Trunp loses again in Court
POSTED BY: THG
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 1, 2026 04:15
VIEWED: 52231
PAGE 7 of 10
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread has 590 posts, and almost 12 full pages. Has Thuggery ever made any actual point in any of his posts? Somewhere around half of the posts must be his.
I thought of going through the pages to look see if anything posted by Ted was ever solid, but the endless stream of nonsense posted here was daunting.
So, 6ix, is there any posts that he made which are valid? Obviously, some are still unresolved since they have not yet played out. But are there any which have run the course of the topic, and how many?
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it.
... is what everybody reading any post of Ted's thinks when reading any post of Ted's.
Quote:
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it. Anybody posting or visiting the site can see you have posted in old threads 50 times since the last person, other than you posted there. Even my, not to old threads have you posting again and again, always off topic.
And what do these posts of yours have in common? You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. Almost always, your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
Incorrect usage of comma after "my". How many fucking times are you going to use the wrong version of to/too/two? IT'S TOO IN THIS CASE, RETARD.
Not that the sentence fragment is even real English to begin with.
Quote:
And what do these posts of yours have in common?
Every post of yours consists of 1 or more of 3 following themes...
1. Clickbait bullshit and headlines doing the thinking for you.
2. Cartoons doing the thinking for you.
3. Your illiteracy.
Quote:
You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. And most times your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Now I think you're just confusing JSF for Jaynez.
But you're also more or less explaining your own dumbassery again.
Quote:
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
Nah. We're going to shit on all of your dumbass threads to nowhere, loser.
You're too much of a coward and a pussy to make any posts in real threads with actual topics of substance.
You crack me up Gilligan. Trump is a convicted felon. He has been convicted of sexual assault. His NY company was convicted of fraud. He also was able to defer 4 other felony indictments worth about another 30 felonies, until the election, so they got tossed.
All on appeal or tossed and nothing will be paid. I don't care about any of your political warfare, and nobody else does either.
Quote:
He is betraying our friends and praising our enemies. He is openly corrupt. The list of his injudicious acts is endless.
None of this is true.
Quote:
An example is women and children starving to death because of his cuts to a gov. department with an already small budget. Or all the people who are going to die because they are about to lose their health care. People who may be dealing with cancer or something else.
Show me one example.
Quote:
You side with him. Nothing about you Jack is respectable, or to be taken seriously.
I side with America.
You side with MS13, Tren de Argua, men in women's bathrooms and sports, wide open borders and unchecked immigration, anti-whitism, $2.5 Trillion in debt added every year to fund all of your unaffordable brainwashing and a long post history of thousands of other anti-American ideas and values.
-
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread has 590 posts, and almost 12 full pages. Has Thuggery ever made any actual point in any of his posts? Somewhere around half of the posts must be his.
I thought of going through the pages to look see if anything posted by Ted was ever solid, but the endless stream of nonsense posted here was daunting.
So, 6ix, is there any posts that he made which are valid? Obviously, some are still unresolved since they have not yet played out. But are there any which have run the course of the topic, and how many?
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it. Anybody posting or visiting the site can see you have posted in old threads 50 times since the last person, other than you posted there. Even my, not to old threads have you posting again and again, always off topic.
And what do these posts of yours have in common? You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. Almost always, your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.>
... is what everybody reading any post of Ted's thinks when reading any post of Ted's.
Quote:
You're too much of a coward and a pussy to make any posts in real threads with actual topics of substance.
You crack me up Gilligan. Trump is a convicted felon. He has been convicted of sexual assault. His NY company was convicted of fraud. He also was able to defer 4 other felony indictments worth about another 30 felonies, until the election, so they got tossed.
He is betraying our friends and praising our enemies. He is openly corrupt. The list of his injudicious acts is endless.
An example is women and children starving to death because of his cuts to a gov. department with an already small budget. Or all the people who are going to die because they are about to lose their health care. People who may be dealing with cancer or something else.
You side with him. Nothing about you Jack is respectable, or to be taken seriously.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread has 590 posts, and almost 12 full pages. Has Thuggery ever made any actual point in any of his posts? Somewhere around half of the posts must be his.
I thought of going through the pages to look see if anything posted by Ted was ever solid, but the endless stream of nonsense posted here was daunting.
So, 6ix, is there any posts that he made which are valid? Obviously, some are still unresolved since they have not yet played out. But are there any which have run the course of the topic, and how many?
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it.
... is what everybody reading any post of Ted's thinks when reading any post of Ted's.
Quote:
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it. Anybody posting or visiting the site can see you have posted in old threads 50 times since the last person, other than you posted there. Even my, not to old threads have you posting again and again, always off topic.
And what do these posts of yours have in common? You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. Almost always, your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
Incorrect usage of comma after "my". How many fucking times are you going to use the wrong version of to/too/two? IT'S TOO IN THIS CASE, RETARD.
Not that the sentence fragment is even real English to begin with.
Quote:
And what do these posts of yours have in common?
Every post of yours consists of 1 or more of 3 following themes...
1. Clickbait bullshit and headlines doing the thinking for you.
2. Cartoons doing the thinking for you.
3. Your illiteracy.
Quote:
You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. And most times your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Now I think you're just confusing JSF for Jaynez.
But you're also more or less explaining your own dumbassery again.
Quote:
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
Nah. We're going to shit on all of your dumbass threads to nowhere, loser.
You're too much of a coward and a pussy to make any posts in real threads with actual topics of substance.
You crack me up Gilligan. Trump is a convicted felon. He has been convicted of sexual assault. His NY company was convicted of fraud. He also was able to defer 4 other felony indictments worth about another 30 felonies, until the election, so they got tossed.
All on appeal or tossed and nothing will be paid. I don't care about any of your political warfare, and nobody else does either.
Quote:
He is betraying our friends and praising our enemies. He is openly corrupt. The list of his injudicious acts is endless.
None of this is true.
Quote:
An example is women and children starving to death because of his cuts to a gov. department with an already small budget. Or all the people who are going to die because they are about to lose their health care. People who may be dealing with cancer or something else.
Show me one example.
Quote:
You side with him. Nothing about you Jack is respectable, or to be taken seriously.
I side with America.
You side with MS13, Tren de Argua, men in women's bathrooms and sports, wide open borders and unchecked immigration, anti-whitism, $2.5 Trillion in debt added every year to fund all of your unaffordable brainwashing and a long post history of thousands of other anti-American ideas and values.
-
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread has 590 posts, and almost 12 full pages. Has Thuggery ever made any actual point in any of his posts? Somewhere around half of the posts must be his.
I thought of going through the pages to look see if anything posted by Ted was ever solid, but the endless stream of nonsense posted here was daunting.
So, 6ix, is there any posts that he made which are valid? Obviously, some are still unresolved since they have not yet played out. But are there any which have run the course of the topic, and how many?
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it.
... is what everybody reading any post of Ted's thinks when reading any post of Ted's.Quote:
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it. Anybody posting or visiting the site can see you have posted in old threads 50 times since the last person, other than you posted there. Even my, not to old threads have you posting again and again, always off topic.
And what do these posts of yours have in common? You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. Almost always, your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
You crack me up Gilligan. Trump is a convicted felon. He has been convicted of sexual assault. His NY company was convicted of fraud. He also was able to defer 4 other felony indictments worth about another 30 felonies, until the election, so they got tossed.
All on appeal or tossed and nothing will be paid. I don't care about any of your political warfare, and nobody else does either.
I don't know which if any are on appeal. It doesn't matter. Fact, he was found guilty of all the things I posted. Innocent until proven guilty. Well, he was proven guilty. Being white trash none of it matters to you and that's ok, because you are white trash.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Incorrect usage of comma after "my". How many fucking times are you going to use the wrong version of to/too/two? IT'S TOO IN THIS CASE, RETARD.
Not that the sentence fragment is even real English to begin with.
First, I put the comma where I did for effect. That said dummy. You put the word my in quotes with the period on the outside of the quotation; wrong. You make me laugh Gilligan. And know this. I can live with spelling errors. Not a game changer for me. I also wrote it as 5 to 10 times; sue me.
Now, to more serious matters. Your boy Trump is fucking up big time again.
T
Mexican security chief confirms cartel family members entered US in a deal with Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico's security chief confirmed Tuesday that 17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. last week as part of a deal between a son of the former head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trump administration.
Mexican Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch confirmed a report by independent journalist Luis Chaparro that family members of Ovidio Guzman Lopez, who was extradited to the United States in 2023, had entered the U.S.
Guzmán Lopez is one of the brothers left running a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel after notorious capo Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán was imprisoned in the U.S. Video showed the family members walking across the border from Tijuana with their suitcases to waiting U.S. agents.
Rumors had circulated last week that the younger Guzmán would plead guilty to avoid trial for several drug trafficking charges in the U.S. after being extradited in 2023.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mexican-security-chief-confirms-c
artel-family-members-entered-us-in-a-deal-with-trump-administration/ar-AA1EIoYr?ocid=StaticFallback&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=9de8b0229d564c6986b99d1d56beda41&ei=37
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
First, I put the comma where I did for effect. That said dummy. You put the word my in quotes with the period on the outside of the quotation; wrong. You make me laugh Gilligan. And know this. I can live with spelling errors. Not a game changer for me. I also wrote it as 5 to 10 times; sue me.
I don't want to hear excuses about why you wasted your life and why you're retarded. Nobody cares.
Quote:
Now, to more serious matters. Your boy Trump is fucking up big time again.
What else is new in your bizarro world. Go fuck yourself, dummy. Nobody cares what you think about anything and nobody is listening to you or anywhere you get your "news" from anymore.
Your party is dead and their propaganda bullhorn is broken and any ounce of patience that Real Americans had for people like you is spent.
Keep screaming into the void. It's the only move you've left yourself with. And when your dying Democratic Party is finally taken over by the extreme-left, you will be politically homeless, just like I said many times that you would, and it will be your own goddamned fault.
And I'll be pulling out my bottomless bag of I Told You So's and this time I'm going to staple one to your fucking face so you finally get the message.
How's that?
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
First, I put the comma where I did for effect. That said dummy. You put the word my in quotes with the period on the outside of the quotation; wrong. You make me laugh Gilligan. And know this. I can live with spelling errors. Not a game changer for me. I also wrote it as 5 to 10 times; sue me.
I don't want to hear excuses about why you wasted your life and why you're retarded. Nobody cares.Quote:
Now, to more serious matters. Your boy Trump is fucking up big time again.
And I'll be pulling out my bottomless bag of I Told You So's and this time I'm going to staple one to your fucking face so you finally get the message.
How's that?
You capitalized the s in so's as well as the t in told and the y in you. All mistakes dummy.
How's that?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey Ted...
Did you notice something over the last few days?
With all of your racism and sexism bullshit and pandering and ass kissing and making sure to let everybody know all the time that you're one of the "good guys", it's kind of funny how that tag session went, huh?
You thought you "had me beat" so bad that even Second came to chime in two posts and he never does that.
Here's the deal, you mindless little fucking twerp.
I like Brenda. I've liked Brenda for years. She's one of the few people still here that thinks for herself and has genuinely interesting things to say.
And boy... The international tensions these last few weeks that we have no power over really made you get manic on your Headline ingestion and drive you fucking crazy, didn't you? Trying to rile up everyone every day about US/Canada relations and the fucking sky falling.
And then I've said stuff these last few months that would get me insta-banned on YouTube and old Twitter regarding race and sex. I'm sure in your desire to be the first to white knight and be offended for everybody else, you just thought that this was it, and Brenda would never talk to Jack again and I'll get some Good Boy Points!!!
And then because of the headlines and the chronic BS all the time, Brenda, who never speaks politically comes out and says some things in political threads here, and I don't do NEARLY as good as I should to hold back and I speak really shitty to her in reply like I would to a dumbass like you who deserves it. Though I haven't apologized for that, I felt bad about it almost immediately, and I've felt bad about it since. She DESERVES much more respect from me than that. Not because of the color of her skin or because of her private parts. But because she's fucking earned it out of me by the way she carries herself and the way she speaks to me and everyone else.
I ain't great at apologies, but I did go out of my way to also pop in the Garden that I haven't been posting in very often to say that Brenda's good deal of friends was also well earned in the RWED thread because it was the best I could muster at the time. Again, that ain't me blowing smoke up her ass. That's me actually knowing at least the part of her she shows online really well after many years here. Brenda... at least the Brenda we see here, should have a lot of friends. The world just wouldn't be right if that weren't the case.
And then here you come trying to rile things up between us in the tags, and even fucking Second who never posts there pops in of nowhere and starts posting shit in an attempt to take to another level.
Then what happens???
Brenda threatens to knock my teeth out and calls me "boy" and she gave me a real bellylaugh that I haven't had in quite a while, and I called her "Awesome".
And for the last few days we've been engaged in interesting conversation the likes that you are entirely incapable of, and you're left out of the tag section after being punked like a little bitch for trying to bring political images back into it...
There's a lesson to be learned here, son. And you need to learn it.
I'm sure this scenario or something very similar to it has played out for you time and time and time again your entire life. And you've never figured out why.
You don't get it. You do all the "right" things. You say all the "right" things. You think all the "right" things. And you let everyone know it any chance you get.
But nobody wants to be around you, do they?
Nobody wants to spend any time with you. Nobody likes you.
It's because you are not a real person. You are a facsimile of a person.
This is your intervention that nobody else cares enough to give you.
Get yourself some help before it is too late.
I'm sorry to bring you up, Brenda. But Ted needs an intervention and nobod
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Good to go...
T
Trump MET with INSTANT KARMA over Judge INDICTMENT
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I was thinking about maybe starting with the first page. This thread started in Nov 2019.
Much from that period might be settled by now.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ted, why did you leave out the most pertinent part, the context, from your post, about 3 or 4 posts above?
Quote:Are you trying to be biased? Ashamed that you are wrong? Or do you prefer that the Drug Cartels continue their crimes unabated?
García Harfuch confirmed the family members' crossing in a radio interview and said it was clear to Mexican authorities that they were doing so after negotiations between Guzmán López and the U.S. government.
He believed that was the case because the former cartel boss, whose lawyer said in January he had entered negotiations with U.S. authorities, had been pointing fingers at members of other criminal organizations likely as part of a cooperation agreement.
“It is evident that his family is going to the U.S. because of a negotiation or an offer that the Department of Justice is giving him,” Garcia Harfuch said.
The confirmation by García Harfuch comes the same day that the U.S. Attorney General's Office announced it was charging a number of top cartel leaders with “narcoterrorism” for the first time since the Trump administration declared a number of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump SCOTUS Showdown REACHES its PEAK at MAJOR Oral Argument
Tomorrow at 9am eastern
If someone wants to go to the beginning of the thread and go through everything up until now, I say great. You'll have to read and watch everything. The facts, shit, you'll have to face up to about your boy Trump, will be a real eye opener since I know you guys choose to remain clueless.
Anyway, tomorrow is a big day. Be there or be square.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Ted, why did you leave out the most pertinent part, the context, from your post, about 3 or 4 posts above?Quote:Are you trying to be biased? Ashamed that you are wrong? Or do you prefer that the Drug Cartels continue their crimes unabated?
García Harfuch confirmed the family members' crossing in a radio interview and said it was clear to Mexican authorities that they were doing so after negotiations between Guzmán López and the U.S. government.
He believed that was the case because the former cartel boss, whose lawyer said in January he had entered negotiations with U.S. authorities, had been pointing fingers at members of other criminal organizations likely as part of a cooperation agreement.
“It is evident that his family is going to the U.S. because of a negotiation or an offer that the Department of Justice is giving him,” Garcia Harfuch said.
The confirmation by García Harfuch comes the same day that the U.S. Attorney General's Office announced it was charging a number of top cartel leaders with “narcoterrorism” for the first time since the Trump administration declared a number of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.
Mexican security chief confirms cartel family members entered US in a deal with Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico's security chief confirmed Tuesday that 17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. last week as part of a deal between a son of the former head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trump administration.
Mexican Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch confirmed a report by independent journalist Luis Chaparro that family members of Ovidio Guzman Lopez, who was extradited to the United States in 2023, had entered the U.S.
Guzmán Lopez is one of the brothers left running a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel after notorious capo Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán was imprisoned in the U.S. Video showed the family members walking across the border from Tijuana with their suitcases to waiting U.S. agents.
Rumors had circulated last week that the younger Guzmán would plead guilty to avoid trial for several drug trafficking charges in the U.S. after being extradited in 2023.
What asshole, what was I wrong about? You have the original, quote me from there. All I said was Trump is fucking up. I stand by that.
I prefer that he doesn't bring entire families of corrupt organizations here. You mentioned context. I would have thought this was self-evident. Do you think they are ever going back? They do have supporters across the country; other gang members. And if they can't get together with them, who is going to support them; you?
You can't see me but I'm laughing. Why, because all you and Jack want is to get rid of the Mexicans. Trumps way sure don't cut it.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
'Unprecedented and entirely unconstitutional': Judge motions to kill indictment for allegedly obstructing ICE agents, shreds Trump admin for even trying
In her motion, Dugan’s lawyers condemn her charges and prosecution as being “irrelevant to immunity.” They claim that even if the judge, who has been on the bench in Milwaukee County since 2016, did what she’s accused of doing, there would be no way of prosecuting her “because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts,” according to the motion.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/unprecedented-and-entirely-uncons
titutional-judge-motions-to-kill-indictment-for-allegedly-obstructing-ice-agents-shreds-trump-admin-for-even-trying/ar-AA1ENfer
Fingers crossed...
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
'Unprecedented and entirely unconstitutional': Judge motions to kill indictment for allegedly obstructing ICE agents, shreds Trump admin for even trying
In her motion, Dugan’s lawyers condemn her charges and prosecution as being “irrelevant to immunity.” They claim that even if the judge, who has been on the bench in Milwaukee County since 2016, did what she’s accused of doing, there would be no way of prosecuting her “because she is entitled to judicial immunity for her official acts,” according to the motion.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/unprecedented-and-entirely-uncons
titutional-judge-motions-to-kill-indictment-for-allegedly-obstructing-ice-agents-shreds-trump-admin-for-even-trying/ar-AA1ENfer
Fingers crossed...
T
Yes. Please, oh please. Immunity for my gal because she's on my side.
Any chance that I can jump out unbidden and announce to the world how hypocritical I am on any given day, when somebody compares my "thoughts" in the moment to anything I've ever said before today.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BTW, Ted...
She wasn't arrested for any judgements that she made.
As per your own article, had you bothered to read down that far, this is what she was arrested for, and there is plenty of video proof of her doing it too.
Quote:
Dugan is accused of helping a Mexican national named Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who is facing misdemeanor battery charges. He was in Dugan’s courtroom on April 18 for a hearing when ICE agents allegedly tried to take him into custody. A deputy in Dugan’s courtroom claimed she directed Flores-Ruiz to leave through a jury door, per the motion.
“The government’s prosecution here reaches directly into a state courthouse, disrupting active proceedings, and interferes with the official duties of an elected judge,” the motion alleges.
Dugan is scheduled to appear in court on Thursday to enter a plea.
She was arrested for disregarding lawful orders that compelled the criminal illegal alien invader to be handed over to ICE to be deported and then trying to give him an escape route while keeping them busy. Who knows... A year from now that might be considered a treasonous act.
I wouldn't keep attempting it, or you might find out.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I know exactly what she did. And she did it in her courtroom. She is 100% in charge there. ICE played this whole thing wrong for the sake of a news cycle. Red meat for MAGA losers.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
No. She is not 100% in charge there.
And she is certainly not above the law. Inside or outside of that courtroom.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Ted, why did you leave out the most pertinent part, the context, from your post, about 3 or 4 posts above?Quote:Are you trying to be biased? Ashamed that you are wrong? Or do you prefer that the Drug Cartels continue their crimes unabated?
García Harfuch confirmed the family members' crossing in a radio interview and said it was clear to Mexican authorities that they were doing so after negotiations between Guzmán López and the U.S. government.
He believed that was the case because the former cartel boss, whose lawyer said in January he had entered negotiations with U.S. authorities, had been pointing fingers at members of other criminal organizations likely as part of a cooperation agreement.
“It is evident that his family is going to the U.S. because of a negotiation or an offer that the Department of Justice is giving him,” Garcia Harfuch said.
The confirmation by García Harfuch comes the same day that the U.S. Attorney General's Office announced it was charging a number of top cartel leaders with “narcoterrorism” for the first time since the Trump administration declared a number of cartels as foreign terrorist organizations.
Mexican security chief confirms cartel family members entered US in a deal with Trump administration
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico's security chief confirmed Tuesday that 17 family members of cartel leaders crossed into the U.S. last week as part of a deal between a son of the former head of the Sinaloa Cartel and the Trump administration.
Mexican Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch confirmed a report by independent journalist Luis Chaparro that family members of Ovidio Guzman Lopez, who was extradited to the United States in 2023, had entered the U.S.
Guzmán Lopez is one of the brothers left running a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel after notorious capo Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán was imprisoned in the U.S. Video showed the family members walking across the border from Tijuana with their suitcases to waiting U.S. agents.
Rumors had circulated last week that the younger Guzmán would plead guilty to avoid trial for several drug trafficking charges in the U.S. after being extradited in 2023.
What asshole, what was I wrong about? You have the original, quote me from there. All I said was Trump is fucking up. I stand by that.
I prefer that he doesn't bring entire families of corrupt organizations here. You mentioned context. I would have thought this was self-evident. Do you think they are ever going back? They do have supporters across the country; other gang members. And if they can't get together with them, who is going to support them; you?
You can't see me but I'm laughing. Why, because all you and Jack want is to get rid of the Mexicans. Trumps way sure don't cut it.
T
Ted is literally falling apart at the seems.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Trump SCOTUS Showdown REACHES its PEAK at MAJOR Oral Argument
Tomorrow at 9am eastern
If someone wants to go to the beginning of the thread and go through everything up until now, I say great. You'll have to read and watch everything. The facts, shit, you'll have to face up to about your boy Trump, will be a real eye opener since I know you guys choose to remain clueless.
Anyway, tomorrow is a big day. Be there or be square.
T
Supreme Court HOLDS MAJOR Oral Argument on CITIZENSHIP
Listened to it all and analysis afterwards. That's still going on. I'll post some of it in a bit. Bottom line, Trump loses. And, this ruling with effect 4 or 5 other Trump emergency filings with the Supreme Court. So, kiss those cases goodby as well. Hey JSF, do you understand the context here?
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
This thread has 590 posts, and almost 12 full pages. Has Thuggery ever made any actual point in any of his posts? Somewhere around half of the posts must be his.
I thought of going through the pages to look see if anything posted by Ted was ever solid, but the endless stream of nonsense posted here was daunting.
So, 6ix, is there any posts that he made which are valid? Obviously, some are still unresolved since they have not yet played out. But are there any which have run the course of the topic, and how many?
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it.
... is what everybody reading any post of Ted's thinks when reading any post of Ted's.Quote:
I can't get over how stupid you are. Really, I can't believe it. Anybody posting or visiting the site can see you have posted in old threads 50 times since the last person, other than you posted there. Even my, not to old threads have you posting again and again, always off topic.
And what do these posts of yours have in common? You post one sentence and a link to god knows what. Almost always, your post will consist of a sentence and a link, another sentence and another link. Maybe as many as 5 to 10 times in one post.
Here's a thought. Have an idea, start your own damn thread.
You crack me up Gilligan. Trump is a convicted felon. He has been convicted of sexual assault. His NY company was convicted of fraud. He also was able to defer 4 other felony indictments worth about another 30 felonies, until the election, so they got tossed.
All on appeal or tossed and nothing will be paid. I don't care about any of your political warfare, and nobody else does either.
I don't know which if any are on appeal. It doesn't matter. Fact, he was found guilty of all the things I posted. Innocent until proven guilty. Well, he was proven guilty. Being white trash none of it matters to you and that's ok, because you are white trash.
T
How did I miss this little gem?
We know that you don't know, twerp. You're a moron.
SPOILER ALERT: Any of the very few cases that haven't already been tossed out are on appeal. And he's going to win all of them.
You are a loser and your party is dead.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
BTW, Ted...
She wasn't arrested for any judgements that she made.
As per your own article, had you bothered to read down that far, this is what she was arrested for, and there is plenty of video proof of her doing it too.Quote:
Dugan is accused of helping a Mexican national named Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who is facing misdemeanor battery charges. He was in Dugan’s courtroom on April 18 for a hearing when ICE agents allegedly tried to take him into custody. A deputy in Dugan’s courtroom claimed she directed Flores-Ruiz to leave through a jury door, per the motion.
“The government’s prosecution here reaches directly into a state courthouse, disrupting active proceedings, and interferes with the official duties of an elected judge,” the motion alleges.
Dugan is scheduled to appear in court on Thursday to enter a plea.
She was arrested for disregarding lawful orders that compelled the criminal illegal alien invader to be handed over to ICE to be deported and then trying to give him an escape route while keeping them busy. Who knows... A year from now that might be considered a treasonous act.
I wouldn't keep attempting it, or you might find out.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I know exactly what she did. And she did it in her courtroom. She is 100% in charge there. ICE played this whole thing wrong for the sake of a news cycle. Red meat for MAGA losers.
T
Oh. You know what she did, huh Ted?
Looks like she doesn't...
Wisconsin Judge Pleads Not Guilty to Helping Illegal Immigrant Avoid Arrest
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/federal-grand-jury-indicts-wiscons
in-judge-for-allegedly-helping-illegal-immigrant-avoid-arrest/
If your only argument is that you aren't guilty of what all the cameras show you being guilty of, you'd better get ready to suit up in that orange jumpsuit. And you'll never have gainful employment again after being disbarred.
Tick Tock
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The independent voter is doing just fine Gilligan. And we're going to put you out of business come the mid-terms.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If your only argument is that you aren't guilty of what all the cameras show you being guilty of, you'd better get ready to suit up in that orange jumpsuit. And you'll never have gainful employment again after being disbarred.
Tick Tock
You don't understand. Let me help you with that. Trump had all those documents he should not have. We all saw it on camera. You said he had a right to those documents because he was president even though the law said he can't have them. Make up your mind.
In the courtroom, the judge rules. And that is what the law says. Trump bad, the judge good.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
If your only argument is that you aren't guilty of what all the cameras show you being guilty of, you'd better get ready to suit up in that orange jumpsuit. And you'll never have gainful employment again after being disbarred.
Tick Tock
You don't understand. Let me help you with that.
There is nothing in the world that you could ever possibly help me with.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
The independent voter is doing just fine Gilligan. And we're going to put you out of business come the mid-terms.
T
Oh yeah? Who are you going to vote for, Mr. Independent?
You've never voted anything but Democrat in your life.
You're a fucking joke and your party is dead.
Mid-terms are going to be hilarious. And that's without even taking into account that the Senate map looks so bad for Democrats over the next 2 decades that I'm going to be damn near 70 before the Democrats ever have a chance of running it again.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Trump SCOTUS Showdown REACHES its PEAK at MAJOR Oral Argument
Tomorrow at 9am eastern
If someone wants to go to the beginning of the thread and go through everything up until now, I say great. You'll have to read and watch everything. The facts, shit, you'll have to face up to about your boy Trump, will be a real eye opener since I know you guys choose to remain clueless.
Anyway, tomorrow is a big day. Be there or be square.
T
Supreme Court HOLDS MAJOR Oral Argument on CITIZENSHIP
Listened to it all and analysis afterwards. That's still going on. I'll post some of it in a bit. Bottom line, Trump loses. And, this ruling with effect 4 or 5 other Trump emergency filings with the Supreme Court. So, kiss those cases goodby as well. Hey JSF, do you understand the context here?
T
And he laid out a losing argument.
Hey, where is JSF? He talked shit about tearing my thread apart and making me look bad. I responded and he ran away. He's a chicken shit. Too funny...
T
Supreme Court GRILLS Trump Solicitor General in DISASTER Oral Argument
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You should really temper your expectations and stop following the clickbait, dummy.
And JSF sometimes goes weeks without posting these days.
I know that you spend all day, every day, obsessing over people you hate, but everyone else has lives to live.
You're a fucking joke.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
The independent voter is doing just fine Gilligan. And we're going to put you out of business come the mid-terms.
T
Oh yeah? Who are you going to vote for, Mr. Independent?
You've never voted anything but Democrat in your life.
You're a fucking joke and your party is dead.
Mid-terms are going to be hilarious. And that's without even taking into account that the Senate map looks so bad for Democrats over the next 2 decades that I'm going to be damn near 70 before the Democrats ever have a chance of running it again.
An independent voter, often also called an unaffiliated voter or non-affiliated voter in the United States, is a voter who does not align themselves with a political party. An independent is variously defined as a voter who votes for candidates on issues rather than on the basis of a political ideology or partisanship
Because it is so obvious you don't know shit about the independent voter. I've posted what an independent voter is, and what we are not. And we are the farthest one can be from being in a MAGA type cult.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Because it is so obvious you don't know shit about the independent voter. I've posted what an independent voter is, and what they are not.
Nobody gives a single shit what you post, mongoloid.
You're a straight Dem-ticket lemming.
And it doesn't matter whether or not you think your Independent. You're not going to vote Republican for the rest of your life, and after mid-term Primaries you're not going to have anybody you agree with to vote for in the Democratic Party either.
You will be politically homeless and I will be laughing at you again, like I always do.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
... Speaking of laughing...
CNN: Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments on birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions
https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/15/politics/supreme-court-birthright-citiz
enship-nationwide-injunctions-executive-order
The most important bits from today...
Quote:
The Supreme Court on Thursday seemed open to lifting a series of nationwide orders blocking President Donald Trump from enforcing his birthright citizenship policy, even as several of the justices wrestled with the practical implications of allowing the government to deny citizenship to people born in the US.
CNN isn't seeing whatever your MTN clickbait purports to be seeing.
As for your plan to let us know how this case goes by the end of the day, I hope you're hot holding your breath or you're going to suffocate...
Quote:
How soon will the court rule?
In the run up to the arguments, there was significant debate about what the case is actually about: Was it about judicial power, and the ability of lower courts to block a president or the practical impacts of allowing this president to enforce this order?
Throughout the debate on Thursday, it was clear that many of the justices were also having difficulty separating those two issues.
Even though the case has reached the Supreme Court in an emergency posture, it’s not clear how long it will take the justices to resolve it. The last time the court held arguments in an emergency case, an appeal dealing with environmental regulations, it took the justices several months.
Given the complications involved in the birthright case, it’s possible the court will need until the scheduled end of its term next month.
CNN's final take of the 1st day is that this could take months to settle, but so far it definitely looks to be going a way that is great for America and is sure to make Theodore who hates America cry.
Anything else stupid you want to say about the Supreme Court case today, stupid?
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
And Second is a Viet Nam vet and a multi-billionaire oil tycoon.
Nobody cares.
I'm not joking when I say you will have nobody to vote for after mid-terms if you don't do something. Your choices are going to be MAGA or AOC and Co.
Good luck. You'll need it.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
And Second is a Viet Nam vet and a multi-billionaire oil tycoon.
Nobody cares.
I'm not joking when I say you will have nobody to vote for after mid-terms if you don't do something. Your choices are going to be MAGA or AOC and Co.
Good luck. You'll need it.
There you go again; thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from responding to a democrat to responding to an independent. So sad and sooo fucking funny. It's one of the many reasons why I call you Gilligan.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
And Second is a Viet Nam vet and a multi-billionaire oil tycoon.
Nobody cares.
I'm not joking when I say you will have nobody to vote for after mid-terms if you don't do something. Your choices are going to be MAGA or AOC and Co.
Good luck. You'll need it.
There you go again; with the thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from posting to a democrat to posting to an independent. So sad...
T
Speaking for everybody? What are you even talking about? Be specific.
What lie are you referring to? Be specific.
I'm sitting here showing off 5 articles worth of text per day of critical thinking coming out of my head, son.
All you've got is article headlines and clickbait videos (who lied to you again today all day and are almost always proven false over time) and personal attacks.
How am I supposed to "debate" with you? You can't even come up with any intelligent thoughts of your own and you speak in political cartoons and headlines.
If you want to stop crying and screaming for 5 minutes and behave like an adult and have an adult conversation, I'm all for it.
But I know you far too well and for far too long to know better.
I talk the way I do to you because that is the way you deserved to be talked to.
Period.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There you go again; thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from responding to a democrat to responding to an independent. So sad and sooo fucking funny. It's one of the many reasons why I call you Gilligan.
Like I said
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
And meanwhile, on the other end of Lefty cringe that still hangs on in the RWED, we've got lunatic second who can't seem to make a post anymore without threatening somebody, telling somebody the harm he wants to inflict on somebody, or outright assassination fanfiction.
Do you see where you're at right now?
Take your own advice and look in the mirror. All the adversity and shit that's happening and that has been happening for years is coming from the left. It's nothing but an endless 24/7 barrage of bad news and hate, and burning shit down and breaking stuff and the whining... the ceaseless, nonstop whining....
People don't want any of that anymore. People are tuning out.
Unless Trump really breaks something and Americans really get fucked, it's all over. The Left as you knew it is gone forever. And every time they put out a story-of-the-day about the sky falling only for that problem to evaporate by the next week, The People get even more desensitized to it all and they will care even less.
So you're left in the unenviable position now where you need to actively root against your own country and hope that it fails. Because there is nothing else that is going to ever swing power back to the Democrats now.
Second knows this. It's why he's shitting all over the Democratic Party right now and calling them cowards for not literally killing Trump.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
And Second is a Viet Nam vet and a multi-billionaire oil tycoon.
Nobody cares.
I'm not joking when I say you will have nobody to vote for after mid-terms if you don't do something. Your choices are going to be MAGA or AOC and Co.
Good luck. You'll need it.
There you go again; with the thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from posting to a democrat to posting to an independent. So sad...
T
Speaking for everybody? What are you even talking about? Be specific.
What lie are you referring to? Be specific.
I'm sitting here showing off 5 articles worth of text per day of critical thinking coming out of my head, son.
All you've got is article headlines and clickbait videos (who lied to you again today all day and are almost always proven false over time) and personal attacks.
How am I supposed to "debate" with you? You can't even come up with any intelligent thoughts of your own and you speak in political cartoons and headlines.
If you want to stop crying and screaming for 5 minutes and behave like an adult and have an adult conversation, I'm all for it.
But I know you far too well and for far too long to know better.
I talk the way I do to you because that is the way you deserved to be talked to.
Period.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
There you go again; thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from responding to a democrat to responding to an independent. So sad and sooo fucking funny. It's one of the many reasons why I call you Gilligan.
Like I said
T
That's not a reply.
I asked you questions. Answer them or shut the fuck up. I'm done with your dumbassery today.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I was in the military when I voted for Nixon. I also voted for Bush senior.
T
And Second is a Viet Nam vet and a multi-billionaire oil tycoon.
Nobody cares.
I'm not joking when I say you will have nobody to vote for after mid-terms if you don't do something. Your choices are going to be MAGA or AOC and Co.
Good luck. You'll need it.
There you go again; with the thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from posting to a democrat to posting to an independent. So sad...
T
Speaking for everybody? What are you even talking about? Be specific.
What lie are you referring to? Be specific.
I'm sitting here showing off 5 articles worth of text per day of critical thinking coming out of my head, son.
All you've got is article headlines and clickbait videos (who lied to you again today all day and are almost always proven false over time) and personal attacks.
How am I supposed to "debate" with you? You can't even come up with any intelligent thoughts of your own and you speak in political cartoons and headlines.
If you want to stop crying and screaming for 5 minutes and behave like an adult and have an adult conversation, I'm all for it.
But I know you far too well and for far too long to know better.
I talk the way I do to you because that is the way you deserved to be talked to.
Period.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
There you go again; thinking you speak for everybody. That said, you have to keep lying when you post to me because you don't have the critical thinking skills to shift your debate, from responding to a democrat to responding to an independent. So sad and sooo fucking funny. It's one of the many reasons why I call you Gilligan.
Like I said
T
That's not a reply.
I asked you questions. Answer them or shut the fuck up. I'm done with your dumbassery today.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
I know exactly what she did. And she did it in her courtroom. She is 100% in charge there. ICE played this whole thing wrong for the sake of a news cycle. Red meat for MAGA losers.
T
Yup...
T
CURVEBALL By Wisconsin Judge
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm going to wait it out and not worry about it, Ted.
We'll know it didn't go your way when you never bring it up again after it dies and falls out of the news cycle, which is about 99% of your thread here so far.
Worst case scenario for American Citizens out of this specific case is that it doesn't go the right way and then it gets appealed to a court where it will be set right. Just like 99% of your thread here so far.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
SIX, I appreciated what you said. I do come here for some conversation. And I will admit when I come into the political threads it is usually to read, but all the tension between Canada and the US has had me speaking out. My home this is, this continent. The tension is why I posted "elbows up" in tag. Just showing my perspective on things. And every so often when I post a thread that I think is interesting or funny. I am just looking for as I said a little conversation.
I do try to treat everyone as an individual here as I do in the real world. People tell me that I do succeed out there and I hope to some degree I do here.
My dad, my uncles and my aunts and of course my grandmother all looked Indian. Trust me when I say there was no mistaking who was walking towards you when you saw my dad.
With his brown skin, black eyes and black hair. I and my cousins, though my brother has slightly darker skin than I do, don't look that Indian. It's there but you have to know what to look for in our faces.
And on a final note. I thought at some point I asked you and THG, not to drag me into your squabbles. I mean I know I am the lone Canadian here but I don't feel like playing peace keeper.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes. I know. I won't do it again, and I'm glad that you're not all bent about me doing it yesterday.
I haven't been much of a conversationalist for a while, and can't really promise that I'll continue to be one either. I'll try to be better though. I practically stopped posting in the RWED because Second keeps a ledger of everything I post in there and when we're having an argument in another thread he'll quote and put the exact link to a post I made 3 weeks ago that's completely unrelated to the topic at hand and take something I said there completely out of context and say something shitty to me.
Most of what I'm doing with them is just trolling. They get all nutty over every headline that comes out every day. Sky is falling for a different reason 5 days a week and usually calms down over the weekend until it picks right back up again. I just get more angry about it than I should.
I ain't worried about anything right now any more than I always worry about things.
We all just gotta chill and take a step back from all of this and behave more like you do.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Yes. I know. I won't do it again, and I'm glad that you're not all bent about me doing it yesterday.
I haven't been much of a conversationalist for a while, and can't really promise that I'll continue to be one either. I'll try to be better though. I practically stopped posting in the RWED because Second keeps a ledger of everything I post in there and when we're having an argument in another thread he'll quote and put the exact link to a post I made 3 weeks ago that's completely unrelated to the topic at hand and take something I said there completely out of context and say something shitty to me.
Most of what I'm doing with them is just trolling. They get all nutty over every headline that comes out every day. Sky is falling for a different reason 5 days a week and usually calms down over the weekend until it picks right back up again. I just get more angry about it than I should.
I ain't worried about anything right now any more than I always worry about things.
We all just gotta chill and take a step back from all of this and behave more like you do.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
I understand SIX, which is why the laughing emoji. I was making reference to Canadian peacekeepers that have operated around the world is all. Saw no reason to get bent out of shape.
I try to ignore that because I know what is happening with the trolling.
That's okay. I just miss it is all. Not many people in RL that I can have a proper conversation with. Even the ladies that I play mah jong with get bent out of shape over my frustration with the game or I correct their history. So on Thursday and the occasional Wednesday it is basically shut up and play.
I hear ya on the lot of stuff on your plate. I know all about that stuff. You get one thing sorted out which leads to another thing needing sorted out. Never ending.
I had to take a step back from your Federal election last November as we had a kerffule with ours in BC. As it is either the Bloc or the Conservatives are questioning 3 ridings in Quebec and even if the votes are changed slightly, it isn't going to make much of a difference. Liberals still won. So, I am trying to untangle myself from the Canadian federal election and I think I have succeeded. Not sure though.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wow. You guys cranked up the post counter yesterday. 27 posts, not including the 24th.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Wow. You guys cranked up the post counter yesterday. 27 posts, not including the 24th.
You were one of those posts. And I see you are choosing to ignore my response. What's the matter? Did you see it and run because you couldn't think of something witty to say? Yeah, that's it.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hey JSF. Could you put this into context for me? Too funny...
T
Supreme Court Makes MAJOR RULING on Trump OPERATION
Trump just suffered his 4th loss in a row at the US Supreme Court, this time another 7-2 ruling that prevents Trump from continuing to fly undocumented people to foreign prisons without proper due process, and before the Supreme Court can ultimately rule on whether he is properly using power under the Alien Enemies Act. Michael Popok ties the last 4 losses together, and explains how this one mirrors the 1 AM ruling a month ago in the 7 justices and the 2 dissents (led of course by Alito).
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
All I see is more hatred for America and Americans from Ted today.
That and a dead link to whatever clickbait he was trying to post.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
All I see is more hatred for America and Americans from Ted today.
That and a dead link to whatever clickbait he was trying to post.
That's because you're blind. I post here to expose America haters. It's you and your kind that is doing everything it can to tear it down.
And you can pretend you don't know what is in my post but I know better. It says it in big headlines you can't miss even without watching the video. The video is provided as proof. Something you mostly don't do because the facts don't usually favor what you want. And the link works just fine Gilligan. Haven't learned how to play a video yet, aye? Get a child to show you.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
T
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power
Very much looking forward to your follow up on how this one goes, Theodore.
SPOILER ALERT: When we never hear this topic brought up again by Ted 72 hours from now, we will know that it ultimately didn't go Ted's way. Just like the rest of these never, ever do.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
All I see is more hatred for America and Americans from Ted today.
That and a dead link to whatever clickbait he was trying to post.
That's because you're blind. I post here to expose America haters. It's you and your kind that is doing everything it can to tear it down.
I reject wholesale your entire outlook on life.
You are a low-IQ scumbag who hates America. You should leave. Now.
Don't procrastinate and just go. You're not going to like it here anymore.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-allows-trump-anti-144550761.ht
ml
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power
Very much looking forward to your follow up on how this one goes, Theodore.
SPOILER ALERT: When we never hear this topic brought up again by Ted 72 hours from now, we will know that it ultimately didn't go Ted's way. Just like the rest of these never, ever do.
Your spoiler alert is an example of how you take losses for Trump and ignore them by saying something stupid and moving on. Your points are feckless. In this thread you never provide any evidence Trump hasn't lost, while nearly every time I post I produce evidence he has lost.
Too funny...
T
California Senator Alex Padilla foiled Republicans’ attempt to pass the SAVE Act this week. Sen. Padilla joins Marc Elias to discuss protecting voters’ information from DOGE, his experience expanding ballot access as California’s secretary of state and the work Senate Democrats
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/appeals-court-allows-trump-anti-144550761.ht
ml
It was filed in a Kentucky court. They shopped for a friendly judicial district to file. It will be overruled as it goes up the food chain. The right to collective bargaining has been settled into law. And you would be an idiot to think we should give up that right which protects us from government overreach. Doesn't that clash with all your other MAGA loving posts in the past? Sure it does.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Poor Gilligan; he complained throughout Trumps failed 2020 election bid, that the election was stolen. Even though Trump lost all 63 court cases claiming it was stolen, because his lawyers could offer no evidence at all. Jack was livid. Since then, the republicans have tried and are trying, to rig elections in their favor.
What’s my larger point? Jack is a lie. No question, no debate. Trump is stealing from the average Amercian, Jack denies it. Trump is in the midst of a soft coup. Jack remains silent. Everything Jack has complained about in the past he is for with Trump. Jack is a lie.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
A Win Against Trump
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nobody cares about your low-IQ headline parroting, monkey.
Keep losing, loser.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
‘Unconstitutional under any view': Judge enjoins entire Trump executive order targeting law firm that previously employed top Mueller lieutenant
A Washington, D.C., judge has fully blocked one of President Donald Trump‘s executive orders targeting disfavored law firms.
In late March, the 45th and 47th president signed an Executive Order entitled “Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block” which says the Chicago-based national law firm of Jenner & Block LLP has “abandoned the profession’s highest ideals, condoned partisan ‘lawfare,’ and abused its pro bono practice to engage in activities that undermine justice and the interests of the United States.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/unconstitutional-under-any-vie
w-judge-enjoins-entire-trump-executive-order-targeting-law-firm-that-previously-employed-top-mueller-lieutenant/ar-AA1Fwjdn?ocid=msedgntp&pc=EDBBAN&cvid=ab36089655e44591d1363ebe0e25feb6&ei=81
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Who cares?
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
One way Trump has fucked up big time is he is acting like a dictator with everything and everyone. It makes it easy to show in court Trump is acting out of biases. "Systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment," and not for any other, legal reason.
T
Fed up judge issues SCATHING ruling against Trump
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
T
When the Trump Administration “wolf comes as a wolf” and violates the First Amendment rights of national public radio and violates Congress’ intent on setting up NPR and PBS, they are left with no choice but to run to federal court and stop it
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
BIG ARROW CLICKBAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Shut up, Ted.
Taxpayers will no longer fund Leftist propaganda. Nobody is telling them that they can't keep running their mouths and spewing bullshit. Just that they can do it on their own dime from now on.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG: Saturday, November 2, 2019 3:12 PM
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
T
Judge Chutkan STOPS Trump COLD in Musk-Backed Power Scheme
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Keep cheerleading against America and Americans and see where it gets you.
This will be overturned, just like everything else always is.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Judges are getting very angry with Trump. That helps when judges hear other cases. Trump says it is because this or that, and the judges though recent experences with Trump know that is bullshit.
T
Judge Strikes Down Trump's Order Targeting Law Firm
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That's great. We need more of this to rush these things up the food chain and get all the appeals out of the way so we can finally bury the Democratic Party once and for all.
I don't know why you all work so hard for free for Trump, but god bless ya.
Keep up the good work guys.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
This is a big deal.
T
Judge Chutkan green lights a lawsuit challenging Trump’s “tyranny” and use of Musk/DOGE, while issuing a surprise ruling involving Trump himself.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
Judge Chutkan green lights a lawsuit challenging Trump’s “tyranny” and use of Musk/DOGE, while issuing a surprise ruling involving Trump himself.
Oh. Do be sure to keep us up to date on this one, Ted.
Riveting, edge of your seat stuff. Truly.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
First let me say, I told you so. Big time, I told you so.
Trump is constantly being told by the federal courts he is breaking the law. And they are blocking what he is doing, again and again and again and again and so on. The man thinks he is a dictator. Everything he is doing adds up to being a slow coup. And he is at lighting speed, being shut down.
T
Trump TARIFFS declared UNLAWFUL by Court!!!
Stunning ruling by a federal court striking down Donald Trump’s tariffs against the world.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You didn't tell anybody anything worth telling, and whatever clickbait you just posted means nothing.
Nobody cares, Ted.
You did that.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
A three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade, a relatively low-profile court in Manhattan, stopped Trump’s global tariffs that he imposed citing emergency economic powers
Low-level scrub activist judges.
They will be curb stomped on appeal.
*yawn*
Next.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump's only hope is if more than half of the Supreme Court is 100% corrupt.
T
Trump IN SHAMBLES as PERSONALLY Chosen Court BLOWS UP His PLAN
In shocking news, Trump's chosen court, the Court of International Trade, has just found his entire Tariff plan to be unconstitutional and blocked.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm sure it did, Ted. I'm sure it did.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup
Congress, not the executive branch, has the power to enact tariffs.
By Conor Friedersdorf | May 29, 2025, 10:09 AM ET
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/05/trump-tariffs-court-
rulings/682964/
The debate over President Donald Trump’s tariffs often focuses on whether they are prudent. Defenders insist that Trump’s tariffs will help make America great again and boost national security. Critics counter that they’ll wreck the economy. But the strongest argument against the tariffs is actually that they are unlawful. Neither the Constitution nor any statute authorizes Trump to impose what he ordered.
Now, months after sticklers for the rule of law began making that argument, it has finally been vindicated: Yesterday, the United States Court of International Trade, the federal court with jurisdiction over civil actions related to tariffs, struck down almost all of Trump’s tariffs in a 49-page ruling. The decision includes a detailed discussion of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law delegating increased power over trade to the president during national emergencies, which the White House had cited to support its moves. It concludes that the law does not authorize any of Trump’s tariff orders. https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Administration officials quickly challenged the ruling’s legitimacy. “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. “The judicial coup is out of control,” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted on social media. But their objections are dubious, not because the judiciary never overreaches, but because at least three features of this dispute make the argument for judicial overreach here especially weak.
First, the Constitution is clear: Article I delegates the tariff power to Congress, and Article II fails to vest that power in the presidency. So the Trump administration begins from a weak position. And the court’s ruling did not arrogate the tariff power to the judiciary, which might have warranted describing it as “a judicial coup.” It merely affirmed Congress’s power over tariffs. Americans need not fear a judicial dictatorship here. Congress can do whatever it likes. Indeed, it could pass a law reinstating all of Trump’s tariffs today without violating the court’s ruling. But Congress is extremely unlikely to do so, in part because Trump’s tariff policy clearly lacks public support; for example, a recent poll found that 63 percent of Americans disapprove of it.
Second, the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit include the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Vermont––all democratically accountable entities in a federal system where states are meant to act as a check on unlawful exercises of federal power. All of those states asked the court to rule in this manner to vindicate their rights under the law. As Oregon’s attorney general put it, “We brought this case because the Constitution doesn’t give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy.” States controlled by both Republicans and Democrats routinely file lawsuits asking the judiciary to strike down purportedly unlawful actions by the president. There is bipartisan consensus that such judicial review is legitimate, not couplike, and such rulings have constrained presidents from both parties.
Third, when Congress created the Court of International Trade and later defined its jurisdiction, its precise intent was to create an arm of the judiciary that would exercise authority over trade disputes. Congress made a deliberate choice to alter an earlier law vesting that power in the Treasury Department, under the executive branch, and deliberately vested it in a court instead. To quote from the 1980 law that defined its powers, “The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup
Yes. It is.
And they will soon be ignored and dealt with accordingly.
Tick Tock
The world you thought you were living in 6 months ago is dead. Forever.
Get used to it.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Justice Jackson’s Dissent in Maine Transgender Case Cites an Unlikely Authority — Justice Amy Coney Barrett
https://www.nysun.com/article/justice-jacksons-dissent-in-maine-transg
ender-case-cites-an-unlikely-authority-justice-amy-coney-barrett
Amy Coney Barrett BETRAYS Trump, SIDES With Liberals Over Trump Deportations
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
and dealt with accordingly.
dealt with by the Supreme Amy that he appointed?
Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, a new analysis shows. The rulings against the president came from judges across the ideological spectrum.
https://x.com/DemocracyDocket/status/1928090695505523076
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Striking Down Trump’s Tariffs Isn’t a Judicial Coup
Congress, not the executive branch, has the power to enact tariffs.
By Conor Friedersdorf | May 29, 2025, 10:09 AM ET
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/05/trump-tariffs-court-
rulings/682964/
The debate over President Donald Trump’s tariffs often focuses on whether they are prudent. Defenders insist that Trump’s tariffs will help make America great again and boost national security. Critics counter that they’ll wreck the economy. But the strongest argument against the tariffs is actually that they are unlawful. Neither the Constitution nor any statute authorizes Trump to impose what he ordered.
Now, months after sticklers for the rule of law began making that argument, it has finally been vindicated: Yesterday, the United States Court of International Trade, the federal court with jurisdiction over civil actions related to tariffs, struck down almost all of Trump’s tariffs in a 49-page ruling. The decision includes a detailed discussion of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law delegating increased power over trade to the president during national emergencies, which the White House had cited to support its moves. It concludes that the law does not authorize any of Trump’s tariff orders. https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
Administration officials quickly challenged the ruling’s legitimacy. “It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement. “The judicial coup is out of control,” Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted on social media. But their objections are dubious, not because the judiciary never overreaches, but because at least three features of this dispute make the argument for judicial overreach here especially weak.
First, the Constitution is clear: Article I delegates the tariff power to Congress, and Article II fails to vest that power in the presidency. So the Trump administration begins from a weak position. And the court’s ruling did not arrogate the tariff power to the judiciary, which might have warranted describing it as “a judicial coup.” It merely affirmed Congress’s power over tariffs. Americans need not fear a judicial dictatorship here. Congress can do whatever it likes. Indeed, it could pass a law reinstating all of Trump’s tariffs today without violating the court’s ruling. But Congress is extremely unlikely to do so, in part because Trump’s tariff policy clearly lacks public support; for example, a recent poll found that 63 percent of Americans disapprove of it.
Second, the plaintiffs in this particular lawsuit include the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Vermont––all democratically accountable entities in a federal system where states are meant to act as a check on unlawful exercises of federal power. All of those states asked the court to rule in this manner to vindicate their rights under the law. As Oregon’s attorney general put it, “We brought this case because the Constitution doesn’t give any president unchecked authority to upend the economy.” States controlled by both Republicans and Democrats routinely file lawsuits asking the judiciary to strike down purportedly unlawful actions by the president. There is bipartisan consensus that such judicial review is legitimate, not couplike, and such rulings have constrained presidents from both parties.
Third, when Congress created the Court of International Trade and later defined its jurisdiction, its precise intent was to create an arm of the judiciary that would exercise authority over trade disputes. Congress made a deliberate choice to alter an earlier law vesting that power in the Treasury Department, under the executive branch, and deliberately vested it in a court instead. To quote from the 1980 law that defined its powers, “The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of anyNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
dealt with by the Supreme Amy that he appointed?
Trump administration has lost a shocking 96% of rulings in federal district courts so far this month, a new analysis shows. The rulings against the president came from judges across the ideological spectrum.
Tim doing his clickbait sthick after he's taken nothing but a year of hard financial losses, and some random twitter account called "Democracy Docket".
Not worried about any of that in the slightest.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
When Trump first went after law firms some capitulated. Big mistake; their best and biggest clients are walking away because they don't want pussies representing them.
These law firms should now sue because they were clearly blackmailed by Trump.
T
Trump’s Plan to Control Law Firms Just BLEW UP in His Face
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Complete horseshit. Just like every post you've made in the last 12 years.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
tick tock
T
Trump’s OWN Lawyers FORCE HIM into SUBMISSION
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Complete horseshit. Just like every post you've made in the last 12 years.
Laughing here Gilligan. The Trump administration has lost 96 percent of all their court cases since he took office. He has lost 26 of 27 cases in May alone.
You look like an ass saying otherwise. Plain and simple. It's like you’ve thrown in the towel. Super smart Jack is not so smart after all. In fact, you’ve never had a winning response to what I’ve posted. Why, because you’re a moron. You still haven’t learned you can’t look smart arguing against the facts.
I’m laughing in your face dip shit. For many years I've been laughing in your face.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Laughing here Gilligan. The Trump administration has lost 96 percent of all their court cases since he took office. He has lost 26 of 27 cases in May alone. And here are 4 more.
T
Donald Trump Loses FOUR COURT CASES Within Hours!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So thirsty.
So desperate.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I see you have a big fucking mouth in two non-related threads tonight, Ted, but you didn't reply to this one, didja?
Curious that, innit?
Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador Gilligan. What does that mean? It means I was right and you were wrong.
Remember, say something brilliant so that I no longer wish to return and post here ever again.
T
For The First Time, Trump Administration Facilitated The Return Of A Man They Wrongfully Deported!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I see you have a big fucking mouth in two non-related threads tonight, Ted, but you didn't reply to this one, didja?
Curious that, innit?
Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador Gilligan. What does that mean? It means I was right and you were wrong.
Remember, say something brilliant so that I no longer wish to return and post here ever again.
T
For The First Time, Trump Administration Facilitated The Return Of A Man They Wrongfully Deported!
You asked for it, you got it...
You are celebrating the re-invasion of a drug and human trafficking criminal illegal alien gang member, affiliated with a gang that is now considered a terror group, who will face his charges and will be immediately deported again.
Sounds pretty expensive for the US Taxpayer just so you can get your nut off for the day.
There is nothing to argue with you here Ted. This is just more proof of you being an idiot and/or that you hate America and American citizens. Same old shit, different day.
The only thing that has changed is just how low your bar is set in 2025. It was bad enough they had you blowing Liz and Dick Cheney out of desperation in 2024, now they've got you sucking on illegal alien Venezuelan gang member cock with glee.
By all means. Celebrate your little "win" here, if that's how you really perceive it, for whatever good that does you and your dead party. Whatever it takes, I suppose, so you don't slit your wrists at this point.
As for the "wrongfully deported" part, that hasn't made its way up to the Supreme Court yet. All the laws will be rewritten over the next 3 years and set in stone. Not only will it have been legal to deport him under the incoming major changes to immigration law you're going to witness soon, but they will also encompass 10's of millions more, including women and children. They're all going back home.
Three things happened with this illegal criminal's return. Nothing more, nothing less:
1. Ideologues like you with no ability for critical thinking finally got your first "happy" headline in weeks.
2. The majority of Americans on the other side will be enraged by this and will dig their heels in even harder against criminal illegal aliens.
3. The normies in the middle get to see, yet again, who the Democrats really care about and realize even more how good of a choice they made when they voted Not Democrat in 2024.
So yeah. Party up tonight. Such a major win for you personally, I'm sure.
Tell your non-existent grand kids one day all about the fact that for the additional court and legal costs it will take to process this one scumbag who should never have been here in the first place, you could have put all of them through college for free with money to spare.
Job well done, Democrats. What now?
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh...
And for the short stint he will be here before he gets sent right back home, you'd better hope he doesn't hurt and/or kill any American Citizens while he's back in the US.
If I were you, I'd be sweating bullets about that after your little celebration. They tend to do that. And they really love raping and murdering young white women.
But then again, if I were you, I would be way too smart to behave like you do at all and I'd have nothing to worry about.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
My one and only concern has always been the rule of law. Everyone gets due process. Without that our democracy is done. Now it looked like when he got back, he would have his day in court and then be shipped out.
If you saw the press conference, you'd know Pam Bondi may have fuck that up big time. She listed off a lot of the same things Gilligan said. However, he is only facing one charge, trafficking aliens. Why, because the rest is bullshit. Watch the video.
T
Trump DOJ Presser INSTANTLY DESTROYS Case
AG Pam Bondi should stop giving press conferences, because all it does is give Federal Judges like Judge Xinis ample evidence to find her and the Trump Administration in contempt of court, this time in the Armando Garcia matter.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
We aren't giving any illegals "due process", Ted. It would take 120 years to get them out if we did that. Citizens get Due Process. Non-Citizens get the boot.
We're just playing ball until we steamroll your activist judges and the Supreme Court allows us to start the removals en masse. If you don't have a social security number, you're out. Period. And we're going to remove the anchor babies too.
This is what happens when you allow your party to go nuts for 12 years straight and you don't call them out on any of it.
The over-correction will be as severe as it is swift. And there's not a goddamned thing you can do about it.
Party up this weekend. Celebrate the life of another degenerate thug, just like you did for 5 years with George Floyd. You guys just look like bigger assholes every week.
The world you thought you knew no longer exists. And you have nobody but yourself to blame.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
T
Judge in USIP Case Delivers Trump/Musk/DOGE CRUSHING REBUKE of their Lawlessness & Abuse of Power
Remember this clickbait from May 19th, Ted?
Supreme Court hands DOGE two big wins in FOIA and Social Security access cases
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/3434327/supreme-
court-doge-wins-foia-social-security-access/
Be sure to thank your Democrats for fast tracking everything all the way up the ladder for us at that record pace I warned you against.
Quote:
Two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers — filed the lawsuit against DOGE. They alleged that the DOGE employees’ access to personal data could violate the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.
Well... These unions have no more concern about this than 300 Million other people do...
Unless they were trying to hide something. They weren't trying to hide anything, do you think Ted?
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Quote:
Two unions — the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and the American Federation of Teachers — filed the lawsuit against DOGE. They alleged that the DOGE employees’ access to personal data could violate the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.
Well... These unions have no more concern about this than 300 Million other people do...
Unless they were trying to hide something. They weren't trying to hide anything, do you think Ted?
Like this, perhaps?
Nearly One-Quarter Of U.S. Public School Enrollment Could Be Anchor Babies
https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/05/nearly-one-quarter-of-u-s-public-
school-enrollment-could-be-anchor-babies/
I feel bad for the Citizen children who have had their education disrupted by this, and Covid and Democratic Party bullshit for generations.
That's coming to an end soon.
It's going to be a real shame when the 9 Million illegal kids are the way we get to everyone here illegally who hasn't already fled.
A lot of them will be fleeing and we won't even have to pay for their removal.
Tick Tack
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NBC News: The questions raised by the new charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
The potential political fallout for Democrats and why a federal prosecutor resigned days before the indictment remain unanswered.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kilmar-abrego-garcia-questions-rc
na211601
Quote:
The sudden return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States on Friday to face federal charges of smuggling migrants across the country was a messaging triumph for the Trump administration.
The news deflected public attention from a series of unanimous court rulings — including a Supreme Court decision — that President Donald Trump did not have the power to unilaterally detain and deport individuals to foreign prisons without a review by a judge.
And the allegations against Abrego Garcia are damning. A federal grand jury found that the 29-year-old was an MS-13 member who transported thousands of undocumented immigrants, including children, from Texas to states across the country for profit for nine years. He allegedly also transported firearms and drugs, abused female migrants and was linked to an incident in Mexico where a tractor-trailer overturned and killed 50 migrants.
Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, a lawyer representing Abrego Garcia, said Saturday that he planned to meet his client for the first time on Sunday, but declined to further comment.
A former senior law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of retaliation, said he was struck by the large amount of resources the DOJ put into investigating Abrego Garcia.
"They came hard at a relatively low level guy, which does not necessarily make it improper — just odd. Perhaps they wanted the last word, which seems childish," said the former official. "Typically, you work up the chain; not down it. That said, at least he gets his due process rights this time around."
In a telephone interview with NBC News’ Kristen Welker on Saturday, Trump hailed Abrego Garcia’s indictment and predicted it would be easy for federal prosecutors to convict him. “I think it should be,” he said. “It should be.”
Multiple questions about Abrego Garcia, the case against him, and the political fallout remain unanswered.
Will Democrats pay a political price?
For months, Abrego Garcia’s lawyers, his wife, and some Democrats, have denied that he was an MS-13 gang member. They generally portrayed him as a Maryland construction worker and claimed he was transporting co-workers when a Tennessee state trooper stopped him on Interstate 40 on Nov. 30, 2022.
The indictment paints a different picture: Abrego Garcia was transporting nine Hispanic males without identification or luggage in a Chevrolet Suburban. Prosecutors allege he “knowingly and falsely” told the trooper they “had been in St. Louis for two weeks doing construction” and were returning to Maryland.
However, license plate reader data showed that the Suburban had not been near St. Louis for 12 months. Instead, it had been in Houston where, according to prosecutors, Abrego Garcia had picked up the men. The vehicle was not carrying tools or construction equipment, but its rear cargo area had been modified with makeshift seating to transport more passengers.
The apparent strength of the government’s case could reignite debate among Democrats about the risks of focusing on Abrego Garcia’s case. For weeks, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and other Democrats emphasized that their criticism targeted Trump’s decision to unilaterally deport Abrego Garcia without judicial oversight, not a defense of Abrego Garcia himself.
When Kristen Welker of NBC News asked Trump about Van Hollen, the President mocked the senator and said defending the Abrego Garcia would backfire on Democrats.
“He’s a loser. The guy’s a loser,” Trump said, referring to Van Hollen. “They’re going to lose because of that same thing. That’s not what people want to hear. He’s trying to defend a man who’s got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular.”
Van Hollen defended his stanceNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THG:
OK, we are going to need this thread just to cover all the different losses for Trump in the courts.
Brace yourself...
T
Trump HIT with NIGHTMARE SCENARIO in CA Lawsuit
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nobody cares about your clickbait, Ted.
--------------------------------------------------
"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's all about due process.
T
Texas Judge SLAPS DOWN Trump's Deportation Order, says Due Process NOW!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME