70 Years Since Hiroshima
POSTED BY: Magonsdaughter
UPDATED: Saturday, August 8, 2026 10:26
VIEWED: 23968
PAGE 12 of 16
Right you are.
Well, I was Ctrl+F-ing through the pages and the text "firebomb" wasn't in the post.
I suppose I passed on the vid just 'cause it was McNAMara.
Sorry about that.
Also, a hell of a lot more cities than just Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.
Find here the Serenity you seek. -Tara Maclay
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Robert McNamara, once Secretary of Defense, did all he could to end the use of land-based strategic bomber aircraft. Being politically minded, McNamara never said it out loud, but he could not trust with nukes General Curtis LeMay, who he worked under when the two of them planned the bombing of Japan. LeMay was in charge of dropping nukes for twenty years and McNamara did not have the political might to fire LeMay and make it permanent. Instead, McNamara made LeMay obsolete.
Originally posted by RahlMaclaren:
Also, a hell of a lot more cities than just Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki.
The Kennedy Administration, under the aegis of McNamara, canceled numerous SAC modernization programs. This included the Mach 3 North American B-70 Valkyrie in 1961, the GAM-87 Skybolt missile in 1962, and the Rocky Mountain Deep Underground Support Center in 1963. Skybolt, an air-launched ballistic missile, was canceled following numerous test failures and the perceived by McNamara greater reliability of land-based and submarine-based ballistic missile systems.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:So, you've said (with a straight face, it seems) that since I don't criticize Russia, I must be for it. I've been called anything from a Russian troll to a commie to a Putin-lover.
"If you're not with us, you're against us."
If you're not against it, you must be for it. (This twisted logic seems familiar somehow. Like akin to something from 2002.)
At least I didn't call you Nazi-lovers, but apparently I should have. That's pretty much how you guys roll: You're either crazy-ass hypocrites, complete imbeciles, or evil, or maybe "all of the above".
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
The question is, in fighting such an enemy, what depths of gratuitous violence are YOU willing to countenance? -SIGNY
There were revenge killings of Germans all the way into 1950. The official positions of the German government and the German Red Cross are that the death toll resulting from expulsions ranged from 2 to 2.5 million civilians. At least 473,013 are confirmed deaths of Germans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_%281944%
E2%80%9350%29#Research_tracing_individual_fates_by_the_German_Red_Cross
Ordinary people killed German civilians. It was payback.-SECOND
It's funny, I was thinking about KPO's tagline and what it means: "It's not personal, it's just war".
Imagine using that phrase in a realistic situation. It would, of course, have to be during war, and it would have to be in a relatively quiet situation- the person would have to be close enough to hear you, and you would have to have enough time to speak. So not a firefight. You'd have a person in your sights, and instead of taking a prisoner you're about to pull the trigger.
What do you suppose saying something like that is meant to accomplish? To comfort the soon-to-be victim? Hardly likely! I'm fairly certain it would NOT be a great comfort to know that you're about to be blown away by someone who's neither mortally angry or mortally afraid, but is doing his "due diligence" by cold-killing in warfare.
It's a comfort to WHO? Well, the shooter, of course. It's a way of maintaining a sense of distance in the face of doing something evil ... feeling neither guilt nor empathy nor remorse nor fear nor vengeance at the moment of killing.
The fact that KPO would use that as a kind of mantra for his POV has to make me wonder. In some twisted sense, maybe it seems like wisdom. To get back to your link, I can understand people killing from revenge, although I don't condone it. But to promote a sort of disembodied, casual violence is beyond me.
--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by second:Quote:Major Kong is a rube, a hick, the wrong character to choose for explaining the decision to nuke Hiroshima. The man really making the decisions about what day bombs drop is not Truman. It is General Curtis LeMay. LeMay's trademark cigar is stuck in the mouth of General Jack D. Ripper in Dr Strangelove (1964) http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Film/DrStrangelove
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
Dr. Strangelove: Major Kong Rides The Bomb 1080p
True that. But not as symbolic as Kubrick having a cowboy ride the bomb on the way down.NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Sure. Prove that G did.
When. Where.
Cite it. One exact post.
For my curiosity.
Of course she can't back up her hysterical lies, except with more lies.
It's not personal. It's just war.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
troll
SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Unusual for a politician to suggest that nukes solve foreign policy problems. It was a Texan politician, as expected, but he soon denied all responsibility for his Facebook page.
“Japan has been at peace with the U.S. since August 9, 1945. It’s time we made peace with the Muslim world.”
www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/Post-slamming-Muslims-removed-f
rom-state-6449710.php
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Unusual for a politician to suggest that nukes solve foreign policy problems.
It's hard to argue that it didn't, in 1945.
It's not personal. It's just war.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:Germany and Italy have been peaceful longer than Japan. Neither was nuked. Nukes aren't the magical solution to foreign policy problems.
Originally posted by kpo:Quote:
Unusual for a politician to suggest that nukes solve foreign policy problems.
It's hard to argue that it didn't, in 1945.
It's not personal. It's just war.
The disadvantages of nuking Japan were that Truman made public the super-secret weapon and launched a very expensive nuclear arms race. Neither were to America's advantage.
You can't truthfully use the excuse of nukes saving American lives from an invasion of Japan (but you can if you want to use demagoguery) because the Navy admirals were opposed to an invasion of Japan since isolating Japan by sea and destroying Jap forces & resources by naval and air attack was working well.
www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=59952&mid=1001648#
1001648
Truman wasn't thinking more than a week ahead. He screwed the next 70 years because he let General Curtis LeMay make the decisions when to drop.
On August 9th, the Nagasaki bomb goes BOOM! On August 10 Truman made a secret request about the next atom bomb: "It is not to be released over Japan without express authority from the President." This modified the previous order that the target cities were to be attacked with atomic bombs "as made ready".
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME