Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2026 18:50
VIEWED: 62340
PAGE 52 of 57

PREV PAGE 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 NEXT PAGE

AURAPTOR

Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:28 PM

Class & Holder have never been introduced.

They are total strangers.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

THGRRI

Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:38 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Class & Holder have never been introduced.

They are total strangers.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

I do not dislike Holder. But he knew what was going to go down here because he got to see the evidence. He was after all, the country's top cop. As for you rappy. Your opinion matters not because it is always tainted.

rappy

AURAPTOR

Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:43 PM

Tainted ?

More like founded in truth .

You should try it sometime.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

THGRRI

Friday, October 24, 2014 2:17 AM

AURAPTOR

Friday, October 24, 2014 2:31 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

I'm reposting this because you some how missed the glaring gaff you made the first time.

" ... because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure JUSTICE was served "

Exactly how do YOU define " justice " ? How do you think Holder defines " justice " ???

If Justice is truly blind, then shouldn't the facts speak for themselves ?

What you MEANT to say is that Holder couldn't , after seeing the facts, fulfill his promise to exact REVENGE on Officer Wilson.

Because that's what we're talking about here. Not justice.

THGRRI

Friday, October 24, 2014 5:45 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

I'm reposting this because you some how missed the glaring gaff you made the first time.

" ... because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure JUSTICE was served "

Exactly how do YOU define " justice " ? How do you think Holder defines " justice " ???

If Justice is truly blind, then shouldn't the facts speak for themselves ?

What you MEANT to say is that Holder couldn't , after seeing the facts, fulfill his promise to exact REVENGE on Officer Wilson.

Because that's what we're talking about here. Not justice.

I believe Holder thought the cop was going to go to trial and lose. To him this provided cover when he suggested to the community he would see to it justice would be served. This happened before the facts were known to him. It was a poor choice of words on my part. If you look at the content of the post carefully you should understand where I was going with that. If not my bad.

AURAPTOR

Friday, October 24, 2014 7:53 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

I believe Holder thought the cop was going to go to trial and lose. To him this provided cover when he suggested to the community he would see to it justice would be served. This happened before the facts were known to him. It was a poor choice of words on my part. If you look at the content of the post carefully you should understand where I was going with that. If not my bad.

You and I see Mr Holder entirely differently. I think this was, in his view, a giant make up call, not just for Trayvon, but for injustices against blacks through out the US, and its history.

But speaking out before the facts are known, that's become a staple for this administration.

- The Cambridge police acted stupidly

I was looking at what you WROTE. You see, Holder's version of "justice " does not exactly sync up w/ the definition that MOST folks think of w/ regards to justice.

THGRRI

Friday, October 24, 2014 10:51 PM

You are a dick. I explained what I wrote and you still refuse to change your view of it. Look moron, you are claiming what I am but are to stupid to see it. Our only difference is you are an ideolog who hates anything liberal and so you hate Holder.

I do not, but I do call it as I see it.

Rappy

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, October 25, 2014 7:38 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

Witholder has not retired - he will leave after a replacement is confirmed and sworn in.

The facts FROM THE AUGUST AUTOPSY prove that Justice was already served, and the AG's sole purpose was to obstruct Justice and pervert Justice, nothing more.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Saturday, October 25, 2014 7:51 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
I'm talking about the fantasy world you live in.

Holder has a lot more class than that.

Speaking of the fantasy world YOU live in....
Quote:

Always remember leave no witnesses. In Trayvon's case - it was the perfect crime, plus no witnesses. Zimmerman made sure of that.

Are you delusional? Or just joking?
Have you forgotten about all the witnesses? The witnesses who accidentally told the truth after perjuring themselves on the stand during the trial? The witnesses who all told the same story when they accidentally told the truth, all agreeing with the same account Zimmerman kept repeating, despite the lawyers coaching the witnesses to lie, fabricate, obfuscate, perjure, and avoid revealing the truth during the trial?
Your fantasy world must really sustain you in some way.
Quote:

The other two, not so much. But it always pays to have an ace up your sleeve when lying isn't enough, stack the deck in your favor. The DA is presenting ALL of the evidence to the GJ, so as to appear that he's being fair. Actually, and usually, the DA presents his side of the case (in favor of the prosecution), but usually his/her case against the defendant. He's trying the case before the GJ so as not to get an indictment.

There is another possibility as to why info is being leaked. The DA does not want this to go to Trial. End of story!

Oh goodness, stop the presses. The DA does not want to take to trial an obviously innocent Officer, wasting so much money! How horrific that they cannot find a way to railroad this Officer, fake another trial like against Zimmerman. The DA should be fired for allowing Justice to reign in his District, for not pursuing Malicious Prosecution against another innocent and unjustly maligned Officer.

Quote:

SGG

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

PREV PAGE 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 NEXT PAGE