General Discussions

Help Nathan Buy Firefly

POSTED BY: Channain
UPDATED: Thursday, February 24, 2011 19:08
VIEWED: 30573
PAGE 9 of 9

Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by RionaEire:
Everyone got fresh wine but me, may I have strawberry wine? :)

*Pours ver *FRESH* wine and passes the cup*
Good on you Browncoat. Sorry, though, I'm not the wine maker my uncle was.

Veteran of the 2002 Throes of Cancellation—FFF.net fan since January 7, 2003
Doing the impossible makes us mighty
Minnesota Browncoats
http://www.mnfirefly.com/portal/html/index.php

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by two:
Why sacrifice your firstborn to Rupert Murdoch (or FOX, should you not want to personalize a corporation) if the Firefly rights revert back to Mutant Enemy in 2013? That wasn't sarcasm. It's commonsense to know what you're buying.

What I'm curious about is how do we know that happens automatically?

Every try to by a website domain that someone else has already purchased? When you buy it yourself initially it costs about $160 for the year. If a web domain broker buys a popular name first, they will make you pay at least $2500 if not more to buy it from them.

So do the rights revert back automatically, or is Joss Whedon getting an option to buy them?

Something else I know; a lot of us spent a lot of time hating Fox when Fox really didn't care. You, Two, need to chill it with the Rupert Hate.

Fear is the mind killer. Hate is the soul killer. Hate him and he has power over you. Going against something doesn't mean you have to hate it.

Veteran of the 2002 Throes of Cancellation—FFF.net fan since January 7, 2003
Doing the impossible makes us mighty
Minnesota Browncoats
http://www.mnfirefly.com/portal/html/index.php

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

TWO
Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Channain:
Quote:

Originally posted by two:
Why sacrifice your firstborn to Rupert Murdoch (or FOX, should you not want to personalize a corporation) if the Firefly rights revert back to Mutant Enemy in 2013? That wasn't sarcasm. It's commonsense to know what you're buying.

What I'm curious about is how do we know that happens automatically?

Every try to by a website domain that someone else has already purchased? When you buy it yourself initially it costs about $160 for the year. If a web domain broker buys a popular name first, they will make you pay at least $2500 if not more to buy it from them.

So do the rights revert back automatically, or is Joss Whedon getting an option to buy them?

Something else I know; a lot of us spent a lot of time hating Fox when Fox really didn't care. You, Two, need to chill it with the Rupert Hate.

Fear is the mind killer. Hate is the soul killer. Hate him and he has power over you. Going against something doesn't mean you have to hate it.


Fooled you.
For me, "Rupert Murdoch" is playing the same role as a villain on a scripted TV drama. He's no more a real villain to me than "Adelai Niska." The imaginary "Rupert Murdoch" character stands in place for soulless corporation Fox, giving Fox some personality. It is just dull business with Nielsen numbers flowing in, money flowing out. It is a lean, mean, canceling machine that is run separate from another part (name forgotten) of NewsCorp that actually produced Firefly. I'm lumping all the loosely connected pieces of NewsCorp into one fictional name: "Rupert Murdoch."

In real life, Murdoch is both a TV actor and a TV executive. He has a page at the internet movie database listing his voice work on the Simpsons, for heaven's sakes! He played a fictional character who just so happens to be named "Rupert Murdoch." No relation to the real Murdoch or to FOX. www.imdb.com/name/nm0613770/

The Joss Whedon script for "Serenity", where Wash lives, is
Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by two:
Fooled you.
For me, "Rupert Murdoch" is playing the same role as a villain on a scripted TV drama.

Huh. Not bad. Turns out you have some skills after all. No sense of respect - really, at all, for the other Browncoats writing in here in earnest truth - but skills.

*Pours a cup of very *FRESH* wine and drinks it down*



Veteran of the 2002 Throes of Cancellation—FFF.net fan since January 7, 2003
Doing the impossible makes us mighty
Minnesota Browncoats
http://www.mnfirefly.com/portal/html/index.php

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:51 PM

There's a company with a structure already in place for doing something like this:

http://declarationentertainment.com/how-it-works

http://declarationentertainment.com/reboot-firefly

Get enough people involved, and it'll work.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by thebastidge:
There's a company with a structure already in place for doing something like this:

http://declarationentertainment.com/how-it-works

http://declarationentertainment.com/reboot-firefly

Get enough people involved, and it'll work.

*Pours a cup of very *FRESH* wine and passes it over*

Good on you, Browncoat.

Veteran of the 2002 Throes of Cancellation—FFF.net fan since January 7, 2003
Doing the impossible makes us mighty
Minnesota Browncoats
http://www.mnfirefly.com/portal/html/index.php

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

TWO
Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Channain:

You are disappointed in me. My blaming the fictional character "Rupert Murdoch" rather than FOX for Firefly's cancellation is not starting a fire in your imagination. Silly me. I really believed it would. I fooled myself.

It follows that the scenario where Nathan insults "Rupert" during negotiations for Firefly rights does not amuse you, either. Therefore, this thread is dead for me. The adults are continuing their weighty discussions. I write no more.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 6:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Channain:
Quote:

Originally posted by two:
Fooled you.
For me, "Rupert Murdoch" is playing the same role as a villain on a scripted TV drama.

Huh. Not bad. Turns out you have some skills after all. No sense of respect - really, at all, for the other Browncoats writing in here in earnest truth - but skills.

*Pours a cup of very *FRESH* wine and drinks it down*





Meet Two...

I've personally come to believe that he/she is rather crazy.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 7:04 PM

Quote:

storymark said
I've personally come to believe that he/she is rather crazy.

I don't know about crazy - speaking as someone who is. I'm trying to make a living as a graphic designer in an economy that wants it but doesn't want to pay for it.

Two...? I think the word here is LOONEY.

I'm trying to decide how un- I am about Two being done with my thread.

yeah, not so much.

Veteran of the 2002 Throes of Cancellation—FFF.net fan since January 7, 2003
Doing the impossible makes us mighty
Minnesota Browncoats
http://www.mnfirefly.com/portal/html/index.php

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, February 24, 2011 7:08 PM

Loony works....

And yes, I'm sure we are all heartbroken over Two's exit from the thread. Things shall never be the same...

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME