More Great Second Amendment Moments from America
POSTED BY: Magonsdaughter
UPDATED: Sunday, November 21, 2021 18:20
VIEWED: 9513
PAGE 3 of 6
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
The issue isn't the purposes of those 2 things, it's the number of deaths each are involved.
A guns, as River puts it, is just an object. It doesn't mean what you think. The 2nd Amendment wasn't madness upon conception, it's the country which has gone mad.
Which means we need the 2nd Amendment now, more than ever.
So purpose doesn't matter? Would you describe a dirty bomb in someone's garage as just an object? If I had a rocket launcher, do you think the that would be considered 'just an object'?
The evidence seems to squarely rest with more guns in circulation, more deaths, and certainly more unregulated guns = more deaths. But again, it's clear that 'truthiness' is more important to you than evidence, so it's pointless having this conversation, or any conversation with you.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Damn, Jongs............right on point!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Accident? More like gross negligence or depraved indifference or reckless disregard by the owner. Any of those would be an appropriate charge.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
When it comes to gun violence, the United States stands out.
President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, a renowned Boston-based physician, has advocated for stricter gun-control laws and referred to the U.S. rates of gun violence as a public health threat. Murthy’s views have ignited opposition from the gun lobby and politicians on both sides of the aisle, virtually assuring an end to his bid to become the U.S.’s top public health official.
In any debate about gun control and violence prevention, it is useful to examine data on gun deaths.
How does the US stack up against other countries when it comes to homicides involving guns? The screen grab below, which uses findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, illustrates the difference in firearm homicide rates between the US and other high-income countries. Adjusting for differences in population size, rates of homicides from guns were 6.6 times larger in the US than in Portugal, the country with one of the highest rates in Western Europe.
Firearm homicide rates in selected high-income countries, 2010
Gun Violence
In a 2013 article for The Atlantic online that compared gun homicides in US cities to some of the deadliest places in the world, the authors created a map, below, that shows Atlanta has the same gun murder rate as South Africa, Detroit as El Salvador, Phoenix equal to Mexico’s gun homicide rate:
Atlantic Gun Violence
The Atlantic
Another screen grab, below, compares gun homicide rates in the US with countries that frequently make headlines for conflict-related violence (Afghanistan, Iraq, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Pakistan).
The US has higher rates of homicides from guns than Pakistan. At 4.5 deaths per 100,000 people, the US rates aren’t much lower than gun homicide rates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (5.2 deaths per 100,000 people). Annually, the US has about two fewer gun homicide deaths per 100,000 people than Iraq, which has 6.5 deaths per 100,000.
Firearm homicide rates in Afghanistan, Iraq, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the United States, and Pakistan, 2010
Gun Violence 2Compared to certain countries known for their high crime rates, such as Jamaica, Russia, South Africa, and Kenya, the US had the second-highest rate of gun homicide deaths after Jamaica (view data online).
Although the US stands out for its high rates of homicide firearm deaths, its rates look small compared to certain Latin American countries. The following screen grab indicates that El Salvador, Colombia, and Honduras had the highest rates of firearm homicides in the world in 2010.
Firearm homicide rates in Latin America and the United States, 2010
Gun Violence 3
What can the US learn from strategies these countries are taking to address gun violence?
One inspiring example comes from Cali, Colombia, and highlights the value of using data to identify risk factors for homicide. In the early 1990s, the mayor of Cali decided to use data to improve health outcomes in his city. A physician and epidemiologist by training, Dr. Rodrigo Guerrero Velasco set up a firearm death tracking system to identify different risk factors driving these trends. Guerrero Velasco and his colleagues found that more than half of Cali’s homicide victims were intoxicated. Also, analysis of the data revealed that homicides were more likely to involve young people and occur on holiday weekends, weekends following paydays, and election days.
Based on these findings, Guerrero Velasco implemented several interventions to address these risk factors, such as limiting the hours alcohol could be sold, imposing curfews for individuals under 18 on the weekends, and imposing short-term gun bans on select weekends and election days when homicides were most likely to occur. According to an academic study based on an analysis of the city’s gun death database, homicides declined from a high of 124 per 100,000 in 1994 to 86 per 100,000 in 1997. Another study published in the Journal of the American MediNOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
But our analysis of publicly reported gun deaths
in the twelve months after the mass shooting in
Newtown, Connecticut, shows that the federal
data substantially undercount these deaths:
FROM DECEMBER 2012 TO DECEMBER 2013, AT LEAST
100 CHILDREN WERE KILLED IN UNINTENTIONAL
SHOOTINGS — ALMOST TWO EACH WEEK, 61 PERCENT
HIGHER THAN FEDERAL DATA REFLECT.
And even
this larger number reflects just a fraction
of the total number of children injured
or killed with guns in the U.S. each year,
regardless of the intent.
ABOUT TWO-THIRDS OF THESE UNINTENDED DEATHS
— 65 PERCENT — TOOK PLACE IN A HOME OR VEHICLE
THAT BELONGED TO THE VICTIM’S FAMILY, MOST
OFTEN WITH GUNS THAT WERE LEGALLY OWNED BUT
NOT SECURED.
Another 19 percent took place in
the home of a relative or friend of the victim.
MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS OF THESE TRAGEDIES COULD
BE AVOIDED IF GUN OWNERS STORED THEIR GUNS
RESPONSIBLY AND PREVENTED CHILDREN FROM
ACCESSING THEM.
Of the child shooting deaths
in which there was sufficient information
available to make the determination,
70 percent (62 of 89 cases) could have been
prevented if the firearm had been stored
locked and unloaded. By contrast, incidents
in which an authorized user mishandled
a gun — such as target practice or hunting
accidents — constituted less than thirty
percent of the incidents
http://everytown.org/documents/2014/10/innocents-lost.pdf
But you know, why would anyone regulate objects designed to maim or kill? Anyone? Anyone?
Carry on....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
He actually put one in the chamber. But my question is do gun stores normally stock loaded guns on the shelve?
By the way, he could have killed somebody!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by JO753:
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
True that. Assuming, of course, that this woman had every legal right to own a gun. Of course, right and sanity come into question here. What sane person would put a loaded gun, safety off - one in the chamber, in their purse to go shopping?
(Provided that the Wal-Mart is in a "safe" area).
Could you imagine a mother, walking with her kids, in a crime-ridden area packing a loaded gun? So that when one of these stupid teens goes off and starts shooting, she could shoot back. Now that makes sense, don't it?
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:Quote:
But our analysis of publicly reported gun deaths
in the twelve months after the mass shooting in
Newtown, Connecticut, shows that the federal
data substantially undercount these deaths:
FROM DECEMBER 2012 TO DECEMBER 2013, AT LEAST
100 CHILDREN WERE KILLED IN UNINTENTIONAL
SHOOTINGS — ALMOST TWO EACH WEEK, 61 PERCENT
HIGHER THAN FEDERAL DATA REFLECT.
And even
this larger number reflects just a fraction
of the total number of children injured
or killed with guns in the U.S. each year,
regardless of the intent.
ABOUT TWO-THIRDS OF THESE UNINTENDED DEATHS
— 65 PERCENT — TOOK PLACE IN A HOME OR VEHICLE
THAT BELONGED TO THE VICTIM’S FAMILY, MOST
OFTEN WITH GUNS THAT WERE LEGALLY OWNED BUT
NOT SECURED.
Another 19 percent took place in
the home of a relative or friend of the victim.
MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS OF THESE TRAGEDIES COULD
BE AVOIDED IF GUN OWNERS STORED THEIR GUNS
RESPONSIBLY AND PREVENTED CHILDREN FROM
ACCESSING THEM.
Of the child shooting deaths
in which there was sufficient information
available to make the determination,
70 percent (62 of 89 cases) could have been
prevented if the firearm had been stored
locked and unloaded. By contrast, incidents
in which an authorized user mishandled
a gun — such as target practice or hunting
accidents — constituted less than thirty
percent of the incidents
http://everytown.org/documents/2014/10/innocents-lost.pdf
But you know, why would anyone regulate objects designed to maim or kill? Anyone? Anyone?
Carry on....
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
The issue isn't the purposes of those 2 things, it's the number of deaths each are involved.
Thats a joke, rite?
In addition to the absurdity uv the 1st haf uv the statement,you are ignoring the imense inequality uv scale between carz & gunz.
We collectively drive billionz uv milez a year. Even if you only went by the number uv timez we start our carz compared to fire our gunz, the injury/fatality rate for gunz woud be many timez greater than for carz.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh Jo, stop with the facts. If a thing 'feels' true, isn't that enough?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Amen, brother! I need to go to church more. And join the republican party. Perhaps, sumday, God willing, save enuf to pay for a lobotomy. Then I coud hav a chance uv bekuming a truly productiv gun toting member uv society.
----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early
http://www.nooalf.com
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Well if you're not a gun wielding maniac, you're just UN American, it would seem.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME