New Trend - Shoot the Unarmed Black Man
POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, July 28, 2026 22:14
VIEWED: 9409
PAGE 2 of 8
Exactly! The video doesn't lie, it just records what's in front of it. This man was shot seemingly without warning or any type of SWAT strategy except shoot to kill.
Here's the thing: He was seen walking throughout the store with the gun, talking on his cell phone, passing by other shoppers who didn't give it a second thought as he passed.
The video was shown to the 911 caller who then changed his story. Curious.
(for those not familiar with the 911 call, the caller reported that he was pointing the gun at people. It is obvious from the video that was not the case).
Right on Point: In an OPEN CARRY state a man is shot because he was openly carrying A GUN. This just drips, no OVERFLOWS, with irony.
(Notice I said a man. He just so happens to be black, and we all know what that implies. Everyone else in creation in the state of Ohio can openly carry except...)
Of course, that 911 call set him up for disaster.
The police claim that they yelled for him to drop his weapon. There's no sound in this video, but it's clear to see that he was shot immediately upon the police entering the scene. So when and where did they issue the command to "Drop your weapon!"
What I would love to see is if others in the store were carrying a weapon. That would complete the ironic part to a T. Of course, that shouldn't matter.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by ElvisChrist:
Don't forget a 22 year old unarmed black man gunned down in an Ohio Walmart. He was carrying a BB gun that he'd picked up in the store when he was killed. Actually, he'd already put the BB gun down when he was murdered by police.
This happened inside a Walmart, America's largest gun retailer, in Ohio, an open-carry state. Had he been carrying an actual loaded AR-15, he'd still have been committing no crime - except for being black, it seems.
Just another "isolated" incident, though. Just because a thing happens five or seven thousand times a year doesn't make it a trend. I mean, it's not like there were scary brown people beheading them or anything.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh that point did not escape me. Yes, you are right, this has been happening throughout history of this country. You can replace the word shoot with hang, beat, mutilate, incarcerate, drug and rape.
Video evidence is undeniable, but people will still LIE. The fact that the police showed the video to the 911 caller is proof of that. He changed his story. That's a bit late for Ooops.
Of course, our resident smarty, Mr. Auraptor, calls it an "isolated incident,"
actually he said "another isolated" incident. Irony of all ironies, that these words are spoken by him, about an "incident" - however "isolated" - that occurs again, in the capitol of GUN CENTRAL - WALMART - in an Open Carry state. Even Hollywood would say, "Not believable enough" send it back for rewrite.
Justice has turned it's vision elsewhere, the shooting has been deemed "justified."
Right on point Frem, which doesn't surprise me.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Nothing "new" about it, it's always been this way, tis just by way of turning their intended surveillence society back around on them, it can no longer be swept under the rug as a "few bad apples" or "isolated incidents" no matter how hard jackboot lickers try.
I also wouldn't put too much faith in prosecution given the factual data in hand regarding how prosecutors softball the charges, often with some really bizarre legal contortions, since police-prosecutor collusion is part and parcel of the systematic corruption which allows this malaise to fester.
http://www.policemisconduct.net/
Have a look for yourself if you don't believe me.
As for the situation in question, the poor bastard never stood a chance, if he DOESN'T instantly obey, he gets shot or tased, and if he does, he gets shot or tased, how does he have an "out", I ask you ?
And of course, if the meteoric rise of reporting police abuse and catching them in the act (because, again, it's ALWAYS been this bad, it's what they are.) another problem now coming into the public eye is just how long and how often police see the occasional rape as a "perk of the work", and don't you just love what the suggested "defense" is...
Cop's Tip For Not Getting Raped By A Cop: 'Don't Get Pulled Over'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/23/oklahoma-police-rape_n_587075
2.html
This following on the heels of that ridiculous obey-or-else editorial, there's a certain undercurrent here of backhanded admission that the police are bad actors with malicious intent, and while our corrupt and degraded justice system would never in a million years admit it, there is some legal grounds for shooting first as a direct result of these discoveries and admissions.
Remember, the Supreme Court itself has stated that due to police conduct, immediate flight from their presence does not constitute probable cause because people might have good reason to fear and flee the police.
So, disturbing precedents are being set, most recent of which is a guy who fired on a no-knock raid because they failed to effectively identify themselves before going all hoo-rah.
Actions have consequences.
For maximum irony, would be a case where a black man shoots an off duty cop who belligerently threatened him and cites stand-your-ground.
-Frem
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Frem has pointed out the error of my title to this thread, and which you have, ironically, confirmed in your statement.
Please, by all means, feel free to remove the words in the title "New" and "Trend"
I thank you!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Rightly charged and rightly will face the music for this one.
However... , the suspect DID suddenly turn around and reach into his car, hands completely out of view. The cop had no idea what the suspect was reaching for, and the quick jittery way in which he did it, could be viewed as suspicious.
The cop barking orders caused the suspect to get nervous, and then he acted out in a nervous manner.
Far from any 'trend' as you suggest, though.
Just another isolated incident, as seen through the lens of a bit of hysteria.
( was that the inappropriate comment you were looking for ? )
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Just to satisfy my own feeling of self worth, i decided to track down the meaning of "another isolated incident"...................
Another: doesn't need exposition, we all know what "another" means; but here it is - being one more or more of the same
Isolated: here's one of it's meanings; "having minimal contact or little in common with others"
Incident: an event or occurrence
So, to bring it full circle: An event that has little in common with other events has taken place once more, in other words more of the same.
How can an event have both little in common with others and happen again, more of the same? In the world of Auraptor, anything is possible.
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Rightly charged and rightly will face the music for this one.
However... , the suspect DID suddenly turn around and reach into his car, hands completely out of view. The cop had no idea what the suspect was reaching for, and the quick jittery way in which he did it, could be viewed as suspicious.
The cop barking orders caused the suspect to get nervous, and then he acted out in a nervous manner.
Far from any 'trend' as you suggest, though.
Just another isolated incident, as seen through the lens of a bit of hysteria.
( was that the inappropriate comment you were looking for ? )
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Random , unrelated incidents which have nothing to do with each other happen all the time.
Pretty self explanatory.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Random , unrelated incidents which have nothing to do with each other happen all the time.
Pretty self explanatory.
Unless they're perpetrated by Muslims or progressives. Then they're part of a grand conspiracy.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
No, Muslims flat out tell us what they're going to do. There is a common , clearly defined tie in with their actions, in contrast to the rare, unrelated incidents of shootings by cops. Most cops aren't looking to draw their weapon, while the actions of radical Muslims are overt & intentional. No radical Muslim regrets murdering an infidel. Every cop wishes he could avoid having to shoot.
Colossal difference there.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
These "random" incidents have a common thread, it is a semi-coordinated effort to shoot any "dangerous" suspects of a certain persuasion.
Remember Ohio is a gun-toting state, Open Carry rules the day.
Let me say it straight out: I haven't heard of a single case whereby a man, of a certain persuasion, has been shot while toting his Open Carry Assault AR-15.
But a man with a BB Gun is shot on site without so much as a how-do-you-do!
There has been no report of a white male carrying a weapon out in public being shot by a law enforcement official. NONE!
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Random , unrelated incidents which have nothing to do with each other happen all the time.
Pretty self explanatory.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Folks, Auraptor has gone to La-La Land
SGG
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
No, Muslims flat out tell us what they're going to do. There is a common , clearly defined tie in with their actions, in contrast to the rare, unrelated incidents of shootings by cops. Most cops aren't looking to draw their weapon, while the actions of radical Muslims are overt & intentional. No radical Muslim regrets murdering an infidel. Every cop wishes he could avoid having to shoot.
Colossal difference there.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
La-la land ? Because I simply state the facts ?
Me thinks yo doth project too much, SGG.
And CWP ( conceal weapons permit ) is issued to those who have applied and who have passed a more intense background check, as I understand it. Why would any white, black, yellow, brown, red, man, or woman, be shot simply because they have a CWP and are carrying ?
Talk about trips to la-la land!
Quote:
Let me say it straight out: I haven't heard of a single case whereby a man, of a certain persuasion, has been shot while toting his Open Carry Assault AR-15.
Merely carrying this doesn't pose an imminent threat. Oh, and it's legal.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME