Abortion
POSTED BY: cartoon
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 03:33
VIEWED: 22628
PAGE 12 of 28
Jack, while the "Get em tied" thought is in my eyes a valid argument, that particular issue is complicated by a whole raft of liability-related BS that makes it almost impossible to get done for the reasons you suggest.
I know this because one of my ex's actually tried to go that route after being more or less forced to carry an unwanted child due to contraceptive failure, who then abdicated custody of it in a fashion I found somewhat irresponsible and offensive, but it wasn't my kid or my decision, so I had no useful input on the matter.
After that, she made every attempt to get em tied, and nobody would freakin DO it, some because they didn't feel she was old enough (mid-20's) some because she didn't have X amount of kids already, but in general, it could not be done because it WOULD not be done, by anyone qualified to do it.
So that option is prettymuch removed from the table on this one, i'm afraid.
What rooks me so horribly is that many of the same folks who are so concerned about a fetus couldn't give a damn what happens after it pops out, and the barriers to normal folk who cannot have kids adopting are insane.
First off, it costs more in legal fees than a hummer H1 with every possible option, it comes with invasive nose-poking into ones life, and a raft of unethical religious questions and tests that have little if any bearing on the matter.
There's plenty of folks who'd adopt if it wasn't legally and financially prohibitive to do so, try dealing with MARE for a while and you'll see what a nightmare it is.
And so, my "kids" are furry little refugees from certain death that were more or less street adoptions, four of whom were in pretty awful shape to begin with - all of whom are happy, healthy and well cared for now.
Our cats are surrogate children, due to our inability to have them, and the impossibility of adoption, how sad is that ?
-Frem
It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yes Frem, this being such an impacting topic for everybody on the planet, there is no real cookie cutter solution. Having never looked into the possibility of getting them tied myself, I don't even know how much it costs and I'm assuming it's very expensive. I'm also assuming that it's not covered by your regular health insurance plans at work either.
I think it's very sad that you didn't have any children of your own, by blood or otherwise. You seem to me to be a very wise person who doesn't regurgitate every little BS line that you're fed on the news and I don't think enough kids have a role model at home that might influence them to question the intentions and validity of things that they are just expected to believe are true "because".
Having never looked into adoption, I never knew it cost so much. That too, is unfortunate. It makes you think that maybe all of these unwanted kids are going to be raised by the Government and maybe one day they'll outnumber the children being raised by families at home...... But Huxley already wrote about that and I'm quite sure he did a better job than I could when he wrote it all those years ago.
There are plenty of ways to prevent childbirth and they're almost 100% effective. I think that these alternatives, coupled with an adequite intelligence that will keep one from shagging some lowlife who could/would never stick around to raise a child would be enough to make this such a non-issue that I wouldn't ever have to hear or think about it anymore.
I want somebody to say that the issue is over and the Government is staying out of it, and then I will never have to hear about it again. I don't want to judge other people and I don't like doing it either, but I find some of the things posted here infuriating. BigGov is forcing me, nay all of us, to pass judgement here. They should stay the hell out of it and then it can remain the abortionee's and their doctor's business as it should be.
As frustrated as people make me here and in the "real world", I can't even smoke a damn cigarette without going out in the sub-zero weather.
"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." http://www.myspace.com/6ixstringjack
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
All I got to say to that is...
Amen, Bro.
And hail to The Church of Mind Yer Own Bizness.
-F
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Police find five foetuses at the home of US anti-abortion activist
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-60950016
She told local news outlet WUSA9 that "people would freak out when they heard" what was inside the containers being seized.
WHO calls for widespread removal of #abortion restrictions, end to ‘criminalization’
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-30-who-calls-widespread-removal-of
-abortion-restrictions.html
Shithole Commiefornia?
California introduces new bill that would allow mothers to #kill their babies up to 7 days after birth."
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/24/california-introduces-new-bill-t
hat-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-7-days-after-birth/
·
New California bill, AB 2223, prohibits the criminalization of perinatal (one month after birth) death, essentially allowing for "after-birth abortions" up to one month after birth
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=2
02120220AB2223
Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
And hail to The Church of Mind Yer Own Bizness.
From the person who sent his fellow Americans Death-Threats for not voting Hillary Clinton?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
California introduces new bill that would allow mothers to #kill their babies up to 7 days after birth."
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/24/california-introduces-new-bill-t
hat-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-7-days-after-birth/
Does anybody have the exact legal verbiage from AB 2223 that states specifically that a mother can murder a baby up to 7 days old either herself or by proxy that they could provide us?
I've never heard of miamistandard.news before and have no idea what side of the lies they're pushing.
This story reeks of a trap.
Rile up a bunch of pro-life Rethuglicans and get them to start calling this the "Child Murder Bill" so they can be just as big of clowns as all the Leftist pieces of shit calling Florida's recent bill the "Don't Say Gay Bill".
--------------------------------------------------
Me: "Remember Covid?"
Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Supreme Court spokesperson on leaked draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade: “The Court has no comment."
Gianna Jessen was intended to die before she was born?
https://www.nujournal.com/news/local-news/2017/09/17/first-choice-hero
-for-life-banquet-to-be-held-tuesday/
Sarah Brown was born brain-damaged, lame, and blind and somehow survived for five years
https://www.lifesitenews.com/pulse/the-abortionist-injected-sarahs-bra
in-with-poison-but-she-didnt-die-until/
Melissa Ohden now aged 42,
https://www.lifenews.com/2020/06/25/woman-who-survived-abortion-i-was-
left-to-die-as-medical-waste/
Josiah is a young man living in Oklahoma who is now very involved in a movement called Abolitionism. While in years past the abolition movement fought things like slavery, their primary focus today is to completely eradicate abortion as an option for pregnant women. Josiah has plenty of reason to oppose it, as he was born as the result of a botched abortion in Korea and now has a maimed arm. He was adopted by a family in Oklahoma and is now grown and healthy.
http://blog.abolishhumanabortion.com/2012/03/my-name-is-josiah-and-i-a
m-abortion.html
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by JAYNEZTOWN:
California introduces new bill that would allow mothers to #kill their babies up to 7 days after birth."
https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/24/california-introduces-new-bill-t
hat-would-allow-mothers-to-kill-their-babies-up-to-7-days-after-birth/
Does anybody have the exact legal verbiage from AB 2223 that states specifically that a mother can murder a baby up to 7 days old either herself or by proxy that they could provide us?
I've never heard of miamistandard.news before and have no idea what side of the lies they're pushing.
This story reeks of a trap.
Rile up a bunch of pro-life Rethuglicans and get them to start calling this the "Child Murder Bill" so they can be just as big of clowns as all the Leftist pieces of shit calling Florida's recent bill the "Don't Say Gay Bill".
--------------------------------------------------
Me: "Remember Covid?"
Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"
Maryland Senate Bill 669 Legalizes Madness? Commiefornia its 123467(a) which exempts a mother from criminal and civil liability for the "perinatal death" of her child but no true definition of "Perinatal death". New language added to AB 2223 proposed legislation would shield the mother from civil and criminal charges for any “actions or omissions” related to her pregnancy, “including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.” There is a description of death separate from miscarrriage or stillbirth or aboution: "miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death", some legal experts say it is intended to cover death after birth. Health and Safety Code referenced and search for the definition of "perinatal" you find it unequivocally defined as up to one month post birth?
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?la
wCode=WIC§ionNum=14134.5.&article=4.&highlight=true&keyword=perinatal
Republican Party has abandoned Hollyweird Commiefornia and all of CA
?
SEC. 7. Section 123467 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read
(b) A person who aids or assists a pregnant person in exercising their rights under this article shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise be deprived of their rights, based solely on their actions to aid or assist a pregnant person in exercising their rights under this article with the pregnant person’s voluntary consent.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
This is a really stupid study. Is it possible that depressed, drug-dependent women CHOOSE abortion because they realise that they're not parent material? It's the problem with any correlation: does A cause B, does B cause A, are they both caused by C, or are they coincidental?
---------------------------------
Reality sucks. Especially when it contradicts our cherished ideas.
If Roe v Wade is overturned the Dems will win in a landslide. If this happens, I believe it is possible they will clean up the Supreme Court. Justices can be impeached, and those who’ve lied about how they would not overturn what has been precedent for decades must be impeached for lying.
This country is founded on the rule of law. This rule of law can only be maintained if we maintain a separation of church and state. It is obvious some on the court are not capable of doing that. They need to go for that reason. And of course, for lying to Congress. That is after all is said and done, against the law.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You're an abortion, Ted.
--------------------------------------------------
Me: "Remember Covid?"
Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The reality is that 30 pct of women have had an abortion some time in their lifetime. even responsible women on birth control having sex with their husbands. Bc birth cotrol isn't foolproof.
That's 15% of the voting age population. And who know how many sisters and mothers sympathize with them?
If the Dems wanted an issue that would cover a multitude of their sins, the Supreme Court might just hand it to them.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Debate not just an America thing?
The Oldenburg Baby is the name given by the German media to Tim, an infant born in Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany on 6 July 1997. Tim was born prematurely in the twenty-fifth week of pregnancy as the result of a failed late-term abortion. Doctors had expected the child would soon die and thus withheld treatment for nine hours. He became a focus of the debate surrounding abortion, especially late-term abortion, and its legal and ethical consequences.
Tim died on the 4th of January 2019 from a lung infection; he was 21 years old
https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/oldenburg_ostfriesland/Ol
denburger-Baby-stirbt-mit-21-Jahren,tim144.html
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME