A thread for Democrats Only
POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Sunday, September 6, 2026 15:36
VIEWED: 755368
PAGE 24 of 725
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Those montages of Obama stutters, sputters, speech gaffes are hilarious. Trump cannot rank up with the Ebonics-in-Chief gaffemaster.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I wonder whether Obama was drunk when he was on his 57 state tour?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Some people don't seem to realize that Trump on his worst day is not in the same league or depths as Obama on his Mo Betta Bestest Day. Even Trump on a day of being dead is fresh air compared to Bobo.
Do all Ebonics speakers not know how to pronounce corpse man? Or is that merely demonstration of Obamination's illiteracy?
Wow, the two of you are petty and ignorant beyond belief. Obama is wicked smart compared to Trump. You two denying that is one for the record books.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Just because he is the first admitted Drug Dealer Preezy of the Steezy does not make him smart. Get a grip.
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:Quote:Those montages of Obama stutters, sputters, speech gaffes are hilarious. Trump cannot rank up with the Ebonics-in-Chief gaffemaster.
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I wonder whether Obama was drunk when he was on his 57 state tour?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
Some people don't seem to realize that Trump on his worst day is not in the same league or depths as Obama on his Mo Betta Bestest Day. Even Trump on a day of being dead is fresh air compared to Bobo.
Do all Ebonics speakers not know how to pronounce corpse man? Or is that merely demonstration of Obamination's illiteracy?
Wow, the two of you are petty and ignorant beyond belief. Obama is wicked smart compared to Trump. You two denying that is one for the record books.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Yeah really...
By what metric is he smarter?
Likeability doesn't count as one.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wun thing I no about idiots iz that they cant tell the differens between the levelz uv intellect.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wun thing I no about dem iz One is spelled One, and there is an O and F in OF.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
President Trump's job approval rating plunges to new record low of 32%
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/president-trump-approval-rati
ng-dips-new-record-32-article-1.3696240
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
President Trump's job approval rating plunges to new record low of 32%
I really don't get it!
He was horrible before. Why did people just start to notice?
... oooOO}{OOooo ...
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trumps-approval-rating-jumps-to-45-p
ercent-highest-since-september/article/2642685
Trump's approval rating jumps to 45 percent, highest since September/ Dec 6, 2017, 8:03 AM
I think one needs to be careful about what one accepts as a fact. I've been looking at approval ratings now and again, and I didn't notice an unusual, sudden drop recently. So I went looking for an up to date graph of compiled poll ratings over time ... https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/ http://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donal
d-trump.aspx And I didn't find any significant, new, noteworthy drop in approval. It's not that he's doing well, but there doesn't seem to be anything catastrophic recently.
HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/15/16774216/trumpism-is-dead-t
rumpism-never-existed
“Making America Great Again” became a sort of Rorschach test in 2016. Some voters looked at “Trumpism” and saw a means of getting better health care, or better trade deals, or keeping their jobs. Some even looked at Trump and saw a pro-LGBTQ candidate in the same man evangelical Christians viewed as a hero in waiting. His opponents worried about the potential power of Trump’s populist appeal, too. David Frum wrote in the Atlantic earlier this year that a populist agenda — massive spending on infrastructure, combined with massive tax cuts and a heavily restrictionist immigration policy and economic protectionism — would ensure Trump a second term in office.
But Trump’s own “Trumpism” seemed to die a rapid death when Trump entered office. While doing markedly little abroad to earn his campaign reputation as a foreign policy “dove,” President Trump has supported a markedly unpopular health care policy and a tax bill aligned with long-standing GOP priorities while doing very little on trade. As Trump has jostled with journalists and black athletes on Twitter, the long-promised massive infrastructure investment has yet to take place, NAFTA remains intact, and China has yet to be named a currency manipulator. (And, of course, the wall remains unbuilt.)
The “Trumpism” of the 2016 presidential campaign was thus largely imaginary, a selling point rather than an overarching policy.
This is the reason why so many GOP members of Congress have voted with Trump in 2017: Not because they are supporting a Trumpian agenda, but because Trump has largely governed as a pretty standard conservative Republican. While conservative priorities — like deregulation and nominating conservative judges — have been more or less successfully brought to fruition, the last remaining fragment of “Trumpism” appears to be Donald Trump’s exceedingly pugnacious Twitter feed.
No wonder that Trump’s popularity with Independents, wanting “Trumpism” as an alternative to Paul Ryan-esque conservatism, has dropped precipitously. Trump had 42 percent job approval ratings from independents in January. That number has dropped to 32 percent, a number President George W. Bush didn’t reach until 2005.
“Trumpism” wasn’t an ideology. It was a means to an end, the promises one makes when trying to win an election . . .
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:
“Trumpism” wasn’t an ideology. It was a means to an end, the promises one makes when trying to win an election . . .
Yeah. At this point it sounds like nothing but "Hope and Change" to me too.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME