Artist's Impression Of Hillary Clinton's Campaign Trail

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Monday, August 24, 2015 22:57
VIEWED: 13128
PAGE 4 of 8

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE

JONGSSTRAW

Friday, March 13, 2015 8:28 AM

Old, frumpy, dishonest, incompetent ... but really

SIGNYM

Sunday, March 15, 2015 1:14 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have many people figured out that Hillary using the illusion of supporting women's rights to extort campaign donations from the world's most heinous warriors against women is the same as the Non-reverend Alsharpieton race-hustling and extorting money from the most racist and discriminatory entities (as protection from him pointing out their racism)?

Do women who are appalled by Non-reverend alsharpieton's race hustling and extortion also find Hillary appalling for USING women to better her bank account, or do they excuse her?

Do racists who excuse Sharpieton find Hillary's despicable behavior as deplorable as they should?

Women are supporting Hillary through liberal pro-choice organizations like EMILY's List (Early Money is Like Yeast). I kind of figured that EMILY's List was a traitor to women's rights when they started supporting pro-war female candidates back in the '90s.

Now, I don't know jack about Sharpton, but I DO remember the big "pass" the black community gave (Uncle Tom) Clarence Thomas just because he was black. So now they (and we) have a rightwinger on the Surpreme Court who is even further to the right than Scalia, and who never issues an opinion of his own because his thinking is so weak.

That's what you get for voting "identity politics". You wind up with Rick Perrys if you're a white southern male, Hillary Clintons if you're a liberal white woman, and Clarence Thomases and Obamas if you're black.

Is it too obvious to say that voters should look beyond color, gender and age when they pull the lever/punch the dot?

--------------
You can't build a nation with bombs. You can't create a society with guns.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Monday, March 16, 2015 2:55 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Have many people figured out that Hillary using the illusion of supporting women's rights to extort campaign donations from the world's most heinous warriors against women is the same as the Non-reverend Alsharpieton race-hustling and extorting money from the most racist and discriminatory entities (as protection from him pointing out their racism)?

Do women who are appalled by Non-reverend alsharpieton's race hustling and extortion also find Hillary appalling for USING women to better her bank account, or do they excuse her?

Do racists who excuse Sharpieton find Hillary's despicable behavior as deplorable as they should?

Women are supporting Hillary through liberal pro-choice organizations like EMILY's List (Early Money is Like Yeast). I kind of figured that EMILY's List was a traitor to women's rights when they started supporting pro-war female candidates back in the '90s.

Now, I don't know jack about Sharpton, but I DO remember the big "pass" the black community gave (Uncle Tom) Clarence Thomas just because he was black. So now they (and we) have a rightwinger on the Surpreme Court who is even further to the right than Scalia, and who never issues an opinion of his own because his thinking is so weak.

That's what you get for voting "identity politics". You wind up with Rick Perrys if you're a white southern male, Hillary Clintons if you're a liberal white woman, and Clarence Thomases and Obamas if you're black.

Is it too obvious to say that voters should look beyond color, gender and age when they pull the lever/punch the dot?

Yes.
Then libtards would never win.

AURAPTOR

Monday, March 16, 2015 3:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Now, I don't know jack about Sharpton, but I DO remember the big "pass" the black community gave (Uncle Tom) Clarence Thomas just because he was black. So now they (and we) have a rightwinger on the Surpreme Court who is even further to the right than Scalia, and who never issues an opinion of his own because his thinking is so weak.

That's what you get for voting "identity politics". You wind up with Rick Perrys if you're a white southern male, Hillary Clintons if you're a liberal white woman, and Clarence Thomases and Obamas if you're black.

Is it too obvious to say that voters should look beyond color, gender and age when they pull the lever/punch the dot?

Clarence Thomas wasn't voted into the USSC by the public. There was no 'giving him a pass', as you call it, by the black or ANY community.

Not a hint of racism as you call Justice Thomas' thinking " weak " , now is there ? The dude is a brilliant man, but because his decisions don't go a certain way, you say his thinking is 'weak'. How pathetic.

1KIKI

Monday, March 16, 2015 3:43 AM

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/clarence-thomass-disgracef
ul-silence

As of this Saturday, February 22nd, eight years will have passed since Clarence Thomas last asked a question during a Supreme Court oral argument. His behavior on the bench has gone from curious to bizarre to downright embarrassing, for himself and for the institution he represents.

Do you think he should be held to a lesser standard than the other justices because he's black?

SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

MAGONSDAUGHTER

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by whozit:
Oh goody, the left has given the OK the trash Hillary. Let's dance.

She's old. She's frumpy.

But she's the Left's old and frumpy hag.

Just remember that.

Women age, get over it.

1KIKI

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:46 AM

Oh shoot Magon's - don't you know? Females don't exist unless they're between the ages of 15 and 25.

Or 20 and 35 if you're really enlightened.

SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:21 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

Women age, get over it.

They age faster when they keep lies and have a lump of charcoal for a heart.

And it wasn't I who first called her 'frumpy', it was one of her own , so don't come after me w/ this phony as hell misogynist crap.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

1KIKI

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:40 AM

"It was another LEFT WING woman who called Hillary frumpy." Cite?

And - hmm - YOU seem to be the one who called her old - as if that was a pejorative.

SAGAN: We are releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide, increasing the greenhouse effect. It may not take much to destabilize the Earth's climate, to convert this heaven, our only home in the cosmos, into a kind of hell.

AURAPTOR

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:59 AM

Seems any mention of her being called frumpy has been scrubbed from the internet. I recall it was some woman, commenting on Hillary , as she appeared on some stage in Africa, as SecState. Old and tired, I believe were also used , as well as possibly bloated.

Then there's this...

Quote:

Hillary Clinton 'Overweight,' Author Ed Klein Tells Fox News

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/06/hillary-clinton-overweight-ed
-klein-fox-news_n_1574195.html

And she IS old, in the negative sense. She thinks she needs 2 "devices " to check multiple e-mail accounts. She thinks that since the Secret Service is physically guarding her home in NY, that her e-mail is secure and safe !!!

She's old, in the sense that she's doddering and feeble- minded. THAT old.

PREV PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NEXT PAGE