Parents of Adolf Hitler Campbell lose custody
POSTED BY: canttakesky
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 07:40
VIEWED: 6710
PAGE 10 of 10
"... what I read is that she feels that the traditional medical treatment would have resulted in harm for her child, and that her trying ANYTHING was in regards to trying to find something that would not cause harm."
OK - what I read was this - in her first post she posited that lack of effective treatment would result in death. Then she said that formula was effective. But she rejected the effective treatment, in effect risking her son's death, in order to try something unknown.
I've seen situations where there was NO effective treatment. I can understand desperation to try something, ANYTHING to help. >> MY << first impulse is to guard life at all costs. The rest can be unscrambled later. So I find her decision to some extent - you fill in the blank.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Look, I think homeopathy is hookum too, and I've even said as much to her face, but you're acting like she was deliberately trying to kill her child, rather than merely trying to make decisions based on what she knew and heard when her child came down with a unexpected disorder.
It's not like it's her fault her child got sick. You know, my grandmother on my mothers side died earlier this year, there were all kinds of complications. Is there any point we could have prevented that, any treatment we could have done besides what the doctor's had her on? I don't know. CTS made a choice, it actually ended up working out. She choose what she thought would cause the least harm INCLUDING her child not dying. It's not a question of living versus dying but with food tolerance, for her it was a question of living with reduced quality of life versus living and developing food tolerance. In my book that's all that matters in regards to her character, and does not suggest to me, at all, that anything was more important to her than the life of her child.
Have you asked her, if her alternative treatment had clearly not been working, if she would have gone back to the formula? Because I'm getting the impression she would have. Trying alternatives that seem more promising before trying recommended treatment does not make someone evil, nor a terrible mother. It just means someone is in a hard place and they're exploring their options.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Maybe it might be good to divert this thread back to the topic, and away from personal discussions around CTS and her parenting.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Good idea.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sure. Parenting is a very personal thing for everyone.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'm going to drag that discussion back to this for a moment because I was there, too, and dealing with my own dangerously and mysteriously sick child, so I was very sensitive to the topic.
1kiki: I think you're being unfair to CTS. I don't believe your interpretation is what she meant - what I read is that she feels that the traditional medical treatment would have resulted in harm for her child, and that her trying ANYTHING was in regards to trying to find something that would not cause harm.
What I got from CTS' posts at the time was that her child was allergic to proteins, that there was an amino acid formula that contained no proteins for her child to react to but would provide all of the necessary nutrients for cell growth, but that she did not want her child to be dependent on big pharma and so she opted to try something else. She also SAID she was afraid of the authorities, which is why she left the country.
Between that and her compulsively anti-vaccination/ anti-chemotherapy stance I got the strong impression that her decision to remove her child from treatment was more due to ideology than anything related to her child's health. Because at the time, there was NO discussion about the side-effects of the medical treatment her child was undergoing.
Now, maybe in the throes of a medical crisis CTS was not as clear as she might have wanted to be. Maybe, in the throes of a medical crisis, it simply was not clear what was causing what... that the vomiting might have been due to the treatment rather than the disease might not become clear until much later. These things happen in complicated situations. But there is one thing I feel that I have recognized about CTS, is that she is a cherry-picker of facts par exellance, and I do not trust her to look at a situation with both eyes open, as it were, nor to think about it openly and with self-honesty whenever it contradicts her strong belief system.
I have not read up through the thread, but I have an additional concern which may be entirely misplaced, and that is her child's intellectual functioning. Severe early starvation... and that is what her child went through... affects brain growth, so I hope he's OK. That's as far as I'm going with this.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Muhammad or Moohamed in France in Belgium's most Muslim-populated cities...is this name not qually or even more perverted than calling your kid 'Hitler' or 'Joe Stalin'?
Emmanuel Macron blames children of single parents for French riots
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/france-riots-2023-emmanuel-macron-b
roken-families-race-factor-n2ljnvpgz
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
So I looked into whatever happened to these children and their parents. The father is a self-avowed Nazi-lover. The mom once claimed he was threatening her. The children were taken away from both parents. They seem to be divorced now. Child protective services...or whatever it's called in NJ... OF COURSE can't discuss the reasons for removal. But nobody outside of the family...not doctors, not neighbors...has hinted at child abuse. And giving a kid a weird or distasteful name isn't abuse, so I wonder if this just wasn't political.
Altho I do have to wonder about people calling their kids entirely made-up names like Keishaka.
Mohammed is a common Arabic name. It's not strange, it's simply using a name common to the parents' ethnicity and religion.
-----------
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." - Henry Kissinger
Loving America is like loving an addicted spouse - SIGNYM
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME