Deep state. MSM. Trump ...
POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Friday, March 14, 2025 17:04
VIEWED: 33741
PAGE 26 of 33
Robert Mueller's consideration of undue influence on Donald Trump's Middle East policies on behalf of Saudi Arabia and UAE.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/mueller-following-the-money-o
n-trump-middle-east-policy-1191850563652
Can you say about Trump, this idiot must go?
T 
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Unless the perspective itself is wrong, and then NOTHING makes sense.
The test being if thingz make sens. If they do, the perspectiv iz useful.
Quote:
Why? What would happen if "someone else" [MOST LIKELY CHINA] took that position? Be specific.
I agree that China iz a bigger thret.
The leader coud deside that America iz a problem that he can fix. Or he coud see an oportunity for himself and grab it. you no - just like Putin did.
Quote:
So? Don't let them "manage" you and you'll be alright.
Woud you mind if sum forin rich 20 y.o. punk showed up 1 day and kikt you out uv your house? 'My dad own bank dat hold you morgaj. New polisy: Pay off now or get out!'
Quote:
OH, THEY TRIED! Don't you remember the "shock treatment" that was applied to Russia, which caused the GDP to drop 25% and the reduced the male lifespan by 10 years?
I do not. Tell us about it.
Quote:
Why does it make any difference how much Hannity made?
Ask 6string. He wuz the wun hoo complained about it.
Quote:
Yanno, JO, when you stop obsessing about RUSSIA!!! you actually make some sense. For example, how can you say that we're an oligarchy controlled by the moneyed, and at the same time say that Putin is controlling us?
Kuz Putin iz an oligark. He got hiz money by taking over a nation. Cant blame sumwun for taking an opportunity to be sumbudy. But you can question their methodz. Maybe it iz nesessary to be a ruthless killer to attain the pozition?
The thing to keep in mind about the super-rich iz that they see goverments az the enemy, (OK, even lots uv nonrich peepl do also) and they hav sum power to fite back.
Did you ever see Rollerball? Its about a future in wich the big corporationz
took over the world. It can happen.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
House probe ignored most Trump-Russia contacts, report claims
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-probe-ignored-most-trump
-russia-contacts-report-claims/ar-BBKyhIL?ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
House probe ignored most Trump-Russia contacts, report claims
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-probe-ignored-most-trump
-russia-contacts-report-claims/ar-BBKyhIL?ocid=spartanntp
T
It's sad that at the end of the day the big casualty out of all of this is Wikileaks and other whistleblowers in general.
The report linked in the above article calls wikileaks a "Russian Operative".
The report linked also doesn't say anything new. It reads as a point by point collection of things that have been posted to this forum over the months about the Russian narrative.
The report linked also doesn't even claim that the house probe ignored anything. It simply points out denials of contact with Russia, alleged contacts between Trumps Team and Russia, alleged meetings between them and high ranking campaign officials and advisors who were allegedly aware of these alleged relationships.
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_Creative/MoscowProject.pdf
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
House probe ignored most Trump-Russia contacts, report claims
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-probe-ignored-most-trump
-russia-contacts-report-claims/ar-BBKyhIL?ocid=spartanntp
T
It's sad that at the end of the day the big casualty out of all of this is Wikileaks and other whistleblowers in general.
The report linked in the above article calls wikileaks a "Russian Operative".
The report linked also doesn't say anything new. It reads as a point by point collection of things that have been posted to this forum over the months about the Russian narrative.
The report linked also doesn't even claim that the house probe ignored anything. It simply points out denials of contact with Russia, alleged contacts between Trumps Team and Russia, alleged meetings between them and high ranking campaign officials and advisors who were allegedly aware of these alleged relationships.
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_Creative/MoscowProject.pdf
I always find myself saying shit jack. So again, shit jack. The article says that, "the House committee charged with investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 election obtained either no or incomplete information on about 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and Russians, or groups and individuals with strong Russia ties like Wikileaks."
That means they ignored or paid little attention to 81% of the evidence. Learn to understand what you are reading. One way to do that is to avoid reading it though biased eyes. Try to avoid searching for I got ya moments.
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
FEC probing Nunes for possible campaign violations
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fec-probing-nunes-for-possible
-campaign-violations/ar-BBKxmeH?ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
House probe ignored most Trump-Russia contacts, report claims
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-probe-ignored-most-trump
-russia-contacts-report-claims/ar-BBKyhIL?ocid=spartanntp
T
It's sad that at the end of the day the big casualty out of all of this is Wikileaks and other whistleblowers in general.
The report linked in the above article calls wikileaks a "Russian Operative".
The report linked also doesn't say anything new. It reads as a point by point collection of things that have been posted to this forum over the months about the Russian narrative.
The report linked also doesn't even claim that the house probe ignored anything. It simply points out denials of contact with Russia, alleged contacts between Trumps Team and Russia, alleged meetings between them and high ranking campaign officials and advisors who were allegedly aware of these alleged relationships.
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/TODAY/z_Creative/MoscowProject.pdf
I always find myself saying shit jack. So again, shit jack. The article says that, "the House committee charged with investigating Russian involvement in the 2016 election obtained either no or incomplete information on about 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and Russians, or groups and individuals with strong Russia ties like Wikileaks."
That means they ignored or paid little attention to 81% of the evidence. Learn to understand what you are reading. One way to do that is to avoid reading it though biased eyes. Try to avoid searching for I got ya moments.
T
81% of "evidence". You mean alleged incidents over the last year that were quoted off of anonymous sources?
How would one go about investigating things that have no witnesses on the record? Would they strap everyone down for a polygraph test that we've already established has no place in the real world today?
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Get rid of your Italics open quote, or put a close quote in your signature, cunt.
I'm tired of asking nicely.
Do Right, Be Right. :)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
That will be the least uv hiz problemz later this yir.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.7532020.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
McMaster to Resign as National Security Adviser, and Will Be Replaced by John Bolton
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mcmaster-to-resign-as-national
-security-adviser-and-will-be-replaced-by-john-bolton/ar-BBKzUaa?ocid=spartanntp
T
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME