Voter fraud - American election vastly corrupted
POSTED BY: Ghoulman
UPDATED: Monday, January 27, 2025 00:47
VIEWED: 29159
PAGE 6 of 16
Quote:
You want proof of voting fraud, that would, indeed, swing the election? Go here, NOW:
If I read this correctly, there is no proof, right?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Let's try this:
[Proof link removed 26 Nov. 2004 at thread-starter's polite request.]
If you don't know what's going on by now, I can't help you.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
^^^ great post Ruxton! THANX!!! 
But it's a little big, though it's a nice low Kilo size it's large for even a high rez screen setting. Can you Photoshop that a bit? I can if you don't have.
Thanx again. :)
Quote:
Originally posted by Jasonzzz:
Watch out! The computer you are typing on, that phone line you are using, the stuff that you eat, you wear, your medicine, your mouthwash, that TV set, and your underpants are all controlled by American corporate goons.
You must resist!
You know... that's all true! Resist!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, the pollsters admit there were some issues with the exit polls and some issues with how they were being used. Unfortunately the Media tends to use them as the end all be all.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
^^^ not this time 'round I think. Seems the media ignored the Exit Polls and spent a lot of time explaining how inaccurate they supposidly are. Which is bizarre considering Exit Polls are all the press has to report with during an election. So what about the exit polls the press used years ago? Were media pundits wrong to even report those polls for the last 50 frellin' years? No, of course not.
But THIS election was different. 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, the polls don't show anything. You can set the polls up at places you know will sway one way or the other and only take partial polls. I know that in the three prez elections I have taken part of, in two differant precincts, in two differant cities, in two differant counties in Ohio, there have NEVER been polls taken. Just the "I voted today" stickers and ballots. So, basically, it's like the Gallop poll, you can make it say anything you want, especially when you aren't polling EVERYONE. (incomplete) Polls are just that, polls. If the prez could be decided by polls, they would use polls instead of ballots.
And, if things were bad for this election, than that means that both of Clinton's elections are suspect, cause we all know that no one wanted him in office. *please note sarcasm*. If we had republican presidents for the last 50 years (like some communist countries seem to do) then methinks there is a problem.
AND, the Ohio electronic voting was NOT the entire state, mind you. MOST of the state still uses paper ballots, so that statistic might be correct for the electronic votes, but not the WHOLE state.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Ghoulman:
^^^ not this time 'round I think. Seems the media ignored the Exit Polls and spent a lot of time explaining how inaccurate they supposidly are. Which is bizarre considering Exit Polls are all the press has to report with during an election. So what about the exit polls the press used years ago? Were media pundits wrong to even report those polls for the last 50 frellin' years? No, of course not.
But THIS election was different.
Well.. this isn't the first election the media has gotten burned on by the exit polls. Part of the problem wasn't so much in the polls themselves as it was the way the media used them.
The 2000 election and the 2002 elections and the way the media used the polls really got screwed up. The misuse of exit polls created enough of a stir to cause a congressional investigation. To no avail.
I think in the future Exit polls won't be the tool of choice by the media. I rather liked the fact that all the media had to resort to, was the best and most accurate information - RAW DATA. Go figure..LOL
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I was watching an interview with Tom Brokaw on
Nov 3. He said during the election they got a
a copy of the poll data showing kerry ahead, but
then noticed that the people they selected were heavily skewed towards left demographic.
When they saw this, they tossed the poll data in
the trash, and decided not to report the data which they were sure did not reflect the actual vote counts.
Am I a Lion?... No, I think I'ma tellin' the truth.
BarnStormer
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
What's the data behind the charts? They need some double checking. I looked and the one for Ohio is way off. The exit poll and final results posted at CNN for Ohio is:
Bush Kerry
Exit Poll 50.94% 48.59%
Tally 51% 49%
Like Fireflyfans.net?
Haken needs a new development system. Donate.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=5&t=3283
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Jason, it could have been because they were only using the "electronic voting" machine votes. There are a number of counties that actually used the electronic voting, but by no means a majority. It probably discounted the votes that people cast using the old "hanging chad" ballots.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME