That's what I found so offensive and cynical about Geezer's choice of a white child. As if we all 'understand' that a white child is more valuable.
Maybe I'm slow though. Your type of epiphany came to me later in life.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Mmmm, I guess that means me too...given I'm SECOND generation American. Or does that mean I only have HALF a right to call myself American and live where I do?
Goodness, it gets so confusing...how about someone who's parents were one immigrant and one child of an immigrant and an "American"? Are they one-quarter responsible for the atrocities? Do they only have three-quarters right to call themselves American?
Or does that mean I'm half responsible for all the wrongs done by France? Or that I have to call myself "Half-French American"? I can't call myself French-American, 'cuz only my mom was French. Or, wait, all Black people, even if one parent was white, are "African Americans"...what does that mean for me?
Oh, shit, what the hell; it's just too complex to know who to blame for what and who has what right to call themselves whatever...
"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni:
I wasn't referring to Ireland... different situation I think. Almost more of a internal matter than a foreign war that.
I know, I was taking a swipe at the Americans there.
Quote:
Originally posted by GinoBiffaroni:
more Sudan, the Mahdi revolt, the Boer war, the Zulu wars, the Marahatta confederation in India
examples like that, maintaining forces that far away from home ( even though East Indian Company forces were largely Indian ) was insanely expensive
The East India Company was dissolved about a century before the dissolution of the British Empire though? Much of what you cite would seem to be part of the expansion, rather than dissolution of the British Empire.
--------------------------------------------------
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sig and Rue: Bingo, Bingo, BINGO!!! That's why I despair of Americans; if never exposed to other societies and cultures, the insular nature, especially of Middle America, makes it hard for people to ever see those of other nations as "people", feeling exactly the same things they do.
It's why I came back from Afghanistan forever changed, and why I think those of our soldiers who are self-aware and aware of their surroundings will come back from Iraq and Afghanistan changed forever.
If only we could ALL...
Well, wars would be harder to start anyway...
"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
I am not wrong though to point out that the British settled in Northern Ireland by force.
Which makes the present day Irish descendants of those settlers different from anyone else, how? There's not many, if any nations today that aren't the descendants of people who settled by force. Or is Spain still part of the Roman empire because the Latin descendants are still living there?
--------------------------------------------------
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
But isn't it always part of the expansion, not the dissolution, of an empire which causes those things? Empires don't expand as they fail, they contract.
And while discussing examples of those wars far from home, don't forget the British-Afghan occupancy. It was a biggie for the Afghans, and THEY'VE never forgotten it!
Also, Citizen, bear in mind that empires can take hundreds years to fall. Usually they don't even know they're falling until way into the process. Perhaps today's global village will cause it to happen more quickly, but previously it's taken a very long time.
"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The problem with the decedents of the British is that they have disproportionate economic and political power TODAY. And the separation of N Ireland from the rest is not an indigenous one but a result of the British colonizing an already-populated area.
If you are arguing that there's an equivalence between US white people and Amerindians, and the British and the Irish I have no argument. But that doesn't necessarily place the British in a better light - just a longer-standing one.
Which is what I find so remarkable about Canada creating a substantial territory for the Inuit and others. It’s an attempt to redress the way things are today to create a least a level of fairness for past injustice, no matter how far back the white settlers can lay their claims.
***************************************************************
Silence is consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME