Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!

POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 8 of 16

PREV PAGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NEXT PAGE

SIGNYM

Monday, October 10, 2016 6:32 PM

Quote:
I did notice this morning that one of the Republican women attacking Hillary took $850,000 to break off her highly-principled-and-in-no-way-connected-to-either-money-or-politics attack on Bill Clinton. In April 1998, the case was dismissed by Republican Judge Susan Webber Wright as lacking legal merit. On appeal, in the midst of his trial for impeachment based on his testimony in the Jones case, Clinton was faced with the prospect of having to go under oath again and testify more about his sexual history. Instead, Clinton agreed to an out-of-court settlement, paying Jones and her lawyers $850,000 to drop the suit.

SO, FIRST OF ALL, IT WASN'T "TRUMP MONEY". You should apologize to Paula Jones, and Trump, and all of other women victims that you insinuated were somehow paid off by Trump. You're such a bitch, SECOND; didja know that? Your ethics are being warped by your bias.

And in a further development in the case

Quote:
In April 1999, Judge Wright found Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay $1,202 to the court and an additional $90,000 to Jones's lawyers for expenses incurred, far less than the $496,000 that the lawyers originally requested.

Wright then referred Clinton's conduct to the Arkansas Bar for disciplinary action, and on January 19, 2001, the day before Clinton left the office of president, he entered into an agreement with the Arkansas Bar and Independent Counsel Robert Ray under which Clinton was stripped of his license to practice law in Arkansas for a period of five years. His fine was paid from a fund raised for his legal expenses.

So Bill Clinton was found in contempt of court for providing misleading evidence (He could have been charged with perjury instead, which means he got a break.), FINED, and temporarily disbarred.

I see that some of these "fact checking" websites http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-presidential-debate-fact-check/2016
/10/bill-clinton-paula-jones-settlement-fine-229460 claim that Bill Clinton was "not fined", he "settled" the case. But the reality is, BOTH happened, and in addition he was disbarred

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

SIGNYM

Monday, October 10, 2016 6:36 PM

Quote:
You are right about me being mean spirited. You are wrong about my target. It is not women as my target. It is Republicans. There are woman-Republicans, so it does get confusing who I am shooting at.

Well, there is the source of your error, right there.

You are so biased you can't even tell where that little story that you tell yourself about the "good guys" and "bad guys" departs from reality.

You don't do yourself, or anyone else, any favors by being religious (ie believing, not asking questions) about your view of the world. Yes, Republicans are quite often evil. But somewhere in since Jimmy Carter, Democrats have parted ways with representing the little guy.

Oh, they'll do things like support gay marriage, but if it INTERFERES WITH GETTING DONATIONS FROM THE WEALTHY, they'll fade like a newspaper in the sun. That's been Obama's mantra since he was elected, which is why we have the nightmare that is Obamacare.

Seriously, the guy had a fucking mandate, a Democratic Congress, and a historic moment, and he totally bobbled his once-in-a-century oppty. What a loser.

--------------
I think it's time you disabused yourself of that pleasant little fairy tale about our fearless leaders being some sort of surrogate daddy or mommy, laying awake at night thinking about how to protect the kids. HA! In reality, they're thinking about who to sell them to so that they can get a few more shekels in their pockets.

SECOND

Monday, October 10, 2016 8:35 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

You are so biased you can't even tell where that little story that you tell yourself about the "good guys" and "bad guys" departs from reality . . . which is why we have the nightmare that is Obamacare.

And the winner is Melania Trump wearing a $1,100 Gucci 'Pussy Bow' Shirt to the Debate. No more comment, and I am unanimous in that.
http://theslot.jezebel.com/melania-trump-wore-an-1-100-gucci-pussy-bow
-shirt-to-t-1787604900

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SIGNYM

Monday, October 10, 2016 8:55 PM

Well, now THAT was relevant! Not.

Interestingly, when you bring a pigeon within sight of something it really wants (seed) and something it's afraid of (cat) it will often do irrelevant things, like turn circles or preen its feathers.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

THGRRI

Monday, October 10, 2016 8:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

Who are you afraid Hillary is going to start a war with?

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

1KIKI

Monday, October 10, 2016 9:12 PM

Billy Bush

Wrong. But I'm going to put this in the predictions thread because you're trying to look clever but you're just looking stupid.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

THGRRI

Monday, October 10, 2016 10:59 PM

G, great to have you back

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

THGRRI

Monday, October 10, 2016 11:03 PM

____________________________________________

Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719

SECOND

Tuesday, October 11, 2016 12:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Well, now THAT was relevant! Not.

Interestingly, when you bring a pigeon within sight of something it really wants (seed) and something it's afraid of (cat) it will often do irrelevant things, like turn circles or preen its feathers.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

I think we need more irrelevance. Something similar to tattooing Trump on forehead while wearing Firefly tee-shirt.

www.reddit.com/r/firefly/comments/56sb2g/an_embarrassment_to_firefly_f
ans_worldwide/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

1KIKI

Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:13 AM

Originally posted by G:
I remember when Sig first made that stretch (I was like, "where the hell is she getting that?") and then in the next 24 hours I started seeing the same BS Fear statement on Twitter and in Russian papers. The Directive had obviously gone out to all the minions and they had dutifully responded. It must be freeing to just follow orders like they do. (Wait for SNIGGLES to crack wise in 3... 2... 1... )

I was glad to see Frem dismiss that as the rest of us have.

Actually, he didn't dismiss it. What he said pretty much paraphrased what I've been saying - that Hillary is so damn stupid (no lessons learned from Iraq, Libya, Ukraine or Syria! and completely deaf to Putin's warnings) that she'll keep on provoking Russia until she stumbles us into WWIII. God forbid you should understand or honestly portray anything at all.

Originally posted by Frem:
Not half as close as you think, but damn closer than is comfortable, sure.
Neither side actually wants such a confrontation, so it's all mostly dick-waving and puffed up threats, by people too damn stupid to know how fast that can go badly wrong - obviously they've not read a lot of David Drakes work...

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

PREV PAGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NEXT PAGE