Obama likes hot sweaty man sex

POSTED BY: whozit
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 00:36
VIEWED: 7795
PAGE 1 of 1

WHOZIT

Friday, September 19, 2008 10:22 PM

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/178233.html Ick

PIRATENEWS

Friday, September 19, 2008 11:38 PM

There's something creepy about that video.

Like the Watusi are about to start hacking the Zulus with machetes.

Saddam Hussien Obama Osama campaigned in Africa with his cousin for president of Kenya last year. The went to every Islamic shrine (grass hut) in Kenya, dressed in Arab costume, and performed ritual animal and baby sacrifices, allegedly. Just like Bohemian Grove.

His cousin lost the election for president, but then bribed and extorted his way into the non-existant job of prime minister. So now Kenya has both a president and prime minister for the first time in its history. Obama's cousin can still implement 100% Islamic law, which was part of his election platform.

It's all part of the master plan for the British Empire. Just like the massive influx of Muslims in England, with legalization of Islamic courts.

And yes, Obamas love hot sweaty mansex.

PHOTOS: Crackhead Obama in gay sex romp
http://rense.com/general81/globe2.htm

Obama Sinclair Archive:
http://rense.com/Datapages/sinclairdat.htm

FUTUREMRSFILLION

Friday, September 19, 2008 11:50 PM

The stupidity on this site often knows no bounds.

I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

KHYRON

Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:10 AM

Seriously, who are the admins again? I think it's high time that Whozit's IP gets a ban, or at the very least Whozit should get tagged. When I checked in this morning there were 3 new threads by him, all with this sort of fucking bullshit.

------------------------------

This isn't my signature. I have to type this every time I make a post.

PIRATENEWS

Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:34 AM

The Obama Nazis are gittin uppity... and the fake election is not even finished yet.

You guys could at least wait until the Illuminati rigs the electronic voting machines.

Don't worry, the next holocaust will begin soon enough.

FREMDFIRMA

Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:00 AM

I concur Khyron.

You'd wanna contact Haken for that.

In the meantime...

PN ?

Thrash this asshole, show him how it's done, willya ?

Just keep it to the threads he started, as a favor, if you please.

-F

RUE

Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:13 AM

Hope nobody minds when I get out the popcorn to watch.

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

ID

Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:46 AM

ID

Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by FutureMrsFIllion:
The stupidity on this site often knows no bounds.

I think You've clearly made your point here.

RUE

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:01 AM

Why did you capitalize the Y in 'you've' ? And why do you claim to think ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

KIRKULES

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:11 AM

If Whozit changed the name of this thread to Bush likes hot sweaty man sex, you all would be piling on like the hypocrite thought censors you really are. If Whozit was putting these treads in an inappropriate forum, I might agree with you, but his posts are every bit as relevant to "Real World Discussions" as most of the crap you all come up with.

I see our resident "Anarchist" is calling for censorship too, once more revealing his true nature.

ID

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:12 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by rue:
Why did you capitalize the Y in 'you've' ?

'Cause I'm drinking

Quote:

And why do you claim to think ?

'cause "Cogito, ergo sum" ergo sum ergo cogito?

FUTUREMRSFILLION

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:12 AM

oh bullshit kirkules

I am on The List. We are The Forsaken and we aim to burn!
"We don't fear the reaper"

FORSAKEN original

“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Mahatma Gandhi

OLDENGLANDDRY

Saturday, September 20, 2008 9:50 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:

Don't worry, the next holocaust will begin soon enough.

And we'll be starting in Tennessee, which will hereafter be known as "New Zion"

BWAAAHAAAHAAAAHAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

WHOZIT

Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:58 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Khyron:
Seriously, who are the admins again? I think it's high time that Whozit's IP gets a ban, or at the very least Whozit should get tagged. When I checked in this morning there were 3 new threads by him, all with this sort of fucking bullshit.

------------------------------

This isn't my signature. I have to type this every time I make a post.

You're rite I over did it last night, but if you want me banned because I made fun of Obama then go cry to Haken. I do'nt think he'll throw me out of here unless I was to bomb this site with SPAM.

KHYRON

Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:22 PM

No, I want you banned because you're an idiot and you flood RWED with your inane garbage. Let me illustrate:

And that's ignoring the BS you post in other threads.

------------------------------

This isn't my signature. I have to type this every time I make a post.

KWICKO

Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:24 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by whozit:
Quote:
Originally posted by Khyron:
Seriously, who are the admins again? I think it's high time that Whozit's IP gets a ban, or at the very least Whozit should get tagged. When I checked in this morning there were 3 new threads by him, all with this sort of fucking bullshit.

------------------------------

This isn't my signature. I have to type this every time I make a post.
You're rite I over did it last night, but if you want me banned because I made fun of Obama then go cry to Haken. I do'nt think he'll throw me out of here unless I was to bomb this site with SPAM.

Which is exactly what you've been doing, with all the bullshit links that have nothing to do with anything. There is absolutely no difference between what you're doing and the e-mails that pile up in my SPAM filter - except those e-mails actually have something to offer.

I don't care if Obama like hot sweaty man sex. I don't care if McCain likes hot sweaty man sex with that tranny Palin. What I DO care about is having to see twelve new threads a day that are exactly the same, and offer nothing of relevance, and offer links that are nothing at all.

If you've got a point of view, for fuck's sake, man - STATE IT! Posting up garbage links IS the perfect example of SPAM, and you're doing nothing but trying to push relevant, active discussions down the page.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

WHOZIT

Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:57 PM

What do you two offer? Like I said earlier maybe I over did it, but you two just bitch and whine, and now your building case to get me banned, complete with charts. You two are typical Obama thugs, people with a different opinion must be silenced!

RIVERLOVE

Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:42 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Khyron:
No, I want you banned because you're an idiot and you flood RWED with your inane garbage. Let me illustrate:

And that's ignoring the BS you post in other threads.

------------------------------

This isn't my signature. I have to type this every time I make a post.

Why isn't all this crap going to Troll Country? If this immature, obnoxious, confrontational, retarded, sewer-worthy, and utterly meaningles shit isn't the very definition of a cancerous Troll, then what the hell is? And don't some wizenheimer say me. I'm not 1% of that disgraceful record.

SWISH

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:13 PM

Hint to whozit: when you start trashy threads that no one responds to, the solution is NOT to start more threads.

Please haken - can this troll be dealt with?

FREMDFIRMA

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:17 PM

Quote:
If you've got a point of view, for fuck's sake, man - STATE IT! Posting up garbage links IS the perfect example of SPAM, and you're doing nothing but trying to push relevant, active discussions down the page.

Exactly.

Nice work on the graphical assessment Khyron.

We'll take a lot of crap if someone has an actual POINT to discuss, even a wacky one, and we look the other way on most of the sock puppetry in spite of the fact that most of them are pitifully obvious, nor do we really give a shit if your language is politically correct or not.

But there ARE limits - and spamming valid discussions off the page with crap of less content or interest than junkmail is one of the things universally despised by all of us.

I doubt you'll listen, but I just wanted it on record that you were warned as politely as we'd bother doing before Haken roasts your ass like an Xmas chestnut.

Have a nice day!

Asshole.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

CHRISISALL

Saturday, September 20, 2008 3:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by whozit:
You two are typical Obama thugs, people with a different opinion must be silenced!

Trouble is, you don't have an opinion- I support banning you (please note that however much I disagree with AURaptor, I'd never want to see him banned) because you typically have nothing to add, save for your adolescent rancor.
You are the only one I ever told to shut up that I was actually serious about.

Biped.

BANWHOZITisall

WHOZIT

Saturday, September 20, 2008 4:11 PM

Fine, I'm done with the lot of you. Enjoy your one sided conversation. I'll censor myself, good riddance.

SIGNYM

Saturday, September 20, 2008 4:54 PM

Quote:
If Whozit changed the name of this thread to Bush likes hot sweaty man sex...

No, only if he changed it to ROVE likes hot sweaty man sex. Then he'd have a point.

Quote:
his posts are every bit as relevant to "Real World Discussions" as most of the crap you all come up with.

Ideally there should be SOME reality in a "Real World" post!

Quote:
Fine, I'm done with the lot of you. Enjoy your one sided conversation. I'll censor myself, good riddance.

Oh, thank god!

---------------------------------
Any idea, no matter how much you may agree with it, can be radicalized and employed as an excuse for violence. There is no such thing as a righteous or untouchable philosophy, and when you start thinking that there is, you have become an extremist.- Finn Mac Cumhal

CHRISISALL

Saturday, September 20, 2008 8:02 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SignyM:
Oh, thank god!

How many chickens are gonna hatch???

Wecouldn'tbesoluckyisall

KIRKULES

Saturday, September 20, 2008 8:32 PM

I find it somewhat ironic that a tread started by Whozit has now become a let's ban Whozit thread, and has now been bumped to the top more times than 86% of the other threads in RWED. Maybe if you all spent a little more time responding to the other treads, and less time bitching about Whozit, the board would look a little more like your "ideal". Which I can only assume is the other forums here, where they only get bumped once a month or so. Hell, you might all well just turn over half the forums here to Whozit, at least there'd be something going on there.

SIGNYM

Saturday, September 20, 2008 8:40 PM

That's really not accurate. If you'll notice, most of the thread by Whozit die pretty quickly.

---------------------------------
Any idea, no matter how much you may agree with it, can be radicalized and employed as an excuse for violence. There is no such thing as a righteous or untouchable philosophy, and when you start thinking that there is, you have become an extremist.- Finn Mac Cumhal

SWISH

Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:24 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
I find it somewhat ironic that a tread started by Whozit has now become a let's ban Whozit thread, and has now been bumped to the top more times than 86% of the other threads in RWED.

Not so ironic, given the umpteen purely trash threads that whozit started this week, the fact that he/she showed no signs of stopping, and the completely reasonable desire by most posters to not see another couple hundred whozit.bs threads bogging down RWED.

And might I say - the attempt failed because the troll has started another one. Has anyone contacted Haken about this yet?

KIRKULES

Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:49 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by swish:
[Bwhozit.bs threads bogging down RWED.

Have you been prevented from posting? Is your Internet service so slow that a thread with zero replies is "bogging down" your download speed? What exact inconvieance are you facing other than a threat to your self appointed position as arbiter of content.

CHRISISALL

Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:59 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
What exact inconvieance are you facing other than a threat to your self appointed position as arbiter of content.

Visual spam- it's quite annoying- but then, that's the point, really.

Vegetarianisall

ELVISCHRIST

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:02 PM

Quote:
Hell, you might all well just turn over half the forums here to Whozit, at least there'd be something going on there.

He'd be quite welcome in Troll Country.

FREMDFIRMA

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:03 PM

And what's your excuse other than a lame-ass, paper-thin, politically-motived proxy defense simply cause you happen to share a hatred ?

Face the facts, dude,

He managed to singlehandedly piss off just about everyone in RWED, so we're throwing him a farewell gala of the boot party persuasion, ain't no one askin or forcing you to participate, and his own actions have "volunteered" him as the pinata.

You hang that kinda kick-me sign on around here, yer gonna get kicked, it's just that simple.

And yes, Haken's been made aware of the problem.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

KIRKULES

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:31 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

And yes, Haken's been made aware of the problem.

-Frem

I wouldn't think a tattletale would survive very long in the "Anarchist" community. Oh, that right you're in the super secret anarchists that like tattletales.

CHRISISALL

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
a tattletale

You immature dolt- it's 'public outcry'- that's not the same thing.

Mature(not)Chrisisall

KWICKO

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:46 PM

Quote:
I wouldn't think a tattletale would survive very long in the "Anarchist" community. Oh, that right you're in the super secret anarchists that like tattletales.

Subversives and anarchists bring EVERYONE'S misdeeds into the light of day.

Seriously, have you not seen any of PN's posts? No cow is sacred, no one is above being dragged out of the darkness and into the light.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

KIRKULES

Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:56 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
You immature dolt

Mature(not)Chrisisall

Come-on Crisisimmature we can band together and keep this thread at the top for a week in memory of our martyr Whozit.

Allah akbar

SWISH

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Come-on Crisisimmature we can band together and keep this thread at the top for a week in memory of our martyr Whozit.

[Because of the posts to this thread,] Have you been prevented from posting? Is your Internet service so slow that a thread with [non]zero replies is "bogging down" your download speed?

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:04 AM

This board ain't public property, shitheel.

It belongs to Haken, and it's *HIS* choice on what and whether to take action about it, and his right to do so at his sole discretion.

And as visitors on his turf, there's a certain respect in making him aware of problems that concern it, just as was done when some scumbag was spamming exploit-links to the blue sun room.

Or do you not understand the very concept of private property in spite of ranting about socialism every chance you get ?

You're talkin about the turf of a man I hold in the highest respect here, mano - sure as shit imma tell him if some dickhead is vandalising it.

Or maybe that's your sock-puppet that's about to get laundered and you're pissed about it, I dunno.

Did it ever occur to you that RWED is in fact pretty damn close to a functioning Anarchist society ?

And that even Anarchists have a low tolerance for something universally destructive, and will deal with it in a fashion that respects everyones rights as much as possible ?

Or do you, like nearly everyone else, not even understand the concept, preferrring to think of it as absolute raving chaos on every level and dismiss it as such ?

Or perhaps you could simply explain your motivation for defending such behavior, that'd be fun too.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:15 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Or perhaps you could simply explain your motivation for defending such behavior, that'd be fun too.

-Frem

It just seems fair that if you get to keep your pet PN, I should be able to keep Whozit. I mean, it must have taken you years to train PN to not make his pictures so big they blow out the treads. I think Whozit could be trained if he was just given more time. I promise I'll feed and water him and you won't even know he's here.
Comeon Frem let me keep him , it's not fair you get to keep PN.

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by swish:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Come-on Crisisimmature we can band together and keep this thread at the top for a week in memory of our martyr Whozit.
[Because of the posts to this thread,] Have you been prevented from posting? Is your Internet service so slow that a thread with [non]zero replies is "bogging down" your download speed?

Wow, I just realised I'm a troll too. Sorry I inconvienienced you. Might I suggest Verizon Fios, or just not clicking on this thread.

CHRISISALL

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:48 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:

Wow, I just realised I'm a troll too.

Not so much that you couldn't easily come back to the poster side....

isall

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:56 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:

Wow, I just realised I'm a troll too.
Not so much that you couldn't easily come back to the poster side....

isall

Thanks for giving me another chance to bump this thread Chrisismymentorisall. If I just respond to posts directed at me, and don't mention the sweaty man thing, I think I'll be alright.

SWISH

Sunday, September 21, 2008 12:58 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Wow, I just realised I'm a troll too. Sorry I inconvienienced you. Might I suggest Verizon Fios, or just not clicking on this thread.

Why would I not click on this thread? I have no problem with it. It's you who's been kvetching about all the posts it's getting.

Aside, in a stage whisper: let's all watch KR go batty now, since he appears to be completely missing the irony...

Edited to add: Kirkrules, I think you're a bit nuts, but in an earnest, honest way that at least follows thread topics. I'd never call you a troll. *strokes head fondly* Feel any better now?

CHRISISALL

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:03 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
If I just respond to posts directed at me, and don't mention the sweaty man thing, I think I'll be alright.

Give yourself a little time man, it'll all be okay.

Nurturing Chrisisall

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by swish:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Wow, I just realised I'm a troll too. Sorry I inconvienienced you. Might I suggest Verizon Fios, or just not clicking on this thread.
Why would I not click on this thread? I have no problem with it. It's you who's been kvetching about all the posts it's getting.

Aside, in a stage whisper: let's all watch KR go batty now, since he appears to be completely missing the irony...

Thanks for stopping by and expressing your support for the underground bring back Whozit movement. Can we all chant together now.
Whozit! Whozit! Whozit! Whozit!

CHRISISALL

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:09 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:

Whozit! Whozit! Whozit! Whozit!

No backsliding now...!!!

Toughloveisall

SWISH

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:14 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Thanks for stopping by and expressing your support for the underground bring back Whozit movement. Can we all chant together now.
Whozit! Whozit! Whozit! Whozit!

ROFLMAO!

You must be a Bush/McCain/Palin lover, because who else would equate participation in a discussion bashing a person as a sign of support for them? Oh wait - it's just that thread hit count equals love of the thread starter, no matter the content of the posts, right? Oh, KR, you silly simplistic thing...

But I still think you're not a troll.

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:22 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by swish:
Why would I not click on this thread? I have no problem with it.

Sorry, I thought my brilliant persuasive skills had bought you back to the realm of the enlightened.
Anyway, thanks for bumping the thread.

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by chrisisall:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:

Whozit! Whozit! Whozit! Whozit!

No backsliding now...!!!

Toughloveisall

The funny thing is, I haven't even been drinking tonight yet. I'm kind of worried what might happen after a few beers. I'll probably just get all melancolly an shed a few tear for Whozit.

CHRISISALL

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:38 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
I'll probably just get all melancolly an shed a few tear for Whozit.

Whozit will return no doubt, have no fear.

isall

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, September 21, 2008 4:49 AM

Believe it or not, Kirk - PN's actually quite capable of rational discussion if the topic interests him enough, and there is indeed a point to some of the stuff he rants on about.

And it's also not like some of our other posters haven't pulled some stunts in their time, Kaneman, Jongstraw, etc - but do actively participate in discussions now, and I'll stand to the right to do so no matter how I disagree with em or not.

Try not to die of shock, but in fact I suggested an attempt to reason before the banstick, although the choice is ultimately up to Haken cause it's his turf.

I may not be very nice, but ponder this - standing up for rights is fine and dandy, but ultimately meaningless unless you're willing to do it for everyone, friend or foe.

-F

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:06 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Believe it or not, Kirk - PN's actually quite capable of rational discussion if the topic interests him enough, and there is indeed a point to some of the stuff he rants on about.

I may not be very nice, but ponder this - standing up for rights is fine and dandy, but ultimately meaningless unless you're willing to do it for everyone, friend or foe.

-F

I have trashed PN few times lately, but I've never called him a troll or anyone else here for that matter. Don't set yourself up on a pedestal, you're the one that is the first to come to PN's defense every time someone calls him a troll and wants him baned. I actually enjoy most of Pn's posts, but when he attacked a 17 year old pregnant girl because her mom is running for VP, I thought that was a little too much. Even after that I don't want him banned. Whozit more than once expressed his desire not to be banned, but instead of giving suggestions as to what exactly you and others thought he was doing wrong, you all just grabbed your torches and ran him out of town. Whozit was right, he would have never been persecuted if his comedy was about Pres. Bush. There's a huge majority of liberals here, and in typical fashion they want to silence those they disagree with, they just saw a easy target in Whozit because of his approach.

SWISH

Sunday, September 21, 2008 1:43 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Whozit was right, he would have never been persecuted if his comedy was about Pres. Bush. There's a huge majority of liberals here, and in typical fashion they want to silence those they disagree with, they just saw a easy target in Whozit because of his approach.

You really are missing the point here. All this has nothing to do with what side whozit is on - his many, many threads contain absolutely nothing but connections to his own web site, and that is spam, and that makes him trollish.

And I need to clarify my own stance, since I assumed it was obvious though I see now that it wasn't at all and sorry about that: I don't think whozit has earned banning. I'm lobbying for his spam threads to go to troll country.

ANTHONYT

Sunday, September 21, 2008 4:48 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kirkules:
Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
Believe it or not, Kirk - PN's actually quite capable of rational discussion if the topic interests him enough, and there is indeed a point to some of the stuff he rants on about.

I may not be very nice, but ponder this - standing up for rights is fine and dandy, but ultimately meaningless unless you're willing to do it for everyone, friend or foe.

-F

I have trashed PN few times lately, but I've never called him a troll or anyone else here for that matter. Don't set yourself up on a pedestal, you're the one that is the first to come to PN's defense every time someone calls him a troll and wants him baned. I actually enjoy most of Pn's posts, but when he attacked a 17 year old pregnant girl because her mom is running for VP, I thought that was a little too much. Even after that I don't want him banned. Whozit more than once expressed his desire not to be banned, but instead of giving suggestions as to what exactly you and others thought he was doing wrong, you all just grabbed your torches and ran him out of town. Whozit was right, he would have never been persecuted if his comedy was about Pres. Bush. There's a huge majority of liberals here, and in typical fashion they want to silence those they disagree with, they just saw a easy target in Whozit because of his approach.

Hello,

You are mistaken. Whozit could have spammed us with the following statement:

"Whozit has big ears and likes hot sweaty man sex."

And I would have hated his disruptions just as much. Because posting that crap all day does not contribute to anything but my annoyance.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

KWICKO

Sunday, September 21, 2008 6:47 PM

Yup, and as far as I know, Whozit hasn't been "banned" at all - he just went off in a snit.

Okay, so he and PN both tend to post lots of links - but go click on Whozit's "whozitreport.bs" links and see where they go. They're just blind links, they're nothing.

And at least PN *tries* to offer some relevant comment in amongst all his links.

Do I think Whozit should be banned? Nope. I think he should be *warned*, and the useless blind link posts of his moved to Troll Country, and if that doesn't work to put him on the straight and narrow, THEN he should be banned.

I'm a fairly open-minded guy, and I've got a remarkably high tolerance for "offensive" speech; I don't know that I've ever seen anything here in RWED that I'd deem "ban-worthy" - and I've seem some remarkably vile things said here. Even said quite a few of them myself. And I've never been banned, tagged as offensive, or even so much as warned.

This is THE most open board I've been around, by a fair piece.

But, that being said, this is a PRIVATE web site, open to members only. As such, your First Amendment rights don't really count for much in here. If you'd like to have a substantive discussion about free speech, feel... well, feel FREE to start it up.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

KWICKO

Sunday, September 21, 2008 6:58 PM

Also, if you'll look around a bit, you'll notice that Whozit is still alive and well, and has posted three times today.

So why all the fuss about him being banned, when it clearly hasn't happened?

Looks like he took the warnings he was given and has been born again hard.

M

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 9:24 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Also, if you'll look around a bit, you'll notice that Whozit is still alive and well, and has posted three times today.

So why all the fuss about him being banned, when it clearly hasn't happened?

Looks like he took the warnings he was given and has been born again hard.

M

That's been my point all along. It was oblivious to me and anyone else except those blinded by their Obama love that Whozit is a cool guy/gal that just did'nt understand the rules and how they are arbitrarily applied around here. Turns out anything goes as long as you're one of the insiders who assumes to know what the administrator of the site wants or expects. This was all about Whozit walking on you alls perceived turf and nothing else. He/She caused you no inconvenience and disrupted this site in no way, other than spoiling your ideal. That's one of the reasons so few post in the RWED, they don't know what the rules are until Frem makes them up.

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, September 21, 2008 10:19 PM

Common Sense, Kirk - apply it for once.

Nobody had a problem with the guy specifically, they had a problem with the nonparticipative spamming of the same meaningless crap over and over, something which anyone with half a brain knows isn't really welcome on any forum anywhere.

Your own political zealotry has blinded you to the actual issue here and it makes you look utterly ridiculous when it's patently obvious your only reason for defending that behavior is a mutually shared political hatred.

Did it somehow escape you that PN busts on Obama for much the same thing Whozit did, only he makes an actual case out of it with accusations and statements from Sinclair and others, linked content and amusing (and yes at times offensive) comments and photos ?

This had jack shit to do with whatever Whozit was saying cause in essence he wasn't saying anything at all, just spamming - which is considered vandalism in any forum worth the name.

But you seem to not get that, cause your own petty personal and political hatred has gotten in the way of your reasoning, no matter how smart you are otherwise.

I suggest you take a step back, step on that hatred for a minute and take a good look at what others have said in this thread, cause I really do believe you have misunderstood the entire argument in the first place.

Emotion is a damn poor substitute for intellect within the reasoning process.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 10:43 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Emotion is a damn poor substitute for intellect within the reasoning process.

-Frem

You know Frem, constantly telling everyone that you're smarter that them doesn't make it true. I do believe it is an excellent brainwashing tactic though. If you repeat anything enough times some people will begin to believe it.

FREMDFIRMA

Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:31 PM

You just don't get it Kirk...

I was implying that you're quite smart enough to have known that, only that you were too pissed to be fully rational about it.

And I can tell, too, cause in any other case you'd not be fool enough to stand here and keep buying rope from me, like you're doing.

You seem pretty determined to paint me as evil as of late - what's the matter, some Anarchist steal your woman out from under ya ? run over your dog ?

Or are you specifically angry at me for hammering cracks in the foundations of your worldview ?

Cause something's eatin ya, man - and it's real obvious.

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

KIRKULES

Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:43 PM

Damn Frem, you are a likable dude. I especially like your ability to take what you hand out. I'm through with my mini-rant and apoligise for singling you out when I was really just mad in general about the way Whozit was being treated. I agree that my suggestion that politics was a motivating factor among the Whozit banners is weak, but I still believe that this was more about him treading on you alls turf than anything else. One of your rules of thumb that I really do like is not taking grudges from one thread to another, I'll try to follow that one better in the future.

KWICKO

Monday, September 22, 2008 12:31 AM

Kirk, let me put it in terms EXACTLY like the ones Whozit uses and you are defending.

How long do you think I'd last around here if I started posting up two, three, or ten times a day a new thread titled "Bush Sucks Cheney!" with the body of the thread reading "Go to http://www.bushsuckscheney.bs to see more of Bush in hot sweaty man-sex with Cheney!"

And not posting it just once and having a bit of a laugh, but continuing to post it, repeatedly, day after day after day, with little or no changes at all, and links that go do nothing at all.

Would you consider that SPAM? Would you consider it disruptive to the board, and a waste of space?

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

KWICKO

Monday, September 22, 2008 12:33 AM

Quote:
It was oblivious to me and anyone else except those blinded by their Obama love...

I don't know if I've been blinded by your obliviousness here or what...

[Sorry; I couldn't resist.]

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

KIRKULES

Monday, September 22, 2008 12:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Kirk, let me put it in terms EXACTLY like the ones Whozit uses and you are defending.

How long do you think I'd last around here if I started posting up two, three, or ten times a day a new thread titled "Bush Sucks Cheney!" with the body of the thread reading "Go to http://www.bushsuckscheney.bs to see more of Bush in hot sweaty man-sex with Cheney!"

And not posting it just once and having a bit of a laugh, but continuing to post it, repeatedly, day after day after day, with little or no changes at all, and links that go do nothing at all.

Would you consider that SPAM? Would you consider it disruptive to the board, and a waste of space?

Mike

I agree that he formatted his posts incorrectly by not putting the subject in the title. I just don't think anyone here read any of the contents of his posts after the first few. Almost all contained political humor that I believe is worthy of posting. While you might not find it humorous because of your political leanings, I found much of it hilarious.

KWICKO

Monday, September 22, 2008 12:52 AM

Quote:
Almost all contained political humor that I believe is worthy of posting. While you might not find it humorous because of your political leanings, I found much of it hilarious.

Agreed, there was some political stuff that was well worth posting. As such, post it. Put it in a relevant thread, make it your signature, or even start a new thread about it.

But don't start TWELVE new threads about it in one day!

And yes, some of it is hilarious. Obama's ears aren't really that BIG, but they certainly do stick out quite a bit.

At any rate, I think he's merely taking a "self-time-out" from here, and I've no doubt that he'll be back.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

SWISH

Monday, September 22, 2008 12:59 AM

KR, if you found his posts so amusing, why didn't you reply to them so he'd stop creating more damned threads? It was all a rather pathetic ongoing beg for attention, and if you'd just patted his head a few times, given up a few LOLs, maybe none of this would have happened....

See - since you're the only one who found it amusing, it's ALL YOUR FAULT in the end!

(OK, it's Sunday and I don't want to go to work tomorrow and I'm snarky. Please don't take this seriously.)

KIRKULES

Monday, September 22, 2008 1:00 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Quote:
It was oblivious to me and anyone else except those blinded by their Obama love...

I don't know if I've been blinded by your obliviousness here or what...

[Sorry; I couldn't resist.]

Mike

Sorry, my grasp of the English language is so poor,you're going to have to help me out here.

Edit: That darned spell check doesn't find them if they're real words.

KIRKULES

Monday, September 22, 2008 1:04 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by swish:
KR, if you found his posts so amusing, why didn't you reply to them so he'd stop creating more damned threads? It was all a rather pathetic ongoing beg for attention, and if you'd just patted his head a few times, given up a few LOLs, maybe none of this would have happened....

See - since you're the only one who found it amusing, it's ALL YOUR FAULT in the end!

(OK, it's Sunday and I don't want to go to work tomorrow and I'm snarky. Please don't take this seriously.)

If you will read his posts in "legitimate" threads you will see that I tried to acknowledge his contribution. I just did'nt see his other posts as a problem until you all got out the torches.

KWICKO

Monday, September 22, 2008 2:06 AM

Quote:

Sorry, my grasp of the English language is so poor,you're going to have to help me out here.

Edit: That darned spell check doesn't find them if they're real words.

I hear ya. I think the word you were looking for was "obvious". I just found that it made it unintentionally hilarious the way you had it.

I'm a fan of the spellcheck feature that Apple's Safari browser has implemented - if it doesn't recognize the word, it'll underline it in red, and you can either correct it, ignore it, or tell it to learn the word and add it to your dictionary. It's lousy with names and places, though... and I'm still teaching it slang and colloquialisms (such as "y'all" and "ain't")

And it didn't recognize obliviousness as a real word, either.

:shrug:

As for torches, I prefer a flamethrower. Much better reach.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

FREMDFIRMA

Monday, September 22, 2008 4:44 AM

No worries Kirk, I do hope he takes the suggestions in hand and applies them however, cause RWED is a great place to learn how to refine an argument to make it more effective and coherent, even if the process is kinda frustrating to the one making it.

I do feel the dude has something to contribute, and wish he would throw down and contribute it, even if it's a half page rant based on personal perspective fulla bad punctuation and grammatical errors, it's something to start from at least.

And while I might not be very nice, especially when blowing holes in a bad arguement, for all the snark there's usually a core of decent advice in there too - I've been compared to Severus Snape for that before, and I'll not deny the resemblance cause some might have noticed an attempt to strongly hint to him a couple times that his little train was headed for a wall before folks blew a gasket on him.

I guess we'll wait and see, cause I admit a certain curiousity to specifically why he don't like Obama, it's not like I care for the socialist sumbitch neither, so we might even find some common ground.

You never know,

-Frem

It cannot be said enough, those who do not learn from history, are doomed to endlessly repeat it

KWICKO

Monday, September 22, 2008 5:10 PM

Yup, if you hate Obama, that's cool. I just want you to be able to articulate WHY you hate him, what it is about him that drives you crazy. I'm hoping your hate comes from something other than his "big ears", his love for hot sweaty man-sex, or the color of his skin. But maybe it's just a slickness factor, a sleaziness about him that you can't quite pinpoint. That's cool, too. That's exactly how I felt about Bill Clinton, and how I still feel about John Edwards; I can't quite put my finger on it, but there's just something very un-kosher about those guys...

Apparently Chrisisall feels the same way about Bush.

So spill it - if you hate the guy, state your case! I don't think anyone's going to kill you over it, or have you banned for it. Hell, my wife doesn't like Obama (she's a Hillary supporter, which I really don't get), and I have since the '04 DNC, when I told her he was going to be President one day. She thinks he's too slick, too "icky", and I get the exact same vibe from Hillary. Still, we're together, not fighting about it, but not agreeing either.

Mike

This world is a comedy for those who think, and a tragedy for those who feel.

PIRATENEWS

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 12:36 AM

Quote:
OBAMA SEX PERV SCANDAL

National Enquirer
10/13/2008

The ENQUIRER exclusively reports a "sex pervert" was Sen. Barack Obama's longtime mentor and "father figure".

For seven years, the presidential candidate had a "father-son" relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, who has confessed to having sex with children, sadomasochism, bondage and practicing a wide array of deviant sexual activities.

In his 1995 memoir Dreams from My Father, Obama identifies his childhood mentor only as "Frank," but Obama insiders later confirmed he was referring to Davis, a journalist and poet who was a pal of Obama's maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham.

Frank Marshall Davis admitted in his private papers that he had secretly authored a hard-core pornographic autobiography called Sex Rebel: Black, published in 1968. The author of the book - a copy of which was been obtained by The ENQUIRER - is listed as "Bob Greene." Davis later confessed to its authorship after a reader noticed similarities in style and phraseology between that book and Davis' poetry.

Davis confessed: "I could not truthfully deny that this book, which came out in 1968 as a Greenleaf Classic, was mine."

The appalling catalog of admitted real-life decadence is laced with perverted sexual activity, bisexuality, rape - and the seduction of children.

"Davis' admission he wrote this disturbing book exposes Obama's mentor as living a secret double life - and as a sexual pervert," disclosed a source.

In his shocking tell-all, Davis admits to seducing a thirteen year-old girl, voyeurism, exhibitionism, bisexuality, rape and sadomasochism.

Barack, called "Barry" as a child, was a mere ten year old when he first met the family friend who lead a secret double life.

Obama's grandfather introduced Barry and Davis because he believed it would help his alienated grandson identify with being of mixed heritage because Barack's mother, Ann, was a white American while his father, Barack Sr.black Kenyan.

Obama's parents separated and then divorced when Barack was only 2. Ann remarried and took Barack to live with her and new husband Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia - but Barack was later sent to live with his white grandparents in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Barack describes how Frank Davis had a lasting effect on him and became a father figure over the seven years they knew one another on the tropical island.

In Dreams from My Father, Obama wrote: "He would read us poetry whenever we stopped by his house, sharing whiskey with Gramps out of an emptied jelly jar.

"As the night wore on, the two of them would solicit my help in composing dirty limericks."

Obama described being counseled by Frank often and recalled drinking whiskey with him.

Since Frank Davis has been identified as the author of Sex Rebel: Black, Obama has been extremely secretive about the true nature of his experience with the self-admitted deviant.

For all the details pick up The ENQUIRER - on sale now.

www.nationalenquirer.com/obama_sex_perv_scandal/celebrity/65575

Just like George W Bush and Billary "Clinton".