Real World Event Discussions

The Assault Weapons Ban

POSTED BY: AnthonyT
UPDATED: Friday, December 5, 2008 17:22
VIEWED: 10930
PAGE 4 of 17

Monday, December 1, 2008 1:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shinygoodguy:
It seems to me that I can recall a sitting President who did exactly that (ryhmes with tush).
Civil liberties, which were guaranteed in the Constitution, were seriously hampered, if not downright crippled, by changes in the nation's laws that allowed the government to perform otherwise illegal search, surviellance and siezures only on the suspiscion that someone, anyone, was a terrorist. This was just the tip of the iceberg.



Hmm. Neither Wilson or Lincoln rhymes with tush. Nor does Roosevelt.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 2:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shinygoodguy:
While we're looking for impeachable actions, especially when it comes to the Constitution, we should consider action against all Presidents who look to circumvent that all to perfect document.

It seems to me that I can recall a sitting President who did exactly that (ryhmes with tush).
Civil liberties, which were guaranteed in the Constitution, were seriously hampered, if not downright crippled, by changes in the nation's laws that allowed the government to perform otherwise illegal search, surviellance and siezures only on the suspiscion that someone, anyone, was a terrorist. This was just the tip of the iceberg.

The Constitution should not be tampered with...period. So yes, I agree, hang them by their thumbs from the Washington Monument if they attempt to change any portion of the Constitution.

Tawabawho?



You'll get no argument from me. Hang the lot.
But when you do, remember that the 2nd Amendment is just as important as the 1st, 4th, 5th, and all the rest.

Mercy is the mark of a great man.
Guess I'm just a good man.
Well, I'm alright.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 2:46 PM

How about this...

Instead of trying to ban all weapons, or conviscate them, or price them out of ownership...

We make it law that you MUST be armed. You MUST carry AT LEAST a handgun (of no less than 9mm) on you at ALL TIMES. And you HAVE to know how to use it.

Unless you are a convicted criminal or crazy, EVERYONE must be armed, starting at 18.

(Before 18 you must carry a knife and know how to use it.)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 3:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Hmm. Neither Wilson or Lincoln rhymes with tush. Nor does Roosevelt.


Not in English...he's speaking Gibberish (the native tongue of Gibraltar) in which everthing rhymes with "tush" except "Crazytalk" which sounds like "Geezer".

H

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 4:15 PM

Glad to see ya back Zero, hope ya had fun.

As for the other stuff, wouldn't be their thumbs I'd wanna hang em from, and I'd have done so to about 90% of em if not more.

-F

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 4:24 PM

Wulf, it's called Kennesaw, Georgia.

And it WORKED.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=31381&m=561443

Of course, when it didn't match with the gun-grabbers predictions of social chaos and a "gunfight on every corner" - they dropped it right down the memory hole, believe it.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 4:36 PM

I always thought/knew it would work.

Give a society the ways, rights, and means to protect themselves (from government AND from each other)...

Then there will be peace.

For all the whining many do for peace, they never REALLY want it. They will never take the steps to insure and enshrine it.

I don't believe that peace is just the calm between wars, but rather....it is found when every citizen has true freedom and the ability of self-determination.

That can only be had when everyone has the power to protect themselves. When the government (and its representatives) are held in check by that same power of the people.

In truth, why do we think we need cops?







NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 5:00 PM

Same reason we "need" Government.
*spits in disgust*

Either one is just a freakin plague masquerading as it's own cure - always was, always will be.

-F

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 6:10 PM

So, as you are now part of the plague....lol

Hows the cure going?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 1, 2008 6:48 PM

In answer as to why we NEED assault weapons....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27989275/?omg

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME