Fox hits local ‘Firefly’ group with cease and desist
POSTED BY: HAKEN
UPDATED: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 02:39
VIEWED: 72250
PAGE 4 of 7
Okay, I've tried three times to respond to Storymark's post. WTF? So if it mysteriously shows up later in triplicate, my apologies.
To summarize it, I strongly disagree with you on almost every point, Storymark. Sorry. We'll have to agree to disagree.
I love to make point and counter-point. To debate. But clearly something is prohibiting me. Sad thing was, I wasn't even half as accusatory as you were in saying "read the thread". I did. My argument wasn't with that part of it. If I were arrogant, I'd suggest you re-read what I was saying, but I won't.
Instead, I resubmit in new terms, FOX did not HAVE to go after them, they chose to do so. They simply went after the weakest prey, despite that prey having helped them.
Not a corporate monkey,
TCM
http://www.cafepress.com/10thcrew
*Download my Firefly Games for FREE at
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=13&t=36208&m=664612
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I bet Fox hacked their phones and peeked in their bedroom windows.
Or hired Nazi hookers with videocambras.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1032803/Bizarre-sex-life-F1-bo
ss-Max-Mosley-revealed-court-insists-Its-perfectly-harmless-private.html
http://meaningfuldistractions.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/news_max_mosely
_nazi_hooker_trial_97869/

Quote:
Pulling the plug and running for theri lives, News Corp chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch with his Communist Chinese wife Deng Wen Di in the US yesterday
TYCOON Rupert Murdoch has announced the closure of Britain's biggest-selling newspaper, the 'News of the World', in a breathtaking response to the phone-hacking controversy engulfing his media empire.
As allegations multiplied that its journalists hacked the voicemails of thousands of people, from child murder victims to the families of war dead, the tabloid haemorrhaged advertising, alienated millions of readers and posed a growing threat to Murdoch's hopes of buying broadcaster BSkyB.
Yet no one, least of all the 168-year-old paper's 200 staff, was prepared for the drama of a single sentence that will go down as one of the most startling turns in the 80-year-old Australian-born press baron's long and controversial career.
The preamble to a statement from Murdoch's son James, who chairs the British newspaper arm of News Corp, said: "News International today announces that this Sunday, 10 July 2011, will be the last issue of the 'News of the World'."
He added: "The 'News of the World' is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed when it came to itself."
Journalists at the newspaper raged that they had been betrayed by former editor Rebekah Brooks, now the News International chief executive, who faces calls for her resignation, following revelations that the newspaper under her editorship hacked the phone of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler.
"Murdoch has sacrificed a newspaper to save one woman," one member of the newsroom said.
Andy Coulson, David Cameron's former director of communications at Downing Street and a former editor of the newspaper, was preparing to be questioned under caution over what he knew about phone hacking under his editorship.
James Murdoch denied perverting the course of justice by authorising payments to hacking victims.
Earlier in the day, major advertisers continued their exodus from the Sunday newspaper, with Sainsbury's, Asda, O2, Boots, Specsavers, Dixons and Npower joining companies such as Ford in suspending their relationship with the 'News of the World'. The Royal British Legion cut its ties with the paper over allegations of hacking of the families of military casualties in Iraq.
Scotland Yard admitted that almost 4,000 people may have had their phones hacked by the newspaper's private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, placing further strain on the testimony of senior officers to parliament that there were only
http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/end-of-the-world-as-murdoc
h-pulls-plug-on-paper-2816200.html
Met police chief quits over phone hacking: Britain's top police officer, Sir Paul Stephenson, announced his shock resignation as he was brought down by his failure to tell senior figures, including the prime minister, that Scotland Yard had hired a former News of the World executive as an adviser while refusing to reopen inquiries into phone hacking.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/17/met-chief-quits-over-phone-ha
cking
News of the World phone-hacking whistleblower found dead: Sean Hoare, the former News of the World showbusiness reporter who was the first named journalist to allege that Andy Coulson was
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
If Fox was smart they would not have cancelled Firefly in the first place
There is no problem so large that it can't be solved with the proper application of explosives
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Fox can $%#@&^$ - *%@#^ with gravy on it!
Z
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
or cerebral flatulence, if you prefer
"Haven't you killed me enough for one day ?"
- Mal, War Stories
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by TenthCrewMember:
Okay, I've tried three times to respond to Storymark's post. WTF? So if it mysteriously shows up later in triplicate, my apologies.
To summarize it, I strongly disagree with you on almost every point, Storymark. Sorry. We'll have to agree to disagree.
You can disagree all you like - it doesn't change the law.
Quote:
I love to make point and counter-point. To debate. But clearly something is prohibiting me. Sad thing was, I wasn't even half as accusatory as you were in saying "read the thread". I did. My argument wasn't with that part of it. If I were arrogant, I'd suggest you re-read what I was saying, but I won't.
Instead, I resubmit in new terms, FOX did not HAVE to go after them, they chose to do so. They simply went after the weakest prey, despite that prey having helped them.
Sorry you feel coming with knowledge rather than responding with emotion is arrogant.
And yes, they did have to go after them - it's the law. As was explained.... you know, had you read the whole thread.
Quote:
Not a corporate monkey,
Nor very well versed in reality, it would seem.
I never said I LIKED what Fox did. Sorry you cannot distinguish between stating the law, and being a "corporate monkey".
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
So, what, when a university film club decides to show a movie in their common room...?
My university forces clubs to pay a fee if they want to show a movie at an official club meeting so the school can pay for copyrights.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,
I believe that Copyright is important in the promotion of art, as it assures that people get paid for their investment in the art.
However, I would be very glad to see adjustments in Copyright law to create a more equitable situation.
--Anthony
Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.
Sadly, the creators usually get a pittance.
I say, once a show has been dead for 5 years, cut out the middle men in suits altogether and watch the prices to screen such things go down considerably.
Courtney Love sold 25% of the stake of Nirvana for her drug addicitons for a meager 50 million bucks. With current copyright laws, they'll be making 100 fold over the next 50 years off of that, and you bet your ass that they'll be fighting tooth and nail to keep that work out of the public domain years after I've died of lung cancer, just like they've done with the Beatles.
"In April 2006, Love announced that she had arranged to sell 25 percent of her stake in the Nirvana song catalog in a deal estimated at $50 million. The share of Nirvana's publishing was purchased by Primary Wave Music, which was founded by Larry Mestel, a former CEO of Virgin Records. In an accompanying statement, Love sought to assure Nirvana's fanbase that the music would not simply be licensed to the highest bidder, noting, "We are going to remain very tasteful and true to the spirit of Nirvana while taking the music to places it has never been before."[75] Further releases have since been made. This includes the DVD releases of Live! Tonight! Sold Out!! in 2006,[76] and the full, uncut version of MTV Unplugged in New York in 2007.[77] The band's performance at the 1992 Reading Festival was released on both CD and DVD as Live at Reading in November 2009.[78] That same month, Sub Pop released a 20th anniversary deluxe edition of Bleach, which included a previously unreleased live concert from 1990.[79] A 20th anniversary deluxe edition of Nevermind is intended for release in September 2011.[80]"
Copyrights, like Communism, seem really good on paper, but when the people with all the power control them, they are misused most definately.
On a side note, you know how long it's been since I've been to a ballgame? When I was a kid, not all that long ago, I could see a Sox game, bleacher seats, with my old man for 4 bucks a pop. Speaking of pop, you could get a decent sized cup of it for little over a buck.
I'll be damned if I'm going to pay 40 bucks for the same bleacher seats today and pay 9 bucks for a 12 ounce bottle of shitty domestic beer.
All that skimming off the top has ruined a lot of entertainment for a lot of people. This is just another example of that.
FOX didn't give two shits about this show when it initially ran the episodes in whatever order they saw fit and then when they cancelled it VERY prematurely.
Seems pretty pathetic when they guard it like they do today, even if they can just pawn the blame off to SAG for that.
"A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." ~Shepherd Book
BTW... I love my General Discussion Peeps. If you feel a strong need to judge me on RWED discussions I've had in the General Discussion, I welcome it, but I also say that they are two different worlds......
And while my core never wavers and though I may say things you don't like in the RWED, I'd never say them in General Discussions and I hope you would do the same.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
