Real World Event Discussions

Questions that conservatives can't answer

POSTED BY: kpo
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 9, 2025 23:15
VIEWED: 19339
PAGE 6 of 16

KWICKO

Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:01 PM

Oh, and because I'm about 95% sure that Rappy is going to come stumbling in any second and start whining about "Cites?", here ya go, even though you steadfastly refuse to produce any such cites for your own idiotic claims.

http://stateimpact.npr.org/texas/2012/12/03/landowner-fights-keystone-
xl-pipeline-by-suing-the-state/

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

STORYMARK

Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:17 PM

So many actual facts!

I think you just garunteed that chickenshit never shows up in this thread again.

No better rappy-repellant than TRUTH.

Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NIKI2

Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:13 PM

Quote:
No better rappy-repellant than TRUTH

But that it were so! No, he'll show up with some "ad hominems" and once again repeat that he's already answered the questions, something personally nasty to you or me, that global warming is a cult, something snarky about Al Gore (does anyone else even remember Al Gore but Rap???), yada, yada. The usual; he's perfectly adept at avoiding truth, you know that, silly.

I'm sure that stuff about Texas is just a bunch of lies, Mike; some librul propaganda no doubt, there's something wrong with the cite you linked, or somesuch...

KWICKO

Friday, March 29, 2013 5:15 AM

Quote:
Niki wrote:

The Supremes are batting it around (like you can find much ELSE on the news...sigh...), so why don't we? Maybe not debate the issue of same-sex marriage ITSELF, since we've been there/done that enough times to choke a horse, but make guesses as to what the Supremes will end up doing?

When asked, Rappy doesn't care to hazard a guess at what the Supremes might decide on DOMA and/or Prop 8, but worries that it will lead directly to dogs marrying horses, or something.

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

SIGNYM

Sunday, March 31, 2013 7:03 AM

Just checking up on this thread to see if ANY of my so very simple questions were ever answered.

And the answer to THAT is... NOPE!

NIKI2

Monday, April 1, 2013 4:37 PM

Of course not, Sig...you never really expected otherwise, did you? ...silly gel...

KWICKO

Monday, April 8, 2013 3:11 AM

Upon request, Rappy cannot state what his definition of "incest" is, only that he agrees with Jeremy Irons that a man marrying his son isn't incest.

Reference thread:

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=54520

KPO

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:59 PM

Auraptor tells Magons, 'You need to get laid', and claims his reasons for it 'weren't the least bit sexist'. But then he can't/won't answer:

Why, according to you, does Magons, 'need to get laid'? Why are you making assumptions about the length of time since she last had sex, and what does it have to do with what she posted?

It's not personal. It's just war.

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by kpo:
Auraptor tells Magons, 'You need to get laid', and claims his reasons for it 'weren't the least bit sexist'. But then he can't/won't answer:

Why, according to you, does Magons, 'need to get laid'? Why are you making assumptions about the length of time since she last had sex, and what does it have to do with what she posted?

It's not personal. It's just war.

You need to get laid as well. Obsession is bad, mmmkay ?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

BYTEMITE

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:43 PM

I am the only person on the board who has never been laid.

True facts.

It probably isn't related to my myriad problems. Unless it was caused by medicines I took my developing years. No one knows for sure.

Should note that value for a person or their opinions, either gender, does not derive from the quantity or recency of their partners. Also note that reduction to a sex object is demeaning for both men and women. I observe sexual shaming of men towards other men on many sites, and it is always troubling to observe how often internet culture goes there, and how widely accepted aggressive sexual comments are. Our society has issues it seems.