Real World Event Discussions

An experiment on partisanship

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Saturday, June 22, 2013 15:55
VIEWED: 4823
PAGE 3 of 4

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Done w/ the thread jack now. I've said my piece here.
Oh, cuttin' and runnin' again?



Reading comprehension 101


I addressed the issue brought up in the OP.

Feel no need to devolve the thread into a whizzing contest.

Start up another thread, if the topic so moves you. I'll gladly reply there.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I addressed the issue brought up in the OP.



Oh, you mean you wrote a post expanding on the strengths of the Obama presidency?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:06 AM

HEY KPO! I gotta question!

Quote:

So you want this to be sincere? Or should I just repeat the rightwing talking points?
'Cause I could do either.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:02 AM

They both could have been a lot worse?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
HEY KPO! I gotta question!
Quote:

So you want this to be sincere? Or should I just repeat the rightwing talking points?
'Cause I could do either.



It doesn't have to be heartfelt, but it shouldn't be sarcastic. George Bush is on trial, you're his lawyer; make the best case that you can that he was a good president. Talking points is fine, any sincerity you can add to it the better.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:44 PM

Quote:

George Bush is on trial, you're his lawyer; make the best case that you can that he was a good president.


no please his dog would miss him and he has a wife and children or something

Instead of an overt death sentence, send them to colonize ehhhhhh maybe Australia/Antartica/the Atlantic Abyssal Plain/Whatever.

Hey Magons, you guys want an Obama or a Bush 43? I can guarantee freshness! I'll even poke airholes in the box!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 4:12 PM

To try the original post's challenge:

George W Bush was elected as a caretaker President - Clinton's Presidency delivered prosperity but the sleeze factor drove enough voters towards Bush rather than Gore. Bush clearly envisaged himself as a hands-off President but one single day forced the most dramatic shift required of a President in decades: 9/11. For the past fifty years, the almost absurd level of American defence spending projected an almost untouchable status on the United States and in little over an hour, that invincibility was shattered.

Suddenly a do-nothing President had to do something and despite a shaky start, the new coalition of the willing took Afghanistan in a matter of weeks. This however presented Bush with a new problem - simply conquering a tinpot nation like Afghanistan didn't offer nearly enough catharsis to the American people. So a new target had to be found and it also offered Bush the opportunity to right a previous wrong - the removal of Saddam Hussein. There's little doubt that Hussein was a truly evil man and in many ways, the war in Iraq was a good choice.

Bush had to entrust the war to his generals and advisers but he was misled in many ways - the idea that all Iraqis would greet US troops as liberators was absurdly optimistic and the hope that the Taliban could be defeated quickly soon disappeared. Bush was now trapped in two wars, draining the country's resources and continually dragging away his focus from domestic policies.

So before you hate Bush, pity him. He was the wrong man, in the wrong job, in the wrong circumstances - his best wasn't good enough but very few Presidents would have been able to play the hand he was dealt.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:02 PM

Quote:

So before you hate Bush, pity him. He was the wrong man, in the wrong job, in the wrong circumstances - his best wasn't good enough but very few Presidents would have been able to play the hand he was dealt.


Good thing he never had to go it alone! :D

#oops #lolnope #hatersgonnahate

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MAL4PREZ:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I addressed the issue brought up in the OP.



Oh, you mean you wrote a post expanding on the strengths of the Obama presidency?




" If you are conservative, to write a short essay arguing why Obama has been a good president . "



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:16 AM

Good job Simon. I've always used the old cliche: "Some men are born great. Some men achieve greatness. Some have greatness thrust upon them." Bush 43 is category 3, and in my opinion-- well, that would be partisan.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME