Trump talks about respect for women: Grab 'em by the P***Y!
POSTED BY: ElvisChrist
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 03:18
VIEWED: 23001
PAGE 10 of 16
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
“It terrifies me and it should terrify all women,” Jones stated about Hillary’s presidential ambitions.
“It should terrify all men and women,” Willey added. “She will annihilate any enemy. All of her enemies. Anybody who has spoken against her. Across the board for I don’t know how many years. She will get rid of them.”
“No woman who advocates for women attacks the victims of sexual assault be it by her husband or anybody else,” said Willey.
The women argued that the term “enabler” best describes Hillary Clinton’s role in her husband’s alleged sexual crimes.
“There is not a better word for any of this,” stated Broaddrick. “Especially when she threatened me personally.”
Willey added, “She is complicit in everything that he has done.”
You mean Alex Jones right
Alexander Emerick "Alex" Jones (born February 11, 1974) is an American radio show host, documentary filmmaker, writer, and conspiracy theorist. He hosts The Alex Jones Show from Austin, Texas, which airs on the Genesis Communications Network and shortwave station WWCR across the United States and online.
Jones has been the center of many controversies, including his statements about gun control in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. He has accused the U.S. government of being involved in the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks and the filming of fake Moon landings to hide NASA's secret technology. He says that government and big business have colluded to create a New World Order through "manufactured economic crises, sophisticated surveillance tech and—above all—inside-job terror attacks that fuel exploitable hysteria". Jones has described himself as a libertarian, paleoconservative and an "aggressive constitutionalist". Jones has been described by others as a pro-Russian propagandist,[21] conservative, a right-wing conspiracy theorist, and a libertarian.
____________________________________________
Russia trolls get contract extension
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60719
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts that this was old news 20 years ago ...
News from 21st Century. Well, actually from this week!:
Trump on Friday charged that the women accusing him of sexual misconduct fabricated their stories to damage his campaign after two more women came forward with allegations that he had groped them.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-idUSKBN12E1CK
At his last event of the day on Friday, in Charlotte, Trump suggested that his accusers were fabricating their stories for publicity or to damage his campaign. "It's not hard to find a small handful of people willing to make false smears," he said.
Trump said the women may be motivated for financial reasons or political reasons or "the simple reason they want to stop our movement."
Trump had been promising that he would soon provide information showing the allegations against him were false.
Trump, 70, mocked Leeds on Friday. "Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you," he said.
The New York Post reported that Anthony Gilberthorpe contacted the Trump campaign after Leeds went public with her story, and said he was sitting near Leeds and Trump in first class on the same flight.
"I was there, I was in a position to know that what she said was wrong, wrong, wrong," said Gilberthorpe, who is now 54 and would have been a teenager at the time.
Gilberthorpe is known in Britain for his claims that he provided underage boys to British politicians for sex parties in the 1980s.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140812194717/http://www.private-eye.co.u
k/sections.php?section_link=street_of_shame
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Originally posted by 1kiki:
“It terrifies me and it should terrify all women,” Jones stated about Hillary’s presidential ambitions.
“It should terrify all men and women,” Willey added. “She will annihilate any enemy. All of her enemies. Anybody who has spoken against her. Across the board for I don’t know how many years. She will get rid of them.”
“No woman who advocates for women attacks the victims of sexual assault be it by her husband or anybody else,” said Willey.
The women argued that the term “enabler” best describes Hillary Clinton’s role in her husband’s alleged sexual crimes.
“There is not a better word for any of this,” stated Broaddrick. “Especially when she threatened me personally.”
Willey added, “She is complicit in everything that he has done.”
Originally posted by THGRRI:
You mean Alex Jones right
Alexander Emerick "Alex" Jones (born February 11, 1974) is an American radio show host, documentary filmmaker, writer, and conspiracy theorist. He hosts The Alex Jones Show from Austin, Texas, which airs on the Genesis Communications Network and shortwave station WWCR across the United States and online.
Jones has been the center of many controversies, including his statements about gun control in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. He has accused the U.S. government of being involved in the Oklahoma City bombing, the September 11 attacks and the filming of fake Moon landings to hide NASA's secret technology. He says that government and big business have colluded to create a New World Order through "manufactured economic crises, sophisticated surveillance tech and—above all—inside-job terror attacks that fuel exploitable hysteria". Jones has described himself as a libertarian, paleoconservative and an "aggressive constitutionalist". Jones has been described by others as a pro-Russian propagandist,[21] conservative, a right-wing conspiracy theorist, and a libertarian.
That would be PAULA Jones - one of the women.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That reporter could have covered an anonymous “Jane Doe” filing a federal lawsuit against Donald Trump, accusing him of raping her in 1994 when she was thirteen years old. The mainstream media ignored the filing.
We are so lucky to be receiving this information. Another coincidence is Trump's campaign chair, Steve Bannon, was at the helm of Breitbart.com the website that made the video. That is no reason to think Trump paid these women. They are speaking from their hearts, not from their bank accounts filled with $1,000,000 of Trump money.
It is not women as my target. It's republicans. (especially republican-supporting women, second?)
Meanwhile, the Trump-Ailes axis of abuse
Yes, Bill Clinton had affairs; but there’s a world of difference between consensual sex, however inappropriate ...
In 24 hours, Donald Trump was accused of sexual harassment, assault, or inappropriate behavior 11 times.
Bill Clinton's accusers (everything from sexual harassment to groping to attempted rape to rape:
1) Juanita Broaddrick
2) Kathleen Willey
3) Paula Jones
4) Sandra Allen James
5) Eileen Wellstone
6) Carolyn Moffet
7) Carolyn Zercher
8) Gennifer Flowers
9) Helen Dowdy
And that's not counting whatever happened during Bill's many trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Lolita Express”.
second - first you claim you don't have a problem with 'women'. And you're quick to believe the many claims by various women against Trump.
But when it comes to claims made by women against Bill and Hillary, suddenly your good will towards women disappears. You claim that the only reason those women said what they said was due to Trump's money - forgetting that those women have been saying the same thing for decades, far before Trump came on the scene - and despite the scorn they've endured FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU through all that time.
And NOW you're saying that their stories doesn't count because they're too old - but those women suddenly making claims NOW about Trump, that also happened years ago, are new enough to matter.
Why do you believe one set of women and credit their importance - but not the other?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I believe all these women, both Bill Clinton's and Trump's women. Because of those women, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998. That is why Trump should also be impeached, except he has not yet been elected. Let us avoid the trouble of a trial of Trump in the Senate by not electing him in the first place.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Why do you believe one set of women and credit their importance - but not the other?
The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Let us avoid the trouble of a trial of Trump in the Senate by not electing him in the first place.
Impeachment, as you acknowledge, is a trial. Statements are given and evidence is produced. A verdict is reached.
Bill was found guilty at trial.
Trump hasn't had a trial yet.
Are you saying that Bill should be accorded all the benefits of a trial, but Trump should face the standard of 'first the hanging, then the trial'?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Originally posted by second:
I believe all these women, both Bill Clinton's and Trump's women.
I also take it you rescind your previous objections to bill's accusers - which you made at length over a long period of time, in order to dismiss, demean and trivialize the women - that they're republican, their testimony was bought, and that they should be ignored because it was so long ago. And I further assume you won't resort to that again.
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:What??? Bill got an acquittal. As one might expect, the Senate voted along party lines. The Republicans saw Bill as guilty and the Democrats did not agree. Well, there was a Republican from Vermont, Jim Jeffords, voting not guilty. What a traitor to the GOP! He had to quit the GOP and become an Independent.
Originally posted by 1kiki:
Bill was found guilty at trial.
Trump hasn't had a trial yet.
Are you saying that Bill should be accorded all the benefits of a trial, but Trump should face the standard of 'first the hanging, then the trial'?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton#Acquittal_by
_the_Senate
When it comes time for Trump’s trial in the Senate, voting will be very predictable: it will be along party lines. Rather than have the USA face the shame of having a jury of Senators demonstrating extreme prejudice, let’s all just NOT vote for Trump as President in the first place.
Mr Trump, was the kiss of death consensual?
www.gocomics.com/tomtoles/2016/10/16
www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2016/10/16
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Huh???
What??? Bill got an acquittal.
As I recall, Bill was impeached. That WAS what happened, correct?
And I see you're resorting to cartoons again.
Yanno, it's funny. When I ask you for YOUR (plural) opinions and YOUR (plural) reasons, I hear *crickets*. Nobody can seem to explain why they have the opinions that they do. Instead, they either troll, or they post what someone else wrote. Hmmm...
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=60903&mid=10179
96#1017996
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60755
Hillary is a WAR CANDIDATE, and that's just what we need, right? More war?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
As usual, second resorts to partial truths to support a lie:
After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, vowed to finish his term.
I gotta ask, second, when you have to lie, over and over, and get caught, over and over - doesn't that clue you in to the fact you're going down the wrong path?
Let me just point out that the author left out vital relevant facts in the opinion piece. Doing that is known as cherry-picking. And whether you do that in the news, in discussion, in debate or in opinion, when you distort the facts, you've changed the nature of your communication into propaganda. But WE don't have any of THAT in the US, do we?!
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME