new deadly human-to-human-transmissible coronavirus emerges out of China
POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Tuesday, May 5, 2026 22:21
VIEWED: 203741
PAGE 272 of 283
If you're referring to the new antiviral, it wasn't HCQ. And if you ARE referring to the new antiviral, I suggest you learn to read.
Quote:
JSF" If they had the option of getting HCQ and being out of the hospital in hours, or being left to die in this study, what kind of fatalist nimrods chose to die for science? Or die for stupidity's sake?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Tsk tsk.
SIX: You are an asshole.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, I'm a bit concerned about how this antiviral works. Apparently it's able to insert itself into the genomic (RNA) material of the virus and create nonsense proteins, kind of gumming up the works.
But what happens if it creates a SUPER-virus that is resistant to this antiviral? Because every time a virus replicates, nature throws dice. It could become less infectious, or more. It could become less deadly, or more. Or it could become something different. Prolly not gonna happen, but I wonder how scientists are so sure that it won't?
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Prolly not gonna happen, but I wonder how scientists are so sure that it won't?
They still can't make up their minds on whether or not milk is bad for you from day to day.
I'm sure they have their theories though.
We're all eventually going to die, en-masse. It will be at the hands of at least one of them.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
From the annals of Manipulated Satistics.
Quote:
'Not Supposed To Happen': US State With Highest Vaxx Rate Sees Record Surge In COVID Cases
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/not-supposed-happen-us-state-highes
t-vaxx-rate-sees-record-surge-covid-cases
Quote:
In late August, four of ten cases of COVID-19 in Vermont were among vaccinated people, according to a letter signed by 90 employees of the Vermont Health Department, including state Epidemiologist Patsy Kelso.
HOWEVER, since
Quote:
More than 69 percent of Vermont’s population has been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 as of Sept. 24
Hmmm... 7/10 are vaccinated. but 4/10 new cases are vaccinated. That means that the vaccinated are getting sick at a MUCH lower rate than the unvaccinated.
Also, Vermont, altho experiencing a peak of "new cases" compared to its own history, is near the bottom (on a per capita basis) compared to other states, and similarly near the bottom of "new deaths" per capita compared to other states in the nation.
So I wouldn't exactly label Vermont as a failure in terms of reducing cases and deaths from Covid because they, and their vaccination policy, seem to be doing better than most other states.
Just as an FYI, Vermont's Delta caseload, like pretty much everyone else's, has peaked and is now declining.
I pisses me of when authors write up phony statistics. THEY know what they're doing, but the unwary reader won't catch on.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I just saw that and was going to post it here!
The only other thing I'd like to add is that Vermont's vaccinations peaked in April-May, 5 months ago.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why was it necessary to have 90 employees sign a document.
Sounds like evidence porn to me.
They have the janitor's signature on that too?
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Here's something interesting, Signy - passive immunity to COVID-19 that lasts for months.
AstraZeneca seeks U.S. approval for drug cocktail to prevent COVID
Oct 5 (Reuters) - AstraZeneca (AZN.L) has requested emergency approval from U.S. regulators for its antibody cocktail, the first protective shot other than vaccines against COVID-19, another potential major step in the global fight to combat the virus.
While vaccines rely on an intact immune system to develop targeted antibodies and infection-fighting cells, Astra's biotech compound known as AZD7442 contains lab-made antibodies designed to linger in the body for months to contain the virus in case of an infection.
COVID-19 therapies based on the same class of monoclonal antibodies are sold by rivals Regeneron (REGN.O), Eli Lilly (LLY.N) and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK.L) and its partner Vir (VIR.O) to stop the disease from worsening during early, milder stages of the infection.
The AstraZeneca therapy, designed to last several months to a year, could protect people who do not have a strong enough immune response to COVID-19 vaccines due to, for instance, chemotherapy or anti-rejection drugs after organ transplants.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/astrazeneca-files-us-approval-drug-pr
event-covid-19-2021-10-05/
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yeah...
That all sounds great until those man-made antibodies lingering around in your body for months and months on end start targeting your healthy flesh, moving on eventually to the healthy organs.
No thanks.
Anybody who has had even a minor case of Vitiligo will not welcome that possibility.
Ask me know I know.
--------------------------------------------------
Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Are you in denial?
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
From the annals of Manipulated Satistics.Quote:
'Not Supposed To Happen': US State With Highest Vaxx Rate Sees Record Surge In COVID Cases
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/not-supposed-happen-us-state-highes
t-vaxx-rate-sees-record-surge-covid-casesQuote:
In late August, four of ten cases of COVID-19 in Vermont were among vaccinated people, according to a letter signed by 90 employees of the Vermont Health Department, including state Epidemiologist Patsy Kelso.
HOWEVER, sinceQuote:
More than 69 percent of Vermont’s population has been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 as of Sept. 24
Hmmm... 7/10 are vaccinated. but 4/10 new cases are vaccinated. That means that the vaccinated are getting sick at a MUCH lower rate than the unvaccinated.
Also, Vermont, altho experiencing a peak of "new cases" compared to its own history, is near the bottom (on a per capita basis) compared to other states, and similarly near the bottom of "new deaths" per capita compared to other states in the nation.
So I wouldn't exactly label Vermont as a failure in terms of reducing cases and deaths from Covid because they, and their vaccination policy, seem to be doing better than most other states.
Just as an FYI, Vermont's Delta caseload, like pretty much everyone else's, has peaked and is now declining.
I pisses me of when authors write up phony statistics. THEY know what they're doing, but the unwary reader won't catch on.
Although actual figures are nonexistent in that story, or in any of it's links, the story does still quite clearly state the highest hospitalizations since last Jan, the second most deadly month since the pandemic began, and the record level number of case.
You do not seem to dispute those facts. Why not? And what are the actual figures, which you claim are manipulated?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME