New Trend - Shoot the Unarmed Black Man

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 22:14
VIEWED: 9409
PAGE 4 of 8

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE

ELVISCHRIST

Monday, September 29, 2014 11:53 PM

"Just another isolated incident..."

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/officer-sandy-murderer-james-boyd-sta
ted-shoot-penis-hours-killing/

ELVISCHRIST

Tuesday, September 30, 2014 4:31 AM

And of course this guy's now on paid vacation. I mean "administrative leave."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/boston-cop-with-racist-homophobic-p
ro-rape-facebook-page-busted-by-local-tv/

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, October 2, 2014 5:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
A sobering fact: Far more Americans have been killed by police since 9/11 than by terrorists.

And far, far more have been killed by black men who were not killed by police in time. Probably many of them unarmed black men, as well.

SHINYGOODGUY

Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:13 PM

Thank you very much Captain Obvious, you just proved my point. "Open Carry" I said nothing about "concealed" weapon..........that would mean that someone had a hidden weapon on their person.

Let me type this slowly so you understand.......Open Carry is not concealed weapon.

Ok, now let's see. What's in the pictures? People are OPENLY carrying weapons of mass destruction and no one is lying down bleeding with Policemen standing over their corpses.

All the people in your pictures are standing upright without any holes in them (other than the type God intended). That's normal!

Do you consider what they are doing as threatening? No, right. So then why, in their infinite wisdom, did they shoot on site a man OPENLY carrying a weapon?

SGG

Quote:
Originally posted by AURAPTOR:
La-la land ? Because I simply state the facts ?

Me thinks yo doth project too much, SGG.

And CWP ( conceal weapons permit ) is issued to those who have applied and who have passed a more intense background check, as I understand it. Why would any white, black, yellow, brown, red, man, or woman, be shot simply because they have a CWP and are carrying ?

Talk about trips to la-la land!

Quote:
Let me say it straight out: I haven't heard of a single case whereby a man, of a certain persuasion, has been shot while toting his Open Carry Assault AR-15.

Merely carrying this doesn't pose an imminent threat. Oh, and it's legal.

STORYMARK

Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:09 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Folks, Auraptor has gone to La-La Land

SGG

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, Muslims flat out tell us what they're going to do. There is a common , clearly defined tie in with their actions, in contrast to the rare, unrelated incidents of shootings by cops. Most cops aren't looking to draw their weapon, while the actions of radical Muslims are overt & intentional. No radical Muslim regrets murdering an infidel. Every cop wishes he could avoid having to shoot.

Colossal difference there.

Gone to? He's been the president there for years.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

STORYMARK

Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:10 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
A sobering fact: Far more Americans have been killed by police since 9/11 than by terrorists.

And far, far more have been killed by black men who were not killed by police in time. Probably many of them unarmed black men, as well.

Flaunt that racism. Might as well, since you don't actually posses any redeeming qualities.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”? Isaac Asimov

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, October 3, 2014 3:26 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Folks, Auraptor has gone to La-La Land

SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, Muslims flat out tell us what they're going to do. There is a common , clearly defined tie in with their actions, in contrast to the rare, unrelated incidents of shootings by cops. Most cops aren't looking to draw their weapon, while the actions of radical Muslims are overt & intentional. No radical Muslim regrets murdering an infidel. Every cop wishes he could avoid having to shoot.

Colossal difference there.

Gone to? He's been the president there for years.

Which delusions are you suffering now? It is so hard to keep track of your fantasies, they blur into each other so.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Friday, October 3, 2014 3:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
A sobering fact: Far more Americans have been killed by police since 9/11 than by terrorists.

And far, far more have been killed by black men who were not killed by police in time. Probably many of them unarmed black men, as well.

Speaking of which, what are the statistics on people killed by unarmed black men? And maybe unarmed black teens? However many, each of them should have been shot.

FREMDFIRMA

Friday, October 3, 2014 4:23 AM

And it seems a thing, now - demand compliance in an angry, threatening manner and then when the poor bastard hops to comply, shoot/tase/beat them anyway.

Florida Officer Tases 62-Year-Old Woman In the Back Just for the Hell of It
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/florida-officer-tases-62-year-
old-woman-back-just-hell-it

Quote:
October 1, 2014

After police arrived on the scene of her Tallahassee, Florida, neighborhood, 62-year-old Viola Young asked them why they were there. Told to turn around, Young did so and walked away.

While walking away, at just about 2:31 in this video shot by a local resident, the officer brutally uses his stun gun to tase Young in the back. Immediately, she falls flat on her face. It's brutal.

No charges have been brought and the officer is currently on paid leave.

So, in light of all the incidents mentioned here, look at the options.

1. Don't comply, get shot/tased/beaten.
2. Comply, get shot/tased/beaten.
OR..
(and this in reference to the above Ferguson incident)
3. Shoot first, shoot fast and flee - GET HOME SAFE AND SOUND.

Sure looks to me that police conduct is directly influencing their own safety in a really negative way here - what's it say when of all these incidents the ONLY ones who came out of it unscathed and unmolested were those who opened fire on a cop, and all the ones who didn't were treated to various levels of abuse up to and including death ?

I think via preponderance of evidence that there is some degree of legal justification to be "in fear for ones life" and initiate hostilities with a cop, up to and including lethal force, because the instant you so much as don't supplicate yourself fast enough for their liking (and maybe even if you do) that *IS* the reaction you'll face - and the legal question of Tasers has been settled on that already, if it's a lethal weapon (for purpose of law) when pointed by a civilian, it's still a lethal weapon (for purpose of law) when a cop points one at you.
Ergo ANY confrontation with an abusive officer *MUST* go into lethal force immediately because the officers training and reaction leaves utterly no alternative.

The courts will no doubt twist and squirm as long as possible to avoid this ugly reality in order to protect the pets that feed them and their corrupted system, but just as the meteoric rise in reporting has finally brought home beyond dispute that police conduct as a whole is downright monstrous, so too will demands for self-defense clauses and accountability until they are also undeniable.

And the badges have no one to blame for that but themselves.

-Frem

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Sunday, October 5, 2014 1:54 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
A sobering fact: Far more Americans have been killed by police since 9/11 than by terrorists.

And far, far more have been killed by black men who were not killed by police in time. Probably many of them unarmed black men, as well.

Speaking of which, what are the statistics on people killed by unarmed black men? And maybe unarmed black teens? However many, each of them should have been shot.

Found some stats, should look for more.

From 2010, 5.8% of murders were commited by unarmed offenders.
42% of robberies were commited by unarmed offenders.
27.4% of assaults were committed by unarmed offenders.

Apparently, exposing the number of unarmed black men committing these crimes is taboo.

Fortunately, George Zimmerman and Brian Wilson did not allow themselves to become statistics, and saved the rest of our civilization from the same.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE