Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!
POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 14 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
You really do need help with that, don't you?
Poor thing. Keep trying. You might figure it out someday.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*
Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hillary will win.
I've been saying that for weeks. I even posted, quite a bit I might add, that posting about Trump was pointless since hillary WAS going to win.
I'm glad you finally agree with me about something. You're really late to the realization, but I suppose better late than never.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are many, many problems with hillary.
She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes.
Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming at Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election. Do you suppose a 'Just kidding, Vlad !' will work?
hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.
hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.
And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.
But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Wow, two whole pointless HATE-FILLED screeds from MAL4! We have been blessed!
MAL4, you can't seem to post on any other topic expect me and KIKI. Hon, you used to be capable of holding a decent conversation. What happened?
I'll make a deal with you ...
If you define "intelligence" and perhaps answer three or four questions for clarification (if something isn't clear) then I'll answer your question, or challenge, or whatever it is. But you'll have to pick it out of that welter of words that you linked to, because I don't want to read an entire page of blather.
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
There are many, many problems with hillary.
She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes.
Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming at Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election. Do you suppose a 'Just kidding, Vlad !' will work?
hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.
hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.
And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.
But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.
President: National poll results............
Averages for Sun Oct 16 2016
Hillary Clinton (D) 45% (+7.00)
Donald Trump (R) 38%
Gary Johnson (L) 6%
____________________________________________
Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
There are many, many problems with hillary.
She breaks countries and starts wars wherever she goes.
Right now, she and obama are drumming up war fever JUST TO WIN THE ELECTION. Never mind that it's not against some small hapless country full of brown people that most voters can't find on a map. No, hillary and obama are aiming at Russia, a fully capable nuclear equal. I wonder if they've considered that the Russian response to their war-mongering might be something they can't just turn off after the election. Do you suppose a 'Just kidding, Vlad !' will work?
hillary as a president would have zero power to keep her many, many empty promises. And she knows that, but it doesn't stop her from making them anyway, because people really are that gullible. So, why not? But even more than that, hillary herself doesn't believe them, as the leaked documents show. hillary is an empty husk of a person when it comes to integrity.
hillary is completely corrupt, mixing state power with personal gain, as the leaked emails about pay-to-play as Secy of State and her toadying speeches to GS show.
And there's the billary issue - co-abusers of women and children, equal, if not worse than anyone else on the campaign trail.
But the BIGGEST problem with hillary is her finger on the nuclear button. Having left Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and Syria in unfixable smoking ruins, and unable to admit or even understand that she was wrong, surrounded by her equally deluded neocons in the State Department, military and CIA who also think a nuclear war is winnable, deaf to warnings, she'd turn her attention toward Russia - with her bloated fat finger on the nuclear button and US policy to launch nuclear weapons FIRST in her waddling hip pocket. Given her unblemished history of failure, I can't imagine anything could possibly go wrong.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:1kiki: So, Hillary is your hobbyhorse. You'll ride her for the next four years. Good for you! Hillary is also the Republicans' hobby. The Rs in Congress will continue their investigations of her crimes. And you will, too! You're even investigating crimes that have not yet happened! And already patting yourself on the back for your prescience.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
WAY back when, someone asked if anyone was going to get seriously depressed or unhinged if their candidate lost. At the time, my position was (and still is) 'anybody but hillary'. And at the time I replied that I was going to be neither seriously depressed nor unhinged if the election didn't go the way I wanted - but that I was going to get my 'I told you so' posts written ahead of time.
I hope you're prepared for a lot of 'I told you so' posts, second. Because, contrary to your childish faith in ignoring the things you don't want to admit, hillary's shit DOES stink, and she's full of it.
Unfortunately, when she takes a dump, and she will, it'll be on us. But at least I'll have the satisfaction of being able to say ...
Melania Trump defended her husband by telling CNN that Donald's "grab 'em by the pussy" remark was actually all Billy Bush's fault:
Melania Trump says her husband was "egged on" in the 2005 tape in which he made lewd comments about his own sexually aggressive behavior toward women...."And as you can see from the tape, the cameras were not on — it was only a mic. And I wonder if they even knew that the mic was on," she said, referring to Trump and NBC's "Access Hollywood" host Billy Bush.
She said they were engaged in "boy talk, and he was led on — like, egged on — from the host to say dirty and bad stuff."
www.cnn.com/2016/10/17/politics/melania-trump-interview/index.html
The cameras weren't on! So there's no telling what was really happening on that bus. It's funny, isn't it? I always figured Donald for the strong kind of guy who couldn't be pushed around by a muffinhead like Billy Bush, but lately I've begun to wonder if we ever really knew Billy.
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Actually, SECOND, Hillary will be YOUR hobby-horse. I wash my hands of her.
It's a good thing to try and predict what happens next, because it tells you whether your "model" .... the sum total of your experience, information, and logic .... is consistent with reality.
So, you're predicting that Hillary will get her tax plan through?
That there will be peace in the Middle East?
That the average person will be wealthier, and that there will be a xfer of money?
That the US government will respect our Constitutional rights more than under Bush or Obama?
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:You ask why? It is the American way: Without even giving him a trial, NBC News has fired "Today" show host Billy Bush, who was caught on tape in a vulgar conversation about women with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump before an "Access Hollywood" appearance.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
SECOND, you have gone unbelievably, breathtakingly stupid.
Here I am, talking about accusations versus evidence....
and then you respond with poll numbers!
Hey! I have an idea!
Let's go to the polls and decide whether global warming is happening or not! That's a good idea, right??
Since when was "the truth" decided by polling??? That goes back to my question about knowing "the truth" and the difference between "knowing" and "believing".... which you have not yet answered. Why is that, hon?
Billy Bush did not get a trial. Trump will not get a trial. He's fired.
www.seattlepi.com/entertainment/television/article/NBC-News-fires-Bill
y-Bush-after-lewd-Donald-Trump-9979152.php
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Signym, it is almost Halloween and you're wearing a costume to hide that you're an ordinary Republican. Your list of questions are precisely the same as my Texas Republican neighbor, who hates Hillary. He predicts disaster on all fronts for America if Hillary is President. He also has not given up on Trump winning. That might be different from you.
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Actually, SECOND, Hillary will be YOUR hobby-horse. I wash my hands of her.
It's a good thing to try and predict what happens next, because it tells you whether your "model" .... the sum total of your experience, information, and logic .... is consistent with reality.
So, you're predicting that Hillary will get her tax plan through?
That there will be peace in the Middle East?
That the average person will be wealthier, and that there will be a xfer of money?
That the US government will respect our Constitutional rights more than under Bush or Obama?
Clinton is proposing a center-left agenda, an extension of the policies Obama was able to implement in his first two years, and it’s clear that Republicans believe all such policies are disasters. They believe Obama's foreign policy has been a disaster.
Does today’s America look like a disaster? No. We have many problems, but we’re hardly living in a miasma of despair. Leave government statistics (which almost half of Trump supporters completely distrust) on one side; Gallup finds that 80 percent of Americans are satisfied with their standard of living, up from 73 percent in 2008, and that 55 percent consider themselves to be “thriving,” up from 49 percent in 2008. And there are good reasons for those good feelings: recovery from the financial crisis was slower than it should have been, but unemployment is low, incomes surged last year, and thanks to Obamacare more Americans have health insurance than ever before.
www.well-beingindex.com/americans-life-evaluations-improve-during-obam
a-era
www.well-beingindex.com/standard-of-living-ratings-rise-during-obama-p
residency
Republicans despise Obama and Hillary. You despise Hillary. I am not taking time to check what you said about Obama, but how could it be any different than what you said about Hillary? Obama made her his Secretary of State and campaigns for Hillary. Signym, you and the Republicans must have a great deal to agree about the last eight years and the next four.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME