Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!

POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 11 of 16

PREV PAGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NEXT PAGE

1KIKI

Monday, October 17, 2016 9:16 AM

In any case, second, since you did NOT object to the American ideal that EVERYONE is entitled to the same justice - I'm going to assume that you agree that bill and hillary should not be exempt because of their positions of power, nor should Trump be targeted for political reasons.

Am I correct?

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

SECOND

Monday, October 17, 2016 10:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
What??? Bill got an acquittal.
Huh???

As I recall, Bill was impeached. That WAS what happened, correct?

And I see you're resorting to cartoons again.

Yanno, it's funny. When I ask you for YOUR (plural) opinions and YOUR (plural) reasons, I hear *crickets*. Nobody can seem to explain why they have the opinions that they do. Instead, they either troll, or they post what someone else wrote. Hmmm...

You don't know anything about the US or law or American politics, do you? Impeach means the same as indict. A legislature impeaches, a grand jury indicts. And do you know what follows after that? A trial with the legislature deciding guilt or innocence, just like there are trials with juries deciding guilt or innocence. Bill Clinton had a trial and was acquitted. That does not mean he was as innocent as child. It means there was not enough votes in the Senate to convict him of a crime.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SECOND

Monday, October 17, 2016 10:18 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
In any case, second, since you did NOT object to the American ideal that EVERYONE is entitled to the same justice - I'm going to assume that you agree that bill and hillary should not be exempt because of their positions of power, nor should Trump be targeted for political reasons.

Am I correct?

As usual, you are not correct. Trump is a lecher. That is why anybody who is not his friend is disparaging him. He made himself into a target for rotten tomatoes. An example of someone who did the same is Bill Cosby, who worked even harder than Trump, and for more years, to ruin his own reputation.

I feel the need for a cartoon to close this day. Interpret it as you please.
www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-fury-and-failure-of-donald-
trump-w444943

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

SIGNYM

Monday, October 17, 2016 10:31 AM

First, you have to determine that what is ALLEGED actually happened. Women do not deserve to be disbelieved nor do they deserve to be believed. No evidence as far as I can tell. Politically-motivated hack-job a distinct possibility. 24-7 media circus and an easily manipulated public makes for poor judgment on your part.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

SHINYGOODGUY

Monday, October 17, 2016 11:01 AM

I say "Grab them by the pussy"

SGG

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
First, you have to determine that what is ALLEGED actually happened. Women do not deserve to be disbelieved nor do they deserve to be believed. No evidence as far as I can tell. Politically-motivated hack-job a distinct possibility. 24-7 media circus and an easily manipulated public makes for poor judgment on your part.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

1KIKI

Monday, October 17, 2016 11:36 AM

Trump is a lecher. And so is bill. hillary is his beard and active co-abuser.

But you defend bill and hillary for political reasons. that's pretty sleazy of you.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

SIGNYM

Monday, October 17, 2016 12:10 PM

Quote:
I say "Grab them by the pussy"

That's not what he said. You might want to listen to the actual recording instead of what some people "say" that he said.

Second, there's a difference between what people SAY and what they have done. You can't convict people because they have a potty mouth, or giggle like 12-year-old boys about women.

Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?

SECOND

Monday, October 17, 2016 6:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Second, there's a difference between what people SAY and what they have done. You can't convict people because they have a potty mouth, or giggle like 12-year-old boys about women.

I'm not nice like you, Signym. I really don't care to follow your simple and very sweet philosophy of life. Since I do not have the powers to convict Trump or Bill Cosby and jail or penalize them, my philosophy is that I have no obligation to be fair to them.

The people who should be fair to Trump or Cosby are those who know them as part of their duties: Trump's lawyers, the court room judges that decide Trump's (or Cosby's) fate. On the other hand, the lawyers opposing Trump (or Crosby) have no obligation to be fair to these guys. They don't even have any obligation to not hurt Trump's (or Cosby's) feelings, either.

I should add that Republicans voters and Congress felt no need to be considerate of Bill Clinton's reputation and feelings during his trial in the Senate or during the impeachment proceedings before that or during the special prosecutor's investigation before that. They said whatever they wanted and they (including Trump) never stopped saying the same after Bill Clinton was NOT convicted. That is how America works and that is why Trump is now in trouble about his sexual assaults. He is being treated no worse than Trump treated Bill Clinton.

SECOND

Monday, October 17, 2016 7:10 PM

I believe Trump's campaign went off the rails because of Trump's new campaign C.E.O. Steve Bannon:

www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/steve-bannons-vision-for-the-trump-co
alition-after-election-day

It took someone smarter and more cynical than Trump to distill Trump’s platform of protectionism, closed borders, and white identity politics into one message about a global conspiracy. The man behind this new message is Steve Bannon, who became the C.E.O. of the Trump campaign in August. Bannon is on leave from Breitbart, the right-wing news site where he served as executive chairman, and where he honed a view of international politics that Trump now parrots.

Bannon is new to right-wing rabble-rousing. Bannon went to the Harvard Business School and became wealthy as a mergers-and-acquisition deal-maker for Goldman Sachs, in the nineteen-eighties. He made a fortune by buying a share of the royalties for “Seinfeld” back in 1993, and receives them to this day.

Bannon met Andrew Breitbart, the founder of the news Web site, when Bannon was financing conservative documentaries in Los Angeles in the aughts. Breitbart, who previously worked with the Drudge Report, started Breitbart in 2005 as a conservative news aggregator, much like his former employer. In the fall of 2009, Bannon and Breitbart worked together on a business plan to launch a more ambitious version of the site, and Bannon joined its board in 2011, once the financing deal closed. When Andrew Breitbart died, in 2012, Bannon became executive chairman and took over the site. Back then Breitbart was a pugnacious but still recognizably conservative site, but, with Bannon in charge, its politics started to change.

Bannon embraced the growing populist movement in America, including the “alt-right,” a new term for white nationalists, who care little about traditional conservative economic ideas and instead stress the need to preserve America’s European heritage and keep out non-whites and non-Christians. Under Bannon, Breitbart promoted similar movements in Europe, including the United Kingdom Independence Party, the National Front in France, Alternative for Germany, and the Freedom Party in the Netherlands. Bannon likes to say that his goal is “to build a global, center-right, populist, anti-establishment news site.” After the election is over, Breitbart, which has offices in London and Rome, plans to open up new bureaus in France and Germany.

This ambition extends to supporting the election of right-wing candidates. In 2013, Bannon encouraged Senator Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, who led the opposition to immigration reform, to run for President, but Sessions declined to enter the race. Bannon went on to attend early candidate forums, where he noticed that, while most Republicans stuck to the Party’s small-government message, Trump was hitting the protectionist themes that proved popular at Breitbart and on the European right.

In early 2015, Breitbart tilted toward Cruz, but after Trump entered the race that summer, with a sharper anti-immigrant message, Breitbart evolved into an unofficial arm of the Trump campaign. “Donald Trump: Candidate for Our Age” and “20 Reasons Why It Should Be Donald Trump in 2016” were typical headlines. When Trump fired his campaign director, Paul Manafort, in mid-August, he made Kellyanne Conway, a Republican pollster, his new campaign manager, and named Bannon his campaign C.E.O.

The role of Trump being Bannon's boss will soon be reversed. Trump will probably be working for Bannon after the election, depending. If Trump is too toxic, Bannon will not need Trump's services for Breitbart's media empire. I don't think Trump's show The Apprentice will be back. Trump needs a new network and show if he wants to be on TV after the election. Trump will be like Bill Cosby, who can't find a venue for his standup comedy act because of his personal problems.

1KIKI

Monday, October 17, 2016 8:02 PM

Bill Clinton's accusers (everything from sexual harassment to groping to attempted rape to rape:
1) Juanita Broaddrick
2) Kathleen Willey
3) Paula Jones
4) Sandra Allen James
5) Eileen Wellstone
6) Carolyn Moffet
7) Carolyn Zercher
8) Gennifer Flowers
9) Helen Dowdy

And that's not counting whatever happened during Bill's many trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express”.

Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!

PREV PAGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NEXT PAGE