This is Why Trump is a SCUMBAG!
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 22:00
VIEWED: 74665
PAGE 1 of 70
Children, little babies are being cruely and inhumanely affected by HIS
Policy to yank them away from their mothers.
Fucking Piece of Shit Scumbag! Hope he develops cancer and dies a horrible
death. Yes, I said it! Anyone who can think evil enough to do this low
vile thing is a POS that doesn't deserve to live. Innocent babies, who have
nothing to do with anything, are being used as political canon fodder.
Only a soulless animal would do such a thing, devoid of any human quality
would even think of such a thing. Both him and Sessions, that little
fucking weasel.
"America is better than this" - What a Doctor saw in a Texas shelter for
Minor children
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/%e2%80%98america-is-better-than-this%
e2%80%99-what-a-doctor-saw-in-a-texas-shelter-for-migrant-children/ar-AAyJpWv
Quote:
The small shelter along the Texas border to Mexico held 60 beds and a little playground for children....Colleen Kraft told The Washington Post, because as much as she wanted to console the little girl, she couldn’t touch, hold or pick her up to let her know everything would be all right. That was the rule, Kraft said she was told: They’re not allowed to touch the children.
“The really devastating thing was that we all knew what was going on with this child. We all knew what the problem was,” Kraft said. “She didn’t have her mother, and none of us can fix that.”
Kraft, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said colleagues who were alarmed by what was going on at the border invited her to see for herself, so she visited a shelter run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement.
“The really basic, foundational needs of having trust in adults as a young child was not being met. That contradicts everything we know that the kids need to build their health,” Kraft said.
Toxic Stress
Such a situation could have long-term, devastating effects on young children, who are likely to develop what is called toxic stress in their brain once separated from caregivers or parents they trusted. It disrupts a child’s brain development and increases the levels of fight-or-flight hormones in their bodies, Kraft said. This kind of emotional trauma could eventually lead to health problems, such as heart disease and substance abuse disorders.
These are the same scumbags who profess that abortion is a mortal sin and
that these "babies" have a right to live. Fucking hypocritical slugs.
Yeah, that's taking the moral high ground. You show 'em how it's done.
Whoever supports this should have a baby taken from them and have their throat slit for all that's worth. At least that would be more honest.
Trump/Sessions is condenming these babies to a life of misery.
I hope it comes back to them TENFOLD.
SGG
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Curious to see how the trolls will twist this one. Trump, in a disjointed and weird bunch of word salad, blamed Democrats.
Should be entertaining to watch them whine about how this somehow isn't Trump's plan, show old pics that don't relate, etc.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/hhs-handed-child-migrants
-to-human-traffickers.html
New York Magazine
Article Date: January 29, 2016 10:25 am
Quote:
The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.
In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.
“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”
As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.
The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor. HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.
The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015. Exactly how many of those fell prey to traffickers is unknown, because the agency does not keep track.
Oops.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
ADDENDUM: I figured I better do a little fact checking and see what political bias New York Magazine has just to cover my ass from more "Nazi" comments from the peanut gallery.
Just as I suspected...
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-magazine
Quote:
New York Magazine media bias rating is Left.
New York Magazine's bias is considered to be liberal. Despite the fact that New York Magazine’s readers reside in a location that many consider to be liberal, in the 1990s, the magazine chose Tucker Carlson, a conservative talk-show-host, as the company’s primary national correspondent. The AllSides Bias Rating™ of the New York Magazine is "far left." The majority of AllSides users who voted agree that the New York Magazine has a left-sided bias in its stories.
More On New York Magazine
The New York Magazine was founded in April of 1968 by Milton Glaser and Clay Felker and has an emphasis on New York City news. When the magazine was founded, its prime competitor was the New Yorker; at the time, New York Magazine was thought to be less polite, establishing itself as a “cradle of New Journalism." Over time, the magazine broadened its scope to become more national. Now, the New York Magazine covers the news, culture, entertainment, and lifestyle defined in New York City life. Each week, 1.8 million people read the magazine. The company has created other news websites as well, such as vulture.com, thecut.com, and scienceofus.com, each focusing on different areas of the news.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-magazine/
Quote:
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Notes: Established in 1968. New York is a bi-weekly magazine concerned with life, culture, politics, and style generally, and with a particular emphasis on New York City. NY Mag has a left wing bias in story selection and reporting, but is always sourced and factual. (5/13/2016)
Both considered to be Left to Far Left, as well as factual.
Nope... can't claim it's bogus because it came from zerohedge or RT.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
The AllSides Media Bias RatingTM reflects the average judgment of the American people.
Here it is folks. A source Jack believes. Problem is the information they dispense is based on peoples opinions and not facts. If they agree with this or that which is in the reported news. Decisions based on their own particular brand of bias.
Some of us here are reporting facts uncovered by the press as to our governments behaviors. Jack only believes something when it matches up to his opinion. Sad, very sad.
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Mental midgets shouldn't play in the light of day with firecrackers, for a couple of reasons:
1- They might blow what little fragments of brain function is left in that tiny crevice between their ears (hell, a strong breeze would do the trick)
2- See Number #1
A mind is a terrible thing to waste (oh wait, a speck of dust doesn't count).
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
ADDENDUM: I figured I better do a little fact checking and see what political bias New York Magazine has just to cover my ass from more "Nazi" comments from the peanut gallery.
Just as I suspected...
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-magazineQuote:
New York Magazine media bias rating is Left.
New York Magazine's bias is considered to be liberal. Despite the fact that New York Magazine’s readers reside in a location that many consider to be liberal, in the 1990s, the magazine chose Tucker Carlson, a conservative talk-show-host, as the company’s primary national correspondent. The AllSides Bias Rating™ of the New York Magazine is "far left." The majority of AllSides users who voted agree that the New York Magazine has a left-sided bias in its stories.
More On New York Magazine
The New York Magazine was founded in April of 1968 by Milton Glaser and Clay Felker and has an emphasis on New York City news. When the magazine was founded, its prime competitor was the New Yorker; at the time, New York Magazine was thought to be less polite, establishing itself as a “cradle of New Journalism." Over time, the magazine broadened its scope to become more national. Now, the New York Magazine covers the news, culture, entertainment, and lifestyle defined in New York City life. Each week, 1.8 million people read the magazine. The company has created other news websites as well, such as vulture.com, thecut.com, and scienceofus.com, each focusing on different areas of the news.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-magazine/Quote:
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Notes: Established in 1968. New York is a bi-weekly magazine concerned with life, culture, politics, and style generally, and with a particular emphasis on New York City. NY Mag has a left wing bias in story selection and reporting, but is always sourced and factual. (5/13/2016)
Both considered to be Left to Far Left, as well as factual.
Nope... can't claim it's bogus because it came from zerohedge or RT.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
True. No matter how you feel about the status of media today, their shortcomings
and failures to cover all aspects of the current administration's despicable
machinations and soulless behavior, it does not erase or absolve the cruelty of
this latest Gestapo tactic.
It is morally reprehensible six ways from Sunday. Hiding behind the lies and
desperation of the Scumbag-in-Chief only proves to expose this Nazi regime's
penchant for torture and chaos.
The latest breaking news is that these 'fucking animals' leave the lights on
all night, which does not allow the children to sleep throughout the night.
They claim it's for security, according to the Homeland Security hag that
held a press conference yesterday.
Trump really expects for people with brains to fall for his load of crap. He
doesn't know a law from a hole in the wall, and he states (lies) that it's the
democrats fault, that they are obstructing his administration. Whoa, look at
the big brain on trump. A big fancy word like obstruction. He doesn't have a
clue. You are the (OMG, I think I'm going to be sick) president, and your lame
ass party has control of both houses. How the fuck can the Democrats obstruct?
Yeah, they don't make presidents like they used to anymore.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by JJ:
The AllSides Media Bias RatingTM reflects the average judgment of the American people.
Here it is folks. A source Jack believes. Problem is the information they dispense is based on peoples opinions and not facts. If they agree with this or that which is in the reported news. Decisions based on their own particular brand of bias.
Some of us here are reporting facts uncovered by the press as to our governments behaviors. Jack only believes something when it matches up to his opinion. Sad, very sad.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
State-sanctioned child abuse.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
DONALD TRUMP JR. LIKES TWEET SUGGESTING CHILDREN SEPARATED FROM PARENTS AT BORDER ARE CRISIS ACTORS
http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-jr-likes-tweet-suggesting-childre
n-separated-parents-border-are-981126
President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., liked a tweet that suggested children who had been separated from their parents at the U.S. southern border had been “coached” by liberals, comparing them to crisis actors.
Trump Jr. liked the tweet from right-wing website Breitbart, which quoted conservative pundit Ann Coulter’s warning not to fall for “actor children,” amid criticism of the Trump administration’s policy of separating parents from their children at the border.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME