I thought the Left was for FAIRNESS. Guess not.
POSTED BY: AURaptor
UPDATED: Sunday, November 30, 2025 19:35
VIEWED: 3822
PAGE 2 of 6
So you're saying you fully support not allowing Cubans into the country any more, correct?
I mean, if we're going by "fairness"...
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Another Rappy rant without facts of cites - but a lot of unfounded ideological crap. Just more BS floating in the wind....
Another childish dismissal of anything I say, out of hand, w/ out any reasoned, intelligent or honest response to the issue.
Same old B.S., from the 'mark.
Well, it is a dismissal of what you have to say, this is true. But at least I'm up front about it, rather than pretending complete fabrications and distortions are factual, as you do on a daily basis.
And the dismissal is based on your well documented track record of being utterly full of shit, so it is justified.
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Well, it is a dismissal of what you have to say, this is true. But at least I'm up front about it, rather than pretending complete fabrications and distortions are factual, as you do on a daily basis.
You just made that up. Cite one example of how I DAILY fabricate, distort anything, or apologize.
Quote:There is no such track record, so again, cite your proof, or shut the fuck up.
And the dismissal is based on your well documented track record of being utterly full of shit, so it is justified.
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
So you're saying you fully support not allowing Cubans into the country any more, correct?
I mean, if we're going by "fairness"...
Prime example of a straw man argument.
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
So you're saying you fully support not allowing Cubans into the country any more, correct?
I mean, if we're going by "fairness"...
Prime example of a straw man argument.
Well, if by "straw man" you mean directly addressing your original post and point...
Quote:
Why should one immigrant be more special than another ?
If you're from Africa, India or Poland, you're treated 1 way as an immigrant. But if you're from Mexico or further south, you're treated COMPLETELY different.
So why DO we have a COMPLETELY different immigration policy and process for anyone coming from a communist nation like Cuba?
I'm simply asking why you seem to support having such double standards, and why you won't address the question, since you seem to hold such outrage and be involved in so much hand-wringing over this issue.
Mike
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Well, it is a dismissal of what you have to say, this is true. But at least I'm up front about it, rather than pretending complete fabrications and distortions are factual, as you do on a daily basis.
You just made that up. Cite one example of how I DAILY fabricate, distort anything, or apologize.
Well, you just claimed that there was NO law broken in the RNC's latest "census" mailer, despite clear evidence that there absolutely IS a violation of federal law in that matter. Now you're trying to equivocate and back off that claim because you've been proven to be full of shit, fabricating "facts" that you've simply pulled out of your ass - apparently with your teeth.
Quote:Quote:There is no such track record, so again, cite your proof, or shut the fuck up.
And the dismissal is based on your well documented track record of being utterly full of shit, so it is justified.
"The economy is on fire!" - You were still claiming this as late as 2008, despite being told explicitly what was happening, and what was GOING to happen because of the Bush policies.
"95% of Americans pay no taxes!" - despite being shown time and again that you were completely making up bogus numbers, you kept trying to stick by them, and then lamely came back saying that you were "tired" when you made those claims. You never apologized, you never admitted you were dead wrong, you never admitted any fault at all, even though you were quite demonstrably full of shit.
"There's nothing in the law that REQUIRES anything!" - despite having the actual text of the law quoted to you, more than once, you STILL maintain that what it plainly says is simply not there, doesn't exist. Again, you're utterly full of shit.
Story, what else would you like to add? I didn't mean to steal all your thunder.
Mike
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
When the children stop changing the subject title, maybe they'll be ready for a grown up discussion.
But not until then.
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Nah, Kwick - that was a solid "greatest hits" right there.
The response it got from our lad here is just icing - he asks for examples, gets them, then changes the subject (by complaining about the change in subject - how meta).
"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Next I expect he'll wheel out the haughty and hoary old "you're not worthy of my eminent response" line.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:As if YOU are???
When the children stop changing the subject title, maybe they'll be ready for a grown up discussion.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
I guess you think that gives you good enough cover to slip out of the thread?
Here's an idea: Why don't you salvage your reputation a bit, and actually address the countering facts and questions on the topic of the thread? Have a real conversation, in which people respond on point with thoughtful, verifiable replies. Might be worth a try.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME