A thread for Democrats Only
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 15:36
VIEWED: 755368
PAGE 22 of 725
Russia has just thrown the election to Trump': Leaked transition emails suggest that Flynn didn't act alone when he 'broke the law by speaking to Russia while Obama was still in power'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5140245/Emails-suggest-Flynn-d
idnt-rogue-Russia-call.html#ixzz50Cvz2uDu
Leaked emails show Flynn's right-hand woman, KT McFarland, discussing Obama's Russia sanctions hours after they were announced
McFarland said that the December 29 declaration was designed to get the incoming president to make rash tweet
'If there is a tit-for-tat escalation Trump will have difficulty improving relations with Russia, which has just thrown USA election to him,' she wrote.
The White House lawyer dealing with the Russia probe said she was talking about how the election was portrayed by the Dems
The email was also sent to Flynn, Reince Priebus, Sean Spicer and Steve Bannon; that day Flynn called Russian ambassador
White House said Flynn had a mandate to call ambassador despite 1799 law, and Flynn's lies to FBI were only illegal act
Trump tweeted on Saturday that he knew Flynn lied and that was why he fired him - leading to claims he committed felony
Flynn admitted lying to FBI investigators on Fr
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5140245/Emails-suggest-Flynn-d
idnt-rogue-Russia-call.html
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Trump shoud say "thats why I hired him".
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
Trump shoud say "thats why I hired him".
Have you noticed the change in direction Trumps supporters are taking. Going back to the elections it's been stated by Trump and all his staff, that they have had no contact with the russians. Now it's we did, many contacts, but we didn't break the law.
Tick tock
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
lol... tick tock
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
"Didnt break the law", "its not illegal", "no collusion", "never happened", "absolutely no evidens".
Then why the liez?
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You claimed to be an Independent. I know I am an Independent. The difference is that I suspect you are lying.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:you still posting in this thread? Thought you disqualified yourself.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:JSF, I think you just contradicted yourself.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:You insult me.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:You are a very silly person, T. I don't respect anybody who feels that they have all of the answers and it is their job to "enlighten" anybody else. This is the mode you operate under 24/7. You're just spreading the truth. You're just doing what is right. "You should HATE anyone who doesn't agree with my version of the truth..."
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I do not respond to you under the delusion that I can enlighten you. As your posts continually show, you're someone who resists enlightenment. I do it because you continue to post foolishness which allows myself and others, to show how ignorant those who believe as you do are.
You sound like an evangelist. I want no part of your cult.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I tried for a bit to enlighten T, but it was hopeless, a lost cause.
Which makes his post even funnier.
When you cease to even attempt to enlighten your fellow human, you end hope.
T
And clearly, thinking is what you are not doing.
Clearly lying is what you're doing. I started this thread. I asked others of certain persuasions to join me. Reading comprehension is clearly not your thing. Nor is thinking logically. Why would I be excluded from posting in my thread. It is you and Jack that are not of a persuasion that I invited here. You must be to stupid to understood that so here you are. Oh well
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:You claimed to be an Independent. I know I am an Independent. The difference is that I suspect you are lying.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:you still posting in this thread? Thought you disqualified yourself.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:JSF, I think you just contradicted yourself.
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:You insult me.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:You are a very silly person, T. I don't respect anybody who feels that they have all of the answers and it is their job to "enlighten" anybody else. This is the mode you operate under 24/7. You're just spreading the truth. You're just doing what is right. "You should HATE anyone who doesn't agree with my version of the truth..."
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I do not respond to you under the delusion that I can enlighten you. As your posts continually show, you're someone who resists enlightenment. I do it because you continue to post foolishness which allows myself and others, to show how ignorant those who believe as you do are.
You sound like an evangelist. I want no part of your cult.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
I tried for a bit to enlighten T, but it was hopeless, a lost cause.
Which makes his post even funnier.
When you cease to even attempt to enlighten your fellow human, you end hope.
T
And clearly, thinking is what you are not doing.
Clearly lying is what you're doing. I started this thread. I asked others of certain persuasions to join me. Reading comprehension is clearly not your thing. Nor is thinking logically. Why would I be excluded from posting in my thread. It is you and Jack that are not of a persuasion that I invited here. You must be to stupid to understood that so here you are. Oh well
T
So what, what do I care what you think.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
THGRRI is an independent. JSF is an independent.
By the very definition of the word, no two
independents need be alike or even similar. :)
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So which independent would be included in the subset "Democrats only" do you think?
Originally posted by Oonjerah:
THGRRI is an independent. JSF is an independent.
By the very definition of the word, no two
independents need be alike or even similar. :)
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
THGRRI is an independent. JSF is an independent.
By the very definition of the word, no two independents need be alike or even similar. - OONJ
So which independent would be included in the subset "Democrats only" do you think?- JSF
Obviously, only the ones who agree with THUGR.
-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME