Real World Event Discussions

Another Unarmed Black Teen Killed

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Tuesday, August 25, 2026 18:50
VIEWED: 62340
PAGE 51 of 57

Thursday, October 23, 2014 4:44 AM

Just want to make sure you who do not wait for the facts are paying attention. Once again I want to remind you, they did not give out the facts of the case as the public demanded so they can test witness testimony against the physical evidence as it is determined by the experts. They do this to see if the witnesses are lying. If they give it out early and before they are ready, the witnesses will start to tailor their statements to appear more creditable.

I knew there was a major problem when many of the so called witness tried to suggest the cop tried to pull a 6'5 300 hundred pound man into the police vehicle through the driver side window. Bullshit....and shame on those of you who wished this to be true so you could pounce on the cop.


Evidence supports officer’s account of shooting in Ferguson

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-
account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Evidence supports officer’s account of shooting in Ferguson

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-
account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html





Wait... this AND the fact that Saddam had WMD ?

Talk about the worst week ever for some folks.

Yikes.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:37 AM

The NY Times reported there will be no Federal civil rights violation charges made in this case. So the pressure is now on the Grand Jury to bring a criminal indictment against the officer. With the ongoing racial tension over this case they almost have to to bring it to trial, just like they did in Sanford, Florida.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The NY Times reported there will be no Federal civil rights violation charges made in this case. So the pressure is now on the Grand Jury to bring a criminal indictment against the officer. With the ongoing racial tension over this case they almost have to to bring it to trial, just like they did in Sanford, Florida.



Why give a token gesture to taking this to trial when there's no evidence ? Cost the tax payer's MORE money, to put on a dog and pony show, which will end, predictably, with the cop not being convicted, which will only outrage the paid protesters, the race merchants and anarchists all that much more, resulting in more property damage, more injuries , incarcerations, and possibly lives ?

THIS is what PC madness feels like.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
The NY Times reported there will be no Federal civil rights violation charges made in this case. So the pressure is now on the Grand Jury to bring a criminal indictment against the officer. With the ongoing racial tension over this case they almost have to to bring it to trial, just like they did in Sanford, Florida.



Why give a token gesture to taking this to trial when there's no evidence ? Cost the tax payer's MORE money, to put on a dog and pony show, which will end, predictably, with the cop not being convicted, which will only outrage the paid protesters, the race merchants and anarchists all that much more, resulting in more property damage, more injuries , incarcerations, and possibly lives ?

THIS is what PC madness feels like.


One way or another the taxpayers are gonna pay; either for the trial, or the riots, or both. And when the dust settles from all the damage and mayhem, nothing will have changed as Sharpton and his vile ilk slither back to their race-mongering day jobs.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 8:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
One way or another the taxpayers are gonna pay; either for the trial, or the riots, or both. And when the dust settles from all the damage and mayhem, nothing will have changed as Sharpton and his vile ilk slither back to their race-mongering day jobs.



It'll be both. Trial, followed by riots.

Why ? Because the PC , " comprehensive " , bureaucratic bullshit mentality that has infected this nation has made it impossible to do the right thing.

No matter what.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 8:43 AM

I am not against Eric Holder. I want to say that up front. He did retire right before the shit was to hit the fan with this. I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 8:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:

I think it is because he knew the facts would not allow him to fulfill his promise to make sure justice was served.





Wait... huh?


You're joking, right ?

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 9:10 AM

Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:07 PM

And you thought of this all on your lonesome. Well, there are some things in life that go unexplained, I'm guessing this will be one.
I'm talking about the fantasy world you live in.

Holder has a lot more class than that.

Funny how information from the secret grand jury finds it's way into the local & national press. Someone is leaking out information about the Grand Jury. Hmmmmmm, who could it be? Could it be SATAN!?

I was waiting a long time to use the Old Church Lady signature motto.

But seriously, only one person (aside from the secret panel of jurors) knows what is actually happening in the panel's room. The prosecutor. And yet, bits and pieces of info manage to get out to the press, as though they were preparing for something.

8 people have testified and given their accounts of the day's events and 1 person has given his account of the events that fatal day. The only other person that knew the accounts better than anybody, but he's dead. Hmmmmm, Trayvon, that other young man in Florida and now Brown. All the shooters claim self defense, all the dead people were unarmed, and each shooter claiming self defense in fear of an unarmed teen who went for their gun.


Always remember leave no witnesses. In Trayvon's case - it was the perfect crime, plus no witnesses. Zimmerman made sure of that. The other two, not so much. But it always pays to have an ace up your sleeve when lying isn't enough, stack the deck in your favor. The DA is presenting ALL of the evidence to the GJ, so as to appear that he's being fair. Actually, and usually, the DA presents his side of the case (in favor of the prosecution), but usually his/her case against the defendant. He's trying the case before the GJ so as not to get an indictment.

There is another possibility as to why info is being leaked. Perhaps the DA wishes to cause a mistrial. Food for thought.

The DA does not want this to go to Trial. End of story!

P.S. Now the Indictment Date has been pushed back. We were told originally the end of October. Now the news out of Ferguson is that the DA's office believes it will be another month or two. To borrow another motto from the Church Lady "Now isn't that Special"


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nope, he went there and I believe it was because he thought the cop was guilty. I further think he had access to the grand jury testimony and realized the black community would demand he act when there was no indictment of the cop. I think he did not want to get caught up in having to tell the community that the cops testimony is the real way it went down and the shooting was justified.

In other words I believe the sheriff left town.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME