Real World Event Discussions

Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!

POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 13 of 16

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:55 AM

Quote:

Trump assaulted women and thinks of them as objects- GSTRING

You're willing to convict Trump based on accusation, but not Hillary. That's your double standard.- SIGNY

Wrong - That's not a double standard - it's a false equivalency.
Wrong - I'm not convicting him, I'm willing to NOT vote for him based on that (and many other things).
You just showed a demonstrable lack of intelligence.



You're willing to assume that Trump did the things he's accused of, based on... accusations. But you're unwilling to assume that's true of anybody else. I can only verify that Trump said what he said.


That's a consistent pattern with you. You go on what "somebody said". Saddam has WMD. Qaddafi is massacring his people. Assad gassed Ghouta. Noriega is a drug runner. Iran is building nuclear weapons. Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia destroyed the UN convoy.

It's not possible to do these things without leaving verifiable and widespread evidence .... how many times have I asked you for evidence? I've even pointed out what kinds would be useful ... trace compounds in Sarin indicating its manufacture. Pieces of warhead which would reveal alloys. Convoy trucks with missile damage - bent frames, blown-off pieces, craters and damage to surrounding objects. Something other than smudgy photos of nondescript buildings in a desert, and vials of fake white powder.

Quote:

DOUBLE STANDARD: A double standard may take the form of an instance in which certain concepts (often, for example, a word, phrase, social norm, or rule) are perceived as acceptable to be applied by one group of people, but are considered unacceptable—taboo—when applied by another group.
That's what you do. Often.

And BTW- please define "intelligence".



Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 12:58 AM

Quote:

Why does your mind block you from understanding Trump has admitted he does this? Innocent until proven guilty SIG. Unless of course you admit your guilt.= THUGR


Then listen to the tape. Clearly you have no idea what he said.




Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Why does your mind block you from understanding Trump has admitted he does this? Innocent until proven guilty SIG. Unless of course you admit your guilt.= THUGR


Then listen to the tape. Clearly you have no idea what he said.




No need SIG because you continue to misrepresent the truth. Instead I'll answer you with this.

THE VILLAGES, Fla. — Lifelong Republican Linda Fogg pauses sometimes while explaining how she became a Hillary Clinton supporter.

A proud Texan and former docent at the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum in Dallas, Fogg has never voted for a Democrat for president. But there she was last week on the porch of a Panera Bread restaurant in one of Florida’s reddest communities sporting a “Republicans for Hillary” T-shirt — and inviting passers-by to join her club.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/in-deep-red-florida-trouble-for
-trump/ar-AAj3PPy?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=BHEA000


____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:11 AM

Quote:

No need [to listen to the Trump tape and find out for myself what he said] SIG because you continue to misrepresent the truth. =THGUR


Here I am giving you a link to the tape itself ... the tape in question which has caused such a fuss... with subtitles even! in case the audio is too garbled for you to hear ... how in god's name can that possibly be "misrepresenting the truth"?

It's not my tape. It's not my interpretation. Go look for yourself, if you really want to know the truth. Or not, if you don't.



Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

No need [to listen to the Trump tape and find out for myself what he said] SIG because you continue to misrepresent the truth. =THGUR


Here I am giving you a link to the tape itself ... the tape in question which has caused such a fuss... with subtitles even! in case the audio is too garbled for you to hear ... how in god's name can that possibly be "misrepresenting the truth"?

It's not my tape. It's not my interpretation. Go look for yourself, if you really want to know the truth. Or not, if you don't.




Russia Today says its United Kingdom bank accounts have been blocked

http://thevillagessuntimes.com/2016/10/17/russia-today-says-its-united
-kingdom-bank-accounts-have
/

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 5:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

You're willing to assume that Trump did the things he's accused of, based on... accusations. But you're unwilling to assume that's true of anybody else. I can only verify that Trump said what he said.

That's a consistent pattern with you. You go on what "somebody said".

No more of this chitchat. Let's go to the polls and see what voters think of Trump. Men love him. Women don't.
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/785972580301742080


https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/785972385836961792


Trump is toast.
www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2016/10/fear-of-a-female-planet-if-o
nly-men-voted-trump-would-win-in-a-landslide-.html




The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

I don't think either KIKI or I have ever said that Trump was a great human being. I believe I've said probably a dozen times by now that Hillary and Trump are MORAL EQUIVALENTS, with a slight edge to Trump because what he is accused of is far less serious than what Hillary is accused of.

You can carry on with that line of thinking until Election 2020, but while we wait for voting to end, some advance thoughts on post-election punditry:

It's already obvious that pundits will dismiss Hillary's achievement. They'll claim that she only won because she had an insane opponent, and/or that she should have won by a bigger margin. But this will be all wrong. First of all, negative partisanship limits the potential margin of any candidate; most Rs vote R regardless. Beyond that, would a white male candidate have exposed Trump so thoroughly? I doubt it. Remember, he slid right by the Matt Lauer types.

The turning point came in 1st debate, when Hillary set him up, both by her presence and with the strategic cite of Alicia Machado. The point is that Trump didn't just happen to melt down, Hillary triggered his meltdown - and that required grace and steely resolve. Plus of course her gender. So there's a real case that Hillary was by far the best person to beat Trump, and bring GOP sickness into the open.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:33 AM

WAY back when, someone asked if anyone was going to get seriously depressed or unhinged if their candidate lost. At the time, my position was (and still is) 'anybody but hillary'. And at the time I replied that I was going to be neither seriously depressed nor unhinged if the election didn't go the way I wanted - but that I was going to get my 'I told you so' posts written ahead of time.

I hope you're prepared for a lot of 'I told you so' posts, second. Because, contrary to your childish faith in ignoring the things you don't want to admit, hillary's shit DOES stink, and she's full of it.

Unfortunately, when she takes a dump, and she will, it'll be on us. But at least I'll have the satisfaction of being able to say ...




Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 7:12 AM

SECOND, you have gone unbelievably, breathtakingly stupid.

Here I am, talking about accusations versus evidence....

Quote:

You're willing to assume that Trump did the things he's accused of, based on... accusations. But you're unwilling to assume that's true of anybody else. I can only verify that Trump said what he said.

That's a consistent pattern with you. You go on what "somebody said".



and then you respond with poll numbers!

Quote:

Let's go to the polls and see what voters think of Trump.
Hey! I have an idea!

Let's go to the polls and decide whether global warming is happening or not! That's a good idea, right??

Since when was "the truth" decided by polling??? That goes back to my question about knowing "the truth" and the difference between "knowing" and "believing".... which you have not yet answered. Why is that, hon?



Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

G, THUGR, MAL4: Oh BTW, please define intelligence.
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&p=4#1
018100

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, October 18, 2016 7:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
WAY back when, someone asked if anyone was going to get seriously depressed or unhinged if their candidate lost. At the time, my position was (and still is) 'anybody but hillary'. And at the time I replied that I was going to be neither seriously depressed nor unhinged if the election didn't go the way I wanted - but that I was going to get my 'I told you so' posts written ahead of time.

I hope you're prepared for a lot of 'I told you so' posts. Because, contrary to your childish faith in ignoring the things you don't want to see, hillary's shit DOES stink, and she's full of it.


No, YOU should be prepared for a whole big lot of "I told you so" posts because you are a cowardly moron who will be proven demonstrably wrong. Hillary will win. 90% on that now. And you will be expected to answer for how wrong you are in your judgements.

Recall, my friends, all the horrible things that were "supposed" to happen in Obama's presidency, things like the end of the US as we know it and the destruction of the economy and no more guns and gas prices out of control, etc...

http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/politics/here-are-the-gops-top-5-scary-ob
ama-predictions-that-never-happened
/

Yeah, no. It never happened. Yet sad trolls like sigkik cling to this alternate reality. (Because they know it is ridiculous and they know they will always get someone to fight them over it. Attention whores. :p)

And here we are in 2016: Sigkik the attention starved troll is making dire predictions for Hillary's presidency. I tried to get the sigkik to stand up and own her/its predictions but the troll "can't be bothered to read my post" and take on the challenge. More likely she/it glanced at my challenge and bitched out exactly like the coward that her hero Drumph is...

Here it is Sigkik, if you have to intestinal fortitude to look:

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60557&mid=1
014580#1014580


Bitch out again please. Or stand up.

LOL! Yeah right. As if you'd ever take a firm stance on anything you post.

You do make it fun, cause you make it so easy. :p


*-----------------------------------------------------------------*
Battle is the Great Redeemer. It is the fiery crucible in which true heroes are forged. The one place where all men truly share the same rank, regardless of what kind of parasitic scum they were going in.
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME