Impressed, or Appalled ?
POSTED BY: Fremdfirma
UPDATED: Friday, August 12, 2011 00:03
VIEWED: 3586
PAGE 1 of 3
Me, I'm not completely sure.
I think the victims oughta have the right to make him stand in the town square naked for a couple hours then beat him unconscious with blackjacks, but the villain in me cannot help but slightly admire the pure gall and cleverness of this sumbitch.
Honey-Soaked Naked Girls Were Filmed By Pastor
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/pastor-films-honey-soaked-girls
-987654
Quote:
The 30-year-old Fortenberry, investigators alleged, organized a “Fear Factor” game that included honey being poured over four girls he had picked to participate. After the contest, Fortenberry instructed the minors that they “could take a shower and wash the honey” off their bodies.
It was at this point that he allegedly videotaped the four teenagers with a camera he had hidden in the church bathroom.
Investigators learned about the filming from one of the girls, who eventually went on to date Fortenberry.
*blink*
And he shows her the tape ?!
Duuuuuuuuuuude, sooo WRONG!
-Frem
I do not serve the Blind God.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm going with apalled here.
"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
AUGUST 8--Using a hidden video camera, a Texas man filmed four naked, honey-drenched teenage girls while they showered at a church where he worked as a youth pastor.
At the time they were two 15 year olds and two 17 year olds. I am more than appalled.
For punishment, he needs to be made to stand naked in the stocks for a day, with the most humiliating parts like fear shinkage and bathroom time put on youtube. I'm sure some people will get as big a kick out of it as he got by filming them.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Who could be Impressed? Just asking.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
Who could be Impressed? Just asking.
Maybe surprised that they weren't younger and male ?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
The woman, who was 17 at the time of the “Fear Factor” incident, added that Fortenberry confessed to secretly videotaping three other girls (two 15-year-olds and a 17-year-old). When confronted by a police officer, Fortenberry would not deny having filmed the teenagers. “The defendant would only say that he has done things that he should not have done.”
Either way, Texas prosecutors today announced that they could not pursue charges against Fortenberry since the incident occurred more than three years ago, beyond the statute of limitations for the improper photography/visual recording count. The felony complaints, which were filed against Fortenberry on August 4, were dismissed today by the Harris County District Attorney’s office. (2 pages)
Why is there only a three-year statute of limitations on such an act?
I wonder how many of the fathers of those girls have guns... That "pastor" might be on the fast track to meet his dear and fluffy lord face-to-face.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Ambivalent!
The fact that one of the girls started dating the preacher afterward (not sure how that works) might suggest that there was more consent here than implied, so it's LESS creepy, and at least it wasn't rape or molestation.
But a thirty year old priest video-taping girls in a shower is always pretty creepy in general.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
I'm really surprised no one saw the looming trap in that first post given that I all but gift wrapped it in xmas tree lights and tinsel.
Oh the shock, the horror, the outrage....
And how is what this asshole did any real different than what goes on every day, at every airport in america ?
If it's okay for some asshole in one uniform to do it, why is it not okay for some other asshole in a different uniform to do it ?
And NOW you know how I feel about the just-doing-our-job jackboots of TSA/DHS, and why I encourage local merchants to refuse service to them and excommunicate them socially, now you really UNDERSTAND.
Point ?
-Frem
I do not serve the Blind God.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Ambivalent!
The fact that one of the girls started dating the preacher afterward (not sure how that works) might suggest that there was more consent here than implied, so it's LESS creepy, and at least it wasn't rape or molestation.
But a thirty year old priest video-taping girls in a shower is always pretty creepy in general.
But isn't he guilty of child pornography if he still has the tape?
And I'm pretty sure that there's really no level of "consent" involved when you're talking about 15 year-old girls.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Not for sex, no, when one is older that the magic number. Pornography is an element I hadn't considered, though.
Consent is a little blurry sometimes. Tell a fifteen year old she can't have sex with her seventeen year old boyfriend. It ain't happening.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME