Real World Event Discussions

"NOW Do You Believe in Global Warming?"

POSTED BY: Niki2
UPDATED: Monday, August 27, 2012 01:07
VIEWED: 17646
PAGE 9 of 13

Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:17 PM


There's every bit as much compelling evidence that suggests c02 isn't the driver, but may be the RESULT of high temps.

And then there's the claim that , no matter what we do , the amount of impact we can have on undoing what we (allegedly ) have done will amount to a fraction of a degree, in maybe 100 years. Sorry, but spending trillions of dollars for next to no real tangible affect on ANYTHING isn't very wise, imo. Seems we could put that $ to better use, like farming, education, and looking to build better population centers, more inland, while making use of the available resources more wisely.

Quote:

I don't have the time or inclination to refute ALL the wrong-headed wingnut things you post Auraptor


Well then, if you've dismissed my point of view, out of hand, what ever facts, evidence, etc... that I bring to the discussion on the basis that it's " wrong headed " , I kinda fail to see the point of even trying to converse here.

I say let the free market find what ever solutions, if any , are needed. You can't effectively mandate this sort of stuff, from the top down.

And as for your question(s), why should I even bother, if you don't even have the time OR inclination to refute my 'wing-nut' views ?



" We're all just folk. " - Mal

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:33 PM

Sig: I have no influence with Occupy, I'm only with OccupyMarin. Most Occupy groups are regional and deal with regional issues now, I think it's mostly OWS that's dealing with national issues. But in California, we recognize the problem and are doing a LOT about sustainable energy sources. But we stand pretty much alone compared to the rest of the country, and the millions of Raptors out there for whom it's a matter of "pry the oil and gas from my cold, dead hands". OUR legislators have kept drilling off our coast, put in place fuel ameliorations which increase our cost at the pump, and are working hard on wind, solar, etc., and here in Marin there's an organization you can get your energy from which is produced entirely "greenly". We would be part of it, but can't afford it until they bring the cost down. Solar is everywhere around here; even the sanitary district's reclamation machines out at the Las Gallinas Wildlife Ponds where I sulky with my dogs is run by SOLAR only. Our sanitation district does curbside pickup of all recyclables, and now compostables as well, but people have to CHOOSE to divide things up into those bins.

It IS people, the millions like Raptor as well as the other millions who, whatever they believe, are too lazy to separate their trash or do anything else to lessen their footprint. Yes, everything you said, but if enough PEOPLE stood up, the government would follow. Until then, governments won't listen, and energy companies are preparing, but won't put much money into it until/unless it becomes a real issue--until then, they've got TONS to spend and spend it on advertising how wonderful "clean coal" (HOW I hate that!), natural gas, etc., are and how we need to lower the cost of gas, drill more, yada yada to keep from buying "foreign oil"--which DOES NOT EXIST. Remember folks, ALL oil is sold on the international market, so even what we produce here goes wherever whoever buys it is (sorry, lousey English).

Meanwhile, all we can do is vote in the right people, and we have and will. Boxer represents our environmental interests really well and will continue to; our Congresswoman is retiring and the new one will be just as good where the environment is concerned (Occupy's chosen candidate lost by a hair, but the other Dem is also an environmental guy, and he'll beat the pants off the Republican they put up, Republicans keep their affiliations mostly on the Q.T. here in Marin). They redistricted, so OUR Congressperson will represent the entire No. Ca. Coast, so I guarantee everything will be done right environmentally here, we'll protect that much. But how much can we do?? We're fighting a damned big machine, and I wouldn't know where to start.

Making our sanitary district entirely solar, by the way, was paid for by the stimulus--that should piss the hell out of some here. Everywhere WE look, the stimulus is at work on our infrastructure...too bad there wasn't more of it and it wasn't used wisely--like on INFRASTRUCTURE--which would have created jobs, and which ignoring it will cause it to be coming down on our heads any day now...hell, it already IS, bridges are falling down, schools don't have enough desks and some have horrible conditions, etc. We haven't done SHIT about infrastructure in ages...but I won't get started on THAT!

As to, by the way, progress requiring people, in the REST of the world both the people and the governments of many countries have recognized the danger and ARE doing something about it...it's mostly America whose government has its head in the sand and its pockets lined by Big Oil.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:35 PM

Damned computer

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

KPO
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:37 PM

Quote:

And as for your question(s), why should I even bother, if you don't even have the time OR inclination to refute my 'wing-nut' views ?

I don't have time to refute ALL of the wrong, far-right things you post. You post a lot of it. But I specifically replied to one instance of it when you asked. I'm an obliging guy.

Quote:

I say let the free market find what ever solutions, if any , are needed. You can't effectively mandate this sort of stuff, from the top down.

Ah, the free market will sort out everything. Ok. Let's take another example of man's actions hurting the environment: overfishing. There's no way to mandate any kind of regulation to stop overfishing? Government should just throw its hands up and rely on the free market to sort it out? The result - disaster. And your 'solution' for climate change is just the same.

Quote:

Well then, if you've dismissed my point of view, out of hand, what ever facts, evidence etc... that I bring to the discussion

Exactly what facts, or evidence was in your post? I listen to facts/evidence. I ignore partisan opinion-filled rants. Nevertheless I answered it because you asked.

Quote:

And then there's the claim that , no matter what we do , the amount of impact we can have on undoing what we (allegedly ) have done will amount to a fraction of a degree, in maybe 100 years. Sorry, but spending trillions of dollars for next to no real tangible affect

You're just repeating the same point as before, while providing nothing new to back it up (not that you backed it up at all in the first place). I've already explained how this view makes no sense to me - read my last post if you've forgotten my answer. If your view makes no sense, and you can't substantiate it with facts or evidence, there's nothing more I can do.

Quote:

There's every bit as much compelling evidence that suggests c02 isn't the driver, but may be the RESULT of high temps.

Err, the two aren't mutually exclusive. That's what's so scary: CO2 causes warming, and that warming releases more CO2 into the atmosphere - causing more warming... In other words, pretty standard physics suggests that human activity is pushing the earth's climate out of balance and into a vicious circle of runaway warming. This has been theorised for decades, and the theory hasn't changed, and the evidence increasingly bears it out.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:42 PM


How then did we have a Medieval warming period, which took place LONG before the industrial revolution ? If C02 is the CAUSE of global warming, that is, then please explain.

And if this vicious cycle , which has occurred before, leads to warmer and warmer temps, then why haven't we joined Venus in really cooking things up by now ?

And Niki, why do you assume I don't recycle ? Or never have ? Is it that you just assume, that since I'm a southern male conservative, that I automatically chuck all my plastics out the window as I drive down the road, AC blasting at full, pedal to the floor of my pick up, complete w/ gun rack and a rebel flag sticker on the window ?





" We're all just folk. " - Mal

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:26 AM

Arguing With “Global Warming” Idiots =>
http://www.iceagenow.com/Arguing_With_Global_Warming_Idiots.htm

GeoCraft posted a simple ten-question test online, concerning AGW (Anthropogenic
Global Warming). If you familiarize yourself with the correct answers to this quiz,
then you will have the “ammo” to deal with the deceitful criminals behind the
global warming racket.


This Global Warming (un)Reality Quiz should be posted by Rappy, not me.
The Answers in the quiz sound well-researched and scientific. They show that
everything is just fine.

Around the web:
"Most CO2 comes from volcanos."

"The most CO2 comes from the soil & Vegetation 53% and Oceans 44%."

"As for reducing CO2 production, we should be building Nuclear plants as fast
as possible. Cars only produce about 5% of our CO2. Most CO2 comes from power
production. Nuclear Power is the ONLY technology we have today that even has a
chance of providing the massive amounts of reliable 24/7 power we need and is
CO2-free."

"if you look at where most methane comes from, it really isn't from cows. It comes
from swamps and 76% of it actually, another 11% comes from termites, 8 from the
ocean, and finally 8 percent are from animals."
=============

These are the kind of "facts" my Son-in-Law used to spout at me whenever GW came up.
He is a rational, well-informed guy in his opinion.

In my opinion, he is a man uses our natural resources at whim, but has little respect
for nature and its maintenance.

How I spun his arguments: "I am a working man raising a family. I don't have time for
your s--t. I don't want to take an honest look at it, because I don't want to know what
I certainly would find."

And he said: There is no GW. If there was GW, our government would be on it.
If there was GW, humans don't cause it & can do nothing about it.
If there was GW, its effects won't be felt for 100s of years.
He did say, truthfully, that global warming and cooling is part of a tremendously
long, normal, earth cycle.


We don't want to deal with it. We're not gonna look at it.


=========================
I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% of how I react to it. ~Charles R Swindoll

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 20, 2012 3:43 AM

Quote:

If I believe YOU, and ignore real science...
Rappy knows about as much about real science as he does about real world events, which is nothing. And when real science DOES come out, he runs away.

Discussion of the Vostok ice cores and other real science...

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=51211&p=2

Since rappy avoids reality at all costs, may I suggest that we leave him to his delusions and work on solving the problem without him?

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 20, 2012 10:00 AM


Sig

It really bugs you when others don't buy into your religion, huh?




" We're all just folk. " - Mal

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 20, 2012 1:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
may I suggest that we leave him to his delusions and work on solving the problem without him?



Hello,

I think our #1 priority should be to create more efficient energy storage. Energy is free, and energy is everywhere. But until we can store energy efficiently, there will always be a need to use heat to make energy. Heat that usually comes from burning fossil fuels or nuclear decay. (We have fusion tech, but it's probably still 50 years from being practical.)

If we can store wind or solar power effectively, then we can endure any periods without sun and wind by using the surplus in lean hours.

--Anthony



Note to Self:
Raptor - woman testifying about birth control is a slut (the term fits.)
Six - Wow, isn't Niki quite the CUNT? And, yes, I spell that in all caps....
Wulf - Niki is a stupid fucking bitch who should hurry up and die.

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.” -Thomas Szasz


NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, July 20, 2012 1:44 PM


Energy may be free, but getting it to work for you sure isn't.

Oil companies first must find an oil reserve, drill it, pump it, ship it, refine it, pump it, ship it, and then deliver it to a gas station. Oh, and all that stuff had to be built, first , before it all could be drilled, pumped, shipped, refined, pumped, shipped, and delivered.

Despite what Obama says, it didn't just 'happen'. Someone MADE it happen. Lot of folks, actually, and they have mouths to feed and bills to pay.

So, yeah... energy IS free, if you want to do all that stuff yourself.


" We're all just folk. " - Mal

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME