A.N.T.I.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act

POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 17:04
VIEWED: 6042
PAGE 1 of 1

PIRATENEWS

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 6:42 AM

Quote:
Free Speech Violation: Park Ranger Orders Visitor to Leave National Military Park, Citing Objection to Ron Paul Decals on Car
www.rutherford.org/articles_db/press_release.asp?article_id=914

Subject: American National Transportation Initiative Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
From: "John Tate " <john.f.tate@campaignforliberty.com>
Date: Tue 05/24/11 06:16 PM

Dear Patriot,

Harry Reid is attempting to ram the "Patriot" Act through once again with little debate and no amendments - despite his promise to senators on both sides of the aisle to allow an open amendment process.

Thankfully, the liberty movement has an ally in the Senate whose determination to stand up for the American people's liberties is stronger than ever - Senator Rand Paul.

For the past seven hours, Senator Paul has been holding the Senate floor, keeping Reid and his allies from rushing this bill through the Senate without debate or amendments.

I know over the past two days I've sent you numerous requests to take action by calling your senators and demanding they oppose the unconstitutional, misnamed "Patriot" Act - and I will ask you again in just a moment.

But first, please give Senator Paul's office a call at 202-224-4343 to thank him for standing up for the American people and the Constitution!

Afterward, please give both of your senators another call through the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121.

Ask them to stand with Rand Paul, the Constitution, and the fundamental liberties that made America great by opposing the rushed extension of these three provisions without debate - and unamended.

Together, we have a great opportunity to make a difference, but I need you all to remain as steadfast and committed to this fight as Senator Paul.

I hope you will stand with Senator Paul and C4L by again contacting both of your senators to oppose the extension of the so-called "Patriot" Act.

In Liberty,

John Tate
President

2007 US Justice Department audit finds FBI abuse of PATRIOT act powers, Dismissal of United States Attorneys, Investigating copyright infringement, Investigation of potential drug traffickers, Blanket Requests for financial information on visitors to Las Vegas, Prosecution of College Professors, Shakedown of News Reporters, Use against the homeless, RaiseTheFist.com Pirate Radio Webmaster GUNNED DOWN and sent to prison by jew Diane Feinstein for protesting the World Economic Forum in Jew York and posting anarchist cookbooks sold by Amazon.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_invocations_of_the_USA_PATR
IOT_Act

RaiseTheFist.com Patriot Act Victim Webmaster Sherman Austin Faced 20 Years Prison, Released After 1 Year in Fed Prison, Pays Restitution, Banned from Computers for 4 Years, "He cannot associate with any person or group that seeks to change the government in any way (be that environmental, social justice, political, economic, etc...)
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=110&contentid=14
36&page=1

What the FBI Doesn't Want You to See at RaisetheFist.com
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/raisethefist/

Quote:

Oakland, the Patriot Act and Osama bin Laden : Indybay

RaiseTheFist.com

The feds claim that Osama bin Laden was involved in the catastrophe that occurred at the World Trade Center, and other locations on September 11, 2001, and further claimed that the fascist draconian legislation passed that is called the Patriot Act, would solve our problems.

That was around 10 years ago, and the war machine is still running full steam ahead on a global scale, wasting trillions of dollars on death and destruction, spilling blood all around the planet.

Then they said Osama bin Laden was killed on Monday May 2nd, 2011, and the hype has gone on non stop in the main stream pr

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME

PIRATENEWS

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 7:57 AM

Quote:
Raise the Fist Radio is a revolutionary, grass-roots run and rapidly growing independent internet and FM radio station. We broadcast 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year!
http://radio.raisethefist.com
http://www.raisethefist.com/radio/

Jew Diane Feinstein pleased with Austin imprisonment (Sept. 3, 2003)
http://feinstein.senate.gov/03Releases/r-bombmaking3.htm

JAN 24, 2007 - 5 YEARS AFTER THE FBI RAID ON RAISE THE FIST

author: repost from a listserve
written by Sherman Austin
edited, and posted by Akwala

On January 24, 2002 I was surrounded by 25 federal agents from the FBI and Secret Service Los Angeles Joint Terror Task force while I was at home asleep taking a nap.

The agents were armed with sub-machine guns, shot guns, bullet-proof vests, a battering ram, and a 25 page search and seizure warrant filled with as much "terror rhetoric" as they could think of. While asleep I was unaware that agents were
already positioned around every angle of the house, including right outside my window with loaded weapons ready for a fire fight. I was 18.

Fortunately my sister was home and woke me up to the news that "a bunch of FBI looking people" in suites and vests were all over block and up and down the streets. Every single one of them focused on the house. It had only been 2 years since I started the site Raisethefist.com which was receiving thousands of hits daily from around the world, many of those hits were also coming from the FBI, U.S Department of Defense, NSA, Secret Service, and foreign government law agencies. I
was running the site on a computer network and a residential DSL line from my home.

The news was no surprise.

I got up. Looked at the servers hosting raisethefist.com. They were off-line.

I approached the door where 2 special agents asked for my name, then grabbed my shoulder and pulled me outside. Agents armed with their loaded sub-machine guns and shot guns emerged from their hiding spots and entered the house. Just as they
walked in, "Its this way!" one of the agents said as he pointed his sub-machine gun and led others to my room where the servers were.

The 2 special agents who greeted me at the door escorted me back inside and said they had a search and seizure warrant because of my web site, Raisethefist.com. I asked them how this was legal and they said it was now legal under the USA Patriot Act.

I wasn't being accused of authoring anything on raisethefist.com. I was being accused of authoring a web site that was created by somebody else. A white kid. A web site that contained a page on how to build home-made explosives. Again, a web
site I didn't author, implement, or create in any way. The FBI insisted I did. They asked me 7 times if I was the author of the site which contained this explosives information. I said "NO".

I had a link to this web site from Raisethefist.com , as I did to many other sites.
While my room was being ransacked. The "evidence" which consisted of computers, protest signs, and political literature was loaded into boxes and placed into a big white truck waiting outside.

The FBI tried to ask me questions about raisethefist.com. The FBI told my mother they had been watching me for a very long time and my political haven't changed. I was asked if I'd like to see the president killed. I was told I had crossed over a line and as long as I got back on the other side of that line everything would be
okay. In other words if I stayed silent and did what I was told there would be no more trouble.

After approximately 6 hours the FBI agents left. We noticed a message on the answering machine from a call that came in the same day but before the raid. It was from an individual I hadn't spoken to in 2 years. He left a message asking if I wanted to "hang out". A few weeks prior he sent me an email about going to an anti-capitalist demonstration together to "smash the state". I later learned the FBI visited this individual, stood over his shoulder, and dictated

PIRATENEWS

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:08 AM

This is what a convicted terrorist looks like:

Terrorists in Reagan Administration say Revolutionary War is inevitable in 2011/2012:

DMAANLILEILTT

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:16 PM

You sure like the sound of your own voice. Or the sight of your own typing.

"I really am ruggedly handsome, aren't I?"

BYTEMITE

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:40 PM

Hmm. But what are these "amendments" that Rand Paul wants added?

Boy is a far cry from his father, he's making it so the puppet masters win either way. Amendments do us no good. The only thing that does us any good is if they repeal the damn thing or let it expire.

KANEMAN

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:55 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Hmm. But what are these "amendments" that Rand Paul wants added?

Boy is a far cry from his father, he's making it so the puppet masters win either way. Amendments do us no good. The only thing that does us any good is if they repeal the damn thing or let it expire.

.What are these so-called "controversial" changes to the post-9/11 act -- which expanded governmental search powers -- that Paul wants?

"Controversial" things like requiring the government seek a judge's approval before conducting a search of someone's credit cards, emails, library books, bank statements, and business records or conducting a "roving wiretap," and requiring the government to actually come up with probable cause before searching such records or executing such wiretaps.

.Where did Paul get the notion for these "controversial" demands? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

BYTEMITE

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:05 PM

Actually, I was asking because I didn't know, and I was expecting a scam, like I expect from all politicians.

...The 4th amendment already exists. Those protections should already exist. The Patriot Act apparently violates the fourth amendment, otherwise it wouldn't necessitate the addition. We don't need repetition in law like chronic echolalia in order to uphold any ideals we live by, we just need to stop passing the laws that violate them.

My point still stands that it would just be easier to uphold the constitution and Bill of Rights amendments if they just dropped the Patriot Act. So why don't they?

Almost sounds to me like the language of the proposed amendment is to make getting warrants easier, and allow judges to issue warrants for more in-depth investigations of more frivolous suspicions. If a judge issues a warrant immediately without affadivits mentioned or implied (the "oath" mentioned in the fourth amendment) in the wording of the Patriot Act, then law enforcement can make up charges without fear of perjury.

I don't support passing draconian bullcrap with some mouth service claiming the government is looking out for our best interests. I'll only accept repealing it or expiring it.

PIRATENEWS

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 6:05 PM

Quote:
Reid Preempts Paul, Slips Patriot Act in Small Business Bill

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
May 25, 2011

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has circumvented a call by the newly elected senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, to debate the Patriot Act.

In order to prevent a filibuster, Reid performed “some procedural gymnastics,” according to Fox News, and slipped Patriot Act language into a House small business bill that is considered filibuster-proof.

In doing so, Reid has skirted objections to the bill led by Paul and has moved closer to extending the Patriot Act without debate. Democrats have applauded this effort to rush the extension into law without debate.

“The suggestion that the extension should be debated fueled considerable opposition, particularly from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D – CA), who insisted it would be a ‘huge mistake’ to debate the bill and might threaten national security,” writes Jason Ditz.

On Monday, Paul went on the floor of the Senate and argued against the extension. He introduced the Leahy-Paul amendment which would have National Security Letters expire on December 31, 2013. It also requires the Justice Department inspector general to audit the issuance of NSL letters and expands public reporting on the use of such letters under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The National Security Letter provision of the Patriot Act directly assaults the Fourth Amendment. It expands the FBI’s authority to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval.

http://www.infowars.com/reid-preempts-paul-slips-patriot-act-in-small-
business-bill/

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:

Hmm. But what are these "amendments" that Rand Paul wants added?

Boy is a far cry from his father, he's making it so the puppet masters win either way. Amendments do us no good. The only thing that does us any good is if they repeal the damn thing or let it expire.

Paul's 71 page Amendment about library books:
http://leahy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/AmendmentText-Leahy-PaulAmendmen
t.pdf

The Stamp Act allowed British soldiers to write their own search warrants to enter Colonial American homes, to search for Stamp Tax seals on all printed papers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamp_Act_1765

British soldiers were allowed to seize and live in any home they wanted in the American Colonies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_independence

Just like the Feds do in Amerika today.

Quote:
Originally posted by dmaanlileiltt:
You sure like the sound of your own voice. Or the sight of your own typing.

"I really am ruggedly handsome, aren't I?"

"It's beautiful, man!!!"

-Tom Cruise, Taps

KANEMAN

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 6:52 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Actually, I was asking because I didn't know, and I was expecting a scam, like I expect from all politicians.

...The 4th amendment already exists. Those protections should already exist. The Patriot Act apparently violates the fourth amendment, otherwise it wouldn't necessitate the addition. We don't need repetition in law like chronic echolalia in order to uphold any ideals we live by, we just need to stop passing the laws that violate them.

My point still stands that it would just be easier to uphold the constitution and Bill of Rights amendments if they just dropped the Patriot Act. So why don't they?

Almost sounds to me like the language of the proposed amendment is to make getting warrants easier, and allow judges to issue warrants for more in-depth investigations of more frivolous suspicions. If a judge issues a warrant immediately without affadivits mentioned or implied (the "oath" mentioned in the fourth amendment) in the wording of the Patriot Act, then law enforcement can make up charges without fear of perjury.

I don't support passing draconian bullcrap with some mouth service claiming the government is looking out for our best interests. I'll only accept repealing it or expiring it.

You are spot on...but he had to try because that scab of a law is in effect...he was just trying to heal it a bit...but Reid and the dem's figured out how to bypass a good man and procedure...sucks for us...i hated the neo-cons for this law, and I can't believe Obama and these tools are going to continue it...we are all idiots. We fight each other like it's a sporting event...and they laugh, give us the same shit, ask for contributions, and then do the same....we are all fools.

KANEMAN

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 6:57 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:
Quote:
Reid Preempts Paul, Slips Patriot Act in Small Business Bill

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
May 25, 2011

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has circumvented a call by the newly elected senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, to debate the Patriot Act.

In order to prevent a filibuster, Reid performed “some procedural gymnastics,” according to Fox News, and slipped Patriot Act language into a House small business bill that is considered filibuster-proof.

In doing so, Reid has skirted objections to the bill led by Paul and has moved closer to extending the Patriot Act without debate. Democrats have applauded this effort to rush the extension into law without debate.

“The suggestion that the extension should be debated fueled considerable opposition, particularly from Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D – CA), who insisted it would be a ‘huge mistake’ to debate the bill and might threaten national security,” writes Jason Ditz.

On Monday, Paul went on the floor of the Senate and argued against the extension. He introduced the Leahy-Paul amendment which would have National Security Letters expire on December 31, 2013. It also requires the Justice Department inspector general to audit the issuance of NSL letters and expands public reporting on the use of such letters under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The National Security Letter provision of the Patriot Act directly assaults the Fourth Amendment. It expands the FBI’s authority to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval.

http://www.infowars.com/reid-preempts-paul-slips-patriot-act-in-small-
business-bill/

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:

Hmm. But what are these "amendments" that Rand Paul wants added?

Boy is a far cry from his father, he's making it so the puppet masters win either way. Amendments do us no good. The only thing that does us any good is if they repeal the damn thing or let it expire.

Paul's 71 page Amendment about library books:
http://leahy.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/AmendmentText-Leahy-PaulAmendmen
t.pdf

The Stamp Act allowed British soldiers to write their own search warrants to enter Colonial American homes, to search for Stamp Tax seals on all printed papers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamp_Act_1765

British soldiers were allowed to seize and live in any home they wanted in the American Colonies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_independence

Just like the Feds do in Amerika today.

Quote:
Originally posted by dmaanlileiltt:
You sure like the sound of your own voice. Or the sight of your own typing.

"I really am ruggedly handsome, aren't I?"

"It's beautiful, man!!!"
-Tom Cruise, Taps

Unreal....i read about this a couple hours ago...harry is sleazy fuck. our government is out of control. This should not be cool with anyone...and the news should call his dirty harry ass out....well, it's true

KANEMAN

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 7:00 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by dmaanlileiltt:
You sure like the sound of your own voice. Or the sight of your own typing.

"I really am ruggedly handsome, aren't I?"

Why that? This is the biggest thing going on in this country...The patriot act man....who the fuck likes this? POLS that's all....sure PN has to add in all the jew shit and other stuff....but take time to look into what Paul WAS trying to do....seems reasonable.

BYTEMITE

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 7:39 PM

Yeah. :(

I'd like to think there's SOMEONE ethical out there who would try to stall it until it expires, maybe this "amendments" thing is that. But I'm too cynical to believe it.

KANEMAN

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 8:21 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Yeah. :(

I'd like to think there's SOMEONE ethical out there who would try to stall it until it expires, maybe this "amendments" thing is that. But I'm too cynical to believe it.

Reid went around it...use google...just like Obama care....sneaky dirty shit. I like that in my life, with like-minded peeps, but not my government....

KWICKO

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:25 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Actually, I was asking because I didn't know, and I was expecting a scam, like I expect from all politicians.

...The 4th amendment already exists. Those protections should already exist. The Patriot Act apparently violates the fourth amendment, otherwise it wouldn't necessitate the addition. We don't need repetition in law like chronic echolalia in order to uphold any ideals we live by, we just need to stop passing the laws that violate them.

My point still stands that it would just be easier to uphold the constitution and Bill of Rights amendments if they just dropped the Patriot Act. So why don't they?

Actually, it's even easier than that, or at least it should be: Challenge that shit, all the way up to the Supreme Court. If they strike it down (and they seriously should), then the Patriot Act goes away as being in material violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Quote:

Almost sounds to me like the language of the proposed amendment is to make getting warrants easier, and allow judges to issue warrants for more in-depth investigations of more frivolous suspicions. If a judge issues a warrant immediately without affadivits mentioned or implied (the "oath" mentioned in the fourth amendment) in the wording of the Patriot Act, then law enforcement can make up charges without fear of perjury.

I don't support passing draconian bullcrap with some mouth service claiming the government is looking out for our best interests. I'll only accept repealing it or expiring it.

No kidding. With this SCOTUS already saying that cops don't need any kind of warrant beyond their nose and ears ("I heard a toilet flush, and smelled what I thought was marijuana, so I knew they were destroying evidence in that apartment I had no business even listening in on, so I kicked the door in!"), we really DON'T need to make it EASIER for them to get warrants on even flimsier "evidence"!

Quit adding onto the fucking Patriot Act; let it die, or challenge it and get it tossed out. (Only I'm not sure it WOULD get thrown out.

)

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

BYTEMITE

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 11:29 PM

The supreme court could take years to see the case. The Patriot Act has to be renewed every two years or it'll expire. Easier to make it expire than to rely on the good will of life-time appointed tyrants.

KWICKO

Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:13 AM

Good point, Byte, but I'd still like to see BOTH approaches tried. Yes, let it expire, but also keep pushing through courts.

BYTEMITE

Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:08 AM

Well, I'm always for contingency plans and back up strategies. Though I'm cautious here because if the supreme court were to backfire on us in striking down the Patriot Act, it would give it... legitimacy. *shudder*

KWICKO

Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Well, I'm always for contingency plans and back up strategies. Though I'm cautious here because if the supreme court were to backfire on us in striking down the Patriot Act, it would give it... legitimacy. *shudder*

Yeah, that's the real danger. And they've given their legitimacy to some really frightening shit recently.

The downside is, if it's never challenged, it's still going to be seen as "legitimate". The Constitution says lots of really great, really neat things, including such proclamations as the ones that begin, "Congress shall make NO LAW..." - and then some boneheaded state government goes right ahead and does it anyway, or CONGRESS does it anyway, and once a bill is passed and signed into law, it IS the law, until such time as it's challenged and overturned.

So even if the Patriot Act were allowed to expire, the precedent is still sitting there, festering on the shelf, stinking up the books. I hate that. I want it gone, I want it not only expired, but terminated, with extreme prejudice.

But as you point out, this Court may not be in any rush to do that. We may all be boned. :(

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

BYTEMITE

Thursday, May 26, 2011 1:52 AM

Your argument about stinking up the books is both logically and visually convincing. Some effort to kill it with fire and leave it on Dick Cheney's porch is required.

RIONAEIRE

Friday, June 3, 2011 3:26 AM

Yeah, I definitely have some problems with the Patriot Act, and yeah, it shouldn't be called that.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

KWICKO

Friday, June 3, 2011 4:54 AM

Meanwhile, Rand Paul shows us just how much of an ANTI-patriot he truly is, by advocating stamping out the First Amendment protections of free speech and freedom of assembly and the Due Process protections as well!

Quote:
Rand Paul, avowed fascist cocksucker, said:

I'm not for profiling people on the color of their skin, or on their religion, but I would take into account where they've been traveling and perhaps, you might have to indirectly take into account whether or not they've been going to radical political speeches by religious leaders. It wouldn't be that they are Islamic. But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that's really an offense that we should be going after -- they should be deported or put in prison.

Now, by his own words, he's saying that Sharron Angle, for instance, should be deported or put in prison. And so should everyone who ever attended one of her rallies where she spoke of "Second Amendment remedies" and said that she needed to "take out" Harry Reid.

I can only assume that he's never attended a gun show or a Ted Nugent concert. If he had, he's arrest and/or deport everybody there!

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

CANTTAKESKY

Friday, June 3, 2011 5:09 AM

Quote:
Rand Paul, avowed fascist cocksucker, said:

...but I would take into account where they've been traveling ...But if someone is attending speeches from someone who is promoting the violent overthrow of our government, that's really an offense that we should be going after -- they should be deported or put in prison.

Did he really say this? If so, my God.

I guess my vacation plans to visit Persepolis should be scrapped. Or attending a public reading of the Declaration of Independence.

KWICKO

Friday, June 3, 2011 5:16 AM

Yup, CTS, he really, really said it.

This is the hero of the so-called "libertarian" tea party.

Now you see him and them for the fascists they truly are.

Of course he MEANS it to apply to people like Anwar Al-Alakih (sp?), the radical Muslim cleric and American-born American citizen who has had a death warrant placed on him by the U.S. government, no trial needed.

But it applies just as easily, and just as equally, to attendees of speeches and performances by Angle, Nugent, and a host of others.

What if you see a radical speech in a movie? Does that count? You paid to listen to it, after all.

If you ever said "Support the Troops!", you are a socialist. You've taken money from me, by force and at gunpoint, and you've given it to people who are on a mission I don't support, and are murdering others in my name, and I am given no choice in the matter.

KWICKO

Friday, June 3, 2011 5:19 AM

Here's the clip from Hannity's show:

0:56 in.

CANTTAKESKY

Friday, June 3, 2011 12:46 PM

Wow, Kwicko, thank you.

How far the apple falls from the tree.

PIRATENEWS

Friday, June 3, 2011 1:46 PM

Yup da game is rigged. Only suckers vote Demorat or Republicon. But firing the "Federal" Reserve Bank is Step 1.

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Jew Families That Own It And The Fortune 500
http://www.infowars.com/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:

Of course he MEANS it to apply to people like Anwar Al-Alakih (sp?), the radical Muslim cleric and American-born American citizen who has had a death warrant placed on him by the U.S. government, no trial needed.

The same AAA who eats lunch at the Pentagon with the Secretary of the Army?

Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/10/20/al-qaeda-terror-leader-dined-pent
agon-months/

Rand Pul says kill American jews...WHO RAH(sp)!

Jew Adam Gadahn Perlman runs AlCIAduh
http://www.fbi.gov/page2/oct2006/gadahn101106.htm
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/11/gadahn/index.html?section=cnn_topsto
ries
http://www.google.com/search?q=ADAM+GADAHN+Pearlman&rlz=1I7DNUS_en&ie=
UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7

Quote:
In Sept of last year, Adam Gadahn [aka Adam Perlman], the son of Jewish parents, the son of Jewish parents [who are on the board of directors of ADL] in Southern California, who himself converted to Islam, went on to become Osama Bin Laden's spokesman."
-Rep "Jihad" Jane Harman (D-CA), chairman, Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment, CSPAN, "Use of the Internet by Terrorists: Using the Web as a Weapon", November 6, 2007
http://www.piratenews.org/page2.html

Heavy metal jew Adam Gadahn Perlman arrested for beating up Muslims

Dictatorship Watch: The New York Times Defends Obama Assassinations
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/oct2010/pers-o11.shtml

JAYNEZTOWN

Tuesday, March 1, 2022 5:04 PM

I'm not sure if this should go in 'The End of Constitutional America' or here

but it seems there are some Americans on the ground and they may have picked the other side or at least some kind of neutral position. One of them Gonzalo Lira López, an American novelist and film director, he seems to have Imdb credits but I'm not sure which Gonzalo Lo[pez he is, maybe the guy who was making podcasts and film show with Sargon of Akkad? He shows film saying he is in Ukraine now

All bullshit politics forgotten, its the ordinary person of Ukraine that will die and it's the citizens that will suffer.