Boston bombing motive

Quote:

---

Tell that to the Kurds.

---

Aaaaannd... back to your favorite delusion.

Kurds were attacked in 1988. And that justifies an invasion... what, 15 years later??? Kinda late, dontcha think??

----------------------------
So, let's go through your list of delusions, one more time:

Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11. There were no "terrorist training grounds" supporting any terrorist groups, and Hussein himself hated al Qaida.

Saddam did not have enough WMD to form a credible threat to anyone. By 2003, there were only a few remnants of misplaced, forgotten and spoiled chemical and biological shells from 1988.

Iraq did not move WMD into Syria. Although it was kind of amusing to hear you insist that he had.

Saddam did not have a delivery system, since all of his rocketry was restricted to a range that allowed only for defense against Iran.

Saddam did not have a WMD production program, or even a nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons research program. There were no efforts along those lines.

Despite what Rumsfeld said, he did not have WMD deployed anywhere near Baghdad, or anywhere else, for that matter.

The UN did not ask for our "help" in enforcing the weapons ban. They had their own inspection team - which included USA military and CIA inspectors. In fact, the prospect of USA bombing led to an evacuation when the inspectors were within a few months of completing their task.

Nor did the last UN resolution on the matter- R1441- allow any nation to invade Iraq at a whim. UN resolutions supersede each other, that is, altho later resolutions reference previous ones, they also CANCEL THEM OUT. So reference to previous resolutions was not carte blanche for invasion.

-----------

All of this was known by the Bush administration and by anyone who cared to look into the matter. Since you cling so tightly to plainly false ideas (and this is just one) everyone here has pretty much - and quite rightly- branded you as delusional. That's why nobody takes you seriously, on anything.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

You're wrong on about 80%, but that's an improvement for you.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME