I bet this wouldn't have happened if she was wearking a burkah...
POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Thursday, January 9, 2025 00:33
VIEWED: 15798
PAGE 10 of 14
Aaaand yet there's this "Rape conception happens between 25,000 and 32,000 times each year in the U.S"
Yeah, no way those genes didn't become exponentially dominant. And this is in our "rational, modern society" BTW
And as for Magons, I could care less what you think I will be proved right in time.
If you don't get that there are vast genetic differences in different cultures.... WOW ARE YOU PHYSICALLY BLIND!
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Aaaand yet there's this "Rape conception happens between 25,000 and 32,000 times each year in the U.S"
Compare regular conception rates and numbers. Those numbers are tiny.
Second, you're saying rape is intrinsic to males genes, and now you're arguing that "rape genes" are being propagated through the population by rape. You're contradicting yourself. Pick one or the other.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Wishimay:
If you don't get that there are vast genetic differences in different cultures.... WOW ARE YOU PHYSICALLY BLIND!
Apparently less than 1% difference now means "vast."
And that's comparing us to CHIMPANZEES.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
It's not how many children are BORN that determines whose DNA gets passed along - it's how many of those children SURVIVE to pass that DNA along ... and so on generation to generation.
The whole idea of a rapist gender isn't sustainable in evolutionary terms.
A Russian woman gave birth to 69 children in the 1700s. She holds the record for the largest number of children born to one mother. The wife of Feodor Vassilyev gave birth to 16 pairs of twins, seven sets of triplets and four sets of quadruplets between 1725 and 1765. 67 of them survived infancy.
Larger families only increased your chances of survival THEN. More people to grow or find food, more chances of having allies...
If we produce 30,000 children of rape a year NOW, imagine how many there were in medieval times...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
You're still not correctly judging those rape pregnancies relative to the number of regular pregnancies, even assuming that there are rape genes (there aren't).
Secondly, the fact that rape rates can decrease indicates a flaw in your argument that men just rape. If they had no control in it, the rates would never change.
And lastly, a declining frequency of a gene (again assuming that there are rape genes, which there isn't) indicates a lack of evolutionary success with those genes.
I'm actually pretty sure at this point that you're joking about all of this and being controversial for the lulz. This is fine, you have to occupy your time somehow and considering the difficulty in your life I am in no place to judge.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Second, you're saying rape is intrinsic to males genes, and now you're arguing that "rape genes" are being propagated through the population by rape.
No, I'm saying certain populations of males are more inclined to be sexually aggressive.
Men in prisons are more likely to be rapists, yes?? Why is it any less understandable there could be areas of males population on the rest of the planet that are inclined to be rapists? Maybe they are in the same geographic location that a prison was, or maybe men that were criminals were thrown into the desert?
Genetics don't go far. I have my great great great grandmothers large butt. I'm sure if you go thousands of years back in time you would find one of my female ancestors has a large butt as well...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
You're still not correctly judging those rape pregnancies relative to the number of regular pregnancies, even assuming that there are rape genes (there aren't).
Helloooooo? Violent men are more likely to be rapists....
If there could be a genetic predilection for violence, why can't there be a genetic predilection for people who commit rape?
http://bonjukianpatten.com/2014/05/15/the-white-jacksons-of-north-caro
lina-a-family-of-rapists/
Having trouble locating a couple others, but look at Castro, he had relatives arrested for rape, as did Josh Powell and his freaky father...
Rape is sexual perversion, and that DEFINATELY is a gene...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hell, you yourself outta know. You say you have no desire to breed and very little to no desire for sexual relations. You don't think THAT'S genetic? It relates to the way your body funtions, which is controlled by DNA???
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Secondly, the fact that rape rates can decrease indicates a flaw in your argument that men just rape. If they had no control in it, the rates would never change.
Rape rates can decrease because men have found other things to fill their time (porn), and there is some awareness that it is wrong due to levels of education, and that we've gotten better at throwing their dumb asses in prison...
Don't mean the DESIRE isn't still there. Violent porn wouldn't be so popular if it wasn't...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
http://listtoptens.com/top-10-countries-with-highest-rape-crime/
If many Muslims thought rape was a man's fault it would be on this list...
If men all had the same levels of rape stats over the world there wouldn't be a difference. All countries would be on more or less on par.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME